Unconventional treatment of a giant coronary aneurysm presenting as ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a case report.

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment of aneurysmal or ectatic culprit vessels in the setting of acute myocardial infarction is still matter of debate, as revascularization with either percutaneous intervention or surgery is associated with low procedural success and poor outcomes. CASE SUMMARY: We report the case of a 55-year-old male patient, admitted for inferior ST-elevation myocardial infarction, who underwent successful percutaneous implantation of a micro-mesh self-expanding nitinol carotid stent in a right coronary aneurysm with intravascular ultrasonography measured diameter of 9 mm and massive thrombus apposition. DISCUSSION: The technical characteristics of the micro-mesh self-expanding nitinol carotid stent allow for adequate plaque coverage and good apposition even in large vessels, making this device particularly suitable for the treatment of coronary lesions with high thrombus burden, when severe coronary ectasia or aneurysms are present.

Downstream or upstream administration of P2Y12 receptor blockers in non-ST elevated acute coronary syndromes: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The optimal timing to administer a P2Y12 inhibitor in patients presenting with a non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome remains a topic of debate. Pretreatment with ticagrelor before coronary anatomy is known as a widely adopted strategy. However, there is poor evidence on how this compares with administration of a P2Y12 inhibitor after defining coronary anatomy (i.e., downstream administration). Moreover, there are limited head-to-head comparisons of the two P2Y12 inhibitors-ticagrelor and prasugrel-currently recommended by the guidelines. STUDY DESIGN: DUBIUS is a phase 4, multicenter, parallel-group, double randomized study conducted in NSTE-ACS patients designed to compare a pretreatment strategy (including only ticagrelor) versus a downstream strategy (including prasugrel or ticagrelor) and to compare downstream prasugrel with downstream ticagrelor. A total of 2520 patients will be randomly assigned to pretreatment with ticagrelor or to no pretreatment. The PCI group of the downstream arm will be further randomized to receive prasugrel or ticagrelor. The two primary hypotheses are that the downstream strategy is superior to the upstream strategy and that downstream ticagrelor is non-inferior to downstream prasugrel, both measured by the incidence of a composite efficacy and safety endpoint of death from vascular causes, non-fatal MI, or non-fatal stroke, and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3, 4, and 5 bleedings. CONCLUSIONS: The DUBIUS study will provide important evidence related to the benefits and risks of pretreatment with ticagrelor compared with a strategy of no pretreatment. Moreover, the clinical impact of using downstream ticagrelor compared with downstream prasugrel will be assessed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02618837 . Registered on 1 December 2015.

Timing of Oral P2Y12 Inhibitor Administration in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Although oral P2Y12 inhibitors are key in the management of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome, the optimal timing of their administration is not well defined. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare downstream and upstream oral P2Y12 inhibitors administration strategies in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome undergoing invasive treatment. METHODS: We performed a randomized, adaptive, open-label, multicenter clinical trial. Patients were randomly assigned to receive pre-treatment with ticagrelor before angiography (upstream group) or no pre-treatment (downstream group). Patients in the downstream group undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention were further randomized to receive ticagrelor or prasugrel. The primary hypothesis was the superiority of the downstream versus the upstream strategy on the combination of efficacy and safety events (net clinical benefit). RESULTS: We randomized 1,449 patients to downstream or upstream oral P2Y12 inhibitor administration. A pre-specified stopping rule for futility at interim analysis led the trial to be stopped. The rate of the primary endpoint, a composite of death due to vascular causes; nonfatal myocardial infarction or nonfatal stroke; and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3, 4, and 5 bleeding through day 30, did not differ significantly between the downstream and upstream groups (percent absolute risk reduction: -0.46; 95% repeated confidence interval: -2.90 to 1.90). These results were confirmed among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (72% of population) and regardless of the timing of coronary angiography (within or after 24 h from enrollment). CONCLUSIONS: Downstream and upstream oral P2Y12 inhibitor administration strategies were associated with low incidence of ischemic and bleeding events and minimal numeric difference of event rates between treatment groups. These findings led to premature interruption of the trial and suggest the unlikelihood of enhanced efficacy of 1 strategy over the other. (Downstream Versus Upstream Strategy for the Administration of P2Y12 Receptor Blockers In Non-ST Elevated Acute Coronary Syndromes With Initial Invasive Indication [DUBIUS]; NCT02618837).

Management and 5-year outcome of patients with coronary artery disease in different periods of stent technology.

