Restoration of internal rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty may vary depending on etiology in patients younger than 60 ​years of age: a multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) offers promising functional outcomes for young patients, yet challenges persist in restoring internal rotation (IR). This study aimed to assess the restoration of IR after RSA in patients younger than 60 years of age and analyze the factors affecting IR recovery. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter study was conducted, examining the functional outcome of patients who underwent RSA, with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. Two subgroups of patients who underwent primary RSA were analyzed separately with respect to active internal rotation with the elbow at the side (AIR1): "difficult AIR1" and "easy AIR1." RESULTS: The study included 136 patients (overall series) with a mean age of 51.6 years. The overall series showed statistically significant improvement in active range of motion (RoM), pain, and Constant scores, especially with active IR (p â€‹< â€‹0.01). According to etiology, statistically significant improvement (p â€‹< â€‹0.05) in active IR was observed for fracture sequelae, primary osteoarthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis, whereas no statistically significant improvement in IR was observed for tumor, revision, and cuff-tear arthropathy (p â€‹> â€‹0.05). In subgroup analysis, patients with easy AIR1 displayed a statistically significant lower body mass index and better Constant score mobility, as well as improved motion in forward elevation and active IR (p â€‹< â€‹0.05). No statistically significant associations were found between improved IR and prosthetic design or subscapularis repair. Scapular notch, lysis of the graft, and teres minor atrophy were significantly associated with better active IR (p â€‹< â€‹0.05). CONCLUSION: RSA improves active RoM, pain, and functional outcomes in patients aged under 60. However, the degree of improvement in IR may vary depending on several factors and the underlying etiologies. These insights are crucial for patient selection and counseling, guiding RSA optimization efforts. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Glenoid lateralization and subscapularis repair are independent predictive factors of improved internal rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has shown improvement in clinical outcomes for various conditions, although some authors expressed concern about the restoration of active internal rotation (AIR). The current study assesses preoperative and intraoperative predictive factors of AIR in patients having a Grammont-style RSA with a minimum five year follow-up. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicentric study, including patients operated on with a 155° Grammont-style RSA for cuff-related pathology or primary osteoarthritis with posterior subluxation or an associated cuff tear. Patients were clinically evaluated at a minimum of five year follow-up. Patients with previous surgery or those who had a tendon transfer with the RSA were excluded. Demographic parameters, BMI, preoperative notes, and operative reports were obtained from medical records. AIR was graded according to the constant score system from 0 to 10. RESULTS: A total of 280 shoulders in 269 patients (mean age at surgery, 74.9 ± 5.9 years) met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. The average follow-up was 8.1 years (range, 5-16 years). Overall, AIR increased from 4.2 (SD 2.5, range 0 to 10) preoperatively to 5.9 (SD 2.6, range 0 to 10) at final follow-up. At the last follow-up, AIR increased in 56% of cases, was unchanged in 26% and decreased in 18%. In 188 shoulders (67%), internal rotation was functional and allowed patients to reach the level of L3 or higher. Multivariable linear regression found the following preoperative clinical factors predictive of worse AIR after RSA: male gender (ß = -1.25 [-2.10; -0.40]; p = 0.0042) and higher values of BMI (ß = -0.085 [-0.17; -0.0065]; p = 0.048). Two surgical factors were associated with better AIR after RSA: glenoid lateralization with BIO-RSA technique (ß = 0.80 [0.043; 1.56]; p = 0.039) and subscapularis repair (ß = 1.16 [0.29; 2.02]; p = 0.0092). CONCLUSIONS: With a mean of eight year follow-up (5 to 16 years), internal rotation was functional (≥ L3 level) in 67% of operated shoulders after Grammont-style RSA; however, two patients out of ten had decreased AIR after surgery. Male patients and those with higher BMIs had worse AIR, with glenoid lateralization (using the BIO-RSA technique) and subscapularis repair, as they are predictive of increased AIR after RSA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case series, Level IV.

Long-term results of revision rotator cuff repair for failed cuff repair: a minimum 10-year follow-up study.

HYPOTHESIS: Rotator cuff repair remains associated with high retear rates, which range from 13% to 79%. The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical and structural results after revision rotator cuff repair at a minimum 10-year follow-up. METHODS: We retrospectively studied the records of all patients who underwent revision rotator cuff repair in 3 different institutions between July 2001 and December 2007 with a minimum 10-year follow-up. A total of 54 patients (61% males, mean age 52 ± 6 years old) met the inclusion criteria. Outcome measures included pain (visual analog scale [VAS]), range of motion (ROM), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), and the Constant score. Superior migration, osteoarthritis, and acromiohumeral interval (AHI) were assessed on standard radiographs. Fatty infiltration and structural integrity of the repaired tendon were evaluated on magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomographic arthrogram. RESULTS: At a mean 14.1 years (10.4-20.5), range of motion did not progress significantly in elevation and internal rotation between pre- and postoperation (158° [range, 100°-180°] to 164° [range, 60°-180°], P = .33, and L3 [range, sacrum-T12] to T12 [range, buttocks-T7], P = .34, respectively) and decreased in active external rotation from 45° (range, 10°-80°) to 39° (range, 10°-80°) (P = .02). However, VAS, SSV, and Constant score were all significantly improved at last follow-up (P < .001). AHI decreased significantly (P = .002) from 10 mm (7-14 mm) to 8 mm (0-12 mm). Two percent of the supraspinatus/infraspinatus tendons were Sugaya 1, 24% were Sugaya 2, 35% were Sugaya 3, 12% were Sugaya 4, and 27% were Sugaya 5. Goutallier score progressed for all muscles, but this did not reach significance and mean Goutallier remained <2 for all 4 muscles at last follow-up. Hamada score progressed from 0% >grade 2 preoperatively to 6% >grade 2 at last follow-up. CONCLUSION: Revision rotator cuff repair provides significant pain relief and improvement in functional scores at long-term follow-up. The mild progression of fatty infiltration, AHI, and Hamada score suggests that despite high retear rates (39% of stage 4 and 5 in the Sugaya classification), revision repair could possibly have a protective role on the evolution toward cuff tear arthropathy.

After failed radial head arthroplasty, what are the options? Risk factors and results of revisions in a multicenter study.

Introduction: Few multicenter studies have analyzed the outcome of revision surgery of radial head arthroplasties (RHA) in the medium term follow up. The objective is twofold: to determine the factors associated with revision of RHAs and to analyze the results of revision with 2 surgical techniques: isolated removal of the RHA or revision with a new RHA (R-RHA). Hypothesis: There are associated factors of RHA revision and RHA revision results in satisfactory clinical and functional outcomes. Methods: Twenty-eight patients were included in this multicenter retrospective study, with all surgical indications for initial RHA being traumatic/post-traumatic. The mean age was 47 ± 13 years with a mean follow-up of 70 ± 48 months. This series included two groups: the isolated RHA removal group (n = 17) and the revision RHA with new radial head prosthesis (R-RHA) group (n = 11). Evaluation was clinical and radiological with univariate and multivariate analysis. Results: Two factors associated with RHA revision were identified: a pre-existing capitellar lesion (p = 0.047) and a RHA placed for a secondary indication (<0.001). Revision for all 28 patients resulted in improved pain (pre-op Visual Analog Scale 4.7 ± 3 vs. post-op 1.57 ± 2.2, p < 0.001), mobilities (pre-op flexion 118 ± 20 vs. post-op 130 ± 13, p = 0.03; pre-op extension -30 ± 21 vs post-op -20 ± 15, p = 0.025; pre-op pronation 59 ± 12 vs post-op 72 ± 17, p = 0.04; pre-op supination 48 ± 2 vs post-op 65 ± 22, p = 0.027) and functional scores. Mobility and pain control were, for stable elbows, satisfactory in the isolated removal group. When the initial or revision indication was instability, the DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand = 10 ± 5) and MEPS (Mayo Elbow Performance score = 85 ± 16) scores were satisfactory in the R-RHA group. Discussion: In the case of a radial head fracture, RHA is a satisfactory first-line solution without pre-existing capitellar injury, its results being much weaker in the case of ORIF failure and fracture sequelae. In case of RHA revision, isolated removal or R-RHA adapted according to the pre-operative radio-clinical exam. Level of evidence: IV.

Arthroscopic advancement of the supraspinatus muscle and tendon for posterosuperior massive rotator cuff tears.

The tension-free repair of retracted supraspinatus tears with the open muscle and tendon advancement technique first described by Debeyre in 1965 gave satisfactory clinical results. The purpose of this anatomical study was to test the feasibility of an arthroscopic supraspinatus advancement technique. A total of 10 cadaveric shoulders were operated. We assessed the feasibility, measured the slide distance, and recorded the position of the suprascapular nerve (SSN) for each shoulder. Reattachment of the tendon to its native footprint was achieved in all cases. The mean slide distance was 38.8 mm ± 3.6 (33-44). The SSN was released and tension-free in all shoulders. Arthroscopic advancement of the supraspinatus muscle and tendon enables complete rotator cuff repair in irreparable retracted posterosuperior tears and is a noteworthy alternative to the other techniques. Level of Evidence: IV.

Long-term outcomes of coracoid bone block osteolysis: case report.

Latarjet procedure is reliable and reproductible procedure for treatment of anterior shoulder instability. Results are durable but complications can occur: neurological injury, non-union, infection, stiffness, osteolysis of coracoid bone block, recurrence of dislocation, osteoarthritis. We present the case of two patients with complication not described in the literature: osteolysis of the neck of the scapula around screws discovered at 8 and 20 years after initial surgery. These patients presented with previous pain which motivated consultation. Imaging showed coracoid bone block osteolysis, extensive geode weakening articular surface of scapular glenoid, around screws which are not bi-cortical. Screws were removed, osteolysis was filled with iliac cancellous bone graft and joint capsule was re-tensioned. Results of this procedure at one year were clinical and radiological satisfactory.

Survivorship of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty According to Indication, Age and Gender.

Background. The indications for reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) have been widely expanded, but only a few studies report the long-term survival of these implants. Our objective was to report the long-term survivorship of a large series of RSAs implanted for different etiologies. Methods. A retrospective multicenter study including all the RSAs was performed in six shoulder-specialized centers with at least 2 years of follow up. We reviewed 1611 RSAs, operated between 1993 and 2010, including 497 cuff-tear arthropathies (CTA), 239 revision RSAs, 188 massive cuff tears (MCT), 185 fracture sequelae (FS), 183 failed previous cuff repairs (FCR), and 142 primary osteoarthritis (POA). The mean follow-up was 5.6 ± 3.9 years (range 2−20). Results. Overall, 266 RSAs (16.5%) had at least one complication leading to 64 reoperations (4.0%) and 110 revision surgeries (6.8%). The most frequent complications were infection (3.8%), instability (2.8%), and humerus-related complications (2.8%). At 10 years, the survival without revision surgery was 91.0% in primary RSAs and 80.9% in revision RSAs for failed arthroplasty (p < 0.001). In the primary RSA group, MCT and FCR led to 10-year survivals for over 95% but fracture sequelae and tumors had the lowest 10-year survivals (83.9% and 53.1%). Younger patients had a lower 10-year survival. In revision RSAs, male patients had a significantly lower survival than females (72.3% vs. 84.5% at 10 years, p = 0.020). Discussion. Primary RSA for cuff-deficient shoulders or POA leads to a high 10-year survival, but revision RSA or primary RSA for FS and tumors are at high-risk for revision. Surgeons should be aware of high rates of complications and lower survival rates of RSA in younger patients, in males, and in RSAs for revision surgery.

