Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 142(1): 174-80, 2011 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21420106

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Systemic cooling for cardiopulmonary bypass is widely used to attenuate the systemic inflammatory response syndrome and organ injury in children after open surgery. We compared the effects of moderate (24 °C) and mild (34 °C) hypothermia during bypass on markers of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome and organ injury, and on clinical outcome after corrective surgery for congenital heart disease. METHODS: Sixty-six children (mean age, 6.8 ± 5.7 months; mean weight, 6.2 ± 2.3 kg) were randomized to 24 °C or 34 °C bypass temperature during cardiac surgery. Perfusion strategies were otherwise strictly identical. Clinical data and blood samples were collected before bypass, 5 minutes after aortic crossclamp release, and 4, 24, and 48 hours after bypass. Patients were followed up until discharge from the hospital. RESULTS: In the 54 children with outcome data, bypass temperature did not influence the duration of mechanical ventilation between the 24 °C group and the 34 °C group (median [interquartile range] 22 [13-40] hours vs 14 [8-40] hours, P = .14), intensive care unit stay (43 [24-49] hours vs 29 [23-47] hours, P = .79), blood loss (29 [20-38] mL/kg vs 23 [13-38] mL/kg, P = .36), or incidence of postoperative infection (9% vs 11%, P = 1.0). There was no evidence of an influence of bypass temperature on the markers of acute inflammation, innate immune response, organ injury, coagulation, or hemodynamics. CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence that the systemic inflammatory response syndrome and organ injury after pediatric open surgery are influenced by bypass temperature. The routine use of hypothermic bypass may not be warranted in the pediatric population.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Ponte Cardiopulmonar , Cardiopatias Congênitas/cirurgia , Hipotermia Induzida , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica/prevenção & controle , Coagulação Sanguínea , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/efeitos adversos , Ponte Cardiopulmonar/efeitos adversos , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Feminino , Hemodinâmica , Humanos , Imunidade Inata , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Mediadores da Inflamação/sangue , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Respiração Artificial , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica/etiologia , Síndrome de Resposta Inflamatória Sistêmica/imunologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Vitória
2.
Anesthesiology ; 99(5): 1166-74, 2003 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14576555

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Levobupivacaine, the levo-enantiomer of bupivacaine, is as potent as bupivacaine but less toxic. Therefore, the authors investigated the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of perioperative epidural levobupivacaine with and without fentanyl in children. METHODS: After Research Ethics Board approval and informed written consent, 120 healthy children aged 6 months to 12 yr who were scheduled to undergo urologic or abdominal surgery were randomized in a double-blinded and concealed manner to receive one of four epidural solutions as a continuous infusion for 24 h: 0.125% levobupivacaine; 0.0625% levobupivacaine; 1 mug/ml fentanyl; or the combination, 0.0625 levobupivacaine and 1 mug/ml fentanyl. After induction of anesthesia and tracheal intubation, a lumbar epidural catheter was sited, a loading dose was administered (0.75 ml/kg levobupivacaine, 0.175%), and the epidural infusion was commenced. The primary endpoint was the need for rescue analgesia (morphine) in the first 10 h after surgery. Pain, motor strength, and side effects were recorded for 24 h. Venous blood was collected from 18 children to determine the plasma concentrations of levobupivacaine and/or fentanyl before and 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, and 26 or 30 h after the start of the epidural infusion. RESULTS: Of the 114 children who were analyzed for intention to treat, a similar number of children in each group reached the 10-h mark. The time to the first dose of morphine in the first 10 h was less in the plain fentanyl group (P < 0.044). All other effects were similar among the four groups. The plasma concentration of levobupivacaine increased during the infusion period, reaching a maximum of 0.76 +/- 0.11 mug/ml in the 0.125% group and 0.48 +/- 0.12 mug/ml in the 0.0625% group by 24 h. The plasma concentration of fentanyl also increased steadily, reaching a maximum concentration of 0.37 +/- 0.11 ng/ml by 24 h. CONCLUSION: We conclude that 0.0625% levobupivacaine without fentanyl is an effective perioperative epidural solution in children when infused at a rate of 0.3 ml. kg-1. h-1. The plasma concentrations of 0.125% and 0.0625% levobupivacaine and fentanyl (1 mug/ml) at the end of a 24-h infusion are low.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides , Anestesia Epidural , Anestésicos Locais/efeitos adversos , Anestésicos Locais/farmacocinética , Bupivacaína/efeitos adversos , Bupivacaína/farmacocinética , Fentanila , Pressão Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Método Duplo-Cego , Combinação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Frequência Cardíaca/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Morfina/administração & dosagem , Morfina/uso terapêutico , Bloqueio Nervoso , Medição da Dor , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA