Effect of junctional reflux on the venous clinical severity score in patients with insufficiency of the great saphenous vein (JURY study).

OBJECTIVE: Effective treatment options are available for chronic venous insufficiency associated with superficial venous reflux. Although many patients with C2 and C3 disease based on the CEAP (Clinical-Etiological-Anatomical-Pathophysiological) classification have combined great saphenous vein (GSV) and saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) reflux, some may not have concomitant SFJ reflux. Several payors have determined that symptom severity in patients without SFJ reflux does not warrant treatment. In patients planned for venous ablation, we tested whether Venous Clinical Severity Scores (VCSS) are equivalent in those with GSV reflux alone compared with those with both GSV and SFJ reflux. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted at 10 centers. Inclusion criteria were: candidate for endovenous ablation as determined by treating physician; 18 to 80 years of age; GSV reflux with or without SFJ reflux on ultrasound; and C2 or C3 disease. Exclusion criteria were prior deep vein thrombosis; prior vein ablation on the index limb; ilio-caval obstruction; and renal, hepatic, or heart failure requiring prior hospitalization. An a priori sample size was calculated. We used multiple linear regression (adjusted for patient characteristics) to compare differences in VCSS scores of the two groups at baseline, and to test whether scores were equivalent using a priori equivalence boundaries of +1 and -1. In secondary analyses, we tested differences in VCSS scores in patients with C2 and C3 disease separately. RESULTS: A total of 352 patients were enrolled; 64.2% (n = 226) had SFJ reflux, and 35.8% (n = 126) did not. The two groups did not differ by major clinical characteristics. The mean age of the cohort was 53.9 ± 14.3 years; women comprised 74.2%; White patients 85.8%; and body mass index was 27.8 ± 6.1 kg/m2. The VCSS scores in patients with and without SFJ reflux were found to be equivalent; SFJ reflux was not a significant predictor of VCSS score; and mean VCSS scores did not differ significantly (6.4 vs 6.6, respectively, P = .40). In secondary subset analyses, VCSS scores were equivalent between C2 patients with and without SFJ reflux, and VCSS scores of C3 patients with SFJ reflux were lower than those without SFJ reflux. CONCLUSIONS: Symptom severity is equivalent in patients with GSV reflux with or without SFJ reflux. The absence of SFJ reflux alone should not determine the treatment paradigm in patients with symptomatic chronic venous insufficiency. Patients with GSV reflux who meet clinical criteria for treatment should have equivalent treatment regardless of whether or not they have SFJ reflux.

Implementation of a novel peer review academy by Surgery and the Association of Women Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: A novel Peer Review Academy was developed as a collaborative effort between the Association of Women Surgeons and the journal Surgery to provide formal training in peer review. We aimed to describe the outcomes of this initiative using a mixed methods approach. METHODS: We developed a year-long curriculum with monthly online didactic sessions. Women surgical trainee mentees were paired 1:1 with rotating women surgical faculty mentors for 3 formal peer review opportunities. We analyzed pre-course and post-course surveys to evaluate mentee perceptions of the academy and assessed changes in mentee review quality over time with blinded scoring of unedited reviews. Semi-structured interviews were conducted upon course completion. RESULTS: Ten women surgical faculty mentors and 10 women surgical trainees from across the United States and Canada successfully completed the Peer Review Academy. There were improvements in the mentees' confidence for all domains of peer review evaluated, including overall confidence in peer review, study novelty, study design, analytic approach, and review formatting (all, P ≤ .02). The mean score of peer review quality increased over time (59.2 ± 10.8 vs 76.5 ± 9.4; P = .02). In semi-structured interviews, important elements were emphasized across the Innovation, Implementation Process, and Individuals Domains, including the values of (1) a comprehensive approach to formal peer review education; (2) mentoring relationships between women faculty and resident surgeons; and (3) increasing diversity in the scientific peer review process. CONCLUSION: Our novel Peer Review Academy was feasible on a national scale, resulting in significant qualitative and quantitative improvements in women surgical trainee skillsets, and has the potential to grow and diversify the existing peer review pool.