Clinical results and radiological bony adaptations on a cementless short-stem prosthesis - A comparative study between anatomical and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Although the use of short stem and stemless shoulder prosthesis is trending, the surgical outcome may vary due to varying biomechanics. Objectives were to evaluate and compare the short-term clinical results and radiological changes between anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and reverse TSA (rTSA) with a short-stem humeral design. HYPOTHESIS: There is no clinical and radiological difference between TSA and rTSA using a short-stem humeral design. METHODS: This retrospective study included 66 patients who underwent TSA and rTSA (33 patients each) with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Radiographic findings, including preoperative Tingart cortical index (TCI), postoperative filling ratios of metaphysis (FRmet) and diaphysis (FRdia), bone adaptations, and osteolysis around the humeral stem at the immediate postoperative period, and the most recent follow-up were measured. Pre and postoperative Constant-Murley score, subjective shoulder value (SSV), and complications were noted. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 27 (range 24-50) months, FRmet was significantly higher in rTSA group than the TSA group (0.65 vs. 0.60, p=0.009). Bone resorption was similar in both groups (p=0.76) and was correlated to a lower TCI value of<2.9mm (p=0.02). Despite significant clinical improvement in individual groups, the comparison between groups was non-significant (p>0.05). Negative correlation was observed between TCI and total clinical score (p=0.045) in TSA group, active external rotation (p=0.019), activity (p=0.005), SSV (p=0.008) and total score (p=0.025) in rTSA group. Radiographic changes were not influenced by patient characteristics and clinical results (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Although no radiographic difference was observed between TSA and rTSA, better short-term clinical results observed with the usage of the short-stem humeral design prosthesis are encouraging. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; Retrospective cohort study.

The arm change position: Additional information for optimizing range of motion after reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: The arm change position (ACP) is a new parameter for evaluating the humerus' 3D displacement following reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) during 3D pre operative planning. The purpose of this study was to analyze the relationship between ACP variations after RSA and simulated passive joint mobility. The assumption is that the ACP will to help optimize the passive joint mobility of a RSA implant. METHODS: In 30 degenerative shoulders, four shoulder surgeons planned a RSA with virtual motion analysis. After this analysis, each plan was revised to optimize the range of motion. Relationships between the differences in movement amplitude and the differences in ACP were evaluated. RESULTS: Arm lengthening and humerus lateralization were significantly associated with better joint mobility in all three planes (frontal, sagittal and axial). They were equally important for improving external rotation, extension, flexion and adduction. Anterior displacement of the humerus improved both internal and external rotation. DISCUSSION: The ACP is a useful preoperative planning parameter for RSA. It could help with selecting the best implant combination, as well as determining their position, in order to optimize the simulated passive mobility relative to humerus displacement after RSA. To validate the value of the ACP in clinical practice, a prospective study is needed in which the postoperative joint mobility is measured in vivo as a function of the ACP. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, case control study.

Changes in professional practices. Contribution of conformity scoring in assessing and improving operative reports: The SCHOCRO.

INTRODUCTION: In orthopedics, as in all surgical specialties, procedures are described in an operative report. This is an essential and mandatory part of the medical file (Article R.1112-2 of the French Public Health Code) and a fully codified medicolegal document comprising precise items determined by the Health Authority (HAS) and the ORTHORISQ risk management and accreditation organization. HYPOTHESIS: Information on the rules for filling out operative reports could improve their level of conformity, especially if provided early in surgical training. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective comparative study was conducted with 6 groups of junior or senior surgeons, in the public or private sector, who had or had not been given specific information on the criteria for filling out the operative report. A conformity score was designed, based on the HAS-ORTHORISQ criteria (SCHOCRO, out of 100 points) for comparison between groups. RESULTS: Scores did not differ between junior and senior surgeons, whether informed or not. Private-sector surgeons had better scores than university hospital surgeons when not informed (p=0.016). The information improved conformity. The earlier residents were informed, the better their conformity. DISCUSSION: Harmonization of operative reporting improves report quality and should be standard practice for all, and especially for residents as soon as they enter the foundation phase. The SCHOCRO score seemed well suited for assessing operative report quality, being simple and reproducible. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II; prospective study.

Preoperative planning of baseplate position in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: Still no consensus on lateralization, version and inclination.

INTRODUCTION: In the context of reverse shoulder arthroplasty, some parameters of glenoid baseplate placement follow established golden rules, while other parameters still have no consensus. The assessment of glenoid wear in the future location of the glenoid baseplate varies among surgeons. The objective of this study was to analyze the inter-observer reproducibility of glenoid baseplate 3D positioning during virtual pre-operative planning. METHOD: Four shoulder surgeons planned the glenoid baseplate position of a reverse arthroplasty in the CT scans of 30 degenerative shoulders. The position of the glenoid guide pin entry point and the glenoid baseplate center was compared between surgeons. The baseplate's version and inclination were also analyzed. RESULTS: The 3D positioning of the pin entry point was achieved within ± 4 mm for nearly 100% of the shoulders. The superoinferior, anteroposterior and mediolateral positions of the baseplate center were achieved within ± 2 mm for 77.2%, 67.8% and 39.4% of the plans, respectively. The 3D orientation of the glenoid baseplate within ± 10° was inconsistent between the four surgeons (weak agreement, K=0.31, p=0.17). DISCUSSION: The placement of the glenoid guide pin was very consistent between surgeons. Conversely, there was little agreement on the lateralization, version and inclination criteria for positioning the glenoid baseplate between surgeons. These parameters need to be studied further in clinical practice to establish golden rules. Three-dimensional information from pre-operative planning is beneficial for assessing the glenoid deformity and for limiting its impact on the baseplate position achieved by different surgeons. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. Case control study.

Does isolated arthroscopic anterior acromioplasty modify critical shoulder angle?

INTRODUCTION: Critical shoulder angle (CSA)>35° correlates significantly with primary rotator cuff tear and re-tear after repair. Acromial axial orientation varies between individuals. The present study aimed to assess the impact of strictly anterior acromioplasty on CSA. HYPOTHESIS: CSA is reduced by arthroscopic anterior acromioplasty. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A single-center retrospective study included patients receiving isolated arthroscopic acromioplasty between January 2016 and December 2017. Exclusion criteria comprised history of surgery and fracture or dislocation of the shoulder. Pre- and post-operative AP shoulder radiographs were taken. The angle subtended by a line between the inferior and superior edges of the glenoid and a line between the inferior edge of the glenoid and the most lateral point on the acromion was measured. RESULTS: One hundred and two patients were included: mean age, 50.5±10.1 years (range, 23-82 years). Mean CSA was 34.7±4.4° (range, 26-48°) preoperatively and 31.7±3.7° (range, 23-40°) postoperatively (p<0.001). In the group with CSA >35°, the decrease was significant: 34.4±3.2° (range, 28-40°) versus 38.9±2.8° (range, 36-48°) (p<0.001), with 64% CSA <35° after isolated anterior acromioplasty. DISCUSSION: CSA was decreased by arthroscopic acromioplasty. However, in 36% of cases with preoperative CSA >35°, CSA was not normalized. CONCLUSION: Anterior arthroscopic acromioplasty significantly reduced CSA in the overall population, and especially in case of high CSA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; retrospective study.

Clinical and Radiological Results of Hemiarthroplasty and Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Primary Avascular Necrosis of the Humeral Head in Patients Less Than 60 Years Old.

BACKGROUND: Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and hemiarthroplasty (HA) have shown good clinical outcomes in primary avascular necrosis of the humeral head (PANHH) both in short and long terms. The purpose of this study was to assess the complications, the clinical and radiological outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty in young patients with PANHH. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-seven patients aged under 60 years old and suffering from PANHH were operated with arthroplasty. Patients were assessed clinically and radiographically before surgery with a minimum of 2 years of follow up (FU). RESULTS: HA was performed on 108 patients (85%). Two patients were revised for painful glenoid wear after 2 and 4 years. TSA was performed on 19 patients (15%). Five TSA had to be revised for glenoid loosening (n = 4) or instability (n = 1). Revision rate was 26% with TSA and 2% with HA. There were no significant differences between HA and TSA in terms of clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: With a mean FU of 8 years, HA and TSA improved clinical outcomes of patients with PANHH. HA revisions for painful glenoid wear were rare (2%). The revision rate was excessively high with TSA (26%).

Humeral osteolysis after reverse shoulder arthroplasty using cemented or cementless stems comparative retrospective study with a mean follow-up of 9 years.