BACKGROUND: The availability of bare metal stents (BMS) followed by drug-eluting stents of first- (DES1) and second-generation (DES2) progressively increased the rate of the percutaneous revascularizations [percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)] with unknown impact on the long-term outcome of real-world patients with established coronary artery disease. We sought to investigate treatments applied in patients with coronary artery disease in BMS, DES1 and DES2 eras and their 5-year outcome. METHODS: A total of 3099 consecutive patients with at least one coronary stenosis more than 50% observed in 2002 (BMS era), 2005 (DES1 era) and 2011(DES2 era) were enrolled at 13 hospitals in Veneto region, Italy. RESULTS: Moving from BMS to DES1 and DES2 eras patients became significantly older, had more comorbidities and received more frequently statins, betablockers, renin-angiotensin modulators and antiplatelets (P < 0.0001 for all). The PCI/conservative therapy ratio increased from 1.9 to 2.2 and 2.3, the PCI/coronary artery by-pass surgery ratio from 3.6 to 4.0 and 5.1. The crude 5-year survival was 84.9, 83.4 and 81.4% (P = 0.20) and survival free of myocardial infarction, stroke or further revascularizations was 62.1, 60.2 and 60.1% (P = 0.68), with cardiovascular mortality accounting for 60.9, 55.6 and 43.4% of deaths. At multivariable analysis cardiovascular mortality was significantly lower in patients enrolled in 2011 vs. 2002 (hazard ratio = 0.712, 95% confidence interval 0.508-0.998, P = 0.048). CONCLUSION: From BMS to DES1 and DES2 eras progressive worsening of patients characteristics, improvement of medical treatment standards and increase in PCI/conservative therapy and PCI/coronary artery by-pass surgery ratios were observed. Five-year outcomes remained similar in the three cohorts, but in the DES2 era cardiovascular mortality was reduced.

Transcatheter Closure of Left Ventricular Apical Pseudoaneurysm with an Amplatzer Vascular Plug.

We report the case of a 66-year-old man, with a history of previous chest radiation therapy admitted to ED for heart failure. The patient was diagnosed with severe aortic stenosis and multivessel coronary disease and underwent surgical aortic valve replacement and coronary artery by pass grafts. Cardiac surgery was complicated by a left ventricular perforation by a venting catheter. The laceration was repaired with a Teflon patch apparently successful. Four months later, a CT scan performed for oncological follow-up demonstrated the complete detachment of the Teflon patch and the formation of a left ventricular pseudoaneurysm. The pseudoaneurysm was effectively treated percutaneously using an Amplatzer Vascular Plug 4.

Head-to-head comparison of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stent in the same diabetic patient with multiple coronary artery lesions: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study.

OBJECTIVE: It is still controversial whether sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) are equally effective in patients with diabetes. In these patients, multiple individual variables may be responsible for neointimal hyperplasia, thus making difficult the comparison of the two drug-eluting stents (DES). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We designed a prospective, randomized study to compare the efficacy in prevention of restenosis of SES and PES, both implanted in the same diabetic patient with multiple de novo coronary artery lesions undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention. We enrolled 60 patients with diabetes with at least two significant de novo angiographic stenoses in different coronary segments. The primary end point was in-stent late luminal loss (LLL) at 8-month angiographic follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 120 lesions were successfully treated with the randomly assigned DES (SES, n = 60; PES, n = 60). In-stent LLL was lower in the SES than in the PES group (0.26 +/- 0.4 vs. 0.50 +/- 0.6 mm; P = 0.01). Coronary lesions treated with SES presented a reduced in-stent LLL in 40 (68%) patients, while PES resulted in a lower in-stent LLL in 19 (32%) patients (P = 0.0002). At multivariable analysis, the type of DES implanted was the only independent predictor of in-stent LLL (odds ratio 2.3 [95% CI 1.1-5.0]; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: SES directly compared with PES in the same diabetic patient is associated with a decrease in the extent of in-stent LLL at 8 months, suggesting a reduced risk of restenosis.

Initial experience with a new 8 French-compatible directional atherectomy catheter: immediate and mid-term results.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the new Fox Hollow atherectomy device (FHT) designed for more efficient and easier plaque removal. The FHT has short rigid section and low-profile cutter mounted on a monorail catheter. The FHT catheter was utilized in 77 patients with 98 lesions. Mean reference vessel diameter was 2.75 +/- 0.51 mm. Successful atherectomy with tissue retrieval was performed in 94 lesions (96%). Following atherectomy, mean diameter stenosis was reduced from 71.1% to 31.9% and further to 10.4% following adjunctive treatment. Angiographic complications were one coronary perforation and one adventitial staining, both successfully treated with prolong balloon inflation and stent implantation. Nine patients (11.7%) had in-hospital non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI). One patient died (1.3%) for noncardiac reasons and one had MI (1.3%) at 6-month follow-up. Target lesion revascularization was required in 13 (13.8%) lesions and target vessel revascularization in 15 (20.3%) patients. There was target vessel failure in 17 (23.0%) patients. Plaque debulking with the FHT catheter can be performed safely and effectively in relatively small vessels and complex lesions located in mid-distal artery segments with 6-month clinical outcome similar to prior atherectomy devices.