[Translation into French and republication of: "Central venous catheter associated upper extremity deep vein thrombosis in cancer patients: Diagnosis and therapeutic management"]. / Traduction et republication de : « Thrombose veineuse profonde du membre supérieur associée à un cathéter veineux central chez les patients cancéreux : diagnostic et prise en charge thérapeutique ¼.

Catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) is a relatively frequent and potentially fatal complication arising in patients with cancer who require a central catheter placement for intravenous treatment. In everyday practice, CRT remains a challenge for management; despite its frequency and its negative clinical impact, few data are available concerning diagnosis and treatment of CRT. In particular, no diagnostic studies or clinical trials have been published that included exclusively patients with cancer and a central venous catheter (CVC). For this reason, many questions regarding optimal management of CRT remain unanswered. Due to the paucity of high-grade evidence regarding CRT in cancer patients, guidelines are derived from upper extremity DVT studies for diagnosis, and from those for lower limb DVT for treatment. This article addresses the issues of diagnosis and management of CRT through a review of the available literature and makes a number of proposals based on the available evidence. In symptomatic patients, venous ultrasound is the most appropriate choice for first-line diagnostic imaging of CRT because it is noninvasive, and its diagnostic performance is high (which is not the case in asymptomatic patients). In the absence of direct comparative clinical trials, we suggest treating patients with CRT with a therapeutic dose of either a LMWH or a direct oral factor Xa inhibitor, with or without a loading dose. These anticoagulants should be given for a total of at least 3 months, including at least 1 month after catheter removal following initiation of therapy.

[Translation into French and republication of: "Recurrent venous thromboembolism in anticoagulated cancer patients: diagnosis and treatment"]. / Traduction et republication de : « Maladie thromboembolique veineuse récidivante chez les patients cancéreux anticoagulés : diagnostic et traitement ¼.

Patients with cancer are at significantly increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), due both to the impact of malignant disease itself and to the impact of certain anticancer drugs on haemostasis. This is true both for first episode venous thromboembolism and recurrence. The diagnosis and management of VTE recurrence in patients with cancer poses particular challenges, and these are reviewed in the present article, based on a systematic review of the relevant scientific literature published over the last decade. Furthermore, it is uncertain whether diagnostic algorithms for venous thromboembolism, validated principally in untreated non-cancer patients, are also valid in anticoagulated cancer patients: the available data suggests that clinical decision rules and D-dimer testing perform less well in this clinical setting. In patients with cancer, computed tomography pulmonary angiography and venous ultrasound appear to be the most reliable diagnostic tools for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis respectively. Options for treatment of venous thromboembolism include low molecular weight heparins (at a therapeutic dose or an increased dose), fondaparinux or oral direct factor Xa inhibitors. The choice of treatment should take into account the nature (pulmonary embolism or VTE) and severity of the recurrent event, the associated bleeding risk, the current anticoagulant treatment (type, dose, adherence and possible drug-drug interactions) and cancer progression.

Giant cell arteritis-related aortitis with positive or negative temporal artery biopsy: a French multicentre study.

Objective: To compare the clinical presentation and outcome of giant cell arteritis (GCA)-related aortitis according to the results of temporal artery biopsy (TAB).Method: Patients with GCA-related aortitis diagnosed between 2000 and 2017, who underwent TAB, were retrospectively included from a French multicentre database. They all met at least three American College of Rheumatology criteria for the diagnosis of GCA. Aortitis was defined by aortic wall thickening > 2 mm on computed tomography scan and/or an aortic aneurysm, associated with an inflammatory syndrome. Patients were divided into two groups [positive and negative TAB (TAB+, TAB-)], which were compared regarding aortic imaging characteristics and aortic events, at aortitis diagnosis and during follow-up.Results: We included 56 patients with TAB+ (70%) and 24 with TAB- (30%). At aortitis diagnosis, patients with TAB- were significantly younger than those with TAB+ (67.7 ± 9 vs 72.3 ± 7 years, p = 0.022). Initial clinical signs of GCA, inflammatory parameters, and glucocorticoid therapy were similar in both groups. Coronary artery disease and/or lower limb peripheral arterial disease was more frequent in TAB- patients (25% vs 5.3%, p = 0.018). Aortic wall thickness and type of aortic involvement were not significantly different between groups. Diffuse arterial involvement from the aortic arch was more frequent in TAB- patients (29.1 vs 8.9%, p = 0.03). There were no differences between the groups regarding overall, aneurism-free, relapse-free, and aortic event-free survival.Conclusion: Among patients with GCA-related aortitis, those with TAB- are characterized by younger age and increased frequency of diffuse arterial involvement from the aortic arch compared to those with TAB+, without significant differences in terms of prognosis.

