Cyclooxygenase-2 is up-regulated in proliferative inflammatory atrophy of the prostate, but not in prostate carcinoma.

Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is the inducible isoform of the rate-limiting enzymes that convert arachidonic acid to proinflammatory prostaglandins as well as a primary target for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Accumulating evidence suggests that up-regulation of COX-2 is associated with carcinogenesis in multiple organ systems including the large bowel, lung, breast, and prostate. In this report, we examine the expression of COX-2 protein and mRNA in prostate tissue containing various lesions and in prostate cancer cell lines. In the cell lines, LNCaP, DU145, PC-3, and TSU, COX-2 protein expression was undetectable under basal conditions but could be induced transiently by phorbol ester treatment in PC-3 and TSU cells, but not in DU145 and LNCaP cells. Immunohistochemical analysis of 144 human prostate cancer cases suggested that, in contrast to several previous reports, there was no consistent overexpression of COX-2 in established prostate cancer or high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, as compared with adjacent normal prostate tissue. Positive staining was seen only in scattered cells (<1%) in both tumor and normal tissue regions but was much more consistently observed in areas of proliferative inflammatory atrophy, lesions that have been implicated in prostatic carcinogenesis. Staining was also seen at times in macrophages. Western blotting and quantitative RT-PCR analyses confirmed these patterns of expression. These results suggest that if nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are indeed chemopreventive and/or chemotherapeutic for prostate cancer, their effects are likely to be mediated by modulating COX-2 activity in non-PCa cells (either inflammatory cells or atrophic epithelial cells) or by affecting a COX-2-independent pathway.

Methylation and mutational analysis of p27(kip1) in prostate carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: We have previously identified 12p12-13 as a region of frequent genetic loss in prostate carcinoma. A candidate tumor suppressor gene at this locus is the cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor p27(kip1), which has been implicated as a marker of aggressive prostate carcinoma. Herein, we examine metastatic prostate tumors, xenografts, and cell lines for gene inactivation via mutational inactivation or promoter hypermethylation. METHODS: Mutation analysis was performed on metastatic prostate tumors of 18 patients, eight prostate carcinoma cell lines, and 18 xenografts by PCR amplification of the entire open reading frame of p27(kip1). PCR products were sequenced directly using internal primers. Methylation analysis was performed on four cell lines and nine xenografts using direct sequencing of cloned PCR products of bisulfite treated DNA. Presence of a CpG was consistent with methylation of that cytosine in the original sample. RESULTS: With the exception of the previously reported homozygous deletion, no additional mutations were identified. Methylated CpG residues were identified in three xenografts (LuCAP23, LuCAP35, and PC82) and the methylated residues clustered at six sites; the cytosines 69, 149, 191, 286, 349, and 487 base pairs 5' of the ATG start codon. However, no sample demonstrated promotor methylation in all sequenced clones and the number of methylated base pairs ranged from seven to three, not the level usually associated with gene silencing. CONCLUSIONS: Mutational inactivation of p27(kip1) is a rare event in metastatic prostate carcinoma. While CpG methylation does occur, it is an infrequent event and does not appear to be the mechanism of p27(kip1) down regulation in prostate carcinoma.

Linkage and association studies of prostate cancer susceptibility: evidence for linkage at 8p22-23.

Multiple lines of evidence have implicated the short arm of chromosome 8 as harboring genes important in prostate carcinogenesis. Although most of this evidence comes from the identification of frequent somatic alterations of 8p loci in prostate cancer cells (e.g., loss of heterozygosity), studies have also suggested a role for 8p genes in mediation of inherited susceptibility to prostate cancer. To further examine this latter possibility, we performed linkage analyses, in 159 pedigrees affected by hereditary prostate cancer (HPC), using 24 markers on the short arm of chromosome 8. In the complete set of families, evidence for prostate cancer linkage was found at 8p22-23, with a peak HLOD of 1.84 (P=.004), and an estimate of the proportion of families linked (alpha) of 0.14, at D8S1130. In the 79 families with average age at diagnosis >65 years, an allele-sharing LOD score of 2.64 (P=.0005) was observed, and six markers spanning a distance of 10 cM had LOD scores >2.0. Interestingly, the small number of Ashkenazi Jewish pedigrees (n=11) analyzed in this study contributed disproportionately to this linkage. Mutation screening in HPC probands and association analyses in case subjects (a group that includes HPC probands and unrelated case subjects) and unaffected control subjects were carried out for the putative prostate cancer-susceptibility gene, PG1, previously localized to the 8p22-23 region. No statistical differences in the allele, genotype, or haplotype frequencies of the SNPs or other sequence variants in the PG1 gene were observed between case and control subjects. However, case subjects demonstrated a trend toward higher homozygous rates of less-frequent alleles in all three PG1 SNPs, and overtransmission of a PG1 variant to case subjects was observed. In summary, these results provide evidence for the existence of a prostate cancer-susceptibility gene at 8p22-23. Evaluation of the PG1 gene and other candidate genes in this area appears warranted.

Evaluation of linkage and association of HPC2/ELAC2 in patients with familial or sporadic prostate cancer.

To investigate the relationship between HPC2/ELAC2 and prostate cancer risk, we performed the following analyses: (1) a linkage study of six markers in and around the HPC2/ELAC2 gene at 17p11 in 159 pedigrees with hereditary prostate cancer (HPC); (2) a mutation-screening analysis of all coding exons of the gene in 93 probands with HPC; (3) family-based and population-based association study of common HPC2/ELAC2 missense variants in 159 probands with HPC, 249 patients with sporadic prostate cancer, and 222 unaffected male control subjects. No evidence for linkage was found in the total sample, nor in any subset of pedigrees based on characteristics that included age at onset, number of affected members, male-to-male disease transmission, or race. Furthermore, only the two previously reported missense changes (Ser217Leu and Ala541Thr) were identified by mutational analysis of all HPC2/ELAC exons in 93 probands with HPC. In association analyses, family-based tests did not reveal excess transmission of the Leu217 and/or Thr541 alleles to affected offspring, and population-based tests failed to reveal any statistically significant difference in the allele frequencies of the two polymorphisms between patients with prostate cancer and control subjects. The results of this study lead us to reject the three alternative hypotheses of (1) a highly penetrant, major prostate cancer-susceptibility gene at 17p11, (2) the allelic variants Leu217 or Thr541 of HPC2/ELAC2 as high-penetrance mutations, and (3) the variants Leu217 or Thr541 as low-penetrance, risk-modifying alleles. However, we did observe a trend of higher Leu217 homozygous carrier rates in patients than in control subjects. Considering the impact of genetic heterogeneity, phenocopies, and incomplete penetrance on the linkage and association studies of prostate cancer and on the power to detect linkage and association in our study sample, our results cannot rule out the possibility of a highly penetrant prostate cancer gene at this locus that only segregates in a small number of pedigrees. Nor can we rule out a prostate cancer-modifier gene that confers a lower-than-reported risk. Additional larger studies are needed to more fully evaluate the role of this gene in prostate cancer risk.

Loss of heterozygosity at 12P12-13 in primary and metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: Our laboratory has recently identified a 1 to 2 Mb homozygous deletion at 12p12-13 in a prostate cancer specimen and determined that the p27/kip1 gene lies within the deletion. While immunohistochemical analysis has implicated p27/kip1 in prostate carcinoma, no previous studies had identified genetic abnormalities at this locus. Here, we examined primary and metastatic prostate tumors to determine if allelic loss occurs at this locus in localized disease and if it increases the risk of metastatic, high stage or high-grade disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DNA was extracted from prostate tumors and normal tissue of 99 patients. 60 tumors were primary, 20 were metastatic pelvic lymph nodes, and 19 were distant metastases. Multiple metastases were analyzed from 11 of 19 patients with metastatic disease. Polymorphic markers spanning our region of interest were PCR amplified from tumor and normal DNA. PCR products were then scored for allelic loss. RESULTS: Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) was identified in 14/60 (23%) primary tumors, 6/20 (30%) lymph node metastasis, and 9/19 (47%) distant metastases. The difference between primary and distant metastatic disease was statistically significant (p = 0.045, Fisher's exact test). The pattern of LOH was identical in all metastatic sites obtained from individual patients, indicating that genetic loss occurred prior to metastasis. Subset analysis of the 60 primary tumors demonstrated no association between LOH and adverse pathological feature [nodal involvement, seminal vesicle invasion, margin positivity, high Gleason score (7-10)]. CONCLUSIONS: Demonstrating that 12p12-13 LOH is a prominent feature of primary prostate tumors and that multiple metastatic foci have an identical LOH pattern, provides evidence that gene inactivation in this region occurs prior to metastasis. In addition, the strong association between LOH and distant metastasis raises the possibility that mutational inactivation of a gene at 12p12-13, possibly p27/kip1, plays a pivotal role in the development of metastatic disease.