Radioprotection issues in uraniferous minerals collections with reference to an actual case.

Our work investigated the radioprotection implications associated with the possession of a collection of uraniferous minerals. Considering different scenarios, we developed (and applied to an actual collection) specific formulas for radiation doses evaluation. We discussed the shielding necessary to reduce the gamma irradiation down to the required values. A mathematical model was developed to estimate the minimum air flow rate to reduce the radon air concentration below the reference values. The radiation risks associated to the handling of single specimens was also addressed, including hand skin irradiation and shielding capabilities of surgical lead gloves. Finally, we discussed the radiation risks associated to the exhibition of a single specimen. The results, compared to the safety standards of the EU Directive 13/59, show that the exhibition of uraniferous samples with activity of a few MBq do not need specific radioprotection requirements nor for the involved personnel nor for visitors.

A retrospective comparison of setup accuracy from CBCT and SGRT data in breast cancer patients.

INTRODUCTION: Both cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) are used for breast patient positioning verification before treatment delivery. SGRT may reduce treatment time and imaging dose by potentially reduce the number of CBCT needed. The aim of this study was to compare the displacements resulting in positioning from the Image Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT) 3D and SGRT methods and to design a clinical workflow for SGRT implementation in breast radiotherapy to establish an imaging strategy based on the data obtained. METHODS: For this study 128 breast cancer patients treated with 42.5 Gy in 16 fractions using 3D conformal radiotherapy with free breathing technique were enroled. A total of 366 CBCT images were evaluated for patient setup verification and compared with SGRT. Image registrations between planning CT images and CBCT images were performed in mutual agreement and in online mode by three health professionals. Student's paired t-test was used to compare the absolute difference in vector shift, measured in mm, for each orthogonal axis (x, y, z) between SGRT and CBCT methods. The multidisciplinary team evaluated a review of the original clinical workflow for SGRT implementation and data about patients treated with the updated workflow were reported. RESULTS: Comparison of the shifts obtained with IGRT and SGRT for each orthogonal axis (for the x-axes the average displacement was 0.9 ± 0.7 mm, y = 1.1 ± 0.8 mm and z = 1.0 ± 0.7 mm) revealed no significant statistical differences (p > 0.05). Using the updated workflow the difference between SGRT and IGRT displacements was <3 mm in 91.4 % of patients with a reduction in total treatment time of approximately 20 %, due to the reduce frequency of the CBCT images acquisition and matching. CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that IGRT and SGRT agree in positioning patients with breast cancer within a millimetre tolerance. SGRT can be used for patient positioning, with the advantages of reducing radiation exposure and shorter overall treatment time.

Pre and post operative radiation protection in Ru-106 brachytherapy ophthalmic plaque surgery and related material shielding properties.

Pre and post-operative exposure levels of medical staff and people from public in intra-operative Ru-106 ophthalmic brachytherapy are reported, together with attenuation properties of selected shielding materials. In particular radiation exposure of workers during plaque transportation and during medical assistance of implanted plaque patient was measured. Taking into account dose rates and considering standard assistance procedure of hospitalized patients, the exposure of medical staff and people of the public were evaluated for a given workload. In order to provide tools to optimize radiation protection, considering social and economic aspects due to possible hospital discharge or hospital stay, the attenuation properties of common shielding materials (lead, concrete, red brick, PMMA and gypsum) were measured, considering both narrow and broad beam setups. The eye was simulated using a water equivalent phantom and plaque was fixed on it. All measurements were performed with calibrated survey meters. Results were compared with numerical simulation of bremsstrahlung X-ray radiation spectra emitted from patient eye. Exposure levels measured at 1 m distance in front of the implanted eye are 0.05 µSv/h/MBq, at 10 cm from patient head, 0.44 µSv/h/MBq (plaque side), 0.4 µSv/h/MBq (front), 0.25 µSv/h/MBq (lateral, opposed to plaque), 0.2 µSv/h/MBq (back). Average exposure levels, under conservative assumptions, for medical staff is 17 µSv/patient and less than 23 µSv/patient for careers and comforters. TVLs in lead and concrete are about 1.6 cm and 11.5 cm respectively.

Real-time beam monitoring for error detection in IMRT plans and impact on dose-volume histograms : A multi-center study.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to test the sensitivity of a transmission detector for online dose monitoring of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for detecting small delivery errors. Furthermore, the correlation of changes in detector output induced by small delivery errors with other metrics commonly employed to quantify the deviations between calculated and delivered dose distributions was investigated. METHODS: Transmission detector measurements were performed at three institutions. Seven types of errors were induced in nine clinical step-and-shoot (S&S) IMRT plans by modifying the number of monitor units (MU) and introducing small deviations in leaf positions. Signal reproducibility was investigated for short- and long-term stability. Calculated dose distributions were compared in terms of γ passing rates and dose-volume histogram (DVH) metrics (e.g., Dmean, Dx%, Vx%). The correlation between detector signal variations, γ passing rates, and DVH parameters was investigated. RESULTS: Both short- and long-term reproducibility was within 1%. Dose variations down to 1 MU (∆signal 1.1 ± 0.4%) as well as changes in field size and positions down to 1 mm (∆signal 2.6 ± 1.0%) were detected, thus indicating high error-detection sensitivity. A moderate correlation of detector signal was observed with γ passing rates (R2 = 0.57-0.70), while a good correlation was observed with DVH metrics (R2 = 0.75-0.98). CONCLUSION: The detector is capable of detecting small delivery errors in MU and leaf positions, and is thus a highly sensitive dose monitoring device for S&S IMRT for clinical practice. The results of this study indicate a good correlation of detector signal with DVH metrics; therefore, clinical action levels can be defined based on the presented data.