Conservative Treatment of an Infected Aortic Graft with Antibiotic Irrigation.

Conservative management of an aortic graft infection is defined as "the nonresectional treatment of an aortic graft that has an established infection." Incidence of aortic graft infections is 0.5 to 5% and the estimated mortality rate from aortic graft infections ranges from 8 to 27%. We present the case of a 73-year-old male patient with an infected abdominal aortic graft following an emergency ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Postemergency repair, he developed ischemic colitis with sigmoid colon perforation leading to fecal peritonitis and secondary sepsis. He developed a large infective collection within the aortic sac growing vancomycin-resistant enterococcus sensitive to linezolid. A percutaneous drain was placed in the aortic sac and this was irrigated with linezolid for a total of 28 days. The patient clinically improved. Overall, 7 months later, follow-up scan shows complete resolution of infection and the patient remains clinically stable. Conventional treatment of aortic graft infections involves an extra-anatomical bypass. Percutaneous drainage and antibiotic use may be used as bridging therapy for surgery or as definitive therapy when surgical treatment is impractical. Most aortic graft infections grow gram-positive cocci, the organisms form a biofilm which is protected from the external environment. Percutaneous drainage and antibiotic irrigation could possibly penetrate the biofilm and eradicate infection. Morris et al conducted a study on 10 patients having irrigation therapy and systemic antibiotic treatment and found a 1-year survival rate of 80%. In conclusion, conservative aortic graft treatment may be an effective alternative where surgical intervention is not suitable.

Age-specific incidence, risk factors and outcome of acute abdominal aortic aneurysms in a defined population.

BACKGROUND: Contemporary population-based data on age-specific incidence and outcome from acute abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) events are needed to understand the impact of risk factor modification and demographic change, and to inform AAA screening policy. METHODS: In a prospective population-based study (Oxfordshire, UK, 2002-2014), event rates, incidence, early case fatality and long-term outcome from all acute AAA events were determined, both overall and in relation to the four main risk factors: smoking, hypertension, male sex and age. RESULTS: Over the 12-year interval, 103 incident acute AAA events occurred in the study population of 92,728 (men 72·8 per cent; 59·2 per cent 30-day case fatality rate). The incidence per 100,000 population per year was 55 in men aged 65-74 years, but increased to 112 at age 75-84 years and to 298 at age 85 years or above. Some 66·0 per cent of all events occurred in those aged 75 years or more. The incidence at 65-74 years was highest in male smokers (274 per 100,000 population per year); 27 (96 per cent) of 28 events in men aged less than 75 years occurred in ever-smokers. Mean(s.d.) age at event was lowest in current smokers (72·2(7·2) years), compared with that in ex-smokers (81·2(7·0) years) and never-smokers (83·3(7·9) years) (P < 0·001). Hypertension was the predominant risk factor in women (diagnosed in 93 per cent), with 20 (71 per cent) of all 28 events in women occurring in those aged 75 years or above with hypertension. The 30-day case fatality rate increased from 40 per cent at age below 75 years to 69 per cent at age 75 years or more (P = 0·008). CONCLUSION: Two-thirds of acute AAA events occurred at age 75 years or above, and more than 25 per cent of events were in women. Taken with the strong associations with smoking and hypertension, these findings could have implications for AAA screening.

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Diameters: A Study on the Discrepancy between Inner to Inner and Outer to Outer Measurements.

INTRODUCTION: The NHS Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening Programme (NAAASP) uses the maximal anterior to posterior (AP) inner-to-inner (ITI) wall diameter in sizing aortic dimensions when screening with ultrasound. It is recognised that ITI measurements are smaller than outer-to-outer (OTO) measurements, and the primary aim was to calculate the absolute difference in AP ITI and OTO measurements across varying aortic diameters. The secondary aim was to estimate the potential number of patients lost from the screening programme. METHODS: Since April 2012, patients outside the screening programme that undergo ultrasound of abdominal aortas have their ITI and OTO measurements recorded. These measurements were compared retrospectively and analysed for variability at threshold sizes of AAAs. RESULTS: From May 2012 to October 2013, 452 abdominal aortic ultransound scans recorded both ITI and OTO measurements. The majority (81%) were performed on men with the mean age of 78 years. The mean difference between ITI and OTO measurements was 4.21 mm (p < .001). There was no difference between the genders. Thresholds were created for analysis between different ITI and OTO aortic diameters; these were <3 cm, 3.1-4 cm, 4.1-5 cm, and >5 cm. There was no significant difference between the means at each threshold size for ITI diameter (p = .758). In the first 2 years from April 2012, 15,447 men underwent screening.Of these, 177 (1.14%) had sub-threshold ITI aortic diameters between 2.6 cm and 2.9 cm. This would upscale to 5,316 men nationally. CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated a consistent and significant 4mm difference between ITI and OTO diameters in live scanning. Lowering the threshold for entry into a surveillance AAAs to an ITI diameter of 26mm rather than the current 30 mm is advocated. An alternative cost-effective way is to rescreen this small sub-group at 5 or 7 years.

Population-based study of delays in carotid imaging and surgery and the risk of recurrent stroke.

BACKGROUND: Benefit from carotid endarterectomy is greatest when performed within 2 weeks of a presenting TIA or stroke and decreases rapidly thereafter. OBJECTIVE: To determine the delays to carotid imaging and endarterectomy in Oxfordshire, UK, and the consequences for the effectiveness of stroke prevention. METHODS: All patients undergoing carotid imaging for ischemic retinal or cerebral TIA or stroke were identified in two populations: the population of Oxfordshire, UK (n = 680,772), from April 1, 2002, to March 31, 2003, and the Oxford Vascular Study (OXVASC) subpopulation (n = 92,000) from April 1, 2002, to March 31, 2004. The times from presenting event to referral, scanning, and endarterectomy (Oxfordshire population) and the risk of stroke prior to endarterectomy in patients with > or = 50% symptomatic carotid stenosis (OXVASC population) were determined. RESULTS: Among 853 patients who had carotid imaging in the Oxfordshire population, median (interquartile range) times from presenting event to referral, scanning, and endarterectomy were 9 (3 to 30), 33 (12 to 62), and 100 (59 to 137) days. Eighty-five patients were found to have 50 to 99% symptomatic stenosis, of whom 49 had endarterectomy. Only 3 (6%) had surgery within 2 weeks of their presenting event and only 21 (43%) within 12 weeks. The risk of stroke prior to endarterectomy in the OXVASC subpopulation with > or = 50% stenosis was 21% (8 to 34%) at 2 weeks and 32% (17 to 47%) at 12 weeks, in half of which strokes were disabling or fatal. CONCLUSION: Delays to carotid imaging and endarterectomy after TIA or stroke in the United Kingdom are similar to those reported in several other countries and are associated with very high risks of otherwise preventable early recurrent stroke.