Evaluation of an emergency department opt-out provider-driven HIV and syphilis screening and linkage-to-care program.

OBJECTIVE: While the effectiveness of emergency departments (ED) in screening for HIV and syphilis is understood, less is known about dual screening programs. We aim to evaluate the impact of an opt-out provider-initiated HIV and syphilis program on screening, diagnosis, and linkage to care outcomes. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients screened pre (2014-2017) and post (2017-2021) program implementation. Primary outcomes include HIV and syphilis screening, incidence of positive tests, and proportion of patients linked to care. Secondary outcomes included pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) referral and successful linkage rates for HIV-negative syphilis-positive patients. RESULTS: Pre-implementation, 882 HIV tests were performed, of which 22 (2.49%) were new cases and 18 (81.82%) were linked to care; 754 syphilis tests were performed, of which 33 (4.38%) were active infections and 30 (90.91%) were treated. No eligible patients received PrEP referral. Post-implementation, 12,999 HIV tests were performed, of which 73 (0.56%) were new cases and 55 (75.34%) were linked to care; 10,885 syphilis tests were performed, of which 216 (1.98%) were active infections and 188 (87.04%) were treated. 25 (9.09%) eligible patients were referred for PrEP, and four (16.0%) attended their appointment. CONCLUSIONS: Post-implementation, there was a 1373.81% and 1343.63% increase in screening, and a 231.82% and 554.55% increase in positive cases of HIV and syphilis, respectively. Dual screening programs can be successfully implemented within the existing ED framework to increase screening and early detection for HIV and syphilis.

Emergency department screening for latent tuberculosis infection.

OBJECTIVE: Approximately 12.4 million people in the U.S. have latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI), 73% of whom are non-U.S. born. Identification and treatment of LTBI are essential for tuberculosis eradication. We evaluated an emergency department (ED) - based LTBI screening and linkage to care program. METHODS: We queried electronic records of a clinical prevention program located in a Midwestern, urban, academic ED that serves as the region's safety-net hospital. Program staff approached non-U.S. born ED patients from TB endemic areas. Patients received QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QFT) blood testing and, if positive, were referred to treatment. The primary outcome was the proportion of tested patients newly diagnosed with LTBI. We secondarily report the number of patients linked to care who initiated LTBI treatment. RESULTS: The program approached 33 patients, of whom 24 (72.7%) were eligible, and 23 (95.8%) were tested. The majority were male (13, 56.5%), median age was 33 years (IQR 27-45), and 13 (56.5%) were from Latin America. Three patients (13.0%, 95% CI 0.03-0.35) were newly diagnosed with LTBI and linked to care; two (66.7%) started LTBI treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In this first report of an ED-based LTBI screening program implemented in a region with low TB prevalence, over 10% of high-risk ED patients tested positive for LTBI and were linked to treatment. Screening populations at risk for LTBI in EDs and linking them to public health treatment services should be prioritized in order to achieve TB elimination in the U.S.

Missed HIV diagnoses when screening only emergency department patients who have blood samples obtained for other clinical purposes.

OBJECTIVE: Emergency departments (EDs) are highly valued settings for HIV screening. Most large-volume ED HIV screening programs have attenuated operational barriers by screening only ED patients who already have a blood sample available for other clinical reasons. Our objective was to estimate the proportion of HIV positive patients who are missed when an ED excludes patients for whom HIV screening would be the only indication to obtain a blood sample. METHODS: This cross-sectional analysis used existing electronic records of patients seen between 2017 and 2019 by an urban, academic ED and its HIV screening program, which includes patients regardless of whether they receive other ED blood testing. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients tested by the screening program who were newly diagnosed with HIV (Sample 1) for whom HIV screening would be the only indication for venipuncture. We secondarily 1) estimate the proportion of ED patients who received venipuncture using a representative sample of consecutively approached participants which prospectively recorded whether patients had blood obtained or intravenous catheter placement during usual ED care (Sample 2) and 2) report patient characteristics including HIV risk factors for those with and without ED venipuncture for both groups. RESULTS: Of 41 persons newly diagnosed with HIV by the ED screening program (Sample 1), 13 (31.7%, 95%CI 18.6-48.2) did not undergo venipuncture for any reason other than their HIV test. The proportion of ED visits without a venipuncture (Sample 2) was 44.2% (95% CI 41.9-46.6). Patient characteristics were similar for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Screening only those patients with a blood sample already available or easily obtainable due to usual ED care, misses many opportunities for earlier HIV diagnosis. Innovation in research, policy, and practice is needed to overcome still unaddressed barriers to ED HIV screening when HIV screening is the only indication for collection of a biological sample.