Sex disparities in outcomes after carotid artery interventions: A systematic review.

This systematic review aimed to identify sex-specific outcomes in men and women after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS), including transfemoral and transcarotid. A search of literature published from January 2000 through December 2022 was conducted using key terms attributed to carotid interventions on PubMed. Studies comparing outcome metrics post intervention (ie, myocardial infarction [MI], cerebral vascular accident [CVA] or stroke, and long-term mortality) among male and female patients were reviewed. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. Overall, all studies reported low rates of perioperative complications. Among the studies that did not stratify outcomes by the preoperative symptom status, there were no significant sex differences in rates of perioperative strokes or MIs. Two studies, however, noted a higher rate of 30-day mortality in male patients undergoing CEA than in female patients. Analysis of asymptomatic patients undergoing CEA revealed no difference in perioperative MIs (female: 0% to 1.8% v male: 0.4% to 4.3%), similar rates of CVAs (female: 0.8% to 5% v male: 0.8% to 4.9%), and no significant differences in the long-term mortality outcomes. Alternatively, symptomatic patients undergoing CEA reported a higher rate of CVAs in female patients vs. male patients (7.7% v 6.2%) and showed a higher rate of death in female patients (1% v 0.7%). Among studies that did not stratify outcome by symptomatology, there was no difference in the 30-day outcomes between sexes for patients undergoing CAS. Asymptomatic patients undergoing CAS demonstrated similar incident rates across perioperative MIs (female: 0% to 5.9% v male: 0.28% to 3.3%), CVAs (female: 0.5% to 4.1% v male: 0.4% to 6.2%), and long-term mortality outcomes (female: 0% to 1.75% v male: 0.2% to 1.5%). Symptomatic patients undergoing CAS similarly reported higher incidences of perioperative MIs (female: 0.3% to 7.1% v male: 0% to 5.5%), CVAs (female: 0% to 9.9% v male: 0% to 7.6%), and long-term mortality outcomes (female: 0.6% to 7.1% v male: 0.5% to 8.2%). Sex-specific differences in outcomes after major vascular procedures are well recognized. Our review suggests that symptomatic female patients have a higher incidence of neurologic and cardiac events after carotid interventions, but that asymptomatic patients do not.

Sex disparities in hemodialysis access outcomes: A systematic review.

The goal of this systematic review was to collate and summarize the current literature on hemodialysis access outcomes in females, identify differences between females and men, and provide a foundation for future research. A systematic review of the English-language literature was conducted by searching PubMed and Google Scholar for the following terms: "sex," "hemodialysis access," "arteriovenous fistula," "arteriovenous graft," and "dialysis catheter." Reference lists from the resulting articles were also evaluated to ensure that any and all relevant primary sources were identified. Studies were then screened by two independent reviewers for inclusion. Of 967 total studies, 53 ultimately met inclusion criteria. Females have lower maturation rates; have decreased rates of primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency; require more procedures per capita to achieve maturation and to maintain fistula patency; are more likely to receive dialysis via an arteriovenous graft or central venous catheter; and require a longer time and potentially more assistive invasive interventions to achieve a mature fistula. Our findings emphasize the urgent need for further research to evaluate and address the causes of these disparities. Discussion with patients undergoing hemodialysis should include these findings to improve patient education, expectations, satisfaction, and outcomes.

Sex Disparities in Arteriovenous Fistula Maturation Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The end-stage kidney disease life-plan aims to individualize hemodialysis (HD) access selection in patients requiring renal replacement therapy. Paucity of data on risk factors for poor arteriovenous fistula (AVF) outcomes limits the ability of physicians to guide their patients on this decision. This is especially true for female patients, who are known to have worse AVF outcomes when compared to male patients. The goal of this study was to identify risk factors associated with poor AVF maturation outcomes in female patients that will help guide individualized access selection. METHODS: A retrospective review of 1,077 patients that had AVF creation between 2014 and 2021 at an academic medical center was performed. Maturation outcomes were compared between 596 male and 481 female patients. Separate multivariate logistic regression models were created for the male and female cohorts to identify factors associated with unassisted maturation. AVF was considered mature if it was successfully used for HD for 4-week sessions without need for further interventions. Unassisted fistula was defined as an AVF that matured without any interventions. RESULTS: The male patients were more likely to receive more distal HD access; 378 (63%) male versus 244 (51%) female patients had radiocephalic AVF, P < 0.001. Maturation outcomes were significantly worse in female patients; 387 (80%) AVFs matured in females and 519 (87%) in male patients, P < 0.001. Similarly, the rate of unassisted maturation was 26% (125) in female patients versus 39% (233) in male patients, P < 0.001. Mean preoperative vein diameters were similar in both groups; 2.8 ± 1.1 mm in male versus 2.7 ± 0.97 mm in female patients, P = 0.17. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of the female patients revealed that Black race (odds ratio [OR]: 0.6, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.4-0.9, P = 0.045), radiocephalic AVF (OR: 0.6, 95% CI: 0.4-0.9, P = 0.045), and preoperative vein diameter <2.5 mm (OR: 1.4, 95% CI: 10.33-0.901.1-1.7, P = 0.014) were independent predictors of poor unassisted maturation in this cohort. In male patients, preoperative vein diameter <2.5 mm (OR: 1.4, 95% CI: 1.2-1.7, P < 0.001) and need for HD prior to AVF creation (OR: 0.6, 95% CI: 0.3-0.9, P = 0.018) were independent predictors of poor unassisted maturation. CONCLUSIONS: Black women with marginal forearm veins may have worse maturation outcomes, and upper arm HD access should be considered when advising patients on their end-stage kidney disease life-plan.

Early Follow-Up after Arteriovenous Fistula Creation is Associated with Improved Access-Related Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Up to 60% of arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) require intervention to assist maturation, which prolongs the time until it can be used for hemodialysis (HD). Current guidelines recommend early postoperative AVF examination to detect and address immaturity to decrease time to maturation. This study evaluates how the timing of postoperative follow-up to assess AVF maturity affects patients' outcomes. METHODS: All patients who underwent AVF creation between 2017 and 2021 in an academic medical center were retrospectively reviewed, excluding patients lost to follow-up or not on HD. Outcomes were compared between patients that had delayed follow-up to assess AVF maturity, >8 weeks post surgery, versus early follow-up, <8 weeks post-surgery. AVF evaluation for maturity consisted of physical examination and duplex ultrasound. Primary endpoints were time to first cannulation (interval from AVF creation to first successful cannulation) and time to catheter-free dialysis (interval from AVF creation to central venous catheter removal). RESULTS: A total of 400 patients were identified: 111 in the delayed follow-up group and 289 in the early follow-up group. The median time to follow-up was 78 days (interquartile range [IQR], 66-125) in the delayed follow-up group versus 39 days (IQR, 36-47) in the early follow-up group, (P < 0.0001). The maturation rate was 87% in the delayed follow-up group versus 81% in the early follow-up group, (P = 0.1) and both groups had similar rates of interventions to assist maturation (66% vs. 57%, P = 0.2). The early follow-up group had a significantly shorter median time to first cannulation (50 vs. 88 days; P < 0.0001) and shorter time to catheter-free HD (75 vs. 118 days; P <0.0001). At 4 months after AVF creation, the incidence of first cannulation was 74% in the early follow-up group versus 63% in the delayed follow-up group (P = 0.001). Similarly, the incidence of catheter-free dialysis was 65% in the early follow-up group versus 50% in the delayed follow-up group at 4 months postoperatively, (P = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: Early postoperative follow-up for evaluation of fistula maturation is associated with reduced time to first successful cannulation of AVF for HD and reduced time to catheter-free dialysis.

Transradial access for balloon-assisted maturation of arteriovenous fistulas.

Balloon-assisted maturation (BAM) of arteriovenous fistulas has conventionally been performed via direct fistula access. The transradial approach has not been well described for BAM, although its use has been reported throughout the cardiology literature. The purpose of the present study was to assess the outcomes of transradial access for its use with BAM. A retrospective review of 205 patients with transradial access for BAM was performed. One sheath was inserted into the radial artery distal to the anastomosis. We have described the procedural details, complications, and outcomes. The procedure was considered technically successful if transradial access had been established and the AVF had been ballooned with at least one balloon without major complications. The procedure was considered clinically successful if no further interventions had been required for AVF maturation. The average time for BAM via transradial access was 35 ± 20 minutes, with 31 ± 17 mL of contrast used. No access-related perioperative complications, including access site hematoma, symptomatic radial artery occlusion, or fistula thrombosis, had occurred. The technical success rate was 100%, and the rate of clinical success was 78%, with 45 patients requiring additional procedures to achieve maturation. Transradial access is an efficient alternative to trans-fistula access for BAM. It is technically easier and allows for better visualization of the anastomosis.

Predictors of poor outcomes after lower extremity revascularization for acute limb ischemia.

OBJECTIVES: Acute lower extremity ischemia is one of the most common emergencies in vascular surgery and is a cause of considerable morbidity and mortality. The goal of this study was to evaluate outcomes of revascularization for acute lower extremity ischemia and to determine factors associated with perioperative morbidity and mortality. METHODS: A total of 354 patients underwent urgent revascularization for acute lower extremity ischemia at an academic medical center between 2014 and 2019. A retrospective review of patients' demographics, comorbidities, etiology and severity of limb ischemia, and procedural characteristics was recorded. Outcomes, including postoperative complications, perioperative limb loss, and mortality, were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 69 ± 17 years, and 52% were females. 50% of patients presented with Rutherford Class IIb ischemia. Arterial embolization was the most common cause of limb ischemia, seen in 33% of cases. Open surgical revascularization was performed in 241 (68%) patients, while endovascular and hybrid approaches were utilized in 53 (15%) and 60 (17%) cases, respectively. Postoperative adverse events occurred in 44% of patients, including wound complications (11%), cardiac (5%) and pulmonary (16%) complications, strokes (4%), UTIs (10%), renal failure (14%), bleeding (5%), and compartment syndrome (3%). The rate of unplanned return to the operating room was 21%. Major adverse cardiovascular events were seen in 103 (29%) patients and major adverse limb events were seen in 57 (16%) patients. The median length of stay was 10 days (IQR = 4); 49% patients were discharged to skilled nursing facility and 19% were readmitted within 30 days.The rate of amputation during index admission was 10%, and perioperative mortality was 20%. Gender, tibial runoff, and etiology of limb ischemia were independent predictors of limb loss. Women had lower risk of limb loss than men (OR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.023, 0.38). Poor tibial runoff (one-vessel or absence of flow below the knee) was a significant predictor of limb loss as compared to three-vessel runoff (OR, 14.92; 95% CI, 1.92, 115.88). Aneurysmal disease (OR, 38.35; 95% CI, 3.54, 42.45) and traumatic injuries (OR, 108.08; 95% CI, 8.21, 159.06) were the strongest predictors of amputation as compared to other etiologies of limb ischemia. Multivariate model identified ESRD (OR, 9.2; 95% CI, 1.8-46.3), degree of ischemia (class IIb or higher vs class IIa; OR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.2-10.6), and age (OR, 1.5; 95% CI 1.1-2.0 for every 10 years) as independent predictors of perioperative mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Urgent revascularization for management of acute limb ischemia is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Elderly patients with ESRD presenting with severely threatened limbs have especially high risk of perioperative mortality and may not be ideal candidates for limb salvage.

