Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Urol ; 169(4): 1360-2, 2003 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12629361

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We report our preliminary experience with the use of fibrin sealant to manage iatrogenic urinary tract injuries, complex urinary fistulas, and urological surgical complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Topical fibrin sealant was used in 19 patients for iatrogenic urinary tract injury during gynecological or general surgical procedures (7), complex urinary fistulas (5) or urological surgical complications (7). RESULTS: Successful resolution of the injury, fistula or complication was attained after a single application of fibrin sealant in the 18 patients (94.7%) in whom a direct injection technique was used. The only failure (formation of a vesicovaginal fistula) occurred with the air driven sprayed sealant delivery technique after sutured closure of iatrogenic cystotomy during vaginal hysterectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Liquid fibrin sealant appears to be safe and prudent for use in urological "damage control" from trauma, fistulas or surgical complications. Direct injection over a sutured urinary anastomosis appears to be highly effective in preventing urinary drainage. Additional study is needed to define further the role and best use of tissue adhesives in urology.


Assuntos
Doenças Urogenitais Femininas/cirurgia , Adesivo Tecidual de Fibrina/administração & dosagem , Fístula/cirurgia , Doenças Urogenitais Masculinas , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Sistema Urogenital/lesões , Feminino , Doenças Urogenitais Femininas/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças Urogenitais Femininas/etiologia , Fístula/diagnóstico por imagem , Fístula/etiologia , Humanos , Doença Iatrogênica , Masculino , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico por imagem , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Reoperação , Resultado do Tratamento , Sistema Urogenital/cirurgia , Urografia
2.
Urology ; 61(2): 437-41, 2003 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12597963

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate prospectively the long-term device reliability and patient satisfaction after Dura-II malleable penile prosthesis implantation. METHODS: Between 1992 and 1996, 94 patients underwent Dura-II implantation for erectile dysfunction. Patients were prospectively examined and completed standardized questionnaires regarding sexual activity, prosthesis function, intercourse satisfaction, and overall quality of life. An independent statistician analyzed these data. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 63 years, and the mean patient follow-up was 5.7 years. Eighty-five patients were available for long-term evaluation. Fourteen patients died during the follow-up period. One patient was lost to follow-up, and eight prostheses (9%) were explanted; however, no mechanical defects were found in the explanted prostheses. Seventy-six percent and 87% of patients reported satisfactory rigidity and ease of concealing the device, respectively. Seventy-six percent of patients remained sexually active during the evaluation period, and 87% of patients reported that the prosthesis improved their overall quality of life. Eighty-five percent would undergo the implant surgery again, and 88% percent of patients would recommend the Dura-II prosthesis to a friend. CONCLUSIONS: The Dura-II malleable penile prosthesis provides good rigidity, ability to conceal the device, and mechanical reliability, as demonstrated by the results of this long-term study. Most patients stated they would have the prosthesis placed again and would recommend it to a friend.


Assuntos
Disfunção Erétil/cirurgia , Satisfação do Paciente , Implante Peniano , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Desenho de Equipamento , Disfunção Erétil/psicologia , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Implante Peniano/instrumentação , Implante Peniano/psicologia , Implante Peniano/normas , Prótese de Pênis/psicologia , Prótese de Pênis/normas , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Comportamento Sexual/psicologia , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
J Urol ; 167(6): 2352-6, 2002 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11992036

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We reviewed the existing scientific literature regarding the efficacy of preoperative mechanical and antibiotic bowel preparation for urinary diversion surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed MEDLINE searches of the literature from 1966 through 2000 and obtained additional references through a review of the bibliographies of select articles. RESULTS: For urinary diversion surgery information regarding appropriate mechanical and antibiotic bowel preparation is scant. The colorectal surgery literature indicates that oral sodium phosphate appears to be better tolerated than polyethylene glycol and is as effective, although the latter is preferred in patients with compromised renal, cardiac or liver function. A combination of oral and parenteral antibiotics should be used for all urinary reconstructive surgeries involving gastrointestinal tract segments. A parenteral second generation cephalosporin antibiotic should be given within 1 hour of skin incision and repeated at an interval of twice the antibiotic serum half-life or when blood loss exceeds 1 l. CONCLUSIONS: For urinary diversion surgery contemporary methods of mechanical and antibiotic bowel preparation appear to be safe, effective and better tolerated than traditional bowel preparation methods.


Assuntos
Antibioticoprofilaxia , Catárticos/administração & dosagem , Fosfatos/administração & dosagem , Polietilenoglicóis/administração & dosagem , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Derivação Urinária/métodos , Administração Oral , Humanos , Injeções Intravenosas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA