Variation of Plasma Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors after Standard of Care Systemic Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Immunogenic cell death (ICD) is known for releasing damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) from tumor cells. We aimed to find ICD signals by assessing the variation of plasmatic DAMPs (HMGB1, S100A8) before-after standard of care (SoC) systemic treatment in patients with advanced solid tumors. METHODS: Patients scheduled to start a new line of systemic treatment were included. Plasmatic concentrations of HMGB1 and S100A8 were measured (ng/mL) before and after three months of treatment. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were included. Forty-four patients (85%) had metastases, and 8 (15%) were treated for stage III tumors. The most frequent tumor sites were colorectal (35%) and lung (25%). Forty-two patients (81%) received this treatment in the first-line setting. Thirty-six patients (69%) were treated chemotherapy (CT) alone, ten (19%) CT plus targeted therapy, two (3.8%) carboplatin-pemetrexed-pembrolizumab, three (5.8%) pembrolizumab alone and one (1.9%) cetuximab alone. Median plasmatic concentration of S100A8 was significantly higher before than after treatment in the whole population (3.78 vs. 2.91 ng/mL; p = 0.011) and more markedly in the subgroups of patients who experienced RECIST-assessed tumor response (5.70 vs. 2.63 ng/mL; p = 0.002). Median plasmatic concentration of HMGB1was not significantly different before and after treatment (10.23 vs. 11.85 ng/mL; p = 0.382) and did not differ depending on tumor response. Median PFS was not significantly different between patients whose plasma HMBG1 concentration decreased or increased (8.0 vs. 10.6 months; p = 0.29) after treatment. Median PFS was significantly longer in those patients in whom the plasma concentration of S100A8 decreased after treatment (12 vs. 4.7 months; p < 0.001). Median OS was not significantly different between patients whose plasma HMBG1 concentration decreased or increased (13.1 vs. 14.7 months; p = 0.46) after treatment. Median OS was significantly longer in those patients in whom the plasma concentration of S100A8 decreased after treatment (16.7 vs. 9.0 months; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Signals of ICD were not observed. S100A8 behaves as an inflammatory marker with decreased concentration after treatment, mostly in RECIST-responders. PFS and OS were significantly prolonged in those patients who experienced a decrease of S100A8 compared with those patients who experienced increase of plasma S100A8 at three months.

The deleterious influence of tenofovir-based therapies on the progression of atherosclerosis in HIV-infected patients.

We investigated the potential differential effects of antiretroviral therapies on unbalanced chemokine homeostasis and on the progression of atherosclerosis in HIV-infected patients. A two-year prospective study was performed in 67 consecutive HIV-infected patients initiating antiretroviral therapy with abacavir/lamivudine or tenofovir/emtricitabine. Circulating levels of inflammatory biomarkers, progression of subclinical atherosclerosis and expression levels of selected chemokines genes in circulating leukocytes were assessed. Control subjects showed significantly lower plasma concentrations of CRP, tPA, IL-6, and MCP-1 than HIV-infected patients at a baseline. After two years of followup, the observed decreases in plasma inflammatory biomarker levels were only significant for MCP-1, tPA, and IL-6. The decrease in plasma MCP-1 concentration was associated with the progression of atherosclerosis, and this effect was negligible only in patients receiving TDF-based therapy. Multivariate analysis confirmed that treatment with TDF was positively and significantly associated with a higher likelihood of subclinical atherosclerosis progression. However, the expression levels of selected genes in blood cells only showed associations with the viral load and total and HDL-cholesterol levels. Current antiretroviral treatments may partially attenuate the influence of HIV infection on certain inflammatory pathways, though patients receiving TDF therapy must be carefully monitored with respect to the presence and/or progression of atherosclerosis.