Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Psychiatry ; 21(1): 584, 2021 11 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34800995

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chronic diseases are the leading cause of death worldwide. It is estimated that 20% of adults with chronic physical diseases experience concomitant depression, increasing their risk of morbidity and mortality. Low intensity psychosocial interventions, such as self-management, are part of recommended treatment; however, no systematic review has evaluated the effects of depression self-management interventions for this population. The primary objective was to examine the effect of self-management interventions on reducing depressive symptomatology in adults with chronic disease(s) and co-occurring depressive symptoms. Secondary objectives were to evaluate the effect of these interventions on improving other psychosocial and physiological outcomes (e.g., anxiety, glycemic control) and to assess potential differential effect based on key participant and intervention characteristics (e.g., chronic disease, provider). METHODS: Studies comparing depression self-management interventions to a control group were identified through a) systematic searches of databases to June 2018 [MEDLINE (1946 -), EMBASE (1996 -), PsycINFO (1967 -), CINAHL (1984 -)] and b) secondary 'snowball' search strategies. The methodological quality of included studies was critically reviewed. Screening of all titles, abstracts, and full texts for eligibility was assessed independently by two authors. Data were extracted by one author and verified by a second. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were retained: 12 for meta-analysis and three for descriptive review. In total, these trials included 2064 participants and most commonly evaluated interventions for people with cancer (n = 7) or diabetes (n = 4). From baseline to < 6-months (T1), the pooled mean effect size was - 0.47 [95% CI -0.73, - 0.21] as compared to control groups for the primary outcome of depression and - 0.53 [95% CI -0.91, - 0.15] at ≥ 6-months (T2). Results were also significant for anxiety (T1) and glycemic control (T2). Self-management skills of decision-making and taking action were significant moderators of depression at T1. CONCLUSION: Self-management interventions show promise in improving depression and anxiety in those with concomitant chronic physical disease. The findings may contribute to the development of future Self-management interventions and delivering evidence-based care to this population. Further high-quality RCTs are needed to identify sources of heterogeneity and investigate key intervention components.


Assuntos
Depressão , Autogestão , Adulto , Ansiedade/complicações , Ansiedade/terapia , Transtornos de Ansiedade , Doença Crônica , Depressão/complicações , Depressão/terapia , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida
2.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 18(6): 650-655, 2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32502983

RESUMO

Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is an extremely rare and aggressive non-Langerhans histiocytic disorder. ECD typically presents with bone pain in middle-aged adults, although some patients present with multisystem disease involving the skeleton, central nervous system, cardiovascular system, lungs, and other disease sites. The etiology of ECD is currently unknown, but it is thought to be a reactive or neoplastic disorder. Recently, mutation of the BRAF gene has been found in >50% of ECD cases, and this gene has become a therapeutic target for patients with ECD. Vemurafenib, a BRAF inhibitor, has been approved by the FDA for treatment of ECD. This report presents an elderly male patient with an aggressive phenotype of ECD and highlights the utility of multimodality imaging in monitoring the clinical course and disease response to treatment with vemurafenib.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Doença de Erdheim-Chester/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença de Erdheim-Chester/tratamento farmacológico , Imagem Multimodal/métodos , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas B-raf/metabolismo , Vemurafenib/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos/farmacologia , Doença de Erdheim-Chester/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vemurafenib/farmacologia
3.
Blood ; 124(4): 483-92, 2014 Jul 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24850756

RESUMO

Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is a rare, non-Langerhans histiocytosis. Recent findings suggest that ECD is a clonal disorder, marked by recurrent BRAFV600E mutations in >50% of patients, in which chronic uncontrolled inflammation is an important mediator of disease pathogenesis. Although ∼500 to 550 cases have been described in the literature to date, increased physician awareness has driven a dramatic increase in ECD diagnoses over the last decade. ECD frequently involves multiple organ systems and has historically lacked effective therapies. Given the protean clinical manifestations and the lack of a consensus-derived approach for the management of ECD, we provide here the first multidisciplinary consensus guidelines for the clinical management of ECD. These recommendations were outlined at the First International Medical Symposium for ECD, comprised of a comprehensive group of international academicians with expertise in the pathophysiology and therapy of ECD. Detailed recommendations on the initial clinical, laboratory, and radiographic assessment of ECD patients are presented in addition to treatment recommendations based on critical appraisal of the literature and clinical experience. These formalized consensus descriptions will hopefully facilitate ongoing and future research efforts in this disorder.


Assuntos
Consenso , Doença de Erdheim-Chester/diagnóstico , Doença de Erdheim-Chester/terapia , Humanos
4.
J Psychosom Res ; 76(6): 433-46, 2014 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24840137

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Clinical practice guidelines disagree on whether health care professionals should screen women for depression during pregnancy or postpartum. The objective of this systematic review was to determine whether depression screening improves depression outcomes among women during pregnancy or the postpartum period. METHODS: Searches included the CINAHL, EMBASE, ISI, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO databases through April 1, 2013; manual journal searches; reference list reviews; citation tracking of included articles; and trial registry reviews. RCTs in any language that compared depression outcomes between women during pregnancy or postpartum randomized to undergo depression screening versus women not screened were eligible. RESULTS: There were 9,242 unique titles/abstracts and 15 full-text articles reviewed. Only 1 RCT of screening postpartum was included, but none during pregnancy. The eligible postpartum study evaluated screening in mothers in Hong Kong with 2-month-old babies (N=462) and reported a standardized mean difference for symptoms of depression at 6 months postpartum of 0.34 (95% confidence interval=0.15 to 0.52, P<0.001). Standardized mean difference per 44 additional women treated in the intervention trial arm compared to the non-screening arm was approximately 1.8. Risk of bias was high, however, because the status of outcome measures was changed post-hoc and because the reported effect size per woman treated was 6-7 times the effect sizes reported in comparable depression care interventions. CONCLUSION: There is currently no evidence from any well-designed and conducted RCT that screening for depression would benefit women in pregnancy or postpartum. Existing guidelines that recommend depression screening during pregnancy or postpartum should be re-considered.


Assuntos
Depressão/diagnóstico , Programas de Rastreamento , Complicações na Gravidez/diagnóstico , Adulto , Depressão/epidemiologia , Depressão/prevenção & controle , Depressão Pós-Parto/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Assistência Perinatal/métodos , Assistência Perinatal/normas , Assistência Perinatal/tendências , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Complicações na Gravidez/prevenção & controle
5.
Rheum Dis Clin North Am ; 39(2): 365-81, 2013 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23597969

RESUMO

Retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF) is a condition characterized by the presence of inflammation and fibrosis in the retroperitoneal space, for which no standard diagnostic criteria exist. Historically, treatment has focused on relieving the obstruction with percutaneous or cystoscopic assisted placement of ureteral stents followed by more definitive resolution of ureteric obstruction with open or laparoscopic ureterolysis. However, over the past several years management has shifted from primarily a surgical approach to an immunosuppressive-based therapy aimed at modulation of the immune system. This review focuses on the recent advances in the classification, epidemiology, pathophysiology, pathology, imaging, and treatment of RPF.


Assuntos
Fibrose Retroperitoneal , Doenças da Aorta/epidemiologia , Doenças da Aorta/patologia , Comorbidade , Gerenciamento Clínico , Humanos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Fibrose Retroperitoneal/epidemiologia , Fibrose Retroperitoneal/patologia , Fibrose Retroperitoneal/fisiopatologia , Fibrose Retroperitoneal/terapia , Stents , Ureter/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA