[Multifocal serous chorioretinopathy secondary to the use of MEK inhibitors: Illustration and example of management through two case reports]. / Choriorétinopathie séreuse multifocale secondaire à l'utilisation des inhibiteurs MEK : illustration et exemple de prise en charge à travers 2 cas.

New targeted treatments are being used for patients affected by certain types of cancers with specific gene dysregulation. These new treatments transform the prognosis for the patients but the exact way in which they work is often incompletely known. This can prove to be problematic with regard to potential side effects. Ophthalmologic side effects are particularly difficult to detect in animal models. MEK inhibitors are among these new targeted treatments for which the indications are broad. One of the reported side effects of MEK inhibitors is the appearance of atypical multifocal serous chorioretinopathies which, when present, occur rapidly after starting the treatment and disappear soon after stopping it. We report two documented cases of serous chorioretinopathies secondary to the use of selumetinib, an MEK inhibitor. Both patients were followed for several months after initiating the treatment, using angiography, OCT, and filtered photographs. Only a very few cases have been reported, and the detailed description of two clear-cut cases and their management, as well as a review of the current literature, seems a good way to approach the management of this complication.

[Tolerability and short-term efficacy of the Ozurdex® dexamethasone intravitreal implant for treatment of uveitic cystoid macular edema: A retrospective study of 52 injections performed at the Clermont-Ferrand teaching hospital]. / Efficacité et tolérance de l'implant intraoculaire de dexaméthasone Ozurdex(®) dans le traitement des œdèmes maculaires liés aux uvéites : série rétrospective sur 52 injections réalisées au CHU de Clermont-Ferrand.

Macular edema is the main cause of decreased visual acuity in uveitis and determines the visual prognosis. We retrospectively analyzed the tolerability and efficacy of the dexamethasone intravitreal implant in the management of uveitis. Twenty-five patients with uveitic cystoid macular edema were all treated with the Ozurdex(®) dexamethasone intravitreal implant from January 2012 to August 2014. The main outcome measures were visual acuity recovery, changes in macular thickness and resolution of the vitritis. Thirty-two eyes of 25 patients received 52 injections of Ozurdex(®). Both complete regression of the macular edema and resolution of the vitritis occurred in 100 % patients. Visual acuity improved in 62 % of patients: the mean reduction in macular thickness was 252 (±171µm); the mean time between injections was 6.7 (±3.8) months. Secondary ocular hypertension was seen in 33 % of patients. No patient required secondary surgery although a selective laser trabeculoplasty was required for one patient. The dexamethasone intravitreal implant Ozurdex(®) resulted in continuous and complete regression of uveitic cystoid macular edema. It allows evaluation of the potential visual recovery of treated eyes. The tolerability and duration of action provide a rationale for considering Ozurdex(®) as a first-line therapy for uveitis which remains uncontrolled despite optimal systemic treatment.

[Case report of a 45-year-old man with uveal melanoma and suspect controlateral choroidal nævus]. / Mélanome choroïdien et « tumeur mélanocytaire à potentiel évolutif ¼ controlatérale chez un patient de 45ans, à propos d'un cas.

INTRODUCTION: Uveal melanoma is the most common adult primary intraoculary tumor. Bilateral tumor is very rare, but must not be underestimated because early diagnosis and care improve the survival and the visual prognosis. OBSERVATION: We report the case of a patient treated for a left parapapillary choroidal melanoma by disk of ruthenium ((106)Ru), and a follow-up every 3 months for an atypical choroidal large-sized controlateral nævus levelling the macular area. This right nævus changed in 2009 leading to suspicion of a growing melanoma. Because the visual acuity of the left eye was limited to 20/2000, we wanted to confirm this growth before beginning a treatment. But for 3 years the tumor has remained stable and asymptomatic, with a disease staging still negative. To this day, no curative treatment has been started on the right eye. DISCUSSION: In spite of clinical (To Find Small Ocular Melanomas (TFSOM) for example) and paraclinical arguments, it is sometimes difficult to differentiate a large nævus from an early melanoma. Evolution of the tumor often allows to confirm the diagnosis. However, the sole growth of a nævus is not specific of a choroidal melanoma. When confronted with suspicion of a small choroidal melanoma, some authors recommend an immediate treatment for the tumor; others prefer to confirm without a doubt a tumoral growth. It is necessary to weigh out the iatrogenic risks of a conservative treatment on the visual acuity in a monophtalm patient on one side, and the vital risk for the patient on the other side, which seems to be limited in case of small-sized melanoma with a slow evolution. CONCLUSION: A bilateral choroidal melanoma is rare. Systematic and repeated examinations of both eyes are essential. Management of these complicated cases often leads to discussion.