Assessment of Hypoxia in Breast Cancer: Emerging Functional MR Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques and Clinical Applications.

Breast cancer is one of the most prevalent forms of cancer affecting women worldwide. Hypoxia, a condition characterized by insufficient oxygen supply in tumor tissues, is closely associated with tumor aggressiveness, resistance to therapy, and poor clinical outcomes. Accurate assessment of tumor hypoxia can guide treatment decisions, predict therapy response, and contribute to the development of targeted therapeutic interventions. Over the years, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) techniques have emerged as promising noninvasive imaging options for evaluating hypoxia in cancer. Such techniques include blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) MRI, oxygen-enhanced MRI (OE) MRI, chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI, and proton MRS (1H-MRS). These may help overcome the limitations of the routinely used dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) techniques, contributing to better diagnosis and understanding of the biological features of breast cancer. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the emerging functional MRI and MRS techniques for assessing hypoxia in breast cancer, along with their evolving clinical applications. The integration of these techniques in clinical practice holds promising implications for breast cancer management. EVIDENCE LEVEL: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.

AI Applications to Breast MRI: Today and Tomorrow.

In breast imaging, there is an unrelenting increase in the demand for breast imaging services, partly explained by continuous expanding imaging indications in breast diagnosis and treatment. As the human workforce providing these services is not growing at the same rate, the implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) in breast imaging has gained significant momentum to maximize workflow efficiency and increase productivity while concurrently improving diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes. Thus far, the implementation of AI in breast imaging is at the most advanced stage with mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis techniques, followed by ultrasound, whereas the implementation of AI in breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is not moving along as rapidly due to the complexity of MRI examinations and fewer available dataset. Nevertheless, there is persisting interest in AI-enhanced breast MRI applications, even as the use of and indications of breast MRI continue to expand. This review presents an overview of the basic concepts of AI imaging analysis and subsequently reviews the use cases for AI-enhanced MRI interpretation, that is, breast MRI triaging and lesion detection, lesion classification, prediction of treatment response, risk assessment, and image quality. Finally, it provides an outlook on the barriers and facilitators for the adoption of AI in breast MRI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 6.

Robustness of Deep Networks for Mammography: Replication Across Public Datasets.

Deep neural networks have demonstrated promising performance in screening mammography with recent studies reporting performance at or above the level of trained radiologists on internal datasets. However, it remains unclear whether the performance of these trained models is robust and replicates across external datasets. In this study, we evaluate four state-of-the-art publicly available models using four publicly available mammography datasets (CBIS-DDSM, INbreast, CMMD, OMI-DB). Where test data was available, published results were replicated. The best-performing model, which achieved an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.88 on internal data from NYU, achieved here an AUC of 0.9 on the external CMMD dataset (N = 826 exams). On the larger OMI-DB dataset (N = 11,440 exams), it achieved an AUC of 0.84 but did not match the performance of individual radiologists (at a specificity of 0.92, the sensitivity was 0.97 for the radiologist and 0.53 for the network for a 1-year follow-up). The network showed higher performance for in situ cancers, as opposed to invasive cancers. Among invasive cancers, it was relatively weaker at identifying asymmetries and was relatively stronger at identifying masses. The three other trained models that we evaluated all performed poorly on external datasets. Independent validation of trained models is an essential step to ensure safe and reliable use. Future progress in AI for mammography may depend on a concerted effort to make larger datasets publicly available that span multiple clinical sites.