INTRODUCTION: The cause of proximal humeral osteolysis after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) remains controversial. The primary objective of our study was to compare the radiographic outcomes of Grammont-type RSA when a cemented stem is used versus when a cementless stem is used. The secondary objective was to identify the cause of these radiographic changes, especially for the cementless stems. HYPOTHESIS: More proximal humerus bone loss occurs when a cementless humeral stem is used. METHODS: With a minimum follow-up of 5 years, two paired cohorts were compared retrospectively: 70 RSA with cemented stem and 70 RSA with cementless stem. Using the radiographs made at the final follow-up visit, we looked for tuberosity resorption, signs of stress shielding, the presence of periprosthetic radiolucent lines and scapular notching. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 9 years (5.0-20.6), the RSA revision rate was 1.8% in the cemented group and 3.6% in the cementless group (p=1). Tuberosity resorption was twice as common in the cementless group: 59% versus 30% (p<0.001). Signs of stress shielding such as osteopenia were only present in the cementless group. In both groups, tuberosity resorption was often associated with scapular notching. In the shoulders with tuberosity resorption, stage≥3 scapular notching was more common in the cementless group (p=0.001). DISCUSSION: For the cementless stems, proximal humeral osteolysis can in part be attributed to stress shielding. The relationship between notching and tuberosity resorption in the two groups also suggests a secondary biological cause. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; Comparative retrospective study.

Does anterior arthroscopic acromioplasty modify critical shoulder angle?

INTRODUCTION: Critical shoulder angle (CSA) is measured on AP view in neutral rotation as the angle subtended by the tangent to the glenoid and the lateral edge of the acromion. CSA >35° is a risk factor for primary rotator cuff tear and iterative tear after cuff repair. The aim of the present study was to assess change in CSA following arthroscopic anterior acromioplasty. HYPOTHESIS: CSA is decreased by arthroscopic anterior acromioplasty. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A single-center retrospective descriptive observational study included patients undergoing arthroscopic acromioplasty between January 2016 and December 2017, for whom strictly AP pre- and post-operative radiographs were available. Patients with history of surgery, fracture or dislocation in the same shoulder were excluded. RESULTS: 102 patients were included; mean age, 50.5 years (range, 23-82 years). Mean preoperative CSA was 34.7±4.4° (range, 26-48°) and postoperative CSA 31.7±3.7° (range, 23-40°) (p<0.001). In the pathological CSA group (>35°), the values were 38.9±2.8° (36-48°) and 34.4±3.2° (28-40°) (p<0.001), with a 64.3% rate of correction after acromioplasty. DISCUSSION: CSA decreased after arthroscopic acromioplasty. Even so, 36.7% of pathological CSAs (>35°) were not corrected, with risk of rotator cuff tear. CONCLUSION: Anterior arthroscopic acromioplasty significantly reduced CSA overall, notably in case of high CSA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective study.

Results of radial head prostheses implanted during Essex-Lopresti syndrome in multicentric study.

AIMS: The aim was to evaluate the results of radial head prostheses (RHP) in Essex-Lopresti injury (ELI) and to compare results after RHP between acute and chronic ELI. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients treated with RHP for ELI were selected from a multicenter retrospective series of 310 RHP, with follow-up greater than two years. Two groups were acute ELI group (n=19, average diagnosis = 5+/-9 days) and chronic ELI group (n=12, average diagnosis 8.4+/-7.1 months). RHP was associated in some cases with K-wires: during acute ELI to stabilize the distal radio-ulnar joint (n=4) or during chronic ELI with ulnar osteotomy or palliative surgery (n=4). Clinical and radiologic evaluation was performed including analysis of the complications and revisions rates, pain level, range of motion, and MEPS (Mayo Elbow Performance Score) and DASH score (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand). RESULTS: At last follow-up (71+/-38 months), survival of RHP in the acute ELI group was 84% (16/19) and 92% (11/12) in the chronic ELI group without statistically significant difference. Flexion (acute=131degrees+/-13.4 vs chronic=22+/-12.8, p=0.041) and supination (ELI=71+/-16.8 vs chronic=58+/-17.4; p=0.045) were better in acute ELI group. The DASH score was also better in the acute group (15+/-9.1 versus 24+/-15.2, p=0.048). There was more advanced stage of humero-radial osteoarthritis in the chronic ELI group (0.7+/-0.5 versus 1.4+/-0.6, p=0.041). CONCLUSION: RHP in acute ELIs provide better clinical results, although RHPs are part of the therapeutic arsenal to treat chronic ELI.

