Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Surg Endosc ; 38(3): 1398-1405, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38148402

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: With the continuous development of endoscopic technology, endoscopic resection (ER) has gradually become an optional method for the treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). However, studies with a large sample or a long follow-up are lacking. Therefore, this research aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ER for gastric GISTs in the real-world setting with more than 300 enrolled patients and a follow-up period longer than 45 months. METHODS: From January 2013 to February 2023, 409 patients with a pathological diagnosis of GISTs after ER were retrospectively enrolled in this study. After excluding 86 patients with non-gastric GISTs, we assessed 323 patients with gastric GISTs. The main outcome measures were en bloc resection, complete resection, residual disease, recurrence, and complications. RESULTS: There were 194 (60.06%) females and 129 (39.94%) males, and the median age of the included patients was 58 years (51, 63). The median tumor size was 15.0 (10.0, 20.0) mm. According to the modified NIH criteria, 246 (75.85%) patients were classified as very low risk, 62 (19.20%) were classified as low risk, 12 (3.72%) were classified as moderate risk, and 3 (0.93%) were classified as high risk. A total of 287 (88.85%) patients achieved en bloc resection, and 287 (88.85%) also achieved complete resection. Only one patient showed residual and no recurrent lesions were noted during the follow-up. Regarding complications, three patients had complications, with a complication rate of 0.93%, and no severe complications requiring surgical intervention occurred. CONCLUSION: ER is an appropriate alternative method for the treatment of gastric GISTs, with an en bloc resection rate of 88.85% and a complication rate of 0.93%. No recurrence was noted during follow-up, even for GISTs with piecemeal resection.


Assuntos
Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal , Neoplasias Gástricas , Masculino , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Gastroscopia/métodos , Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal/cirurgia , Tumores do Estroma Gastrointestinal/patologia , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , China
2.
Surg Endosc ; 37(5): 3710-3719, 2023 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36650352

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The self-help inflatable balloon (SHIB) and autologous skin-grafting surgery (ASGS) were used to prevent stricture after esophageal complete circular endoscopic submucosal dissection (cESD) with promising clinical results. We aim to evaluate which method is more suitable for patients who underwent esophageal cESD. METHODS: From October 2017 to July 2021, patients whose mucosal defect length were between 30 and 100 mm after esophageal cESD were retrospectively reviewed from two prospective studies. They were enrolled once SHIB or ASGS was used as preventive methods to prevent stricture. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the baseline characteristics between the two groups. Comparisons were made between the two groups, including operation time, the longitudinal length of ulceration, fasting time, hospitalization days, and the incidence of stricture. RESULTS: A total of 41 patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study. The numbers of patients in SHIB group and ASGS group were 25 and 16, respectively. Fifteen patients in each group were selected after performing PSM. The basic baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. The stricture rates were 20% (3/15) in SHIB group and 40% (6/15) in ASGS group, while the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.427). The SHIB group showed significantly shorter operation time, shorter hospitalization days, lower cost, and longer removing balloon/stent time compared with ASGS group (p < 0.001). Comparison of relevant stricture factors between the stricture group and non-stricture group revealed that longer longitudinal length of ulceration (> 60 mm) accounted for a higher proportion in stricture groups (p = 0.035). CONCLUSION: Both the SHIB and ASGS had high efficacy and safety in preventing strictures in patients with mucosal defects no longer than 100 mm in length after esophageal cESD. The longitudinal length of ulceration > 60 mm was the independent factor for predicting stricture.


Assuntos
Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa , Estenose Esofágica , Humanos , Constrição Patológica , Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa/efeitos adversos , Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa/métodos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Estenose Esofágica/etiologia , Estenose Esofágica/prevenção & controle , Estenose Esofágica/cirurgia , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos
5.
Surg Endosc ; 35(12): 6524-6531, 2021 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33179181

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIM: With the worldwide spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), it has devastated the economy and taken a toll on people' life in every aspects. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the influence of the COVID-19 epidemic on the GI endoscopy practice in China. METHODS: The nationwide survey conducted from 13 to 19 April, 2020. A predesigned standard structured questionnaire was sent to all members of the Chinese Society of Digestive Endoscopy (CSDE) in mainland China by email. Number of various GI endoscopic procedures and participants getting endoscopic training from January 1 to April 10, 2020 (the COVID-19 period) and the same period of 2019 were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 468 hospitals responded to this survey, and most of them (85.4%) were tertiary referral hospitals. The sum number of GI endoscopic procedures deceased significantly from 3,203,594 in 2019 to 1,512,619 in 2020, including 2,996,779 to 1,401,665 of diagnostic procedures and 206,815 to 110,954 of therapeutic procedures. More than half of centers (57.1%) reduced about 1,000-5,000 endoscopic activities. Of 271 hospitals (57.9%) providing endoscopic training, the total number of participants decreased from 2,977 in 2019 to 1,131 in 2020. Most of hospitals (93.8%) adhered to the recommendation of endoscopy practice issued by CSDE during the outbreak of COVID-19, and there was no cases of infection in endoscopic departments of all surveyed hospitals. CONCLUSION: With the influence of the COVID-19 epidemic, there has been significant decease of GI endoscopy practice in mainland China.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Epidemias , China/epidemiologia , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2
6.
United European Gastroenterol J ; 8(7): 798-803, 2020 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32615871

RESUMO

Since December 2019, a novel coronavirus disease, COVID-19, has occurred in China and has spread around the world rapidly. As an acute respiratory infectious disease, COVID-19 has been included in type B infectious diseases and managed according to the standard of type A infectious disease in China. Given the high risk of COVID-19 infection during endoscopic procedures via an airborne route, the Chinese Society of Digestive Endoscopy issued a series of recommendations to guide the endoscopy works in China during the pandemic. To the best of our knowledge, no new infectious case of COVID-19 resulting from endoscopic procedures has been reported in China to date. Here, these recommendations are integrated to provide guidance about the prevention of COVID-19 for endoscopists. The recommendations include advice about postponing non-urgent endoscopies, excluding the possibility of COVID-19 in patients undergoing endoscopy, protection of medical staff from coronavirus infection, and cleaning of endoscopy centres.


Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal/normas , Controle de Infecções/organização & administração , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/normas , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Betacoronavirus/isolamento & purificação , Betacoronavirus/patogenicidade , COVID-19 , Teste para COVID-19 , China/epidemiologia , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico/normas , Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/transmissão , Infecções por Coronavirus/virologia , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal/instrumentação , Contaminação de Equipamentos/prevenção & controle , Gastroenterologia/métodos , Gastroenterologia/normas , Gastroenteropatias/diagnóstico , Gastroenteropatias/terapia , Pessoal de Saúde/normas , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/instrumentação , Controle de Infecções/normas , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa do Paciente para o Profissional/prevenção & controle , Transmissão de Doença Infecciosa do Profissional para o Paciente/prevenção & controle , Salas Cirúrgicas/normas , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/transmissão , Pneumonia Viral/virologia , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/normas , SARS-CoV-2 , Sociedades Médicas/normas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA