Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis ; 102(3): 177-83, 2009 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19375671

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Conventional echocardiography is not a reliable method for characterizing tissue patterns of intracardiac masses. AIMS: To assess the ability of contrast echocardiography to characterize intracardiac masses. METHODS: Thirty-one consecutive patients with an intracardiac mass were included in this prospective study. All patients underwent conventional and contrast echocardiographic examinations. Analysis of characteristics by contrast agent allowed classification of intracardiac masses as follows: complete lack of enhancement, suggesting thrombus; partial and/or incomplete enhancement, suggesting myxoma; complete enhancement, suggesting intracardiac tumor. Tissue characteristics of intracardiac masses were also analyzed using at least one of the following techniques: cardiac magnetic resonance, pathology of intracardiac mass and/or mass resolved after anticoagulation during follow-up. RESULTS: Using contrast echocardiography, an accurate diagnosis was made in all patients by an experienced investigator and in all patients except one (97%), by a physician trainee (p=0.31). Among patients with a history of tumor, echocardiography allowed accurate diagnosis of the nature of the mass in all patients; 50% of these patients presented with a secondary cardiac tumor and the others had a thrombus. Of the 14patients with a thrombus located in the left ventricle, 12 (86%) presented with left ventricular motion abnormalities using conventional echocardiography, whereas wall motion abnormalities were observed in all 14patients (100%) using contrast agent. In these patients, 91 and 99% of left ventricular segments were well visualized using conventional and contrast echocardiography, respectively (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Contrast echocardiography may be useful for the tissue characterization of intracardiac masses.


Assuntos
Meios de Contraste , Ecocardiografia/métodos , Neoplasias Cardíacas/diagnóstico por imagem , Mixoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Trombose/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Biópsia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Microbolhas , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Contração Miocárdica , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Trombose/tratamento farmacológico , Trombose/fisiopatologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Função Ventricular Esquerda
2.
Am Heart J ; 151(5): 1129.e1-6, 2006 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16644350

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Carcinoid syndrome may involve right carcinoid heart disease (CHD), secondary to the release of vasoactive substances. Left CHD is rare, as the inactivation of serotonin by the lung protects the left heart. We attempted to evaluate the prevalence of CHD and patent foramen ovale (PFO) with serial contrast transthoracic echocardiographic studies and to determine the markers of right and left CHD progression. METHODS: Forty-one consecutive patients with proved digestive endocrine tumor and carcinoid syndrome were prospectively enrolled. All patients underwent serial conventional and contrast transthoracic echocardiographic studies. Right and left CHD, PFO, radiological examinations, and biological carcinoid markers were systematically assessed. RESULTS: Left CHD was present in 5 patients at baseline and in 13 patients (32%) during follow-up (P = .03). The 13 patients with left CHD also had PFO, and no left CHD occurred without PFO (P < .0001). Right CHD was present in 16 patients (39%) at baseline and in 25 patients (61%) at the end of follow-up (P = .04). The prevalence of right and left CHD was significantly higher in patients with PFO (88% and 76%, respectively; P < .04). A progression of right and left CHD was present, respectively, in 19 and 9 patients but was mainly found in patients with PFO (15 and 9 patients; P < .0001). The main marker of CHD progression was the presence of PFO (odds ratio 44.2, 95% confidence interval 4.4-447.7; P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: PFO is a new marker of CHD progression and should be systematically assessed with routine contrast transthoracic echocardiography in patients with carcinoid syndrome to determine patients at high risk of CHD progression.


Assuntos
Doença Cardíaca Carcinoide/complicações , Doença Cardíaca Carcinoide/diagnóstico por imagem , Ecocardiografia , Comunicação Interatrial/complicações , Comunicação Interatrial/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Idoso , Doença Cardíaca Carcinoide/epidemiologia , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Comunicação Interatrial/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA