Language-Based Disparities in Route of Hysterectomy for Benign Disease.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between patient primary language and route of hysterectomy. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's State Inpatient Database (SID) and State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Database (SASD). SETTING: All inpatient and outpatient hysterectomies from the most recent year of available data (2020 - 2021) from the six states that record patient primary language in the SID and SASD (Indiana, Iowa, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, and New Jersey) were queried. PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged 18 and over undergoing an inpatient or ambulatory hysterectomy for benign indication. INTERVENTIONS: Minimally invasive hysterectomy compared to abdominal hysterectomy. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: The association between patient primary language (English vs non-English) and route of hysterectomy (abdominal vs minimally invasive) was evaluated. The cohort included 52,226 patients who met inclusion criteria. The majority of patients were non-Hispanic White (71%), with a median age of 46 years (IQR 40.0-53.0). 91.4% of patients spoke English as their primary language, 3.6% spoke Spanish, and 5.0% spoke another non-English language. Patients with a non-English primary language were significantly less likely to undergo minimally invasive hysterectomy compared to patients who spoke English (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.56-0.64, p<0.001). This association remained significant following adjustments for age, race, insurance, median income, state, and fibroid, abnormal uterine bleeding, prolapse or endometriosis diagnosis (aOR 0.77, 95% CI 0.71-0.84). In a sensitivity analysis of English vs Spanish vs other non-English language, the association remained significant for other non-English languages (aOR 0.67, 95% CI 0.60-0.75) but not for Spanish (aOR 0.95, 95% CI 0.83-1.09). CONCLUSION: Patients who are non-English speaking are significantly less likely to receive a minimally invasive hysterectomy. Addressing language disparities may improve access to a minimally invasive route of surgery, a possible surrogate for improved surgical outcomes, for our gynecologic patients.

Impact of trainees involvement on surgical outcomes of abdominal and laparoscopic myomectomy.

BACKGROUND: To determine the association of trainees involvement with surgical outcomes of abdominal and laparoscopic myomectomy including operative time, rate of transfusion, and complications. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 1145 patients who underwent an abdominal or laparoscopic myomectomy from 2008-2012 using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (Canadian Task Force Classification II-2). RESULTS: Overall, 64% of myomectomies involved trainees. Trainees involvement was associated with a longer operative time for abdominal myomectomies (mean difference 20.17 minutes, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) [11.37,28.97], p < 0.01) overall and when stratified by fibroid burden. For laparoscopic myomectomy, there was no difference in operative time between trainees vs no trainees involvement (mean difference 4.64 minutes, 95% CI [-18.07,27.35], p = 0.67). There was a higher rate of transfusion with trainees involvement for abdominal myomectomies (10% vs 2%, p < 0.01; Odds Ratio (OR) 5.62, 95% CI [2.53,12.51], p < 0.01). Trainees involvement was not found to be associated with rate of transfusion for laparoscopic myomectomy (4% vs 5%, p = 0.86; OR 0.82, 95% CI [0.16,4.14], p = 0.81). For abdominal myomectomy, there was a higher rate of overall complications (15% vs 5%, p < 0.01; OR 2.96, 95% CI [1.77,4.93], p < 0.01) and minor complications (14% vs 4%, p < 0.01; OR 3.71, 95% CI [2.09,6.57], p < 0.01) with no difference in major complications (3% vs 2%, p = 0.23). For laparoscopic myomectomy, there was no difference in overall (6% vs 10% p = 0.41; OR 0.59, 95% CI [0.18,2.01], p = 0.40), major (2% vs 0%, p = 0.38), or minor (5% vs 10%, p = 0.32; OR 0.52, 95% CI [0.15,1.79], p = 0.30) complications. CONCLUSION: Trainees involvement was associated with increased operative time, rate of transfusion, and complications for abdominal myomectomy, however, did not impact surgical outcomes for laparoscopic myomectomy.

TITLE: Trainees Involvement in MyomectomyThe goal of our study was to determine the association of trainees involvement with surgical outcomes of fibroid excision surgery or myomectomy. We conducted a study of abdominal and laparoscopic myomectomies using an international surgical database. We found that trainees involvement in myomectomy was associated with increased operative time, rate of transfusion, and complications for abdominal myomectomy. However, trainees involvement did not impact surgical outcomes for laparoscopic myomectomy.

Preoperative Hematocrit Level and Associated Risk of Transfusion for Myomectomy Based on Myoma Burden and Surgical Route.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between preoperative hematocrit level and risk of blood transfusion for laparotomic and laparoscopic myomectomy based on myoma burden and surgical route. DESIGN: A cohort study of prospectively collected data. SETTING: American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program participating institutions. PATIENTS: A total of 26 229 women who underwent a laparotomic or laparoscopic myomectomy from 2010 to 2020. INTERVENTIONS: The primary outcome assessed was the risk of transfusion based on preoperative hematocrit level. This was evaluated with respect to myoma burden and surgical route. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were 26 229 women who underwent a myomectomy during the study interval, 2345 women (9%) of whom required a blood transfusion. Compared with patients who did not require transfusion, those who did had lower median preoperative hematocrit levels (34.7 vs 38.2). Patients were stratified by surgical approach (laparotomic vs laparoscopic) and myoma burden (1-4 myomas/weight ≤250 g or ≥5 myomas/weight >250 g) using Current Procedural Terminology codes (58140, 58146, 58545, 58546). In all categories, there was an inverse relationship between blood transfusion and preoperative hematocrit level with increasing risk depending on preoperative hematocrit range. The odds ratios comparing hematocrit level of 29% with 39% were 6.16 (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.15-7.36), 4.92 (95% CI, 4.19-5.78), 4.85 (95% CI, 3.72-6.33), and 5.2 (95% CI, 3.63-7.43) for patients with laparotomic (1-4 myomas/≤250 g, ≥5 myomas/>250 g) and laparoscopic myomectomy (1-4 myomas/≤250 g, 5 myomas/>250 g), respectively. CONCLUSION: Incremental increases in hematocrit result in a significantly decreased risk of blood transfusion at the time of myomectomy.