Intraoperative vascular mapping improves patient eligibility for arteriovenous fistula creation.

BACKGROUND: We assessed the utility of intraoperative vein mapping performed by the operating surgeon for evaluating vessel suitability for arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation. METHODS: In a retrospective review of 222 AVFs, vein diameter measurements were compared between intraoperative and preoperative mapping in the same anatomical location. AVF creation was based on intraoperative vein diameter ≥2 mm, using a distal to proximal and superficial veins first approach. Potential selection of access type based on preoperative findings alone was analyzed. RESULTS: The mean diameter of the veins used for AVF creation measured 3.6 ± 0.8 mm on intraoperative duplex versus 2.5 ± 0.9 mm when the same veins were measured on preoperative duplex. Based on preoperative mapping alone, 23% of patients would have received a more proximal AVF and 5% would have needed a graft. AVFs created more distally based on intraoperative findings had similar maturation rates compared to the rest of the cohort, 79% versus 84% (p = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative vein mapping can be used to evaluate vessel suitability for AVF and compared to pre-operative vein mapping may increase the eligibility of distal veins for fistula creation while reducing the need for AV grafts.

The art of peer review: Guidelines to become a credible and constructive peer reviewer.

Peer review is a learned skill set that requires knowledge of study design, review construct, ethical considerations, and general expertise in a field of study. Participating in peer review is a rewarding and valuable experience in which all academic physicians are encouraged to partake. However, formal training opportunities in peer review are limited. In 2021, the Association of Women Surgeons and the journal Surgery collaborated to develop a Peer Review Academy. This academy is a 1-year longitudinal course that offers a select group of young women surgical trainees across all specialties a curriculum of monthly lectures and multiple formal mentored peer review opportunities to assist them in developing the foundation necessary to transition to independent peer review. The trainees and faculty mentors participating in the Association of Women Surgeons-Surgery Peer Review Academy compiled a summary of best peer review practices, which is intended to outline the elements of the skill set necessary to become a proficient peer reviewer.

Intraparotid facial varix.

A 72-year-old man had presented with a 4-day history of progressive left-sided facial swelling associated with pain. The physical examination revealed left facial fullness over the parotid gland without tenderness to palpation. His vital signs and laboratory test findings were within normal limits. A computed tomography scan demonstrated a left facial varix measuring 3.4 cm × 2.8 cm within an unremarkable-appearing parotid gland. Parotidectomy vs close observation were discussed, and the patient decided to pursue nonoperative management. Ultimately, his symptoms were self-limited, and the swelling had resolved within 6 months after the diagnosis. Interval computed tomography demonstrated a thrombosed left facial varix measuring 1.3 cm × 1.1 cm.

A review of acute limb ischemia in COVID-positive patients.

This literature review discusses the current evidence on acute limb ischemia (ALI) in patients with COVID-19. Throughout the pandemic, these patients have been at increased risk of arterial thrombotic events and subsequent mortality as a result of a hypercoagulable state. The exact mechanism of thrombosis is unknown; however arterial thrombosis may be due to invasion of endothelial cells via angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors, endothelial injury from inflammation, or even free-floating aortic thrombus. Multiple studies have been performed evaluating the medical and surgical management of these patients; the decision to proceed with operative intervention is dependent on the patient's clinical status as it relates to COVID-19 and morbidity of that disease. The interventions afforded typically include anticoagulation in patients undergoing palliation; alternatively, thrombectomy (endovascular and open) is utilized in other patients. There is a high risk of rethrombosis, despite anticoagulation, given persistent endothelial injury from the virus. Postoperative mortality can be high in these patients.

Scoping review of non-thermal technologies for endovenous ablation for treatment of venous insufficiency.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this review article was to compare the outcomes of newer non-thermal endovenous ablation techniques to thermal ablation techniques for the treatment of symptomatic venous insufficiency. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Three independent reviewers screened PubMed and EMBASE databases to identify relevant studies. A total of 1173 articles were identified from database search that met our inclusion criteria. Two articles were identified through reference search. Removal of duplicates from our original search yielded 695 articles. We then screened these articles and assessed 173 full-text articles for eligibility. Subsequent to exclusion, 11 full-text articles were selected for final inclusion. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The non-thermal techniques are similar to thermal techniques in terms of a high technical success rate, closure rate at 12 months, change in Venous Clinical Severity Score and change in quality of life after procedure. However, the length of procedure is shorter for non-thermal modalities and patient comfort is improved with lower pain scores. Return to work may also be earlier after non-thermal ablation. The rates of bruising, phlebitis and paresthesia are higher after thermal ablation. CONCLUSIONS: The non-thermal modalities are safe and effective in treating venous reflux and have shown improved patient comfort and shorter length of procedure which may make them favorable for use compared to the thermal modalities.

Acute Arterial Thromboembolism in Patients with COVID-19 in the New York City Area.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) predisposes to arterial and venous thromboembolic complications. We describe the clinical presentation, management, and outcomes of acute arterial ischemia and concomitant infection at the epicenter of cases in the United States. METHODS: Patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection between March 1, 2020 and May 15, 2020 with an acute arterial thromboembolic event were reviewed. Data collected included demographics, anatomical location of the thromboembolism, treatments, and outcomes. RESULTS: Over the 11-week period, the Northwell Health System cared for 12,630 hospitalized patients with COVID-19. A total of 49 patients with arterial thromboembolism and confirmed COVID-19 were identified. The median age was 67 years (58-75) and 37 (76%) were men. The most common preexisting conditions were hypertension (53%) and diabetes (35%). The median D-dimer level was 2,673 ng/mL (723-7,139). The distribution of thromboembolic events included upper 7 (14%) and lower 35 (71%) extremity ischemia, bowel ischemia 2 (4%), and cerebral ischemia 5 (10%). Six patients (12%) had thrombus in multiple locations. Concomitant deep vein thrombosis was found in 8 patients (16%). Twenty-two (45%) patients presented with signs of acute arterial ischemia and were subsequently diagnosed with COVID-19. The remaining 27 (55%) developed ischemia during hospitalization. Revascularization was performed in 13 (27%) patients, primary amputation in 5 (10%), administration of systemic tissue- plasminogen activator in 3 (6%), and 28 (57%) were treated with systemic anticoagulation only. The rate of limb loss was 18%. Twenty-one patients (46%) died in the hospital. Twenty-five (51%) were successfully discharged, and 3 patients are still in the hospital. CONCLUSIONS: While the mechanism of thromboembolic events in patients with COVID-19 remains unclear, the occurrence of such complication is associated with acute arterial ischemia which results in a high limb loss and mortality.

Maturation Rates of Arteriovenous Fistulas Using Small Veins in the Era of Endovascular Interventions.

BACKGROUND: Traditional practice suggests the abandonment of veins smaller than 3 mm in diameter for arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation because of a low rate of maturation. This study aims to show that with balloon-assisted maturation (BAM), undersized veins can be used to create functional AVFs with a high rate of success. METHODS: All patients who underwent AVF creation between 2014 and 2018 at a tertiary academic medical center were retrospectively reviewed. The patients without preoperative vein mapping, those who failed to follow-up, and the patients who were not on dialysis were excluded. A fistula was considered to be mature if it was successfully cannulated for dialysis. A total of 596 patients were identified for analysis. The cohort was divided into the small-vein group (SVG, <2.5 mm) and large-vein group (LVG, ≥2.5 mm) based on preoperative vein size. Categorical variables were analyzed with the chi-squared test for their association with maturation status. Continuous variables were analyzed with the Wilcoxon rank sum test. A P-value less than 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: In the study cohort, 61.9% of the patients were male, with an average age of 62.8 ± 13.7 years, and an average preoperative vein size of 2.9 ± 1.1 mm. With similar demographic distribution, the participants in the SVG (n = 216) had significantly smaller preoperative vein size of 1.9 ± 0.4 mm than the patients in the LVG (n = 380), 3.5 ± 0.8 mm (P = 0.001). There were significantly more radio-cephalic AVFs created in the SVG (77.8% versus 48.7%, P < 0.0001). The overall maturation rate was 83.1% (n = 495), 219 fistulas (36.7%) matured primarily and 276 (46.3%) required interventions. Ninety-one percent of the patients required only 1 or 2 BAMs to achieve maturation. The SVG achieved a maturation rate of 75.9% as compared with 87.1% in the LVG (P = 0.002). A significantly higher number of patients in the SVG required BAM for maturation as compared with the LVG (67.7% versus 49.9%, P = 0.0002); however, there was no difference in the average number of BAMs required for fistula maturation between the groups (1.5 ± 0.8 for the SVG vs. 1.4 ± 0.7 for the LVG). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, vein size ≥2.5 mm (odds ratio (OR) = 2.11, confidence interval (CI): 1.36-3.27, P = 0.0009) and male sex (OR = 2.30, CI: 1.49-3.57, P = 0.0002) were independent predictors of maturation. CONCLUSIONS: Small veins can be used for AVF creation with lower but still favorable maturation rates using BAM interventions, especially in male patients. This practice can increase the creation of autogenous dialysis access and potentially reduce complications related to prosthetic dialysis access.

The Role of Duplex Ultrasound in Assessing AVF Maturation.

BACKGROUND: Arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are favored for hemodialysis (HD) access. However, in many instances, AVFs fail to mature. We examined the utility of postoperative color duplex ultrasound (CDU) in assessing AVF maturation and determining the need for balloon-assisted maturation (BAM). METHODS: A total of 633 patients underwent AVF creation at a single institution from 2015 to 2018. A total of 339 patients (54%) underwent CDU at a median of 8 weeks postoperatively. We collected the following parameters: vein diameter, volume flow (VF), peak systolic velocities in arterial inflow and venous outflow, and presence of stealing branches. A peak systolic velocity ratio (SVR) of ≥2 correlated with ≥50% stenosis in venous outflow, and SVR ≥3 correlated with ≥50% stenosis at the anastomosis. AVFs were considered mature when they were successfully cannulated on dialysis. A generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) was created to compare duplex criteria associated with successful use of AVF (maturation) to those AVFs that required further intervention or failed to mature. Fistulography images, the current gold standard, were compared with findings from CDU studies to determine validity of the duplex ultrasound. RESULTS: Of the 339 AVFs with postoperative CDU, 31.3% matured without interventions, 38.3% required BAM, 9.7% thrombosed, and the remaining patients were not yet on HD. Based on GLMM analysis, the probability of AVF maturation increases if CDU demonstrated one of the following: the vein diameter is ≥ 6 (odds ratio [OR] = 38.7), no evidence of stenosis in the venous outflow tract (OR = 35.6), no stealing branches (OR = 21.6) and VF ≥ 675 (OR = 5.0). Fistulography was performed in 195 patents. Sensitivity and specificity for each are as follows: vein diameter (84.3%, 28.6%), stenosis (59.3%, 78.8%), and stealing branches (20.7%, 92.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative CDU should be considered routine to correct anatomical findings that might limit AVF maturation and identify the need for further interventions.

Anatomically Coiled Internal Carotid Artery Resulting in Severe Dysphagia and Burning Mouth Syndrome.

This is a report of a 65-year-old female presenting with symptoms of dysphagia due to a coiled left internal carotid artery, treated with resection and primary repair. Dysphagia lusoria is more commonly caused by aortic arch anomalies, aberrant subclavian or common carotid arteries. Internal carotid tortuosity as a cause of severe dysphagia and burning mouth syndrome is highly unusual. A literature review examines the etiology, natural history, and treatment options.