Imagining in Time: The Legacy of Olive Berger (1898-1981).

Olive Berger was a true nurse anesthesia pioneer for our profession. She dedicated her life to the advancement of nurse anesthesia through her leadership, advocacy, scholarly writing, clinical achievements and innovation. She blazed the trail by forming and establishing education requirements for nurse anesthesia programs, established a state nurse anesthesia organization, and led the American Association of Nurse Anesthetists as its 14th president in 1958. She was the Chief Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist and Program Director at the Johns Hopkins Hospital and is best known for her collaboration with surgeons Dr. Alfred Blalock and Dr. Helen Taussig, providing anesthesia care during the groundbreaking repair of tetralogy of Fallot on infants.

It's Never Just a Block: An Analysis of Regional Anesthesia Closed Claims.

Anesthesia care increasingly includes use of regional anesthesia techniques, either as a primary anesthetic or to reduce the patient's postoperative pain. Both neuraxial anesthesia and peripheral nerve blockade have several noteworthy functions. These functions include diminishing sensory sensation to pain and potentially producing a motor blockade, both of which may facilitate the surgical procedure. The desire to reduce reliance on opioid medications, protocols to enhance and accelerate patient recovery from surgery, and patient expectations all contribute to the likelihood that use of regional anesthesia will continue to gain popularity. As such, it is essential to understand whether an association exists between regional anesthesia and adverse outcomes of care. The American Association of Nurse Anesthetists Foundation Closed Claim Research Team searched the most current database of closed claims that involved adverse outcomes when either a peripheral nerve block or a neuraxial block was a component of care in the claims. Although there were only 32 claims in the dataset, a thematic analysis resulted in the identification of 3 themes: errors in cognitive decision making, ineffective communication patterns, and production pressure.

Cardiovascular Complications in Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery: A Cardiac Closed Claims Thematic Analysis.

More than 200 million adults have noncardiac surgery worldwide every year. Anesthesia closed claims databases allow anesthesia providers to critically examine adverse outcomes that occur during an anesthetic or immediately following the administration of anesthesia, to aid in improving patient care. A qualitative analysis of 34 closed malpractice claims with a cardiac-related event was conducted to determine common themes. Five common themes emerged: preanesthetic evaluation, normalization of deviance, medications, hemorrhage, and knowledge deficit/failed clinical reasoning.

Preventable Closed Claims in the AANA Foundation Closed Malpractice Claims Database.

Medical errors are among the top 3 causes of patient deaths in the United States, with up to 400,000 preventable deaths occurring in hospitalized patients each year. Although improvements have been made in anesthesia patient safety, adverse outcomes continue to occur. This study used thematic analysis to examine anesthesia closed claims that were associated with preventable morbidity and mortality. Investigators determined that 123 closed malpractice claims files from the American Association of Nurse Anesthetists (AANA) Foundation closed claims database involved events that the involved Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist could have prevented. Factors that were associated with preventable closed claims included communication failures, violations of the AANA Standards for Nurse Anesthesia Practice, and errors in judgment.

The Role of Documentation Quality in Anesthesia-Related Closed Claims: A Descriptive Qualitative Study.

Clinical documentation is a critical tool in supporting care provided to patients. Sound documentation provides a picture of clinical events that can be used to improve patient care. However, many other uses for clinical documentation are equally important. Such documentation informs clinical decision support tools, creates a legal record of patient care, assists in financial reimbursement of services, and serves as a repository for secondary data analysis. Conversely, poor documentation can impair patient safety and increase malpractice risk exposure by reflecting poor or inaccurate information that ultimately may guide patient care decisions.Through an examination of anesthesia-related closed claims, a descriptive qualitative study emerged, which explored the antecedents and consequences of documentation quality in the claims reviewed. A secondary data analysis utilized a database generated by the American Association of Nurse Anesthetists Foundation closed claim review team. Four major themes emerged from the analysis. Themes 1, 2, and 4 primarily describe how poor documentation quality can have negative consequences for clinicians. The third theme primarily describes how poor documentation quality that can negatively affect patient safety.

Disrupted by disaster: shared experiences of student registered nurse anesthetists affected by hurricane Katrina.

The purpose of this focused ethnography was to describe the shared experiences of student registered nurse anesthetists (SRNAs) whose senior year of education and training was disrupted by Hurricane Katrina, as well as to determine the storm's psychosocial impact on them. A convenience sample of 10 former SRNAs participated in focus groups that were audiorecorded, transcribed, and qualitatively analyzed. Three major themes emerged from the study: Seriousness of Urgency, Managing Uncertainty, and Stability Equaled Relief. The themes represented how the SRNAs appraised and coped with the stressful events surrounding Hurricane Katrina. The psychosocial impact of Hurricane Katrina on the SRNAs resulted mainly in temporary increased alcohol consumption and short-term anxiety. One person started smoking. The results of this study should serve as a guide to formulate policies regarding the education of SRNAs during and immediately after a disaster and to provide a framework for future disaster studies regarding SRNAs.

Asystole during laryngoscopy of a patient with pleural and pericardial effusions: a case report.

A 53-year-old woman presented to the operating room for surgical correction of pericardial and pleural effusions. Her history included stage IV breast cancer, well-controlled hypertension, and diverticulitis. Although her baseline blood pressure, heart rate, and respirations were normal, she was short of breath with diminished breath sounds on the left side of the lungs and required oxygen, 2 L/min via nasal cannula. The nurse anesthesia student, under the direction of the Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist (CRNA) and anesthesiologist, induced general anesthesia with etomidate, fentanyl, lidocaine, and succinylcholine. During placement of a double-lumen endotracheal tube, the patient became asystolic. The nurse anesthesia student immediately withdrew the laryngoscope, and the patient returned to normal sinus rhythm. A second attempt at laryngoscopy produced asystole as well. Again, the laryngoscope was withdrawn, and the patient returned to normal sinus rhythm. After resuming ventilation with 100% oxygen and administering atropine, 0.4 mg, the next intubation was successful, producing no untoward effects. Reintubation at the end of the case with a single lumen endotracheal tube was uneventful. The patient was transported to the intensive care unit and mechanically ventilated overnight. The next morning, she was extubated with no further anesthetic complications.