Osteoarthritis of the shoulder in under-50 year-olds: A multicenter retrospective study of 273 shoulders by the French Society for Shoulder and Elbow (SOFEC).

INTRODUCTION: Osteoarthritis (OA) of the shoulder in under-50 year-olds is rare, and treatment is delicate. Shoulder replacement incurs frequent long-term risk of progression and a high revision rate, making it unsuited to young active patients. The aim of the present study was to determine the epidemiology of shoulder OA in under-50 year-olds and to assess the clinical results of the various treatment options. HYPOTHESIS: The main study hypothesis was that well-conducted non-operative treatment can allow shoulder replacement to be postponed. The secondary hypothesis was that anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is the treatment of choice when other options fail. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study included primary (POA) and post-instability osteoarthritis (PIOA) in patients aged≤50years at symptom onset. Exclusion criteria comprised post-traumatic OA, rheumatoid arthritis and necrosis. Two hundred and sixty-six patients for 273 shoulders were included from 13 shoulder surgery centers: 2 types of non-operative treatment (28 by platelet-rich plasma [PRP] and 88 by viscosupplementation), 73 arthroscopies, and 150 implantations (62 humeral hemiarthroplasties [HA], comprising 10 hemi-metal, 24 hemi-pyrocarbon and 28 hemi-resurfacing; 77 anatomic total prostheses, and 11 reverse prostheses). Minimum follow-up was 12 months for non-operative treatment and 24 months for arthroplasty (some patients having both). Endpoints comprised Constant score, Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) and number of complications/revision procedures. RESULTS: Mean age at treatment was 43 years (range, 23-65 years), with 75% male predominance. Symptom onset was earlier in PIOA than in POA: 36 vs. 39 years (range, 20-50 years). PRP and viscosupplementation postponed implantation by a mean 3.5 years in 86% of cases, as did arthroscopy in 56%. ER1 restriction was the most negative factor. At 74 months' follow-up for HA and 95 months for TSA, mean Constant score was significantly lower for HA (56 vs. 67; p=0.004), with higher rates of complications (31% vs. 11%) and implant exchange (13% vs. 9%). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: PRP, viscosupplementation and arthroscopy allow implantation to be postponed until the shoulder becomes stiff and painful. In case of failure, TSA is the most effective solution in the medium-term. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV a; therapeutic study - investigating the results of treatment.

Press-fit vs. cemented humeral stem fixation for reverse shoulder arthroplasty: functional outcomes at a mean follow-up of 9.5 years.

BACKGROUND: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is a reliable, long-term treatment option for degenerative shoulder pathology. However, the functional outcomes degrade around the fifth year postoperation, particularly for internal and external rotation. Long-term radiographic changes have been reported around the humeral stem, depending on the fixation method. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to compare the clinical outcomes of RSAs by fixation method-cemented vs. press-fit-after a minimum follow-up of 5 years. We hypothesized that proximal humeral osteolysis impacts the functional outcomes. DESIGN AND METHODS: Our study compared 2 matched cohorts: 56 RSAs with cemented stems and 56 RSAs with press-fit stems. We evaluated all the patients using the Constant-Murley score (CMS) and range of motion (ROM), which we measured preoperatively and at the final follow-up visit. We evaluated radiographs from the final follow-up visit to look for proximal humeral osteolysis with tuberosity resorption, signs of stress shielding, periprosthetic radiolucent lines, and scapular notching. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 9.5 years (5-21), regardless of the fixation method, the RSA procedure helped to improve the CMS and active joint ROM postoperatively, except for internal and external rotation with elbow at side in the press-fit group. Shoulder ROM was significantly better in the group with cemented stems for anterior elevation (P < .001), abduction (P = .006), and external (P = .02) and internal rotation with elbow at side (P = .02). The CMS did not differ between groups. The presence of tuberosity resorption or scapular notching had no effect on the CMS and active ROM in either group. Osteopenia, which was more prevalent in the press-fit group, had no impact on the functional outcome. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference between groups in the CMS, although the active shoulder ROM was significantly worse in the press-fit group. This difference could be attributed to more frequent tuberosity resorption in this group.