Surgically implanted endovascular, microaxial left ventricular assist device: A single institution study.

Objective: The Impella 5.5 (Abiomed, Inc), a surgically implanted endovascular microaxial left ventricular assist device, is increasingly used worldwide and there have been more than 10,000 implants. The purpose of this study is to describe a large-volume, single-center experience with the use of the Impella 5.5. Methods: Data were obtained retrospectively from patients supported with the Impella 5.5 implanted at our institution from May 1, 2020, to December 31, 2022. Demographic, operative, and postoperative outcomes for each group are described. Results are reported in median (interquartile range) or n (%). The entire cohort was divided into 5 main groups based on the intention to treat at the time of the Impella 5.5 implantation: (1) patients who had a planned Impella 5.5 implanted at the time of high-risk cardiac surgery; (2) patients with cardiogenic shock; (3) patients bridged to a durable left ventricular assist device; (4) patients bridged to transplant; and (5) patients with postcardiotomy shock who received an unplanned Impella 5.5 implant. Results: A total of 126 patients were supported with the Impella 5.5. Overall survival to device explant was 76.2%, with 67.5% surviving to discharge. Midterm survival was assessed with a median follow-up time of 318 days and demonstrated an overall survival of 60.3% and a median of 650 days (549-752). Conclusions: Outcomes after using the Impella 5.5 are variable depending on the indication of use. Patient selection may be of utmost importance and requires further experience with this device to determine who will benefit from insertion.

Characterization of de novo malignancy after orthotopic heart transplantation: single-centre outcomes over 20 years.

OBJECTIVES: Malignancy is the leading cause of late mortality after orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT), and the burden of post-transplantation cancer is expected to rise in proportion to increased case volume following the 2018 heart allocation score change. In this report, we evaluated factors associated with de novo malignancy after OHT with a focus on skin and solid organ cancers. METHODS: Patients who underwent OHT at our institution between 1999 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed (n = 488). Terminal outcomes of death and development of skin and/or solid organ malignancy were assessed as competing risks. Fine-Gray subdistribution hazards regression was used to evaluate the association between perioperative patient and donor characteristics and late-term malignancy outcomes. RESULTS: By 1, 5 and 10 years, an estimated 2%, 17% and 27% of patients developed skin malignancy, while 1%, 5% and 12% of patients developed solid organ malignancy. On multivariable Fine-Gray regression, age [1.05 (1.03-1.08); P < 0.001], government payer insurance [1.77 (1.20-2.59); P = 0.006], family history of malignancy [1.66 (1.15-2.38); P = 0.007] and metformin use [1.73 (1.15-2.59); P = 0.008] were associated with increased risk of melanoma and basal or squamous cell carcinoma. Age [1.08 (1.04-1.12); P < 0.001] and family history of malignancy [2.55 (1.43-4.56); P = 0.002] were associated with an increased risk of solid organ cancer, most commonly prostate and lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Vigilant cancer and immunosuppression surveillance is warranted in OHT recipients at late-term follow-up. The cumulative incidence of skin and solid organ malignancies increases temporally after transplantation, and key risk factors for the development of post-OHT malignancy warrant identification and routine monitoring.

Cardiac allograft rejection in the current era of continuous flow left ventricular assist devices.

OBJECTIVE: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation has been shown to increase allosensitization before orthotopic heart transplantation, but the influence of LVAD support on posttransplant rejection is controversial. This study examines the postoperative incidence of acute cellular rejection (ACR) in patients bridged with continuous flow LVAD (CF-LVAD) relative to primary transplant (Primary Tx). METHODS: All patients who underwent orthotopic heart transplantation at our institution between July 2006 and March 2019 were retrospectively reviewed (n = 395). Patients were classified into Primary Tx (n = 145) and CF-LVAD (n = 207) groups. Propensity score matching on 13 covariates implemented a 0.1 caliper logistic model with nearest neighbor 1:1 matching. Development of moderate to severe (ie, 2R/3R) rejection was evaluated using a competing risks model. Potential predictors of 2R/3R ACR were evaluated using Fine-Gray regression on the marginal subdistribution hazard. RESULTS: Propensity score matching yielded 122 patients in each group (n = 244). At 12 and 24 months, the cumulative incidence of 2R/3R ACR was 17% and 23% for the CF-LVAD group and 26% and 31%, respectively, for the Primary Tx group (P = .170). CF-LVAD was not predictive of 2R/3R rejection on multivariable Fine-Gray regression (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-1.33; P = .301). There was no difference in the 5-year incidence of antibody mediated rejection (10% [n = 12] vs 9% [n = 11]; P = .827). CONCLUSIONS: After adjusting for covariates, CF-LVAD was not associated with an increased risk of moderate to severe ACR during the 24 months after cardiac transplantation. Further investigation is warranted with larger cohorts, but CF-LVAD may have minimal influence on posttransplant ACR.

Competing Risks to Transplant in Bridging With Continuous-flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

BACKGROUND: Continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) support is a mainstay in the hemodynamic management of patients with end-stage heart failure refractory to optimal medical therapy. In this report we evaluated waitlist complications and competing outcomes for CF-LVAD patients compared with primary transplant candidates listed for orthotopic heart transplantation at a single center. METHODS: All patients listed for orthotopic heart transplantation between 2006 and 2020 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed (CF-LVAD, 300; primary transplant, 244). Kaplan-Meier methodology with log-rank testing was used to evaluate survival outcomes. Terminal outcomes of death, delisting, and transplant were assessed as competing risks and compared between groups using Gray's test. Multivariable Fine-Gray regression was used to identify predictors of transplantation. RESULTS: One-year rates of transplant, delisting, and death were 48%, 8%, and 2%, respectively, for CF-LVAD patients and 45%, 15%, and 9%, respectively, for primary transplant (all P < .001). Waitlist mortality at 5 years was 4% among CF-LVAD patients and 13% for primary transplants. All-cause mortality after listing was lower for CF-LVAD patients (P = .017). There was no difference in posttransplant survival between groups (P = .250). On multivariable Fine-Gray regression stroke (P = .017), respiratory failure (P = .032), right ventricular failure (P = .019), and driveline infection (P = .050) were associated with decreased probability of transplantation. Posttransplant survival was not significantly worse for CF-LVAD patients who experienced device-related complications (P = .901). CONCLUSIONS: Although device-related complications were significantly associated with decreased rates of transplant, CF-LVAD patients had excellent waitlist outcomes overall. In light of the 2018 allocation score change the risk of complications should be taken into account when deciding whether to offer CF-LVAD as a bridge to transplant.

30 Years of Heart Transplant: Outcomes After Mechanical Circulatory Support From a Single Center.

BACKGROUND: Survival after bridge to transplantation with mechanical circulatory support (MCS) has yielded varying outcomes on the basis of device type and baseline characteristics. Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) have significantly improved waitlist mortality, but recent changes to the transplantation listing criteria have dramatically altered the use of MCS for bridge to transplantation. METHODS: Orthotopic heart transplantations from 1988 to 2019 at our institution (Washington University School of Medicine, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St Louis, MO) were retrospectively reviewed and stratified by pretransplantation MCS status into CF-LVAD (n = 224), pulsatile LVAD (n = 49), temporary MCS (n = 71), and primary transplantation (n = 463) groups. Patients who underwent heart transplantation after the approval of CF-LVAD for bridge to transplantation and before the 2018 allocation policy changes underwent subgroup analysis to evaluate predictors of survival and complications in a contemporary cohort. RESULTS: Rates of primary transplantation declined from 88% to 14% over the course of the study. No significant difference in survival was detected in the cohort stratified by MCS status (P = .18). In the modern era, survival of patients treated with CF-LVADs and temporary MCS was noninferior to that seen with primary transplantation (P = .22). Notable predictors of long-term mortality included lower body mass index, peripheral vascular disease, previous coronary artery bypass graft, ABO nonidentical transplant, and increased donor age (all P ≤ .02). There were no differences in major postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: CF-LVAD has grown to account for the majority of transplantations at our center in the last decade, with no adverse effect on survival or postoperative complications. Temporary MCS increased after the 2018 listing criteria change, with acceptable early outcomes.

Machine Learning Outcome Prediction in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Using Regional Left Ventricular Multiparametric Strain.

The clinical presentation of idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDCM) heart failure (HF) patients who will respond to medical therapy (responders) and those who will not (non-responders) is often similar. A machine learning (ML)-based clinical tool to identify responders would prevent unnecessary surgery, while targeting non-responders for early intervention. We used regional left ventricular (LV) contractile injury patterns in ML models to identify IDCM HF non-responders. MRI-based multiparametric strain analysis was performed in 178 test subjects (140 normal subjects and 38 IDCM patients), calculating longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strain over 18 LV sub-regions for inclusion in ML analyses. Patients were identified as responders based upon symptomatic and contractile improvement on medical therapy. We tested the predictive accuracy of support vector machines (SVM), logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), and deep neural networks (DNN). The DNN model outperformed other models, predicting response to medical therapy with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.94. The top features were longitudinal strain in (1) basal: anterior, posterolateral and (2) mid: posterior, anterolateral, and anteroseptal sub-regions. Regional contractile injury patterns predict response to medical therapy in IDCM HF patients, and have potential application in ML-based HF patient care.

A Fully Magnetically Levitated Left Ventricular Assist Device - Final Report.

BACKGROUND: In two interim analyses of this trial, patients with advanced heart failure who were treated with a fully magnetically levitated centrifugal-flow left ventricular assist device were less likely to have pump thrombosis or nondisabling stroke than were patients treated with a mechanical-bearing axial-flow left ventricular assist device. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with advanced heart failure to receive either the centrifugal-flow pump or the axial-flow pump irrespective of the intended goal of use (bridge to transplantation or destination therapy). The composite primary end point was survival at 2 years free of disabling stroke or reoperation to replace or remove a malfunctioning device. The principal secondary end point was pump replacement at 2 years. RESULTS: This final analysis included 1028 enrolled patients: 516 in the centrifugal-flow pump group and 512 in the axial-flow pump group. In the analysis of the primary end point, 397 patients (76.9%) in the centrifugal-flow pump group, as compared with 332 (64.8%) in the axial-flow pump group, remained alive and free of disabling stroke or reoperation to replace or remove a malfunctioning device at 2 years (relative risk, 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78 to 0.91; P<0.001 for superiority). Pump replacement was less common in the centrifugal-flow pump group than in the axial-flow pump group (12 patients [2.3%] vs. 57 patients [11.3%]; relative risk, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.38; P<0.001). The numbers of events per patient-year for stroke of any severity, major bleeding, and gastrointestinal hemorrhage were lower in the centrifugal-flow pump group than in the axial-flow pump group. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with advanced heart failure, a fully magnetically levitated centrifugal-flow left ventricular assist device was associated with less frequent need for pump replacement than an axial-flow device and was superior with respect to survival free of disabling stroke or reoperation to replace or remove a malfunctioning device. (Funded by Abbott; MOMENTUM 3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02224755.).

Two-Year Outcomes with a Magnetically Levitated Cardiac Pump in Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: In an early analysis of this trial, use of a magnetically levitated centrifugal continuous-flow circulatory pump was found to improve clinical outcomes, as compared with a mechanical-bearing axial continuous-flow pump, at 6 months in patients with advanced heart failure. METHODS: In a randomized noninferiority and superiority trial, we compared the centrifugal-flow pump with the axial-flow pump in patients with advanced heart failure, irrespective of the intended goal of support (bridge to transplantation or destination therapy). The composite primary end point was survival at 2 years free of disabling stroke (with disabling stroke indicated by a modified Rankin score of >3; scores range from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating more severe disability) or survival free of reoperation to replace or remove a malfunctioning device. The noninferiority margin for the risk difference (centrifugal-flow pump group minus axial-flow pump group) was -10 percentage points. RESULTS: Of 366 patients, 190 were assigned to the centrifugal-flow pump group and 176 to the axial-flow pump group. In the intention-to-treat population, the primary end point occurred in 151 patients (79.5%) in the centrifugal-flow pump group, as compared with 106 (60.2%) in the axial-flow pump group (absolute difference, 19.2 percentage points; 95% lower confidence boundary, 9.8 percentage points [P<0.001 for noninferiority]; hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31 to 0.69 [P<0.001 for superiority]). Reoperation for pump malfunction was less frequent in the centrifugal-flow pump group than in the axial-flow pump group (3 patients [1.6%] vs. 30 patients [17.0%]; hazard ratio, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.27; P<0.001). The rates of death and disabling stroke were similar in the two groups, but the overall rate of stroke was lower in the centrifugal-flow pump group than in the axial-flow pump group (10.1% vs. 19.2%; hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.84, P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced heart failure, a fully magnetically levitated centrifugal-flow pump was superior to a mechanical-bearing axial-flow pump with regard to survival free of disabling stroke or reoperation to replace or remove a malfunctioning device. (Funded by Abbott; MOMENTUM 3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02224755 .).

Left Ventricular Unloading by Impella Device Versus Surgical Vent During Extracorporeal Life Support.

BACKGROUND: Patients supported with extracorporeal life support (ECLS) can experience severe complications from increased left ventricular (LV) afterload. The Impella (Abiomed, Danvers, MA) percutaneous ventricular assist device (PVAD) may offer an attractive option for unloading the LV in these patients. This study describes the efficacy and outcomes of PVAD use during ECLS compared with surgically placed LV vent. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we reviewed patients supported by ECLS with PVAD or surgical LV vent for cardiogenic shock between April 2010 and May 2016. Included were 23 patients with PVADs and 22 with surgical vents. Patients' baseline characteristics, hemodynamic data, and outcomes were collected immediately preceding combined support initiation, at 48 hours, intensive care unit discharge, and 30 days. RESULTS: After 48 hours, pulmonary artery diastolic pressure was significantly reduced in the PVAD (23.3 ± 8.4 vs 15.6 ± 4.2, p = 0.02) and surgical vent groups (20.1 ± 5.9 vs 15.6 ± 5.4, p = 0.01), and radiographic evidence of pulmonary edema was reduced or unchanged in 90% of PVAD patients and in 76% of surgical vent patients. The primary end points of survival to 30 days (43% vs 32%, p = 0.42) and intensive care unit discharge (35% vs 23%, p = 0.37) were not different between the two methods of support. The PVAD and surgical vent groups were also not significantly different in the rate of vascular complications or in the number decannulated from ECLS and transitioned to durable LV assist device. CONCLUSIONS: PVAD use in ECLS patients is an effective means of LV unloading and preventing worsened pulmonary edema, with outcomes and complications that are comparable to surgical LV vent.

Use of adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibitor prior to left ventricular assist device implantation is not associated with increased bleeding.

Current guidelines recommend adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibitors (ADPRi) be discontinued 5-7 days prior to cardiac surgery due to increased bleeding events, rates of re-exploration, and transfusions. However, the risks of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation in patients taking an ADPRi have not previously been studied. We retrospectively identified 134 eligible patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy that underwent LVAD implantation between July 2009 and August 2013. The cohorts received an ADPRi ≤5 days of surgery (n = 25) versus >5 days prior or not at all (n = 109). Subgroup analyses adjusted for differences in frequency of redo sternotomy between cohorts, excluded patients that received an ADPRi >1 year prior to surgery, and excluded patients with a redo sternotomy. The ADPRi and control groups did not have significant differences in the primary outcomes, intraoperative PRBC units transfused (3.0 vs. 4.0, p = 0.12) or chest tube output within 24 h of surgery (1.66 L vs. 1.80 L, p = 0.61). After adjusting for differences in frequency of redo sternotomy (ADPRi vs. control, 12 vs. 52%, p ≤ 0.001), no significant difference in PRBC units transfused (3.1 vs. 3.5, p = 0.59) or chest tube output (2.04 L vs. 2.04 L, p = 0.98) was seen. No significant difference in 30-day mortality (8.0 vs. 11.0%, p = 0.63), 90-day mortality (16.4 vs. 23.3%, p = 0.42), or length of stay (29.0 vs. 28.0, p = 0.61) was seen. In this single-center experience, use of an ADPRi ≤5 days prior to LVAD implantation was not associated with increased bleeding, length of stay, or mortality.

Clinical outcomes with use of erythropoiesis stimulating agents in patients with the HeartMate II left ventricular assist device.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated clinical outcomes associated with erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) use in left ventricular assist devices (LVAD)-supported patients. BACKGROUND: Use of ESAs in patients with LVADs may minimize blood transfusions and decrease allosensitization. ESAs increase thrombotic events, which is concerning because LVADs are sensitive to pump thrombosis (PT). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 221 patients at our center who received a HeartMate II (Thoratec Corp., Pleasanton, California) LVAD between January 1, 2009 and June 6, 2013. Patients were divided into those who received ESAs during index admission (n = 121) and those who did not (n = 100). Suspected PT was defined as evidence of thrombus in the LVAD or severe hemolysis (lactate dehydrogenase >1,000 mg/dl or plasma-free hemoglobin >40 mg/dl). Outcomes were compared between cohorts using inverse probability-weighted analyses. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 14.2 ± 11.9 months, suspected PT occurred in 37 patients (ESA 23%, no ESA 12%; p =0.03). The ESA cohort received ESAs 13.9 ± 60.9 days after LVAD implantation. At 180 days, event-free rates for suspected PT were ESA 78.6% versus no ESA 94.5% (p < 0.001). ESA use had higher rates of suspected PT (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.35; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.38 to 4.00; p = 0.002). For every 100-unit increase in cumulative ESA dosage, the hazard of suspected PT increased by 10% (HR: 1.10; 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.16; p < 0.001). After inverse probability weighting, ESA use was associated with a significantly higher rate of all-cause mortality (HR: 1.62; 95% CI: 1.12 to 2.33; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: ESA use in LVAD patients is associated with higher rates of suspected PT.

Systolic blood pressure on discharge after left ventricular assist device insertion is associated with subsequent stroke.

BACKGROUND: Stroke is a significant complication in patients supported with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVAD) and hypertension is a significant risk factor for stroke, but the association between blood pressure and stroke in LVAD patients is not well characterized. METHODS: We identified 275 consecutive patients who survived implant hospitalization between January 2005 and April 2013. Patients were grouped according to systolic blood pressure (SBP) as above a median and below a median of 100 mm Hg by their averaged systolic blood pressure during the 48 hours before discharge from implantation hospitalization. The groups were compared for the primary outcome of time to stroke. RESULTS: The above-median SBP group had mean SBP of 110 mm Hg and the below-median SBP group had mean SBP of 95 mm Hg. There were no significant between-group differences in body mass index, smoking, vascular disease, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, or prior stroke. During a mean follow-up of 16 months, stroke occurred in 16% of the above-median SBP group vs in 7% of the below-median SBP group (hazard ratio, 2.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-5.11), with a similar proportion of hemorrhagic and ischemic strokes in each group. In Cox proportional hazard models adjusting for age, diabetes, or prior stroke, the hazard ratio remained statistically significant. SBP as a continuous variable predictor of stroke had an area under the curve of 0.64 in a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In this large, CF-LVAD cohort, elevated SBP was independently associated with a greater risk of subsequent stroke. These results identify management of hypertension as a potential modifiable risk factor for reducing the incidence of stroke in patients supported by CF-LVAD.

Incidence, risk, and consequences of atrial arrhythmias in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.

BACKGROUND: Although atrial arrhythmias (AAs) are common in heart failure, the incidence of AAs subsequent to the placement of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) has not been elucidated. METHODS: Patients receiving a HeartMate II LVAD in the bridge to transplant (n = 490) and destination therapy (n = 634) trials were included (n = 1125). AAs requiring treatment were recorded, regardless of symptoms. Using Cox models with and without a 60-day blanking period, risk factors for early and late AAs were determined. RESULTS: In total, there were 271 AAs in 231 patients (21%), most of which occurred within the first 60 days. Patients with and without AAs had similar survival (p = 0.16). Serum creatinine (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.49 per unit increase, 1.18 to 1.88; p < 0.001) and ejection fraction (HR = 0.98 per 1% increase, 0.95 to 0.999; p = 0.04) were associated with AAs in a multivariable model. Although quality of life (QoL) and functional status improved in all patients, those with AAs had worse unadjusted QoL (p < 0.001) and a decreased rate of improvement in six-minute walk distance over six to 24 months postimplant (p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one-fifth of LVAD patients have AAs, most commonly within the first 60 days of support. Preoperative creatinine is a strong risk factor for early and late AAs. Although AAs do not impact survival, they are associated with decreased functional status and QoL improvements during LVAD support.

Utility of gene expression profiling score variability to predict clinical events in heart transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Gene expression profiling test scores have primarily been used to identify heart transplant recipients who have a low probability of rejection at the time of surveillance testing. We hypothesized that the variability of gene expression profiling test scores within a patient may predict risk of future events of allograft dysfunction or death. METHOD: Patients from the IMAGE study with rejection surveillance gene expression profiling tests performed at 1- to 6-month intervals were selected for this cohort study. Gene expression profiling score variability was defined as the standard deviation of an individual's cumulative test scores. Gene expression profiling ordinal score (range, 0-39), threshold score (binary value=1 if ordinal score ≥ 34), and score variability were studied in multivariate Cox regression models to predict future clinical events. RESULTS: Race, age at time of transplantation, and time posttransplantation were significantly associated with future events in the univariate analysis. In the multivariate analyses, gene expression profiling score variability, but not ordinal scores or scores over threshold, was independently associated with future clinical events. The regression coefficient P values were <0.001, 0.46, and 0.773, for gene expression profiling variability, ordinal, and threshold scores, respectively. The hazard ratio for a 1 unit increase in variability was 1.76 (95% CI, 1.4-2.3). DISCUSSION: The variability of a heart recipient's gene expression profiling test scores over time may provide prognostic utility. This information is independent of the probability of acute cellular rejection at the time of testing that is rendered from a single ordinal gene-expression profiling test score.

A multi-institutional study of malignancies after heart transplantation and a comparison with the general United States population.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of these studies was to determine the incidence and survival of patients with specific malignancies with respect to age and transplant year and to compare the data with the normal non-transplant population. METHODS: Data from 6,211 primary cardiac transplants between July 31, 1993, and December 30, 2008, were collected by 35 institutions participating in the Cardiac Transplant Research Database. Data were compared with information collected by the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Cancer Statistics Review 1975-2006. RESULTS: Multivariable analysis showed older age (relative risk [RR], 2.1; p < 0.0001) and earlier transplant year (RR, 1.8; p < 0.0001) were highly significant risk factors. Aggregate malignancy incidence in the modern era (2001 to 2008) did not differ significantly from the normal population, which appeared to be attributable to a lower rate of malignancies other than lung cancer, lymphoma, and melanoma (actual/expected ratio, 0.71). From 2001 to 2008, rates were significantly higher for lung cancer (actual/expected ratio, 1.86; p = 0.006) and lymphoma (actual/expected ratio, 4.3, p < 0.0001) than in the normal population. The highest risk for lymphoma was in younger adults who received transplants at ages 18 to 35 years (actual/expected ratio, 27). The highest risk for lung cancer was in patients who underwent transplantation at ages 55 to 65 years (actual/expected ratio, 28). Once diagnosed with malignancy, subsequent survival at 5 years was 21% for lung cancer and 32% for lymphoma. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of malignancy has markedly declined during a 15-year period such that the aggregate rate of malignancy approached that of the general population in the United States. However, the distribution of malignancies was not the same, with a greater prominence of lung cancer and lymphoproliferative disease.

HeartWare and HeartMate II left ventricular assist devices as bridge to transplantation: a comparative analysis.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to comparatively analyze outcomes of heart transplant patients bridged to transplantation with HeartWare (HW-VAD) versus HeartMate II (HMII-VAD) left ventricular assist devices. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing Database was reviewed to identify first-time heart transplant recipients who were bridged to transplantation with either HW-VAD (n=141) or HMII-VAD (n=1824) from January 2009 through July 2012. RESULTS: Recipients of HW-VAD had a higher proportion of female patients (27.0% versus 18.9%; p=0.019), a lower body surface area (2.01±0.25 m2 versus 2.06±0.25 m2; p=0.035), and a trend toward a higher peak percentage of panel reactive antibody against human leukocyte class I antigens (40.4%±32.8% versus 33.0%±30.4%; p=0.070). Pretransplantation recipient cardiac index (2.33±0.66 L⋅min(-1)⋅m(-2) versus 2.33±0.68 L⋅min(-1)⋅m(-2)), serum creatinine (1.21±0.43 mg/dL versus 1.26±0.57 mg/dL), and total bilirubin (1.34±3.45 mg/dL versus 1.06±1.84 mg/dL) were comparable between the two groups (p>0.05 for all comparisons). After transplantation, there were no significant differences in freedom from rejection or freedom from cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Posttransplant graft survival rates were similar between the HW-VAD group and the HMII-VAD group at 1, 2, and 3 years (88.4% versus 87.8%, 79.9% versus 83.8%, and 77.4% versus 79.9%, respectively; p=0.843). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest similar hemodynamic unloading, pretransplant end-organ function, and posttransplant outcomes in patients bridged to transplantation with both the HW-VAD and HMII-VAD.

Rituximab is associated with improved survival in cardiac allograft patients with antibody-mediated rejection: a single center review.

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) after cardiac transplantation is associated with significant mortality, and the optimal treatment of this condition is poorly defined. Rituximab has been used successfully for the treatment for antibody-mediated diseases; however, its role in AMR is unclear. We review our experience with rituximab in patients with cardiac allograft AMR. We conducted a retrospective analysis of cardiac transplant patients with a diagnosis of AMR from 2001 to 2011. Inclusion criteria were clinical suspicion of rejection with the presence of C4d complement staining on endomyocardial biopsy and the absence of cellular rejection of grade 2R or greater. Patients were divided into Rituximab and NoRituximab groups. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints were infection, change in ejection fraction (EF), and rehospitalization. Thirty-three patients met inclusion criteria, of whom 13 received rituximab and 20 did not. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Kaplan-Meier curves for a three-yr follow-up period demonstrate improved survival in the Rituximab group (p = 0.0089). There were no differences in secondary endpoints. We found that rituximab therapy was associated with improved survival in cardiac allograft AMR. Further prospective, randomized studies in larger patient populations are needed to confirm this finding and to define ideal timing for rituximab administration.

Thirty-five day Impella 5.0 support via right axillary side graft cannulation for acute cardiogenic shock.

We describe the use of an Impella 5.0 for mechanical support in acute cardiogenic shock after an acute myocardial infarction. A 61-year-old man with a history of severe coronary artery disease who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting with ischemic cardiomyopathy presented with cardiogenic shock after an ST-elevation myocardial infarction. An Impella Recover LP 5.0 (Abiomed, Danvers, MA USA) was inserted via a right axillary side graft, using transesophageal echocardiographic and fluoroscopic guidance. The patient remained in the intensive care unit, where he required a tracheostomy to be weaned off the ventilator. He required renal replacement therapy with subsequent complete recovery. His Impella support was weaned, and on postoperative day 35, the device was removed. The patient developed axillary thrombosis the morning after removal, requiring thrombectomy. Discharge echocardiogram showed mild left ventricular enlargement with global hypokinesis and left ventricular ejection fraction of 25%. The Impella 5.0 device can safely and effectively be used in the long-term support of cardiogenic shock.

Reoperative sternotomy is associated with increased mortality after heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Although several studies have examined factors affecting survival after orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT), few have evaluated the impact of reoperative sternotomy. We undertook this study to examine the incidence and impact of repeat sternotomies on OHT outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all adult OHT from 2 institutions. Primary stratification was by the number of prior sternotomies. The primary outcome was survival. Secondary outcomes included blood product utilization and commonly encountered postoperative complications. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models examined mortality while linear regression models examined blood utilization. RESULTS: From January 1995 to October 2011, 631 OHT were performed. Of these, 25 (4.0%) were redo OHT and 182 (28.8%) were bridged to transplant with a ventricular assist device; 356 (56.4%) had undergone at least 1 prior sternotomy. On unadjusted analysis, reoperative sternotomy was associated with decreased 90-day (98.5% vs 90.2%, p<0.001), 1-year (93.1% vs 79.6%, p<0.001), and 5-year (80.4% vs 70.1%, p=0.002) survival. This difference persisted on multivariable analysis at 90 days (hazard ratio [HR] 2.99, p=0.01), 1 year (HR 2.98, p=0.002), and 5 years (HR 1.62, p=0.049). The impact of an increasing number of prior sternotomies was negligible. On multivariable analysis, an increasing number of prior sternotomies was associated with increased intraoperative blood product utilization. Increasing blood utilization was associated with decreased 90-day, 1-year, and 5-year survival. CONCLUSIONS: Reoperative sternotomy is associated with increased mortality and blood utilization after OHT. Patients with more than 1 prior sternotomy do not experience additional increased mortality. Carefully selected patients with multiple prior sternotomies have decreased but acceptable outcomes.