Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Endourol ; 37(2): 151-156, 2023 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36254381

RESUMO

Objective: Management of symptomatic ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction with hydronephrosis and discordant Tc-99 mercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG-3) renal scintigraphy is challenging. In this study we describe long-term outcomes of patients who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for the correction of symptomatic UPJ obstruction with discordant preoperative Tc-99m MAG-3 renal scintigraphy. Methods: Patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty for symptomatic UPJ obstruction at a single academic center from 2009 to 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized into three groups with varying degrees of obstruction based on preoperative MAG-3 imaging: Group 1: no obstruction (Lasix T1/2 clearance <10 minutes), Group 2: equivocal obstruction (Lasix T1/2 clearance 10-20 minutes), and Group 3: obstruction (Lasix T1/2 clearance >20 minutes. Pyeloplasty success was defined as resolution of symptoms and improvement/stable computed tomography (CT) imaging or MAG-3 scintigraphy. Failure was defined as persistence of symptoms with either obstruction on functional imaging, worsening hydronephrosis, or subsequent intervention. Results: A total of 125 cases were identified, with a median patient age of 35 years. Dismembered pyeloplasty technique was performed in 98.4% of cases. Median preoperative split renal function on MAG-3 scintigraphy was the only statistically significant (p = 0.003) difference in preoperative characteristics between the three groups. There were 15 postoperative complications, with a rate of Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or higher complications of 4.8%. Overall pyeloplasty success was 92.8%, with success rates of 100% (15/15) and 97% (32/33) in the no obstruction and equivocal obstruction groups, respectively. Median time to pyeloplasty failure was 20.4 months. Conclusion: Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty is a safe and effective surgical intervention for correcting UPJ obstruction. Patients with symptoms of UPJ obstruction and discordant functional imaging studies demonstrate similar or improved success rates after pyeloplasty compared with patients with documented high-grade obstruction. Based on these findings preoperative renal scan may not be reliable in appropriate selection of candidacy for pyeloplasty.


Assuntos
Hidronefrose , Laparoscopia , Robótica , Obstrução Ureteral , Humanos , Adulto , Pelve Renal/diagnóstico por imagem , Pelve Renal/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Furosemida , Laparoscopia/métodos , Obstrução Ureteral/diagnóstico por imagem , Obstrução Ureteral/cirurgia , Hidronefrose/diagnóstico por imagem , Hidronefrose/cirurgia , Cintilografia , Rim/diagnóstico por imagem , Rim/cirurgia , Rim/fisiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos
2.
Am J Surg ; 219(3): 390-393, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31761301

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Demand for pancreatic surgery is rising, occasionally necessitating consecutive PDs to be performed by a single surgeon in the same workday. The safety of this practice is unknown. METHODS: Institutional prospective ACS-NSQIP data were reviewed for PDs (2013-2017). Instances where a single surgeon performed two PDs in the same day were a PD pair (PD1, PD2) and compared with univariable analysis. Paired vs. unpaired-PD matched analyses were performed. RESULTS: 661 PDs (25-PD pairs) were performed. PD1 and PD2 revealed similar infectious (12% vs16%), pulmonary (8% vs8%), cardiovascular (12% vs4%), and aggregate (24% vs24%) morbidity (P>0.05). Pancreatic fistula (B + C 0%), delayed gastric emptying (4% vs12%), hospital stay (9.3 vs8.8 days), and 30-day mortality (4% vs4%) were similar (P > 0.05). Matched outcomes were similar except higher cardiovascular morbidity for paired vs. unpaired PD (7% vs0%; P = 0.015). CONCLUSION: With proper patient selection, and in experienced hands at high-volume centers, two consecutive open PDs may be safely performed.


Assuntos
Competência Clínica , Pancreaticoduodenectomia , Segurança do Paciente , Carga de Trabalho , Idoso , Eficiência , Fadiga , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Seleção de Pacientes , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA