RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The effect of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) on gait in Parkinson's Disease (PD) is poorly understood. Kinematic studies utilizing quantitative gait outcomes such as speed, cadence, and stride length have shown mixed results and were done mostly before and after acute DBS discontinuation. OBJECTIVE: To examine longitudinal changes in kinematic gait outcomes before and after DBS surgery. METHOD: We retrospectively assessed changes in quantitative gait outcomes via motion capture in 22 PD patients before and after subthalamic (STN) or globus pallidus internus (GPi) DBS, in on medication state. Associations between gait outcomes and clinical variables were also assessed. RESULT: Gait speed reduced from 110.7 ± 21.3 cm/s before surgery to 93.6 ± 24.9 after surgery (7.7 ± 2.9 months post-surgery, duration between assessments was 15.0 ± 3.8 months). Cadence, step length, stride length, and single support time reduced, while total support time, and initial double support time increased. Despite this, there was overall improvement in the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale-Part III score "on medication/on stimulation" score (from 19.8 ± 10.7-13.9 ± 8.6). Change of gait speed was not related to changes in levodopa dosage, disease duration, unilateral vs bilateral stimulation, or target nucleus. CONCLUSION: Quantitative gait outcomes in on medication state worsened after chronic DBS therapy despite improvement in other clinical outcomes. Whether these changes reflect the effects of DBS as opposed to ongoing disease progression is unknown.
Assuntos
Estimulação Encefálica Profunda , Doença de Parkinson , Núcleo Subtalâmico , Humanos , Doença de Parkinson/complicações , Doença de Parkinson/terapia , Estimulação Encefálica Profunda/métodos , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Globo Pálido , MarchaRESUMO
Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson's disease (PD) is generally contraindicated in persons with dementia but it is frequently performed in people with mild cognitive impairment or normal cognition, and current clinical guidelines are primarily based on these cohorts. Objectives: To determine if moderately cognitive impaired individuals including those with mild dementia could meaningfully benefit from DBS in terms of motor and non-motor outcomes. Methods: In this retrospective case-control study, we identified a cohort of 40 patients with PD who exhibited moderate (two or more standard deviations below normative scores) cognitive impairment (CI) during presurgical workup and compared their 1-year clinical outcomes to a cohort of 40 matched patients with normal cognition (NC). The surgery targeted subthalamus, pallidus or motor thalamus, in a unilateral, bilateral or staged approach. Results: At preoperative baseline, the CI cohort had higher Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) subscores, but similar levodopa responsiveness compared to the NC cohort. The NC and CI cohorts demonstrated comparable degrees of postoperative improvement in the OFF-medication motor scores, motor fluctuations, and medication reduction. There was no difference in adverse event rates between the two cohorts. Outcomes in the CI cohort did not depend on the target, surgical staging, or impaired cognitive domain. Conclusions: Moderately cognitively impaired patients with PD can experience meaningful motor benefit and medication reduction with DBS.