Concomitant association of giant cell arteritis and malignancy: a multicenter retrospective case-control study.

INTRODUCTION: Some studies suggest that there is an increased risk of malignancies in giant cell arteritis (GCA). We aimed to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of GCA patients with concomitant malignancy and compare them to a GCA control group. METHOD: Patients with a diagnosis of GCA and malignancy and with a maximal delay of 12 months between both diagnoses were retrospectively included in this study and compared to a control group of age-matched (3:1) patients from a multicenter cohort of GCA patients. RESULTS: Forty-nine observations were collected (median age 76 years). Malignancies comprised 33 (67%) solid neoplasms and 16 (33%) clonal hematologic disorders. No over-representation of a particular type of malignancy was observed. Diagnosis of GCA and malignancy was synchronous in 7 (14%) patients, while malignancy succeeded GCA in 29 (59%) patients. Malignancy was fortuitously diagnosed based on abnormalities observed in laboratory tests in 26 patients, based on imaging in 14 patients, and based on symptoms or clinical examination in the nine remaining patients. Two patients had a concomitant relapse of both conditions. When compared to the control group, patients with concomitant GCA and malignancy were more frequently male (p < 0.001), with an altered general state (p < 0.001), and polymyalgia rheumatica (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study does not indicate an over-representation of any particular type of malignancy in GCA patients. Initial follow-up dictated by vasculitis may have led to an early identification of malignancy. Nevertheless, GCA male patients with an altered general state and polymyalgia rheumatica might more frequently show concomitant malignancies.

[Upper-extremity venous thrombosis: A retrospective study about 160 cases]. / Épidémiologie des thromboses veineuses des membres supérieurs : étude rétrospective de 160 thromboses aiguës.

AIM: To describe the clinical features and etiologies of upper limb venous thrombosis (ULVT). METHODS: All patients with a clinically suspected ULVT, were included retrospectively from January to December 2016. Diagnosis of ULVT was based on doppler-ultrasonography. Clinical features, topography and symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) were analyzed. The sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV) and negative value (NPV) of clinical symptoms leading to ULVT suspicion were estimated by comparing patients with and without ULVT. RESULTS: Among 488 patients with a suspected ULVT, 160 were diagnosed with ULVT, including, 80 with deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and 80 with superficial venous thrombosis (SVT). Symptomatic PE was found in 2.5 % of cases (n=4). None of the clinical symptoms of ULVT had a sensitivity greater than 40 %. For DVT, presence of superior vena cava syndrome had a 100 % PPV, 71.6 % NPV and 100 % Sp. For SVT, the presence of an cord-like induration had a 85.7 % PPV, 75.3 % NPV and 98.4 % Sp. An endovenous device was present in 87.5 % of DVT and 97.5 % of SVT cases. Malignant hemopathy was found in 43.8 % and 31.3 % of cases of DVT and SVT, respectively. Sepsis and solid neoplasia were present in 25 % and 15 % of cases of ULVT, respectively. Peripherally inserted central catheter or implantable sites were present in 40 % and 17.5 % of DVT patients. No solid neoplasia, hematological malignancy or thrombophilia were diagnosed in patients with ULVT. CONCLUSION: An endovenous device was involved in 92.5 % of cases of ULVT. The prevalence of symptomatic PE was low. Hematological malignancies, sepsis and neoplasia were the most common conditions present in patients with ULVT.

[Late-onset systemic sclerosis: A retrospective study of 27 patients diagnosed after the age of 70]. / Sclérodermie systémique de révélation tardive : étude rétrospective de 27 patients diagnostiqués après l'âge de 70 ans.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to describe special features of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) diagnosed after the age of 70. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients aged above 70 years at the time of diagnosis of SSc and followed at an internal medicine unit between 2000 and 2015. Co-morbidities and clinical characteristics were analyzed, as well as survival at 1, 2 and 3 years. RESULTS: Of 246 patients, 27 (11%) were included (89% women, 96% Caucasians, age 78.3±4.5 years). Synchronous cancer was noted in 3 patients. SSc was mostly limited cutaneous only (24/27), with telangiectasia (63%), gastroesophageal reflux (59%) and digital ulcers (22%), and was associated with anti-centromere antibody (69%). Interstitial lung disease was not frequent (29%). Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) was suspected at diagnosis of SSc in 14 cases (52%), but only 5 patients had undergone heart catheterization, with severe PAH in 3 cases. Survival at 1 and 3 years was 85.2% and 66.7%, and was worse in the case of suspected PAH, at 78.6% and 57.1% respectively. CONCLUSION: Cases of SSc diagnosed after 70 years are mostly limited cutaneous forms. Suspicion of PAH is frequent, and PAH may be the main initial sign of the disease for patients at this age. There may be association with synchronous cancer. Survival is poor.

Management of giant cell arteritis: Recommendations of the French Study Group for Large Vessel Vasculitis (GEFA).

PURPOSE: Management of giant cell arteritis (GCA, Horton's disease) involves many uncertainties. This work was undertaken to establish French recommendations for GCA management. METHODS: Recommendations were developed by a multidisciplinary panel of 33 physicians, members of the French Study Group for Large Vessel Vasculitis (Groupe d'étude français des artérites des gros vaisseaux [GEFA]). The topics to be addressed, selected from proposals by group members, were assigned to subgroups to summarize the available literature and draft recommendations. Following an iterative consensus-seeking process that yielded consensus recommendations, the degree of agreement among panel members was evaluated with a 5-point Likert scale. A recommendation was approved when ≥ 80% of the voters agreed or strongly agreed. RESULTS: The 15 retained topics resulted in 31 consensus recommendations focusing on GCA nomenclature and classification, the role of temporal artery biopsy and medical imaging in the diagnosis, indications and search modalities for involvement of the aorta and its branches, the glucocorticoid regimen to prescribe, treatment of complicated GCA, indications for use of immunosuppressants or targeted biologic therapies, adjunctive treatment measures, and management of relapse and recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The recommendations, which will be updated regularly, are intended to guide and harmonize the standards of GCA management.

[Thrombin generation test]. / Le test de génération de thrombine.

Thrombin is a key enzyme of the coagulation cascade, having both pro- and anticoagulant functions. Global haemostasis assay, the so-called thrombin generation test is appropriate for its assessment. Estimation of an individual's potential to generate thrombin may correlate more closely with a hyper- or hypo-coagulable phenotype, compared to traditional coagulation tests. In patients at risk of venous thrombosis, thrombin generation analysis may be utilized to detect underlying thrombophilia. In patients with documented venous thromboembolism, increased thrombin generation values are seen in those patients at greatest risk for recurrence. In patients with arterial vascular disease, the data are limited. In case of haemophilia thrombin generation assays reflect bleeding severity. It is applicable for monitoring of both conventional haemophilia treatment and inhibitor-bypassing therapy, which is needed when inhibitors develop in patients. Standardization of thrombin generation methods and determination of cut off-values are required before its application in clinical practice.

[Superior vena cava syndrome induced by pacemaker probes, 12 years after introduction]. / Un syndrome cave supérieur 12ans après l'implantation d'un pacemaker.

Superior vena cava syndrome is a rare disease, most often found to result from a malignant process, which causes extrinsic compression of the superior vena cava. In recent years, there has been an increase of superior vena cava syndrome related to medical devices (implantable site, pacemaker [PM], central venous line for parenteral nutrition...). We report the case of a 37-year-old patient who developed a superior vena cava syndrome 12 years after implantation of a PM. The diagnosis was established on venography after two negative venous-CT focused on the superior vena cava. The superior vena cava syndrome improved immediately after angioplasty and stenting covering the PM probes at the superior vena cava/brachiocephalic venous trunk junction.