Patients aged 50-75 years take longer to achieve the patient acceptable symptom state than patients aged 20-34 years following primary hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.

PURPOSE: Though an increasing number of adults older than 50 years are undergoing hip arthroscopy for treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome (FAIS), it is unclear how their timeline for functional outcome improvement compares to that of younger patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of age on time to achieving the Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID), Substantial Clinical Benefit (SCB), and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) following primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS. METHODS: A retrospective comparative single-surgeon cohort study of primary hip arthroscopy patients with minimum 2-year follow-up was conducted. Age categories were 20-34 years, 35-49 years, and 50-75 years. All subjects completed the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) prior to surgery and at 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year follow-up. MCID and SCB cutoffs were defined as pre-to-postoperative increases in mHHS by ≥ 8.2 and ≥ 19.8, respectively. PASS cutoff was set at postoperative mHHS ≥ 74. Time to achievement of each milestone was compared using interval-censored survival analysis. The effect of age was adjusted for Body Mass Index (BMI), sex, and labral repair technique using an interval-censored proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-five patients were included in the analysis with 115 (40.4%) aged 20-34 years, 92 (32.3%) aged 35-49 years, and 78 (27.4%) aged 50-75 years. There were no significant differences between groups in time to achievement for the MCID (n.s.) or SCB (n.s.). However, patients in the oldest group had significantly longer time to PASS than those in the youngest group, both in the unadjusted analysis (p = 0.02) and after adjusting for BMI, sex, and labral repair technique (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48-0.96, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Achievement of the PASS, but not the MCID or SCB, is delayed among FAIS patients aged 50-75 years who undergo primary hip arthroscopy compared to those aged 20-34 years. Older FAIS patients should be counseled appropriately about their longer timeline to achieving hip function comparable to their younger counterparts. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Clinical Outcomes After Concomitant Hip Arthroscopy and Iliotibial Band Lengthening With Trochanteric Bursectomy Compared to a Matched Cohort.

PURPOSE: This study sought to determine the clinical outcomes of patients that underwent hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and concomitant arthroscopic iliotibial (IT) band lengthening with trochan- teric bursectomy (TB group) as well as a matched cohort of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for isolated FAI symptoms (NTB group) from baseline to a minimum of 2-year follow-up. METHODS: Patients who were diagnosed with FAI and symptomatic trochanteric bursitis and who failed con- servative measures and underwent hip arthroscopy and arthroscopic IT band lengthening with trochanteric bur- sectomy were identified. These patients were matched by age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) to a group of patients who underwent surgery for FAI without trochanteric bur- sitis symptoms. Patients were separated into two groups: iliotibial band lengthening with trochanteric bursectomy (TB) and non-trochanteric bursectomy (NTB). The patient reported outcomes (PROs) recorded were the modified Har- ris Hip Score (mHHS) and Non-Arthritic Hips Score (NAHS), which were obtained with a minimum of 2-years follow-up. RESULTS: Each cohort was composed of 22 patients. The TB cohort was composed of 19 females (86%) with a re- ported mean age of 49.3 ± 11.6 years. The NTB cohort was composed of 19 females (86%) with a reported mean age of 49.0 ± 11.7 years. Both cohorts showed significant improve- ment from baseline in the mHHS and NAHS. There was no significant difference in the mHHS and NAHS between the two groups. There was no significant difference between TB and NTB groups with respect to achieving minimal clinically important difference (MCID), [19 (86%) vs. 20 (91%), p > 0.99] or patient acceptable symptom state (PASS), [13 (59%) vs. 14 (64%), p = 0.76]. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in PROs of patients with FAI and trochanteric bursitis who underwent hip ar- throscopy with concomitant arthroscopic IT band lengthen- ing with trochanteric bursectomy compared to patients with isolated FAI who underwent hip arthroscopy.

Endoscopic Excision of Hip Heterotopic Ossification, Plus Indomethacin and Radiation, Is Effective in Treating and Preventing Recurrence.

Purpose: To describe the clinical and patient-reported outcomes of heterotopic ossification (HO) excision as well as the results of a standardized HO prophylaxis protocol among a group of patients who previously underwent open or arthroscopic hip surgery. Methods: Patients who developed HO after index hip surgery and were subsequently treated with arthroscopic excision of HO and postoperative HO prophylaxis using 2 weeks of indomethacin and radiation were retrospectively identified. All patients were seen by a single surgeon and were treated with the same arthroscopic technique. Patients were also placed on a regimen of 2 weeks of indomethacin 50 mg and radiation therapy with 700 cGy in one fraction on the first postoperative day. Outcomes assessed included recurrence of HO and conversion to total hip arthroplasty by latest follow-up. Other outcomes included Modified Harris Hip Scores and Non-Arthritic Hip Scores, which were collected preoperatively and at 1-year and 2-year follow-up. Results: There were 5 female and 9 male subjects, with an average age of 39 years (range 22-66) and average body mass index of 27.1 (19.1-37.5). Average follow-up time was 46 months (range 4-136). No patients had experienced HO recurrence by latest follow-up. Only 2 patients converted to total hip arthroplasty, one at 6 months and the other at 11 months postexcision. Average outcome scores improved by 2-year follow-up (average Modified Harris Hip Scores 52.8 improved to 86.5, average Non-Arthritic Hip Scores 49.4 improved to 83.8). Conclusions: Minimally invasive arthroscopic excision of HO and postoperative prophylaxis with combined indomethacin and radiation therapy effectively treats and prevents the recurrence of HO. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series, therapeutic.

Knee Osteotomies Can Be Performed Safely In An Ambulatory Setting.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the rate of hospital admissions, inpatient conversions, reoperations, and complications associated with tibial tubercle osteotomies (TTO), high tibial osteotomies (HTO), and distal femoral osteotomies (DFO) performed at our ambulatory surgery center compared with our inpatient hospital facility. Methods: A retrospective review of patients receiving a TTO, HTO or DFO at our institution between June 2011 and October 2019 was performed. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients undergoing the aforementioned procedures for malalignment, and a minimum of 90-days follow-up. Revision osteotomies, those undergoing an osteotomy for an acute fracture, and those with rule-out criteria for outpatient surgery (ASA > 3, and body mass index >40) were excluded. Complications, including readmission and reoperation, were compared between the two groups using either the Fisher's exact test and independent samples t-test, where applicable, and a P value of <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results: The study included 531 patients undergoing osteotomies (222 ambulatory surgical center [ASC] and 309 hospital) with no patients lost to follow-up in the 90-day postoperative period. No patients operated on at an ASC required transfer to inpatient setting. There were no differences in complication rates, readmission, or reoperation rates among the two groups (4.1% vs 4.9%; P = .8328; 3.1% vs 4.5%, P = .5026; 3.1% vs 4.5%; P = .5026; respectively). Complications, including surgical site infection and arthrofibrosis were not significantly different in the two cohorts, (1.4% vs. 2.6%, P = .341 and 1.4% vs 1%; P = .698, respectively). Conclusions: Osteotomies about the knee performed in an ambulatory setting were safe, with no difference in readmission, reoperation, or postoperative complications compared to those performed at an inpatient hospital. Additionally, no patient required conversion from an outpatient to an inpatient setting. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Distal posterolateral corner injury in the setting of multiligament knee injury increases risk of common peroneal palsy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify if the location of posterolateral corner (PLC) injury was predictive of clinical common peroneal nerve (CPN) palsy. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of patients presenting to our institution with operative PLC injuries. Assessment of concomitant injuries and presence of neurologic injury was completed via chart review and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) review. A fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologist reviewed the PLC injury and categorized it into distal, middle and proximal injuries with or without a biceps femoral avulsion. The CPN was evaluated for signs of displacement or neuritis. RESULTS: Forty-seven operatively managed patients between 2014 and 2019 (mean age-at-injury 29.5 ± 10.7 years) were included in this study. Eleven (23.4%) total patients presented with a clinical CPN palsy. Distal PLC injuries were significantly associated with CPN palsy [9 (81.8%) patients, (P = 0.041)]. Nine of 11 (81.8%) patients with CPN palsy had biceps femoral avulsion (P = 0.041). Of the patients presenting with CPN palsy, only four (36.4%) patients experienced complete neurologic recovery. Three of 7 patients (43%) with an intact CPN had full resolution of their clinically complete CPN palsy at the time of follow-up (482 ± 357 days). All patients presenting with a CPN palsy also had a complete anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture in addition to a PLC injury (P = 0.009), with or without a posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injury. No patient presenting with an isolated pattern of PCL-PLC injury (those without ACL tears) had a clinical CPN palsy. CONCLUSION: Distal PLC injuries have a strong association with clinical CPN palsy, with suboptimal resolution in the initial post-operative period. Specifically, the presence of a biceps femoris avulsion injury was highly associated with a clinical CPN palsy. Additionally, CPN palsy in the context of PLC injury has a strong association with concomitant ACL injury. Furthermore, the relative rates of involvement of the ACL vs. PCL suggest that specific injury mechanism may have an important role in CPN palsy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Resident, Fellow, and Attending Perception of E-Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Implications on Future Orthopaedic Education.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the current study was to evaluate resident, fellow, and attending perspectives on the use of e-learning as part of orthopaedic surgery education. METHODS: A survey was created evaluating (1) overall attitudes toward e-learning, (2) multi-institutional e-learning/e-conferences, (3) national/regional e-conferences, and (4) future directions with e-learning. The survey was distributed to all the orthopaedic surgery residency program directors in the United States, and they were asked to circulate the survey to their program's faculty and trainees. RESULTS: A total of 268 responses were collected, including 100 attendings and 168 trainees. Overall satisfaction with e-learning compared with in-person learning was higher among trainees than attending faculty, with 51.4% of trainees favoring e-learning, as opposed to 32.2% of attendings (P = 0.006). Both groups felt they were more likely to pay attention with in-person learning (P = 0.89). During the COVID-19 pandemic, 85.7% of residents have used e-learning platforms to join a conference in their specialty of interest while off-service. Most attendings and trainees felt e-learning should play a supplemental role in standard residency/fellowship education, with a low number of respondents feeling that it should not be used (86.6% versus 84%, and 2.1% versus 0.6%, respectively, P = 0.28). CONCLUSION: E-learning has been an important modality to continue academic pursuits during the disruption in usual education and training schedules during the COVID-19 pandemic. Most trainees and attendings surveyed felt that e-learning should play a supplementary role in resident and fellow education moving forward. Although e-learning does provide an opportunity to hold multi-institutional conferences and makes participation in meetings logistically easier, it cannot fully replicate the dynamic interactions and benefits of in-person learning.

Staged Bilateral Hip Arthroscopy Compared With a Matched Unilateral Hip Arthroscopy Group: Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up.

PURPOSE: To determine the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS) at 2-year follow up in patients who underwent staged bilateral hip arthroscopy versus age-, sex-, and body mass index-matched patients who underwent unilateral hip arthroscopy. METHODS: Patients who underwent staged bilateral primary hip arthroscopy between January 2007 and December 2017 for the indication of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) with a minimum 2-year follow-up were identified. The control group comprised patients who underwent a unilateral hip arthroscopy for FAI. The mHHS and the NAHS were analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-two patients (84 hips) in the bilateral group were matched with 84 patients (84 hips) in the unilateral group. Both groups had significantly improved mHHS and NAHS when comparing preoperative scores with postoperative scores (bilateral group mHHS: 45.5 ± 15.1 to 81.7 ± 17.6, P < .0001, bilateral group NAHS: 49.5 ± 13.8 to 83.6 ± 20.0, P < .0001, unilateral group mHHS 48.5 ± 13.8 to 83.6 ± 15.9, P < .0001, unilateral group NAHS 48.8 ± 12.0 to 85.0 ± 16.6, P < .0001). The patient-acceptable symptomatic state was achieved in 57 hips (68%) in the bilateral group versus 62 hips (74%) in the unilateral group, P = .4. Patients with bilateral hip arthroscopy who had <17 months between index procedure and contralateral hip arthroscopy had significantly better mHHS and NAHS (85.5 ± 18.4 vs 75.71 ± 14.4, P = .013 for mHHS and 88.1 ± 17.1 vs 76.2 ± 22.4, P = .0074 for NAHS). CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral hip arthroscopy for the indication of FAI has improved mHHS and NAHS at 2 years of follow up compared to baseline. There was no difference in 2-year mHHS and NAHS in patients who underwent bilateral hip arthroscopy and unilateral hip arthroscopy. Patients in the bilateral hip arthroscopy group that had the contralateral surgery longer than 17 months from index procedure had lower 2 year follow up mHHS and NAHS scores than those that underwent the second surgery within 17 months of the index procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

The Role for Shoulder Hemiarthroplasty in the Young, Active Patient.

Younger patients with severe glenohumeral (GH) arthritis are a challenge to treat, as they have high physical demands, high expectations, a long lifespan, and often altered anatomy from prior surgery or congenital deformity. Nonoperative management is the cornerstone of treatment; however, when it fails, shoulder arthroplasty can be indicated. Although the literature suggests that total shoulder arthroplasty is the most appropriate for severe GH arthritis, there are a subset of patients in which a hemiarthroplasty can still be successful. This article reviews the clinical performance of hemiarthroplasty in patients with specific diagnoses while highlighting the limitations of the operation.