Rotator Cuff Repair in the Pediatric Population Displays Favorable Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Purpose: To systematically review the literature to determine the injury mechanisms, presentation, and timing of diagnosis for pediatric patients with intratendinous rotator cuff tears and to determine the efficacy of surgical intervention for affected patients. Methods: PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Scopus were searched. Studies were included if they involved only pediatric patients, soft-tissue rotator cuff injuries managed surgically, and reported outcomes. Patient characteristics, injury mechanisms, physical examination and imaging findings, time to diagnosis, surgical technique, and treatment outcomes were extracted. Findings were descriptively analyzed with weighted means and proportions. Results: Twenty-one studies comprising 78 patients were included. The age range was 8 to 17 years and 57 were male. The supraspinatus (n = 56) was the most injured tendon. American football was the most reported sport played at the time of injury. Most patients were diagnosed within 6 months of injury via magnetic resonance imaging. Arthroscopic management was undertaken in 68 patients. Forty-six of 51 patients for whom data were available returned to sports at a range of 2.5 to 12 months postoperatively. Repair failure occurred in three patients. Conclusions: The extant literature regarding rotator cuff tears in pediatric patients is limited to reports of low methodological quality. Qualitative synthesis of this low-level literature reveals that rotator cuff tears are mostly reported in male collision sport athletes but may also occur in female athletes and/or throwing athletes. These injuries are often successfully managed via arthroscopic repair, and patients and their families can be reassured that the majority of patients return to sports following surgery. Level of Evidence: Level IV, systematic review of level IV studies.

Rotator Cuff Repair with Graft Augmentation Improves Function, Decreases Revisions, and Is Cost-Effective.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the cost effectiveness of the use of extracellular matrix (ECM) augment at the time of primary rotator cuff repair utilizing a decision tree analysis. METHODS: A decision tree model was created utilizing the existing literature for retear rates with and without dermal graft augmentation. Costs for rotator cuff repair (hospital and surgeon fees) were based on published studies and the cost for graft augmentation was based on institutional data. Utility measures were based upon EQ-5D (European Quality of Life 5 Dimension) scores to assess for improvement in quality adjusted life years (QALY) over a 10-year postoperative period with and without graft augmentation. Cost effectiveness was assessed using the incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER), or the incremental cost for per QALY with graft augmentation. Cost effectiveness is based on previous literature whereby an intervention is considered cost effective if the ICER is less than $50,000/QALY. RESULTS: On the basis of our decision tree analysis, total cost for rotator cuff tear without augmentation was $12,763, while the cost increased to $16,039 with ECM augmentation. With graft augmentation there was an improvement in 2.29 QALY, while there was an improvement of 2.05 without graft augmentation. The ICER of graft augmentation is $14,000/QALY, well below the cost effectiveness cut-off of $50,000/QALY. Sensitivity analysis showed the maximum cost of the ECM augment to be cost effective is $11,921. CONCLUSION: Graft augmentation does come with a significant upfront cost; however, on the basis of our decision-tree analysis, it may represent a cost-effective procedure. There is evidence to potentially consider more routine use in rotator cuff repairs, while being cost effective. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic: Level IV: computer simulation model (Monte Carlo simulation, Markov model) with inputs derived from Level IV studies.

Do Outcomes of Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Differ Based on Age and Sex? A Comparative Group Analysis.

PURPOSE: To analyze the effect of patient age, sex, and associated preoperative factors on patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures and graft survival following primary meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT). METHODS: A prospectively collected database was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients who underwent primary MAT with a minimum of 2 years of follow up between 1999 and 2017. Demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative outcome data were collected for each patient. Postoperative outcomes were stratified based on age and sex, and comparative statistical analysis was performed between sexes, both >40 and <40. RESULTS: A total of 238 patients underwent primary MAT during the study period, of which 212 patients (mean age, 28.5 ± 9.0 years; range, 15.01-53.67 years) met the inclusion criteria with a mean follow-up of 5.1 ± 3.4 years (range 2.0-15.9 years). At final follow-up, patients ≥40 and <40 years of age demonstrated statistically significant improvements in nearly all PRO scores (P < .05 for both groups). There were no significant differences between either group for achievement of minimal clinically important difference for International Knee Documentation Committee (P = .48) or Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score symptoms (P = .76). Because of insufficient numbers, a statistically significant difference could not be demonstrated in reoperation rate (≥40: 1.49 ± 1.77 years, <40: 1.87 ± 1.98 years, P = .591), failure rate (≥40: 7/32 [21.9%], <40: 19/180 [10.6%], P = .072), or complication rate (≥40: 2/32 [6.3%], <40: 12/180 [6.7%], P = .930) based on age. Both sexes showed a significant improvement in PROs, whereas female patients were more likely to undergo revision surgery (P = .033), with no significant differences based on time to reoperation, failure, or complication rates. CONCLUSIONS: PROs similarly improved following MAT in both patients aged ≥40 and those <40 at final follow-up with no significant differences in minimal clinically important difference achievement rate, complication rate, reoperation rate, time to reoperation, or failure rate between groups. Female patients may be more likely to undergo revision surgery after MAT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; therapeutic retrospective comparison study.

