External Ring Annuloplasty: A Safe Landing Zone for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Aortic stenosis in patients with previous valve-sparing root replacement represents a challenge, given the substantial morbidity and mortality rates in case of reoperation. Here, we present the case of a patient with late severe aortic stenosis 12 years after valve-sparing aortic root replacement. He was successfully treated by transapical aortic valve implantation. External ring annuloplasty, by reducing the native annuloaortic ectasia, allows transcatheter aortic valve replacement in case of stenotic deterioration of the native valve after valve-sparing aortic root replacement.

Safety and effectiveness of a transaortic approach for TAVI: procedural and midterm outcomes of 265 consecutive patients in a single centre.

OBJECTIVES: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a transaortic approach (TAo-TAVI) is an alternative to transapical or femoral access. We studied the procedural and midterm efficacy and safety of TAo-TAVI with Edwards Sapien XT and Medtronic CoreValve devices. METHODS: Among 901 patients receiving TAVI since 2006, 265 consecutive patients underwent TAo-TAVI between January 2011 and September 2014. Procedural and midterm results were evaluated according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria. RESULTS: The mean age was 83 ± 5 years. Sapien XT and CoreValve were used in 191 (72.1%) and 74 (27.9%) patients, respectively. Full sternotomy made elective concomitant off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting possible in 38 patients (14.3%) with severe coronary artery disease unsuitable for percutaneous coronary intervention. The device success rate was 95.5%. Postprocedural paravalvular leak ≥2/4 was observed in 16 patients (6.4%). Emergency open chest surgery was required in 10 patients (3.8%) (3 aortic dissections, 3 valve embolizations, 2 LMCA occlusions, 1 aortic annulus rupture and 1 aortic rupture). Cerebrovascular accidents occurred in 3 patients (1.1%). Transfusions ≥4 units were required in 36 patients (13.6%). New pacemakers were implanted in 26 patients (9.8%). Thirty-day and 1-year mortality were 8.7% and 16.2%, respectively. Mean follow-up duration was 24 ± 6 months. At 3 years, freedom from all-cause death was 80% ± 4%. New York Heart Association class

Combined transcarotid transcatheter aortic valve implantation and endarterectomy of the ipsilateral internal carotid artery.

The transcarotid pathway remains a safe route for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) when more traditional approaches are contraindicated. We report a series of three patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and symptomatic significant stenosis of the ipsilateral internal carotid artery (ICA) in patients with high operative risk. All patients were treated successfully within the same setting in our center by endarterectomy first followed by a TAVI with an uneventful postoperative course without new neurological deficits (Modine et al. in J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 140:928-9, 2010; Azmoun et al. in Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 46:693-8, 2014; Overtchouk et al. in Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 6(5):555-7, 2017).

Prognostic value of aortic root calcification volume on clinical outcomes after transcatheter balloon-expandable aortic valve implantation.

BACKGROUND: Few data are available about whether aortic root calcification may impact the outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the impact of aortic root calcification volume on clinical outcome after TAVI with balloon expandable Edwards Sapien XT valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California). METHODS: A total of 162 TAVI patients (aged 84.0 [Interquartile Range (IQR) 81.0-84.0] years, Logistic EuroSCORE 14.5 [IQR 9.8-25.1]) with preprocedural MDCT were studied. Aortic root calcification volume was measured by MDCT image and using the dedicated software for aortic valve assessment (the automated 3mensio™ Valves 5.1, sp1, 3mensio Pie Medical Imaging BV, Maastricht, the Netherlands). A valve calcification index (VCI) was defined as calcification volume (mm(3))/body surface area (mm(2)). RESULTS: VCI was significantly higher among patients with 30-day mortality. A VCI threshold of 517.4 (area under the curve 0.69, 95% CI 0.50-0.87, P = 0.03) predicted a higher incidence of annulus rupture (9.1 vs. 0.9%, P = 0.02) and cardiac tamponade (12.7 vs. 1.9%, P < 0.01), lower device success (83.6% vs. 95.3%, P < 0.01) and 30-day survival rate (80.0% vs. 97.2%, P < 0.01). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed only ejection fraction and VCI were identified as independent predictors of 30-day mortality (Odds ratio 0.948 [95% confidence interval 0.909-0.988], P = 0.012, Odds ratio 1.003 [95% confidence interval 1.001-1.005], P = 0.013, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Significantly worse acute clinical outcomes after Edwards valve implantation were observed in patients with large amount of aortic annulus calcifications quantitatively measured by dedicated MDCT software. Application of VCI may prove helpful in prediction of clinical outcomes after TAVI.

