Anastomotic Leaks following Esophagectomy for Esophageal and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: The Key Is the Multidisciplinary Management.

Introduction: Anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy is associated with high mortality and impaired quality of life. Aim: The objective of this work was to determine the effectiveness of management of esophageal anastomotic leakage (EAL) after esophagectomy for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer. Methods: Patients submitted to esophagectomy for esophageal and GEJ cancer at a tertiary oncology hospital between 2014 and 2019 (n = 119) were retrospectively reviewed and EAL risk factors and its management outcomes determined. Results: Older age and nodal disease were identified as independent risk factors for anastomotic leak (adjusted OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.00-1.13, and adjusted OR 4.89, 95% CI 1.09-21.8). Patients with EAL spent more days in the intensive care unit (ICU; median 14 vs. 4 days) and had higher 30-day mortality (15 vs. 2%) and higher in-hospital mortality (35 vs. 4%). The first treatment option was surgical in 13 patients, endoscopic in 10, and conservative in 3. No significant differences were noticeable between these patients, but sepsis and large leakages were tendentially managed by surgery. At follow-up, 3 patients in the surgery group (23%) and 9 in the endoscopic group (90%) were discharged under an oral diet (p = 0.001). The in-hospital mortality rate was 38% in the surgical group, 33% in the conservative group, and 10% in endoscopic group (p = 0.132). In patients with EAL, the presence of septic shock at leak diagnosis was the only predictor of mortality (p = 0.004). ICU length-of-stay was non-significantly lower in the endoscopic therapy group (median 4 days, vs. 16 days in the surgical group, p = 0.212). Conclusion: Risk factors for EAL may help change pre-procedural optimization. The results of this study suggest including an endoscopic approach for EAL.

Introdução: A deiscência anastomótica após esofagectomia está associada a uma elevada taxa de mortalidade e qualidade de vida comprometida. Objetivo: Avaliar a eficácia da abordagem da deiscência de anastomose esofágica após esofagectomia por neoplasia do esófago e da junção esofagogastrica (JEG). Métodos: Foram revistos retrospetivamente todos os doentes submetidos a esofagectomia por neoplasia do esófago e da JEG num hospital terciário entre 2014 e 2019 (n = 119) e analisados os fatores de risco e as diferentes abordagens na deiscência anastomótica. Resultados: A idade avançada e a presença de metastização ganglionar foram identificados como fatores de risco independentes para deiscência anastomótica (OR 1.06, 95% IC 1.00­1.13 e 4.89, IC 1.09­21.8). Os doentes com deiscência anastomótica estiveram mais dias internados na unidade de cuidados intensivos (UCI) (mediana 14 vs. 4 dias) e tiveram uma mortalidade aos 30 dias e intra-hospitalar mais elevada (15% vs. 2% e 35% vs. 4%, respectivamente). A primeira abordagem terapêutica foi cirúrgica em 13 doentes, endoscópica em 10 e conservadora em 3. Não foram encontradas diferenças estatisticamente significativas entre estes doentes, com uma tendência para a presença de sépsis e de deiscências de maior dimensão nos doentes abordados cirurgicamente. Durante o seguimento, 3 doentes do grupo cirúrgico (23%) e 9 do grupo endoscópico (90%) tiveram alta hospitalar sob dieta oral (p = 0.001). A taxa de mortalidade intra-hospitalar foi de 38% no grupo cirúrgico, 33% no grupo conservador e 10% no grupo endoscópico (p = 0.132). Nos doentes com deiscência anastomótica, a presença de choque sético ao diagnóstico foi o único preditor de mortalidade (p = 0.004). O tempo de internamento na UCI não foi significativamente menor no grupo submetido a tratamento endoscópico (mediana de 4 dias vs. 16 dias no grupo cirúrgico, p = 0.212). Conclusão: A identificação de fatores de risco para deiscência anastomótica após esofagectomia pode ajudar a alterar a optimização pré-procedimento. Os resultados deste estudo sugerem incluir uma abordagem endoscópica nos doentes com deiscência anastomótica.

Therapeutic Leukapheresis: Experience of a Single Oncologic Centre.

Introduction: Leukostasis refers to clinical symptoms caused by hyperleukocytosis seen in some haematological diseases such as leukaemia. Cytoreduction can be achieved by therapeutic leukapheresis. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyse the procedures performed in our Centre and to evaluate their efficacy and safety. Methods: This was a retrospective study of all the therapeutic leukapheresis procedures carried out in our Centre between January 1998 and December 2020. The sample collection was obtained through the review of the clinical files of the respective patients. Statistical analysis was performed using the software R v.4.0.1. A total of 54 therapeutic leukapheresis procedures were performed in 31 patients in our Centre. Results: After these procedures clinical improvement was observed in 16 patients and we verify that there was a significant difference in survival between the group that improved and the group that maintained the same clinical condition or worsened. The lack of immediate clinical improvement was a sign of a poor prognosis. Laboratory efficacy occurred in 16 patients who had a reduction in white blood cell count, with a 39.1% reduction after 24 h, and did not succeed in 15 patients, who had no reduction. However, in this case there is no significant difference in survival between the two groups. There was some complication in 53.9% of the procedures, with hypocalcaemia being the most frequent, which was observed in 22 procedures. Only 4 patients experienced serious side effects but these adverse reactions cannot be attributed to the procedures carried out. The overall survival rate 6 months after this treatment was 51.6%. Conclusion: Despite the reduced number of patients, we conclude that therapeutic leukapheresis is a safe and effective option that may still have a therapeutic role in some cases.

Acute organ failure and risk of admission to intensive medical care in cancer patients: a single center prospective cohort study. / Falência aguda de órgão e risco de admissão em unidade de terapia intensiva nos pacientes oncológicos: estudo de coorte prospectivo unicêntrico.

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the cumulative incidence of acute organ failure and intensive care unit admission in cancer patients. METHODS: This was a single-center prospective cohort study of adult cancer patients admitted for unscheduled inpatient care while on systemic cancer treatment. RESULTS: Between August 2018 and February 2019, 10,392 patients were on systemic treatment, 358 had unscheduled inpatient care and were eligible for inclusion, and 285 were included. The mean age was 60.9 years, 50.9% were male, and 17.9% of patients had hematologic cancers. The cumulative risk of acute organ failure was 39.6% (95%CI: 35 - 44), and that of intensive care unit admission among patients with acute organ failure was 15.0% (95%CI: 12 - 18). On admission, 62.1% of patients were considered not eligible for artificial organ replacement therapy. The median follow-up time was 9.5 months. Inpatient mortality was 17.5%, with an intensive care unit mortality rate of 58.8% and a median cohort survival of 134 days (95%CI: 106 - 162). In multivariate analysis, acute organ failure was associated with 6-month postdischarge mortality (HR 1.6; 95%CI: 1.2 - 2.2). CONCLUSION: The risk of acute organ failure in cancer patients admitted for unscheduled inpatient care while on systemic treatment was 39.6%, and the risk of intensive care unit admission was 15.0%. Acute organ failure in cancer patients was an independent poor prognostic factor for inpatient hospital mortality and 6-month survival.

OBJETIVO: Determinar a incidência cumulativa de falência aguda de órgão e internamento em unidade de terapia intensiva em pacientes oncológicos. MÉTODOS: Estudo de coorte prospectivo de pacientes oncológicos adultos em tratamento sistêmico antineoplásico, internados de forma não programada. RESULTADOS: Entre agosto de 2018 e fevereiro de 2019, 10.392 pacientes foram submetidos a tratamento sistêmico antineoplásico, sendo que 358 necessitaram de internamento hospitalar não programado e foram elegíveis para inclusão; por fim, 258 desses pacientes foram incluídos. A média de idade foi de 60,9 anos, e 50,9% eram do sexo masculino; 17,9% dos pacientes tinham câncer hematológico. O risco acumulado de falência de órgãos foi de 39,6% (IC95% 35 - 44) e o risco de internamento na unidade de terapia intensiva em pacientes com falência aguda de órgão foi de 15,0% (IC95% 12 - 18). À admissão em internamento, 62,1% dos pacientes foram considerados não elegíveis para terapia de substituição artificial de órgãos. O tempo mediano de seguimento foi de 9,5 meses. A mortalidade hospitalar foi de 17,5%, na unidade de terapia intensiva de 58,8%. A mediana de sobrevivência da coorte foi de 134 dias (IC95% 106 - 162). Na análise multivariada, a falência aguda de órgão se associou com a mortalidade aos 6 meses após a alta (hazard ratio: 1,6; IC95% 1,2 - 2,2). CONCLUSÃO: O risco de falência aguda de órgão em pacientes oncológicos admitidos para tratamento hospitalar não programado durante o tratamento sistémico foi de 39,6% e o risco de internamento em unidade de terapia intensiva foi de 15,0%. A falência aguda de órgão em pacientes oncológicos foi um fator de prognóstico independente para maior mortalidade intra-hospitalar e menor sobrevivência aos 6 meses após a alta.

Falência aguda de órgão e risco de admissão em unidade de terapia intensiva nos pacientes oncológicos: estudo de coorte prospectivo unicêntrico / Acute organ failure and risk of admission to intensive medical care in cancer patients: a single center prospective cohort study

RESUMO Objetivo: Determinar a incidência cumulativa de falência aguda de órgão e internamento em unidade de terapia intensiva em pacientes oncológicos. Métodos: Estudo de coorte prospectivo de pacientes oncológicos adultos em tratamento sistêmico antineoplásico, internados de forma não programada. Resultados: Entre agosto de 2018 e fevereiro de 2019, 10.392 pacientes foram submetidos a tratamento sistêmico antineoplásico, sendo que 358 necessitaram de internamento hospitalar não programado e foram elegíveis para inclusão; por fim, 258 desses pacientes foram incluídos. A média de idade foi de 60,9 anos, e 50,9% eram do sexo masculino; 17,9% dos pacientes tinham câncer hematológico. O risco acumulado de falência de órgãos foi de 39,6% (IC95% 35 - 44) e o risco de internamento na unidade de terapia intensiva em pacientes com falência aguda de órgão foi de 15,0% (IC95% 12 - 18). À admissão em internamento, 62,1% dos pacientes foram considerados não elegíveis para terapia de substituição artificial de órgãos. O tempo mediano de seguimento foi de 9,5 meses. A mortalidade hospitalar foi de 17,5%, na unidade de terapia intensiva de 58,8%. A mediana de sobrevivência da coorte foi de 134 dias (IC95% 106 - 162). Na análise multivariada, a falência aguda de órgão se associou com a mortalidade aos 6 meses após a alta (hazard ratio: 1,6; IC95% 1,2 - 2,2). Conclusão: O risco de falência aguda de órgão em pacientes oncológicos admitidos para tratamento hospitalar não programado durante o tratamento sistémico foi de 39,6% e o risco de internamento em unidade de terapia intensiva foi de 15,0%. A falência aguda de órgão em pacientes oncológicos foi um fator de prognóstico independente para maior mortalidade intra-hospitalar e menor sobrevivência aos 6 meses após a alta.