Breast MRI in patients with implantable loop recorder: initial experience.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the feasibility of breast MRI exams and guided biopsies in patients with an implantable loop recorder (ILR) as well as the impact ILRs may have on image interpretation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study examined breast MRIs of patients with ILR, from April 2008 to September 2022. Radiological reports and electronic medical records were reviewed for demographic characteristics, safety concerns, and imaging findings. MR images were analyzed and compared statistically for artifact quantification on the various pulse sequences. RESULTS: Overall, 40/82,778 (0.049%) MRIs during the study period included ILR. All MRIs were completed without early termination. No patient-related or device-related adverse events occurred. ILRs were most commonly located in the left lower-inner quadrant (64.6%). The main artifact was a signal intensity (SI) void in a dipole formation in the ILR bed with or without areas of peripheral high SI. Artifacts appeared greatest in the cranio-caudal axis (p < 0.001), followed by the anterior-posterior axis (p < 0.001), and then the right-left axis. High peripheral rim-like SI artifacts appeared on the post-contrast and subtracted T1-weighted images, mimicking suspicious enhancement. Artifacts were most prominent on diffusion-weighted (p < 0.001), followed by T2-weighted and T1-weighted images. In eight patients, suspicious findings were found on MRI, resulting in four additional malignant lesions. Of six patients with left breast cancer, the tumor was completely visible in five cases and partially obscured in one. CONCLUSION: Breast MRI is feasible and safe among patients with ILR and may provide a significant diagnostic value, albeit with localized, characteristic artifacts. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Indicated breast MRI exams and guided biopsies can be safely performed in patients with implantable loop recorder. Nevertheless, radiologists should be aware of associated limitations including limited assessment of the inner left breast and pseudo-enhancement artifacts. KEY POINTS: • Breast MRI in patients with an implantable loop recorder is an infrequent, feasible, and safe procedure. • Despite limited breast visualization of the implantable loop recorder bed and characteristic artifacts, MRI depicted additional lesions in 8/40 (20%) of cases, half of which were malignant. • Breast MRI in patients with an implantable loop recorder should be performed when indicated, taking into consideration typical associated artifacts.

[WITHDRAWN] Predicting breast cancer with AI for individual risk-adjusted MRI screening and early detection.

This paper has been withdrawn by Lukas Hirsch. Major revisions and rewriting in progress.

Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Breast MRI: Applications in Breast Cancer Primary Treatment Response Assessment and Prediction.

ABSTRACT: Primary systemic therapy (PST) is the treatment of choice in patients with locally advanced breast cancer and is nowadays also often used in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Although imaging remains pivotal to assess response to PST accurately, the use of imaging to predict response to PST has the potential to not only better prognostication but also allow the de-escalation or omission of potentially toxic treatment with undesirable adverse effects, the accelerated implementation of new targeted therapies, and the mitigation of surgical delays in selected patients. In response to the limited ability of radiologists to predict response to PST via qualitative, subjective assessments of tumors on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), artificial intelligence-enhanced MRI with classical machine learning, and in more recent times, deep learning, have been used with promising results to predict response, both before the start of PST and in the early stages of treatment. This review provides an overview of the current applications of artificial intelligence to MRI in assessing and predicting response to PST, and discusses the challenges and limitations of their clinical implementation.

High-Temporal/High-Spatial Resolution Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Improves Diagnostic Accuracy Compared With Standard Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With High Background Parenchymal Enhancement.

PURPOSE: To compare breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diagnostic performance using a standard high-spatial resolution protocol versus a simultaneous high-temporal/high-spatial resolution (HTHS) protocol in women with high levels of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of contrast-enhanced breast MRIs performed at our institution before and after the introduction of the HTHS protocol. We compared diagnostic performance of the HTHS and standard protocol by comparing cancer detection rate (CDR) and positive predictive value of biopsy (PPV3) among women with high BPE (ie, marked or moderate). RESULTS: Among women with high BPE, the HTHS protocol demonstrated increased CDR (23.6 per 1,000 patients v 7.9 per 1,000 patients; P = 0. 013) and increased PPV3 (16.0% v 6.3%; P = .021) compared with the standard protocol. This corresponded to a 9.8% (95% CI, 1.29 to 18.3) decrease in the proportion of unnecessary biopsies among high-BPE patients and an additional cancer yield of 15.7 per 1,000 patients (95% CI, 1.3 to 18.3). CONCLUSION: Among women with high BPE, HTHS MRI improved diagnostic performance, leading to an additional cancer yield of 15.7 cancers per 1,000 women and concomitantly decreasing unnecessary biopsies by 9.8%. A multisite prospective trial is warranted to confirm these findings and to pave the way for more widespread clinical implementation.

Automated Triage of Screening Breast MRI Examinations in High-Risk Women Using an Ensemble Deep Learning Model.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study is to develop and evaluate the performance of a deep learning (DL) model to triage breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in high-risk patients without missing any cancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 16,535 consecutive contrast-enhanced MRIs performed in 8354 women from January 2013 to January 2019 were collected. From 3 New York imaging sites, 14,768 MRIs were used for the training and validation data set, and 80 randomly selected MRIs were used for a reader study test data set. From 3 New Jersey imaging sites, 1687 MRIs (1441 screening MRIs and 246 MRIs performed in recently diagnosed breast cancer patients) were used for an external validation data set. The DL model was trained to classify maximum intensity projection images as "extremely low suspicion" or "possibly suspicious." Deep learning model evaluation (workload reduction, sensitivity, specificity) was performed on the external validation data set, using a histopathology reference standard. A reader study was performed to compare DL model performance to fellowship-trained breast imaging radiologists. RESULTS: In the external validation data set, the DL model triaged 159/1441 of screening MRIs as "extremely low suspicion" without missing a single cancer, yielding a workload reduction of 11%, a specificity of 11.5%, and a sensitivity of 100%. The model correctly triaged 246/246 (100% sensitivity) of MRIs in recently diagnosed patients as "possibly suspicious." In the reader study, 2 readers classified MRIs with a specificity of 93.62% and 91.49%, respectively, and missed 0 and 1 cancer, respectively. On the other hand, the DL model classified MRIs with a specificity of 19.15% and missed 0 cancers, highlighting its potential use not as an independent reader but as a triage tool. CONCLUSIONS: Our automated DL model triages a subset of screening breast MRIs as "extremely low suspicion" without misclassifying any cancer cases. This tool may be used to reduce workload in standalone mode, to shunt low suspicion cases to designated radiologists or to the end of the workday, or to serve as base model for other downstream AI tools.

Deep learning in breast imaging.

Millions of breast imaging exams are performed each year in an effort to reduce the morbidity and mortality of breast cancer. Breast imaging exams are performed for cancer screening, diagnostic work-up of suspicious findings, evaluating extent of disease in recently diagnosed breast cancer patients, and determining treatment response. Yet, the interpretation of breast imaging can be subjective, tedious, time-consuming, and prone to human error. Retrospective and small reader studies suggest that deep learning (DL) has great potential to perform medical imaging tasks at or above human-level performance, and may be used to automate aspects of the breast cancer screening process, improve cancer detection rates, decrease unnecessary callbacks and biopsies, optimize patient risk assessment, and open up new possibilities for disease prognostication. Prospective trials are urgently needed to validate these proposed tools, paving the way for real-world clinical use. New regulatory frameworks must also be developed to address the unique ethical, medicolegal, and quality control issues that DL algorithms present. In this article, we review the basics of DL, describe recent DL breast imaging applications including cancer detection and risk prediction, and discuss the challenges and future directions of artificial intelligence-based systems in the field of breast cancer.

Differentiation Between Benign and Metastatic Breast Lymph Nodes Using Apparent Diffusion Coefficients.

