Outcomes and factors associated with relapse of vaccine-induced liver injury after SARS CoV-2 immunization: A nationwide study.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Different patterns of liver injury have been reported in association with the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. The aim of this study was to describe a nationwide cohort of patients with SARS CoV-2 vaccine-induced liver injury, focusing on treatment and the evolution after further booster administration. PATIENTS AND METHODS: multicentre, retrospective-prospective study, including subjects who developed abnormal liver tests within 90 days after administration of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. RESULTS: 47 cases were collected: 17 after prime dose and 30 after booster. Age was 57 years, 30 (63.8 %) were female, and 7 (14.9 %) had a history of prior autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Most cases were non-severe, though 9 (19.1 %) developed acute liver injury or failure (ALF). Liver injury tended to be more severe in those presenting after a booster (p=0.084). Pattern of liver injury was hepatocellular (80.9 %), mixed (12.8 %) and 3 (6.4 %) cholestatic. Liver biopsy was performed on 33 patients; 29 showed findings of AIH. Forty-one (87.2 %) patients received immunosuppressants, mostly corticosteroids (35/41). One required liver transplantation and another died due to ALF. Immunosuppression was discontinued in 6/41 patients without later rebound. Twenty-five subjects received at least one booster and 7 (28.0 %) relapsed from the liver injury, but all were non-severe. Recurrence was less frequent among patients on immunosuppressants at booster administration (28.6 % vs. 88.9 %, p=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: SARS CoV-2 vaccine-induced liver injury is heterogeneous but mostly immune-mediated. Relapse of liver injury after re-exposure to vaccine is frequent (28.0 %) but mild. Immunosuppression at booster administration is associated with a lower risk of liver injury.

Intestinal occlusion due to Burkitt lymphoma: an unusual cause.

We present the case of a 37-year-old Caucasian woman, with no history of interest, who came to the emergency room for an occlusive condition of 24 hours' evolution. The patient reported a weight loss of 12 kg in the last month, as well as the appearance of a lump in the left breast in the last week. A chest-abdominal CT scan revealed multiple solid-appearing nodules in the left breast, a metastatic liver lesion, and a tumor-like mass in the right iliac fossa measuring 90x60 mm. A biopsy of the breast lesion revealed a diffuse architectural pattern with destruction of the parenchyma and irregular medium-large cellularity with intense and diffuse expression of CD20, CD10 and Bcl6 and a proliferative index of practically 100%, consistent with lymphoma. Burkitt stage IV. Intestinal obstruction constitutes about 15% of hospital admissions for abdominal pain, representing a significant cause of hospital mortality. Although the most common causes of small bowel obstruction are benign (adhesions, hernias), intraluminal lesions such as inflammatory bowel disease or neoplasms are well-established causes associated with this clinical picture. Lymphomas constitute 25% of cases of intestinal obstruction of neoplastic origin; among them, Burkitt lymphoma is a rare type of B-cell lymphoma characterized by rapid and aggressive cell growth, the most common initial involvement of which is located at the abdominal and extra-nodal level.

Mini Nutritional Assessment - Short Form Is a Useful Malnutrition Screening Tool in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis, Using the Global Leadership Initiative for Malnutrition Criteria as the Gold Standard.

BACKGROUND: The use of nutrition-screening tools in cirrhotic patients is not systematized. Recently, specific tools have been proposed for patients with cirrhosis, but their diagnostic capabilities have been scarcely studied. METHODS: This was a prospective study that includes outpatients with liver cirrhosis undergoing follow-up in the hepatology consultations of a tertiary-care university hospital. A trained gastroenterologist applied the screening tools: Liver Disease Universal Screening Tool (LDUST), Royal Free Hospital-Nutrition Prioritizing Tool (RFH-NPT), and Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF). Subsequently, the diagnosis of malnutrition was made according to Global Leadership Initiative for Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria by an endocrinologist, who was blind to the results of the screening tools. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients (38.1% women, mean age 63.1 ± 9.9 years) with cirrhosis (60.3% Child-Pugh A, 34.9% Child-Pugh B, and 4.8% Child-Pugh C) were evaluated. The prevalence of malnutrition was 38.1% (15.9% moderate, 22.2% severe). Advanced stages of cirrhosis were associated with a higher prevalence of malnutrition (P = .021). MNA-SF was the most accurate screening tool, being superior to RFH-NPT and LDUST. It presented better sensitivity than RFH-NPT (88% [0.68-0.97] vs 67% [0.45-0.84], P = .031) and better specificity than both LDUST (97% [0.87-0.99] vs 62% [0.45-0.77], P < .001) and RFH-NPT (97% [0.87-0.99] vs 82% [0.67-0.93], P = .016). CONCLUSIONS: According to the GLIM criteria, malnutrition affected 38.1% of patients with cirrhosis, being severe in 22% of the patients. MNA-SF is the most accurate screening test, superior even to tools specifically designed for cirrhotic patients (LDUST).