Basic immunologic study as a foundation for engineered therapeutic development.

Bioengineering and drug delivery technologies play an important role in bridging the gap between basic scientific discovery and clinical application of therapeutics. To identify the optimal treatment, the most critical stage is to diagnose the problem. Often these two may occur simultaneously or in parallel, but in this review, we focus on bottom-up approaches in understanding basic immunologic phenomena to develop targeted therapeutics. This can be observed in several fields; here, we will focus on one of the original immunotherapy targets-cancer-and one of the more recent targets-regenerative medicine. By understanding how our immune system responds in processes such as malignancies, wound healing, and medical device implantation, we can isolate therapeutic targets for pharmacologic and bioengineered interventions.

Pro-regenerative biomaterials recruit immunoregulatory dendritic cells after traumatic injury.

During wound healing and surgical implantation, the body establishes a delicate balance between immune activation to fight off infection and clear debris and immune tolerance to control reactivity against self-tissue. Nonetheless, how such a balance is achieved is not well understood. Here we describe that pro-regenerative biomaterials for muscle injury treatment promote the proliferation of a BATF3-dependent CD103+XCR1+CD206+CD301b+ dendritic cell population associated with cross-presentation and self-tolerance. Upregulation of E-cadherin, the ligand for CD103, and XCL-1 in injured tissue suggests a mechanism for cell recruitment to trauma. Muscle injury recruited natural killer cells that produced Xcl1 when stimulated with fragmented extracellular matrix. Without cross-presenting cells, T-cell activation increases, pro-regenerative macrophage polarization decreases and there are alterations in myogenesis, adipogenesis, fibrosis and increased muscle calcification. These results, previously observed in cancer progression, suggest a fundamental mechanism of immune regulation in trauma and material implantation with implications for both short- and long-term injury recovery.

Characterization of the antispike IgG immune response to COVID-19 vaccines in people with a wide variety of immunodeficiencies.

Research on coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination in immune-deficient/disordered people (IDP) has focused on cancer and organ transplantation populations. In a prospective cohort of 195 IDP and 35 healthy volunteers (HV), antispike immunoglobulin G (IgG) was detected in 88% of IDP after dose 2, increasing to 93% by 6 months after dose 3. Despite high seroconversion, median IgG levels for IDP never surpassed one-third that of HV. IgG binding to Omicron BA.1 was lowest among variants. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 pseudo-neutralization only modestly correlated with antispike IgG concentration. IgG levels were not significantly altered by receipt of different messenger RNA-based vaccines, immunomodulating treatments, and prior severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infections. While our data show that three doses of coronavirus disease 2019 vaccinations induce antispike IgG in most IDP, additional doses are needed to increase protection. Because of the notably reduced IgG response to Omicron BA.1, the efficacy of additional vaccinations, including bivalent vaccines, should be studied in this population.