The aim of this study was to determine the range of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values for benign axillary lymph nodes in contrast to malignant axillary lymph nodes, and to define the optimal ADC thresholds for three different ADC parameters (minimum, maximum, and mean ADC) in differentiating between benign and malignant lymph nodes. This retrospective study included consecutive patients who underwent breast MRI from January 2017-December 2020. Two-year follow-up breast imaging or histopathology served as the reference standard for axillary lymph node status. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values for minimum, maximum, and mean ADC (min ADC, max ADC, and mean ADC) for benign vs malignant axillary lymph nodes were determined using the Wilcoxon rank sum test, and optimal ADC thresholds were determined using Youden's Index. The final study sample consisted of 217 patients (100% female, median age of 52 years (range, 22-81), 110 with benign axillary lymph nodes and 107 with malignant axillary lymph nodes. For benign axillary lymph nodes, ADC values (×10-3 mm2/s) ranged from 0.522-2.712 for mean ADC, 0.774-3.382 for max ADC, and 0.071-2.409 for min ADC; for malignant axillary lymph nodes, ADC values (×10-3 mm2/s) ranged from 0.796-1.080 for mean ADC, 1.168-1.592 for max ADC, and 0.351-0.688 for min ADC for malignant axillary lymph nodes. While there was a statistically difference in all ADC parameters (p<0.001) between benign and malignant axillary lymph nodes, boxplots illustrate overlaps in ADC values, with the least overlap occurring with mean ADC, suggesting that this is the most useful ADC parameter for differentiating between benign and malignant axillary lymph nodes. The mean ADC threshold that resulted in the highest diagnostic accuracy for differentiating between benign and malignant lymph nodes was 1.004×10-3 mm2/s, yielding an accuracy of 75%, sensitivity of 71%, specificity of 79%, positive predictive value of 77%, and negative predictive value of 74%. This mean ADC threshold is lower than the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) mean ADC threshold of 1.300×10-3 mm2/s, therefore suggesting that the EUSOBI threshold which was recently recommended for breast tumors should not be extrapolated to evaluate the axillary lymph nodes.

Radiologist-Level Performance by Using Deep Learning for Segmentation of Breast Cancers on MRI Scans.

PURPOSE: To develop a deep network architecture that would achieve fully automated radiologist-level segmentation of cancers at breast MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 38 229 examinations (composed of 64 063 individual breast scans from 14 475 patients) were performed in female patients (age range, 12-94 years; mean age, 52 years ± 10 [standard deviation]) who presented between 2002 and 2014 at a single clinical site. A total of 2555 breast cancers were selected that had been segmented on two-dimensional (2D) images by radiologists, as well as 60 108 benign breasts that served as examples of noncancerous tissue; all these were used for model training. For testing, an additional 250 breast cancers were segmented independently on 2D images by four radiologists. Authors selected among several three-dimensional (3D) deep convolutional neural network architectures, input modalities, and harmonization methods. The outcome measure was the Dice score for 2D segmentation, which was compared between the network and radiologists by using the Wilcoxon signed rank test and the two one-sided test procedure. RESULTS: The highest-performing network on the training set was a 3D U-Net with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI as input and with intensity normalized for each examination. In the test set, the median Dice score of this network was 0.77 (interquartile range, 0.26). The performance of the network was equivalent to that of the radiologists (two one-sided test procedures with radiologist performance of 0.69-0.84 as equivalence bounds, P < .001 for both; n = 250). CONCLUSION: When trained on a sufficiently large dataset, the developed 3D U-Net performed as well as fellowship-trained radiologists in detailed 2D segmentation of breast cancers at routine clinical MRI.Keywords: MRI, Breast, Segmentation, Supervised Learning, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Deep Learning Algorithms, Machine Learning AlgorithmsPublished under a CC BY 4.0 license. Supplemental material is available for this article.

Breast MRI Background Parenchymal Enhancement Categorization Using Deep Learning: Outperforming the Radiologist.

BACKGROUND: Background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) is assessed on breast MRI reports as mandated by the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) but is prone to inter and intrareader variation. Semiautomated and fully automated BPE assessment tools have been developed but none has surpassed radiologist BPE designations. PURPOSE: To develop a deep learning model for automated BPE classification and to compare its performance with current standard-of-care radiology report BPE designations. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. POPULATION: Consecutive high-risk patients (i.e. >20% lifetime risk of breast cancer) who underwent contrast-enhanced screening breast MRI from October 2013 to January 2019. The study included 5224 breast MRIs, divided into 3998 training, 444 validation, and 782 testing exams. On radiology reports, 1286 exams were categorized as high BPE (i.e., marked or moderate) and 3938 as low BPE (i.e., mild or minimal). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: A 1.5 T or 3 T system; one precontrast and three postcontrast phases of fat-saturated T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging. ASSESSMENT: Breast MRIs were used to develop two deep learning models (Slab artificial intelligence (AI); maximum intensity projection [MIP] AI) for BPE categorization using radiology report BPE labels. Models were tested on a heldout test sets using radiology report BPE and three-reader averaged consensus as the reference standards. STATISTICAL TESTS: Model performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Associations between high BPE and BI-RADS assessments were evaluated using McNemar's chi-square test (α* = 0.025). RESULTS: The Slab AI model significantly outperformed the MIP AI model across the full test set (area under the curve of 0.84 vs. 0.79) using the radiology report reference standard. Using three-reader consensus BPE labels reference standard, our AI model significantly outperformed radiology report BPE labels. Finally, the AI model was significantly more likely than the radiologist to assign "high BPE" to suspicious breast MRIs and significantly less likely than the radiologist to assign "high BPE" to negative breast MRIs. DATA CONCLUSION: Fully automated BPE assessments for breast MRIs could be more accurate than BPE assessments from radiology reports. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 3.