HIV detection by an emergency department HIV screening program during a regional outbreak among people who inject drugs.

OBJECTIVE: Multiple HIV outbreaks among persons who inject drugs (PWID) have occurred in the US since 2015. Emergency departments (EDs), recognized as essential venues for HIV screening, may play a unique role in identifying undiagnosed HIV among PWID, who frequently present for complications of injection drug use (IDU). Our objective was to describe changes in HIV diagnoses among PWID detected by an ED HIV screening program and estimate the program's contribution to HIV diagnoses among PWID county-wide during the emergence of a regional HIV outbreak. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of electronically queried clinical records from an urban, safety-net ED's HIV screening program and publicly available HIV surveillance data for its surrounding county, Hamilton County, Ohio. Outcomes included the change in number of HIV diagnoses and the ED's contribution to case identification county-wide, overall and for PWID during 2014-2018. RESULTS: During 2014-2018, the annual number of HIV diagnoses made by the ED program increased from 20 to 42 overall, and from 1 to 18 for PWID. We estimated that the ED contributed 18% of HIV diagnoses in the county and 22% of diagnoses among PWID. CONCLUSIONS: The ED program contributed 1 in 5 new HIV diagnoses among PWID county-wide, further illustrating the importance of ED HIV screening programs in identifying undiagnosed HIV infections. In areas experiencing increasing IDU, HIV screening in EDs can provide an early indication of increasing HIV diagnoses among PWID and can substantially contribute to case-finding during an HIV outbreak.

Identifying ED patients with previous abnormal HIV or hepatitis C test results who may require additional services.

OBJECTIVES: Routine emergency department (ED) HIV or HCV screening may inadvertently capture patients already diagnosed but does not specifically prioritize identification of this group. Our objective was to preliminarily estimate the volume of this distinct group in our ED population through a pilot electronic health record (EHR) build that identified all patients with indications of HIV or HCV in their EHR at time of ED presentation. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of an urban, academic ED's HIV/HCV program for previously diagnosed patients August 2017-July 2018. Prevention program staff, alerted by the EHR, reviewed records and interviewed patients to determine if confirmatory testing or linkage to care was needed. Primary outcome was total proportion of ED patients for whom the EHR generated an alert. Secondary outcome was the proportion of patients assessed by program staff who required confirmatory testing or linkage to HIV/HCV medical care. RESULTS: There were 65,374 ED encounters with 5238 (8.0%, 95% CI: 7.8%-8.2%) EHR alerts. Of these, 3741 were assessed by program staff, with 798 (21%, 95% CI: 20%-23%) requiring HIV/HCV confirmatory testing or linkage to care services, 163 (20%) for HIV, 551 (69%) for HCV, and 84 (11%) for both HIV and HCV services. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with existing indication of HIV or HCV infection in need of confirmatory testing or linkage to care were common in this ED. EDs should prioritize identifying this population, outside of routine screening, and intervene similarly regardless of whether the patient is newly or previously diagnosed.

Retrospective Review of Need for Delayed Naloxone or Oxygen in Emergency Department Patients Receiving Naloxone for Heroin Reversal.

BACKGROUND: Emergency departments (EDs) are experiencing an increasing number of heroin overdose visits. Currently, there is no generally agreed upon ED observation period for heroin overdose patients who receive naloxone. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine the safety of a 2-h observation period for heroin overdose patients who receive naloxone. METHODS: We performed a chart review of all patients who presented with any opioid-related complaint between 2009 and 2014 to our urban academic trauma center. Subset analysis of patients with isolated heroin overdose who received naloxone was performed, with the intent of excluding patients intoxicated with long-acting/enteral opioids. The primary outcome was the number of patients who required delayed intervention-specifically, additional naloxone or supplemental oxygen. RESULTS: Between 2009 and 2014, we recorded 806 visits to our ED for heroin use after receiving naloxone. Twenty-nine patients (3.6%) received a repeat dose of naloxone, and 17 patients (2%) received oxygen ≥2 h after initial naloxone administration. Our 2-h intervention rate was 4.6% (N = 37). This decreased to 1.9% (N = 15) after 3 h and 0.9% (N = 7) after 4 h. Patients with polysubstance use were more likely to receive repeat naloxone (p < 0.01), but not oxygen (p = 0.10). Preexisting cardiopulmonary conditions did not correlate with a need for supplemental oxygen (p = 0.24) or repeat naloxone (p = 0.30). CONCLUSIONS: A 2-h ED observation period for heroin overdose patients reversed with naloxone resulted in a delayed intervention rate of 5%. Clinicians may consider a 3-h observation period, with extra scrutiny in polysubstance abuse.