Skin Cancer Awareness and Knowledge About Sun Protection Practices in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: Patient Survey Study.

BACKGROUND: Adequate sun protection practices in chronically immunosuppressed patients can minimize the burden of the most common type of skin cancer in this population. In addition, early recognition of skin cancer by patients can lead to decreased morbidity, and possibly mortality from the disease. Nevertheless, there are significant gaps in the knowledge of sun protection measures and early recognition of skin cancer. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to determine the risk factors of solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) for developing skin cancer and their sun exposure education and behavior post-transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study evaluates the responses of 107 SOTRs on their outlooks and beliefs of sunscreen usage, skin cancer, and sun exposure knowledge. RESULTS: Our study identified several significant risk factors for the development of actinic keratosis or keratinocyte carcinoma in SOTRs including history of sunburn before age 18, blue eyes, history of tanning bed use, performing monthly skin exams, ability to identify precancerous skin lesions, and history of previous skin examinations. CONCLUSION: A patient-centered approach needs to be used to properly educate patients on effective ways to reduce excessive sun exposure. Regular skin examinations, and patients continued education are necessary components in reducing the burden of skin cancer in SOTRs.

Training dermatology residents in dermatoscopy: A case control lecture series assessment.

Lack of standardized dermatoscopy training limits confidence and accuracy. We assessed the effect of a dermatoscopy lecture series on the diagnostic accuracy of dermatology residents' biopsies. Additionally, we evaluated resident comfort with and knowledge of dermatoscopy before and after the curriculum. Twelve dermatology residents were enrolled in a 5-month dedicated dermatoscopy curriculum. To assess knowledge of and comfort with dermatoscopy, residents were given a 50-question assessment and 21-question survey before and after the curriculum. Change in diagnostic accuracy was assessed by comparing the suspected clinical diagnosis to the final histopathologic diagnosis of lesions biopsied by residents before and after the course. Upon completion of the curriculum, residents felt significantly more comfortable performing dermatoscopy (P = .002) and using dermatoscopy to identify melanocytic nevi (P = .037) and melanomas (invasive and in situ) (P = .012). Postgraduate year 2 residents also showed significantly improved diagnostic accuracy after the training course (odds ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.67; P = .013). Our study was limited by a small sample size of 12 residents from a single academic institution. A formal dermatoscopy course can effectively improve dermatology residents' knowledge, confidence, and diagnostic accuracy when using dermatoscopy.

Diagnostic Pearls of Vulvar Epidermolytic Acanthoma: Case Report.

Epidermolytic acanthomas (EA) are uncommon benign tumors clinically presenting as single to multiple papules. Histologically, EA display hyperkeratosis, hypergranulosis, acanthosis, and epidermal degeneration-also known as epidermolytic hyperkeratosis (EH). EA may be misdiagnosed as condyloma both clinically and histopathologically when located on the genitalia. Thus, this diagnosis carries a significant psychological burden and must remain in the differential when initially considering genital warts. We utilize the case of a 62-year old female referred to dermatology for a 5-year history of multiple pruritic and hypopigmented vulvar papules-misdiagnosed as genital warts-to highlight the impact of differentiating EA from genital warts. This patient was initially misdiagnosed with common genital warts at her gynecologist's office and treated unsuccessfully for years. A shave biopsy was performed and histology revealed EH, consistent with EA.