Defining Clinically Significant Outcomes Following Superior Capsular Reconstruction With Acellular Dermal Allograft.

PURPOSE: To define clinically significant outcomes (CSO) thresholds for minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and patient-acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) in patients undergoing superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) with an acellular dermal allograft. We also evaluated patient-specific variables predictive of achieving CSO thresholds. METHODS: The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and subjective Constant-Murley (Constant) scores were collected preoperatively and at the most recent follow up for patients undergoing SCR from 2010 to 2019. A distribution-based approach was used to calculate MCID, and an anchor-based approach was used to calculate SCB and PASS. Logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with CSO achievement. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were identified (n = 39 males; n = 19 females) with a mean age of 53.4 ± 14.1 years at surgery and an average follow-up of 23 months. The MCID, SCB, and PASS were 11.2, 18.02, and 68.82 for ASES, 14.5, 23.13, and 69.9 for SANE, and 3.6, 10, and 18 for Constant, respectively. Subscapularis tear, female sex, and workers compensation (WC) status reduced odds of achieving MCID. Reduced odds of achieving Constant SCB were associated with older age, female sex, and WC status, while concomitant distal clavicle excision during SCR and lower preoperative ASES increased odds of achieving ASES SCB. Reduced odds for achieving ASES PASS were associated with female sex and WC status, while reduced odds for achieving SANE PASS were associated with subscapularis tearing preoperatively. CONCLUSION: On the basis of calculated values for MCID, SCB, and PASS, subscapularis tearing, WC status, age, and sex are associated with failure to achieve clinically significant outcomes following SCR. Concomitant distal clavicle excision during SCR and lower preoperative ASES was predictive for achievement of MCID and SCB. By defining the thresholds and variables predictive of achieving CSOs following SCR, surgeons may better counsel patients prior to SCR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Nonoperative and Operative Soft-Tissue and Cartilage Regeneration and Orthopaedic Biologics of the Knee: An Orthoregeneration Network (ON) Foundation Review.

Orthoregeneration is defined as a solution for orthopedic conditions that harnesses the benefits of biology to improve healing, reduce pain, improve function, and optimally, provide an environment for tissue regeneration. Options include: drugs, surgical intervention, scaffolds, biologics as a product of cells, and physical and electro-magnetic stimuli. The goal of regenerative medicine is to enhance the healing of tissue after musculoskeletal injuries as both isolated treatment and adjunct to surgical management, using novel therapies to improve recovery and outcomes. Various orthopaedic biologics (orthobiologics) have been investigated for the treatment of pathology involving the knee, including symptomatic osteoarthritis and chondral injuries, as well as injuries to tendon, meniscus, and ligament, including the anterior cruciate ligament. Promising and established treatment modalities include hyaluronic acid (HA) in liquid or scaffold form; platelet-rich plasma (PRP); bone marrow aspirate (BMA) comprising mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), hematopoietic stem cells, endothelial progenitor cells, and growth factors; connective tissue progenitor cells (CTPs) including adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AD-MSCs) and tendon-derived stem cells (TDSCs); matrix cell-based therapy including autologous chondrocytes or allograft; vitamin D; and fibrin clot. Future investigations should standardize solution preparations, because inconsistent results reported may be due to heterogeneity of HA, PRP, BMAC, or MSC preparations and regimens, which may inhibit meaningful comparison between studies to determine the true efficacy and safety for each treatment.

Distal Tibial Allograft Augmentation for Posterior Shoulder Instability Associated With Glenoid Bony Deficiency: A Case Series.

PURPOSE: To report the clinical history and preliminary outcomes of patients who underwent posterior glenoid reconstruction using a distal tibial allograft (DTA) for the management of posterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss. METHODS: Patients who underwent posterior shoulder stabilization with a DTA in our institution between 2011 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic characteristics, operative reports, and clinical and functional outcomes were recorded. Outcomes included postoperative range of motion (ROM), recurrent instability, complications, and revision surgery. All patients underwent at least 1 year of follow-up, except 2 patients who underwent revision surgery. Preoperative and postoperative ROM was compared using the 2-tailed Student t test for paired samples. RESULTS: Ten patients who underwent DTA augmentation for posterior instability were included, comprising 2 female and 8 male patients with an average age of 24 years (range, 17-35 years). Five patients had a prior sports-related traumatic event, and 2 patients had a seizure disorder. Seven patients had undergone a prior stabilization procedure. The average reverse bony Bankart lesion was 26% of the glenoid diameter. Concomitant procedures included 4 capsular repairs, 2 labral repairs, 2 capsular plications, and 1 repair for humeral avulsion of the glenohumeral ligament. One patient reported recurrent instability after surgery. Two patients underwent revision surgery, with one removal of symptomatic hardware and one early revision owing to screw penetration into the glenoid. There was no significant difference in preoperative versus postoperative ROM. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior shoulder instability with significant bony deficiency can be managed using DTA augmentation with good outcomes and a reasonable complication rate in these challenging cases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.