ABSTRACT Objective: To ascertain the cumulative incidence of acute organ failure and intensive care unit admission in cancer patients. Methods: This was a single-center prospective cohort study of adult cancer patients admitted for unscheduled inpatient care while on systemic cancer treatment. Results: Between August 2018 and February 2019, 10,392 patients were on systemic treatment, 358 had unscheduled inpatient care and were eligible for inclusion, and 285 were included. The mean age was 60.9 years, 50.9% were male, and 17.9% of patients had hematologic cancers. The cumulative risk of acute organ failure was 39.6% (95%CI: 35 - 44), and that of intensive care unit admission among patients with acute organ failure was 15.0% (95%CI: 12 - 18). On admission, 62.1% of patients were considered not eligible for artificial organ replacement therapy. The median follow-up time was 9.5 months. Inpatient mortality was 17.5%, with an intensive care unit mortality rate of 58.8% and a median cohort survival of 134 days (95%CI: 106 - 162). In multivariate analysis, acute organ failure was associated with 6-month postdischarge mortality (HR 1.6; 95%CI: 1.2 - 2.2). Conclusion: The risk of acute organ failure in cancer patients admitted for unscheduled inpatient care while on systemic treatment was 39.6%, and the risk of intensive care unit admission was 15.0%. Acute organ failure in cancer patients was an independent poor prognostic factor for inpatient hospital mortality and 6-month survival.

Disseminated Saprochaete capitata fungal infection in a patient with acute myeloid leukemia.

The case highlights the importance of actively obtaining informative samples at an early stage and of prompt initiation of combination therapy with antifungal drugs.

Withdrawing and Withholding Life Support in Patients With Cancer in an ICU Setting: A 5-Year Experience at a European Cancer Center.

OBJECTIVE: This was an observational retrospective study aimed to examine the frequency and associated factors of withdrawing or withholding life support (WWLS) in the intensive care unit (ICU) of a comprehensive cancer center. METHODS: Medical records of adult patients with cancer admitted to the ICU between January 2010 and December 2014 were reviewed. Patients who died during that period were classified into 2 groups: full life support and withdrawing and withholding life support. The relative impact of demographic and clinical factors was assessed using logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 247 patients died in our unit (mortality rate of 16.3%). Their median age was 62 (interquartile range [IQR] 51-73) years, there were 142 (57.5%) male patients, and they had predominantly solid malignancies (62.3%). The median Simplified Acute Physiology Score II and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation scores were 67 (IQR 54-80) and 29 (IQR 23-55), respectively. Ninety-six (38.9%) patients died after WWLS with no statistically significant differences in decisions to limit therapy during the study period. Patients with advanced age, solid malignancies, nonneutropenic, and longer duration of mechanical ventilation were more likely to die after WWLS. In multivariate analysis, presenting with neutropenia was independently associated with a lower likelihood of dying after WWLS (odds ratio: 0.34, 95% confidence interval: 0.15-0.80). CONCLUSION: Limitation of therapy has been a common practice in oncologic ICUs over recent years. Neutropenia is an independent predictor of limitation of therapy.

Fine needle aspiration of a lymph node in an HIV patient with chronic infection by Leishmania: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Lymphadenopathy is one of the earliest and commonest manifestations in HIV patients. Fine needle aspiration cytology is an accurate, common procedure in the evaluation of lymphadenopathy in HIV-positive patients. The most frequent etiology of this clinical manifestation, in Western studies, is the presence of reactive hyperplasia due to the HIV itself and infectious diseases with opportunistic agents, namely Mycobacterium. The diagnosis of other microorganisms, such as fungi, helminthes and protozoa, is less likely, and most cases are reported as curiosities. CASE: Chronic visceral leishmaniasis occurred in an HIV-1 patient. Fine needle aspiration biopsy was performed in an axillary lymph node during the course of follow-up. The lymph node aspirates showed numerous macrophages, carrying several intracellular microorganisms (Leishmania amastigotes). CONCLUSION: The cytologic diagnosis offered no major challenge, but the differential diagnosis with other intracellular infectious agents that can also affect HIV patients should always be considered. In this context, we reviewed the HIV patients with lymphadenopathy seen in our hospital and who underwent fine needle biopsy in the last 5 years. From a series of 201 patients and 250 fine needle aspiration biopsy samples, this was the only case of leishmaniasis to date.