Efficacy and Safety of Sarilumab for the Treatment of Posterior Segment Noninfectious Uveitis (SARIL-NIU):: The Phase 2 SATURN Study.

PURPOSE: To assess efficacy and safety of sarilumab, a human anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody, for treatment of posterior segment noninfectious uveitis (NIU). DESIGN: Randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-eight patients (eyes) with noninfectious intermediate, posterior, or panuveitis. METHODS: Eyes received treatment every 2 weeks for 16 weeks with subcutaneous sarilumab 200 mg or placebo. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was the proportion of patients with ≥2-step reduction in vitreous haze (VH) on the Miami scale or with a reduction of systemic corticosteroids (prednisolone or equivalent) to a dose of <10 mg/day at week 16. Primary end point was based on VH evaluation by a central reading center. Investigator evaluation of VH was a prespecified, planned secondary analysis. RESULTS: At week 16, proportion of patients taking sarilumab or placebo with ≥2-step reduction in VH or corticosteroid dose <10 mg/day was 46.1% vs. 30.0% (P = 0.2354) based on central reading center assessment of VH and 64.0% vs. 35.0% (P = 0.0372) based on investigator assessment of VH, respectively. In the subgroup of eyes with VH grade ≥2 at baseline, the mean VH reduction from baseline to week 16 was significantly greater with sarilumab vs. placebo regardless of assessment by the central reading center (-2.1 [n = 11] vs. -1.7 [n = 3], respectively; P = 0.0255) or investigator (-2.5 [n = 19] vs. -1.2 [n = 11], respectively; P = 0.0170). The mean best-corrected visual acuity gain from baseline to week 16 was greater with sarilumab vs. placebo in the overall population (8.9 vs. 3.6 letters, respectively; P = 0.0333) and in the subgroup of eyes with central subfield thickness (CST) ≥300 µm at baseline (12.2 [n = 13] vs. 2.1 [n = 7] letters, respectively; P = 0.0517). Corresponding changes in CST were -46.8 vs. +2.6 µm (P = 0.0683) in the overall population and -112.5 [n = 13] vs. -1.8 [n = 6] µm (P = 0.1317) in the subgroup of eyes with CST ≥300 µm at baseline, respectively. The most common ocular adverse events were worsening of uveitis (0 [placebo] and 3 [sarilumab] patients) and retinal infiltrates (1 [placebo] and 2 [sarilumab] patients). CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous sarilumab may provide clinical benefits in the management of NIU of the posterior segment, especially in eyes with uveitic macular edema.

Effects of Repeated Intravitreal Aflibercept Injection on the Corneal Endothelium in Patients With Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Outcomes From the RE-VIEW Study.

PURPOSE: The effects of repeated intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) on the corneal endothelium were studied in patients with unilateral neovascular age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: RE-VIEW was a phase 4, open-label, single-arm, multicenter study. Patients received IAI every 8 weeks after 3 monthly doses. Slit-lamp biomicroscopy was performed at all study visits. The central corneal endothelial health was evaluated by specular microscopy in the treated versus untreated fellow eyes at baseline and weeks 24 and 52. RESULTS: No slit-lamp abnormalities were noted in 154 enrolled patients (eyes). Baseline versus 52-week mean (±SD) endothelial morphometric values (n = 118) for the treated versus untreated fellow eyes were respectively as follows: endothelial cell density was 2410 ± 364 versus 2388 ± 384 cells/mm at baseline and remained unchanged at 2401 ± 353 versus 2376 ± 364 cells/mm at 52 weeks (P = 0.87); the coefficient of variation was 33.5 ± 4.4% versus 34.0 ± 5.0% at baseline and remained unchanged at 34.2 ± 4.7% versus 34.1 ± 4.9% at 52 weeks (P = 0.18); the percentage of hexagonal cells was 59.5 ± 5.8% versus 59.6 ± 6.4% at baseline and remained unchanged at 59.5 ± 6.0% versus 59.5 ± 5.8% at 52 weeks (P = 0.96). CONCLUSIONS: Repeated IAI for 52 weeks had no apparent corneal endothelial toxicity noted on specular microscopy in patients treated for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Intravitreal Aflibercept for Macular Edema Following Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: 52-Week Results of the VIBRANT Study.

PURPOSE: To determine week 52 efficacy and safety outcomes in eyes with macular edema after branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) treated with 2 mg intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) compared with grid laser. DESIGN: VIBRANT was a double-masked, randomized, phase 3 trial. PARTICIPANTS: Eyes randomized and treated in VIBRANT were followed to week 52. METHODS: In the IAI group, eyes received IAI every 4 weeks through week 24 and IAI every 8 weeks through week 48 with rescue grid laser if needed at week 36. In the grid laser group, all eyes received grid laser at baseline and, if prespecified rescue criteria were met, 1 additional laser from week 12 to 20 and IAI every 8 weeks after 3 monthly doses from week 24 onward (the laser/IAI group). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was percentage of eyes with improvement from baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) letter score ≥15 at week 24. All outcome measures at week 52 were exploratory, and P values are considered nominal. RESULTS: The percentage of eyes with improvement from baseline letter score ≥15 in the IAI and laser/IAI groups was 52.7% versus 26.7% (P = 0.0003) at week 24 and 57.1% versus 41.1% (P = 0.0296) at week 52. The corresponding mean change from baseline BCVA letter score was 17.0 versus 6.9 (P < 0.0001) at week 24 and 17.1 versus 12.2 (P = 0.0035) at week 52. The mean reduction from baseline central retinal thickness was 280.5 µm versus 128.0 µm (P < 0.0001) at week 24 and 283.9 µm versus 249.3 µm (P = 0.0218) at week 52. In the IAI group, 10.6% of eyes received rescue laser at week 36, and in the laser/IAI group, 80.7% received rescue IAI from week 24 to week 48. Traumatic cataract in 1 eye (1.1%) in the IAI group was the only ocular serious adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: After 6 monthly IAI, injections every 8 weeks maintained control of macular edema and visual benefits through week 52. In the laser group, rescue IAI given from week 24 onward resulted in substantial visual improvements at week 52.

Surgical Techniques at Cesarean Delivery: A U.S. Survey.

Objective To assess the frequency of surgical techniques at cesarean delivery (CD) among U.S. obstetricians. Methods Members of the American College of Obstetrician Gynecologists were randomly selected and e-mailed an online survey that assessed surgical closure techniques, demographics, and reasons. Data were analyzed using SPSS (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States), descriptive statistics, and analysis of variance. Results Our response rate was 53%, and 247 surveys were analyzed. A similar number of respondents either "always or usually" versus "rarely or never" reapproximate the rectus muscles (38.4% versus 43.3%, p = 0.39), and close parietal peritoneum (42.5% versus 46.9%, p = 0.46). The most frequently used techniques were double-layer hysterotomy closure among women planning future children (73.3%) and suturing versus stapling skin (67.6%); the least frequent technique was closure of visceral peritoneum (12.2%). Surgeons who perform double-layer hysterotomy closure had fewer years in practice (15.0 versus 18.7 years, p = 0.021); surgeons who close visceral peritoneum were older (55.5 versus 46.4 years old, p < 0.001) and had more years in practice (23.8 versus 13.8 years practice; p < 0.001). Conclusion Similar numbers of obstetricians either reapproximate or leave open the rectus muscles and parietal peritoneum at CD, suggesting that wide variation in practice exists. Surgeon demographics and safety concerns play a role in some techniques.

Intravitreal aflibercept for macular edema following branch retinal vein occlusion: the 24-week results of the VIBRANT study.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) with macular grid laser photocoagulation for the treatment of macular edema after branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). DESIGN: The VIBRANT study was a double-masked, active-controlled, randomized, phase III trial. PARTICIPANTS: Treatment-naïve eyes with macular edema after BRVO were included in the study if the occlusion occurred within 12 months and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was between ≤73 and ≥24 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters (20/40-20/320 Snellen equivalent). METHODS: Eyes (1 eye per patient) received either IAI 2 mg every 4 weeks (n=91) from baseline to week 20 or grid laser (n=92) at baseline with a single grid laser rescue treatment, if needed, from weeks 12 through 20. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the proportion of eyes that gained ≥15 ETDRS letters from baseline BCVA at week 24. Secondary end points included mean change from baseline BCVA and central retinal thickness (CRT) at week 24. RESULTS: The proportion of eyes that gained ≥15 ETDRS letters from baseline at week 24 was 52.7% in the IAI group compared with 26.7% in the laser group (P=0.0003). The mean improvement from baseline BCVA at week 24 was 17.0 ETDRS letters in the IAI group and 6.9 ETDRS letters in the laser group (P<0.0001). The mean reduction in CRT from baseline at week 24 was 280.5 µm in the IAI group and 128.0 µm in the laser group (P<0.0001). Traumatic cataract in an IAI patient was the only ocular serious adverse event (SAE) that occurred. There were no cases of intraocular inflammation or endophthalmitis. The incidence of nonocular SAEs was 8.8% in the IAI group and 9.8% in the laser group. One Anti-Platelet Trialists' Collaboration-defined event of nonfatal stroke (1.1%) and 1 death (1.1%) due to pneumonia occurred during the 24 weeks of the study, both in patients in the laser group. CONCLUSIONS: Monthly IAI provided significantly greater visual benefit and reduction in CRT at 24 weeks than grid laser photocoagulation in eyes with macular edema after BRVO.

Human immunodeficiency virus counseling and testing practices among North Carolina providers.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the percentage of prenatal care providers who offer human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing to pregnant women, investigate how strongly testing is encouraged, and explore testing barriers. METHODS: Between January 2001 and March 2001, we sent surveys to 1381 prenatal care providers in North Carolina, comprised of obstetricians, family physicians who practice obstetrics, and nurse-midwives. A total of 653 questionnaires were returned. RESULTS: Overall, 95.5% of providers who responded reported recommending HIV testing to all pregnant patients. Only 69.2% strongly recommend testing, with obstetricians (73.4%) and family physicians (70.1%) doing so at higher rates than nurse-midwives (55.9%). Almost all respondents (96.9%) strongly recommend testing for women they perceive to be high risk, whereas 39.7% strongly recommend testing to women who have had an HIV test in the past 6 months. When women refuse testing, 48.1% of practitioners inquire about the reason, and 28.2% reoffer the test at a future prenatal appointment. The most significant testing barriers were treating an HIV-positive woman (18.4%) and informing a patient she is HIV positive (14.8%). Respondents report that low literacy and culturally appropriate patient education materials would be most helpful to them. CONCLUSION: Among respondents, most prenatal care providers report that they recommend HIV testing to all pregnant women. However, many respondents base their decision about how strongly to recommend HIV testing on an assessment of the woman's risk for HIV exposure. Significant barriers to offering HIV testing were associated with managing an HIV-positive patient. Providers were most in need of patient education materials.