Quantitative transport mapping (QTM) for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesion: Comparison with traditional kinetics modeling and semi-quantitative enhancement curve characteristics.

PURPOSE: To test the feasibility of using quantitative transport mapping (QTM) method, which is based on the inversion of transport equation using spatial deconvolution without any arterial input function, for automatically postprocessing dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) to differentiate malignant and benign breast tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Breast DCE-MRI data with biopsy confirmed malignant (n = 13) and benign tumors (n = 13) was used to assess QTM velocity (|u|) and diffusion coefficient (D), volume transfer constant (Ktrans), volume fraction of extravascular extracellular space (Ve) from kinetics method, and traditional enhancement curve characteristics (ECC: amplitude A, wash-in rate α, wash-out rate ß). A Mann-Whitney U test and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis were performed to assess the diagnostic performance of these parameters for distinguishing between benign and malignant tumors. RESULTS: Between malignant and benign tumors, there was a significant difference in |u| and Ktrans, (p = 0.0066, 0.0274, respectively), but not in D, Ve, A, α and ß (p = 0.1119, 0.2382, 0.4418,0.2592 and 0.9591, respectively). ROC area-under-the-curve was 0.82, 0.75 (95% confidence level 0.60-0.95, 0.51-0.90) for |u| and Ktrans, respectively. CONCLUSION: QTM postprocesses DCE-MRI automatically through deconvolution in space and time to solve the inverse problem of the transport equation. Comparing with traditional kinetics method and ECC, QTM method showed better diagnostic accuracy in differentiating benign from malignant breast tumors in this study.

Integrating Eye Tracking and Speech Recognition Accurately Annotates MR Brain Images for Deep Learning: Proof of Principle.

PURPOSE: To generate and assess an algorithm combining eye tracking and speech recognition to extract brain lesion location labels automatically for deep learning (DL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 700 two-dimensional brain tumor MRI scans from the Brain Tumor Segmentation database were clinically interpreted. For each image, a single radiologist dictated a standard phrase describing the lesion into a microphone, simulating clinical interpretation. Eye-tracking data were recorded simultaneously. Using speech recognition, gaze points corresponding to each lesion were obtained. Lesion locations were used to train a keypoint detection convolutional neural network to find new lesions. A network was trained to localize lesions for an independent test set of 85 images. The statistical measure to evaluate our method was percent accuracy. RESULTS: Eye tracking with speech recognition was 92% accurate in labeling lesion locations from the training dataset, thereby demonstrating that fully simulated interpretation can yield reliable tumor location labels. These labels became those that were used to train the DL network. The detection network trained on these labels predicted lesion location of a separate testing set with 85% accuracy. CONCLUSION: The DL network was able to locate brain tumors on the basis of training data that were labeled automatically from simulated clinical image interpretation.© RSNA, 2020.

Multispectral Imaging for Metallic Biopsy Marker Detection During MRI-Guided Breast Biopsy: A Feasibility Study for Clinical Translation.

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of multispectral MRI (MSI) in the detection and localization of biopsy markers during MRI-guided breast biopsy. METHODS: This prospective study included 20 patients undergoing MR-guided breast biopsy. In 10 patients (Group 1), MSI was acquired following tissue sampling and biopsy marker deployment. In the other 10 patients (Group 2), MSI was acquired following tissue sampling but before biopsy marker deployment (to simulate deployment failure). All patients received post-procedure mammograms. Group 1 and Group 2 designations, in combination with the post-procedure mammogram, served as the reference standard. The diagnostic performance of MSI for biopsy marker identification was independently evaluated by two readers using two-spectral-bin MR and one-spectral-bin MR. The κ statistic was used to assess inter-rater agreement for biopsy marker identification. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of biopsy marker detection for readers 1 and 2 using 2-bin MSI were 90.0% (9/10) and 90.0% (9/10), 100.0% (10/10) and 100.0% (10/10), 95.0% (19/20) and 95.0% (19/20); and using 1-bin MSI were 70.0% (7/10) and 80.0% (8/10), 100.0% (8/8) and 100.0% (10/10), 85.0% (17/20) and 90.0% (18/20). Positive predictive value was 100% for both readers for all numbers of bins. Inter-rater agreement was excellent: κ was 1.0 for 2-bin MSI and 0.81 for 1-bin MSI. CONCLUSION: MSI is a feasible, diagnostically accurate technique for identifying metallic biopsy markers during MRI-guided breast biopsy and may eliminate the need for a post-procedure mammogram.

Using Deep Learning to Improve Nonsystematic Viewing of Breast Cancer on MRI.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility of using deep learning to identify tumor-containing axial slices on breast MRI images. METHODS: This IRB-approved retrospective study included consecutive patients with operable invasive breast cancer undergoing pretreatment breast MRI between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2017. Axial tumor-containing slices from the first postcontrast phase were extracted. Each axial image was subdivided into two subimages: one of the ipsilateral cancer-containing breast and one of the contralateral healthy breast. Cases were randomly divided into training, validation, and testing sets. A convolutional neural network was trained to classify subimages into "cancer" and "no cancer" categories. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the classification system were determined using pathology as the reference standard. A two-reader study was performed to measure the time savings of the deep learning algorithm using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy-three patients with unilateral breast cancer met study criteria. On the held-out test set, accuracy of the deep learning system for tumor detection was 92.8% (648/706; 95% confidence interval: 89.7%-93.8%). Sensitivity and specificity were 89.5% and 94.3%, respectively. Readers spent 3 to 45 seconds to scroll to the tumor-containing slices without use of the deep learning algorithm. CONCLUSION: In breast MR exams containing breast cancer, deep learning can be used to identify the tumor-containing slices. This technology may be integrated into the picture archiving and communication system to bypass scrolling when viewing stacked images, which can be helpful during nonsystematic image viewing, such as during interdisciplinary tumor board meetings.

Dipole modeling of multispectral signal for detecting metallic biopsy markers during MRI-guided breast biopsy: a pilot study.

PURPOSE: During MRI-guided breast biopsy, a metallic biopsy marker is deployed at the biopsy site to guide future interventions. Conventional MRI during biopsy cannot distinguish such markers from biopsy site air, and a post-biopsy mammogram is therefore performed to localize marker placement. The purpose of this pilot study is to develop dipole modeling of multispectral signal (DIMMS) as an MRI alternative to eliminate the cost, inefficiency, inconvenience, and ionizing radiation of a mammogram for biopsy marker localization. METHODS: DIMMS detects and localizes the biopsy marker by fitting the measured multispectral imaging (MSI) signal to the MRI signal model and marker properties. MSI was performed on phantoms containing titanium biopsy markers and air to illustrate the clinical challenge that DIMMS addresses and on 20 patients undergoing MRI-guided breast biopsy to assess DIMMS feasibility for marker detection. DIMMS was compared to conventional MSI field map thresholding, using the post-procedure mammogram as the reference standard. RESULTS: Biopsy markers were detected and localized in 20 of 20 cases using MSI with automated DIMMS post-processing (using a threshold of 0.7) and in 18 of 20 cases using MSI field mapping (using a threshold of 0.65 kHz). CONCLUSION: MSI with DIMMS post-processing is a feasible technique for biopsy marker detection and localization during MRI-guided breast biopsy. With a 2-min MSI scan, DIMMS is a promising MRI alternative to the standard-of-care post-biopsy mammogram.

Machine learning with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the breast for early prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

In patients with locally advanced breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), some patients achieve a complete pathologic response (pCR), some achieve a partial response, and some do not respond at all or even progress. Accurate prediction of treatment response has the potential to improve patient care by improving prognostication, enabling de-escalation of toxic treatment that has little benefit, facilitating upfront use of novel targeted therapies, and avoiding delays to surgery. Visual inspection of a patient's tumor on multiparametric MRI is insufficient to predict that patient's response to NAC. However, machine learning and deep learning approaches using a mix of qualitative and quantitative MRI features have recently been applied to predict treatment response early in the course of or even before the start of NAC. This is a novel field but the data published so far has shown promising results. We provide an overview of the machine learning and deep learning models developed to date, as well as discuss some of the challenges to clinical implementation.

IDEAL-IQ in an oncologic population: meeting the challenge of concomitant liver fat and liver iron.

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients often have a history of chemotherapy, putting them at increased risk of liver toxicity and pancytopenia, leading to elevated liver fat and elevated liver iron respectively. T1-in-and-out-of-phase, the conventional MR technique for liver fat assessment, fails to detect elevated liver fat in the presence of concomitantly elevated liver iron. IDEAL-IQ is a more recently introduced MR fat quantification method that corrects for multiple confounding factors, including elevated liver iron. METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board with a waiver for informed consent. We reviewed the MRI studies of 50 cancer patients (30 males, 20 females, 50-78 years old) whose exams included (1) T1-in-and-out-of-phase, (2) IDEAL-IQ, and (3) T2* mapping. Two readers independently assessed fat and iron content from conventional and IDEAL-IQ MR methods. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was estimated to evaluate agreement between conventional MRI and IDEAL-IQ in measuring R2* level (a surrogate for iron level), and in measuring fat level. Agreement between the two readers was also assessed. Wilcoxon signed rank test was employed to compare iron level and fat fraction between conventional MRI and IDEAL-IQ. RESULTS: Twenty percent of patients had both elevated liver iron and moderate/severe hepatic steatosis. Across all patients, there was high agreement between readers for IDEAL-IQ fat fraction (ICC = 0.957) and IDEAL R2* (ICC = 0.971) measurements, but lower agreement for conventional fat fraction measurements (ICC = 0.626). The fat fractions calculated with IOP were statistically significantly different from those calculated with IDEAL-IQ (reader 1: p < 0.001, reader 2: p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Fat measurements using IDEAL-IQ and IOP diverged in patients with concomitantly elevated liver fat and liver iron. Given prior work validating IDEAL-IQ, these diverging measurements indicate that IOP is inadequate to screen for hepatic steatosis in our cancer population.

MRI liver fat quantification in an oncologic population: the added value of complex chemical shift-encoded MRI.

INTRODUCTION: Chemotherapy prolongs the survival of patients with advanced and metastatic tumors. Since the liver plays an active role in the metabolism of chemotherapy agents, hepatic injury is a common adverse effect. The purpose of this study is to compare a novel quantitative chemical shift encoded magnetic resonance imaging (CSE-MRI) method with conventional T1-weighted In and Out of phase (T1 IOP) MR for evaluating the reproducibility of the methods in an oncologic population exposed to chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board with a waiver for informed consent. The study included patients who underwent chemotherapy, no suspected liver iron overload, and underwent upper abdomen MRI. Two radiologists independently draw circular ROIsin the liver parenchyma. The fat fraction was calculated from IOP imaging and measured from IDEAL-IQ fat fraction maps. Two different equations were used to estimate fat with IOP sequences. Intra-class correlation coefficient and repeatability coefficient were estimated to evaluate agreement between two readers on iron level and fat fraction measurement. RESULTS: CSE-MRI showed a higher reliability in fat quantification compared with both IOP methods, with a substantially higher inter-reader agreement (0.961 vs 0.372). This has important clinical implications. CONCLUSION: The novel CSE-MRI method described here provides increased reproducibility and confidence in diagnosing hepatic steatosis in a oncologic clinical setting. IDEAL-IQ has been proved to be more reproducible than conventional IOP imaging.