Comparison of multislice computed tomography findings between bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

AIMS: This study sought to compare the multislice computed tomography (MSCT) characteristics of bicuspid aortic valves (BAV) and tricuspid aortic valves (TAV) before and after implantation of the CoreValve (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, California) or the Edwards SapienXT (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA). METHODS AND RESULTS: From March 2009 to March 2013, a total of 67 TAVI patients who had both pre- and post-procedural MSCT were studied. Eleven patients underwent TAVI in BAV with the CoreValve (n = 6) or SapienXT (n = 5) and 56 patients underwent TAVI in TAV with the CoreValve (n = 38) or SapienXT (n = 18). The BAV group was similar to the TAV group except for a higher pre-procedural mean pressure gradient (53.1 ± 17.4 vs. 48.8 ± 20.4 mm Hg, P = 0.03), a larger annulus perimeter (89.3 ± 9.0 vs. 81.8 ± 8.1 mm, P = 0.03) and a higher aortic valve calcium volume (1262.7 ± 396.0 vs. 556.4 ± 461.9 mm(3) , P < 0.01). In the CoreValve group, post-procedural mean pressure gradient was significantly higher in the BAV group (11.0 ± 2.6 vs. 8.2 ± 2.8 mm Hg, P = 0.04) and a smaller valve area/pre-annulus area ratio was observed at each level of the prosthesis (base of the stent frame 81.7% ± 14.9% vs. 94.7% ± 15.0%, P = 0.06, annulus level 74.3% ± 16.7% vs. 89.9% ± 10.5%, P = 0.03, leaflet level 64.6% ± 13.1% vs. 81.2% ± 13.2%, P < 0.01). This was not observed in the Edwards group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to TAV, patients with BAV have higher gradients, larger annulus perimeters and more calcified valves. Higher post procedural gradient and valve underexpansion were frequently observed after CoreValve implantation. Further MSCT study is required to demonstrate the efficacy of TAVI in BAV.

The transaortic approach for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a valid alternative to the transapical access in patients with no peripheral vascular option. A single center experience.

OBJECTIVES: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in patients with poor peripheral vessels still remains problematic, as the transapical approach is not always feasible and is sometimes associated with myocardial damage, bleeding, post-procedural chest pain and pleural effusion. In order to address these issues, we adopted the recently introduced transaortic (TAo) approach. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the TAo-TAVI approach using both the Sapien XT and the CoreValve according to VARC criteria. METHODS: Of 492 patients (October 2006 to February 2012), TAo-TAVI was performed in 94 consecutive patients with unfavourable peripheral access between January 2011 and February 2012. Aortic root condition, valve anatomy and annulus size were carefully assessed by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) for possible TAo-TAVI. The aorta was exposed through an inverted 'T' manubriotomy. After retrograde guidewire crossing of the aortic valve, sheath insertion allowed device positioning and deployment subsequent to balloon valvuloplasty. RESULTS: Mean age was 84.1 ± 5.4 years (67-96) and logistic EuroSCORE 17.6 ± 10.2%. The Sapien XT was used in 88.3% and the CoreValve in 11.7% of patients. Full sternotomy allowed concomitant complete off-pump revascularization (2-4 grafts) in 11 patients. Device success rate was 92.6%. Paravalvular leak ≥2/4 was observed in 7.4%. Conversion to open chest surgery was required in 5.3% (3 aortic dissections, 1 valve migration and 1 left main occlusion). Three cerebrovascular accidents (2 transient ischaemia and 1 delayed stroke) were noted. Transfusion ≥4 units was performed in 12 patients (12.8%). Intensive care unit (ICU) and total hospital stay were 4.9 ± 5.0 and 12.2 ± 6.2 days, respectively. Thirty-day mortality and combined safety endpoint were reported in 7.4 and 16.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The TAo approach for both Sapien XT and CoreValve implantation can be used with satisfactory clinical outcome and an acceptable risk. This access route could prove a valid alternative to the transapical approach.

Potential mechanism of annulus rupture during transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Although annulus rupture is one of the most severe complications of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), the incidence and mechanism of this complication remain unclear. Out of 387 consecutive TAVI cases in our institution, the incidence of annulus rupture was 1.0% (4/387). The first two patients died because of hemodynamic collapse due to tamponade on day 0. Both surviving patients had undergone preprocedural multidetector computed tomography which revealed large calcifications in the epicardial fat part of the aortic annulus. In both cases, annulus rupture occurred after deployment of a balloon expandable valve suggesting that mechanical compression of this "vulnerable area" by calcification may cause annulus rupture.

Sex-related differences in clinical presentation and outcome of transcatheter aortic valve implantation for severe aortic stenosis.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to clarify the impact of sex-related differences in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. BACKGROUND: Although TAVI is becoming a mature technique, the impact of sex differences remains unclear. METHODS: The TAVI patients were included prospectively in a dedicated database from October 2006. The proportion of women (n = 131) was similar to that of men (n = 129). The Edwards valve (85.4%) and CoreValve (14.6%) were used through the transfemoral (65.0%), subclavian (3.1%), or transapical (31.9%) approach. All events were defined according to Valve Academic Research Consortium criteria. RESULTS: Age was similar (83.1 ± 6.3 years), but women had less coronary and peripheral disease, less previous cardiac surgery, higher ejection fraction, and lower EuroSCORE (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation [22.3 ± 9.0% vs. 26.2 ± 13.0%, p = 0.005]). Minimal femoral size (7.74 ± 1.03 mm vs. 8.55 ± 1.34 mm, p < 0.001), annulus size (20.9 ± 1.4 vs. 22.9 ± 1.7 mm, p < 0.001), and valve size (23.9 ± 1.6 mm vs. 26.3 ± 1.5 mm, p < 0.001) were smaller in women. Device success was similar (90.8% vs. 88.4%, p = 0.516) despite more frequent iliac complications (9.0% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.030). Residual mean aortic pressure gradient (11.6 ± 4.9 vs. 10.9 ± 4.9, p = 0.279) was also similar. The 1-year survival rate was higher for women, 76% (95% confidence interval: 72% to 80%), than for men, 65% (95% confidence interval: 60% to 69%); and male sex (hazard ratio: 1.62, 95% confidence interval: 1.03 to 2.53, p = 0.037) was identified as a predictor of midterm mortality by Cox regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Female sex is associated with better baseline clinical characteristics and improved survival, and is identified as a predictor of midterm survival after TAVI.

True percutaneous approach for transfemoral aortic valve implantation using the Prostar XL device: impact of learning curve on vascular complications.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of vascular complications and the predictors of Prostar failure for a "true percutaneous approach" in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). BACKGROUND: Safety and efficacy of a true percutaneous approach in transfemoral-TAVI has not been described in a large prospective cohort. METHODS: Among 264 patients included in our prospective TAVI database (October 2006 to December 2010), transfemoral-TAVI was performed in 170 patients. True percutaneous approach was performed in 142 consecutive patients since March 2008. Successful closure with Prostar was defined as adequate hemostasis without Prostar-related vascular complications. We compared the incidence of vascular complications in our early and late experience. RESULTS: Patients were 83.0±7.2 years old and with a EuroSCORE of 24.0±11.6%. The Edwards valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) (18- to 24-F) was used in 109 cases and the CoreValve (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota) (18-F) in 31. The sheath outer diameter to minimal femoral diameter ratio (SFAR) was 0.96±0.14. Successful closure was achieved in 90.7%, and was significantly increased (95.7% vs. 85.7%, p=0.047) in the late experience group. Cross-over to surgery was required in 3.6%. Vascular complications occurred in 20.0%, and were significantly lower in the late experience group (11.4% vs. 28.6%, p=0.012). Major vascular complications (2.9% vs. 14.3%, p=0.018) were decreased in the late experience group. Early experience (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.66, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04 to 13.89, p=0.047) and SFAR (HR: 110.80, 95% CI: 1.15 to 10,710.73, p=0.044) predicted Prostar failure by univariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Experience reduced major vascular complications in a true percutaneous approach for transfemoral-TAVI. Further application of this less invasive strategy is feasible and may be beneficial, in this high-risk patient cohort.

[Percutaneous aortic valve implantation: results and perspectives]. / Valves aortiques percutanées: résultats actuels et perspectives.

As the French population is aging, a growing number of elderly patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis are going to require therapeutic management. Approximately 30 to 40% of these patients do not undergo surgical treatment and a high proportion is considered to be at high risk for surgery. The transluminal aortic valve implantation technique has been increasingly used over the past few years, thus providing a solution to a major therapeutic issue in our industrialized countries. While the cardiology community was rapidly convinced of its efficacy, remaining doubts regarding the outcome of this technique in terms of mortality were erased by the recent publication of results achieved in cohort B of the Partner US trial. This new approach is clearly here to stay and should soon reach a maturity phase with respect to its indications, the selection of patients and technical aspects.