Assessing sleep in primary brain tumor patients using smart wearables and patient-reported data: Feasibility and interim analysis of an observational study.

Background: Sleep-wake disturbances are common and disabling in primary brain tumor (PBT) patients but studies exploring longitudinal data are limited. This study investigates the feasibility and relationship between longitudinal patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and physiologic data collected via smart wearables. Methods: Fifty-four PBT patients ≥ 18 years wore Fitbit smart-wearable devices for 4 weeks, which captured physiologic sleep measures (eg, total sleep time, wake after sleep onset [WASO]). They completed PROs (sleep hygiene index, PROMIS sleep-related impairment [SRI] and Sleep Disturbance [SD], Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire [MEQ]) at baseline and 4 weeks. Smart wearable use feasibility (enrollment/attrition, data missingness), clinical characteristics, test consistency, PROs severity, and relationships between PROs and physiologic sleep measures were assessed. Results: The majority (72%) wore their Fitbit for the entire study duration with 89% missing < 3 days, no participant withdrawals, and 100% PRO completion. PROMIS SRI/SD and MEQ were all consistent/reliable (Cronbach's alpha 0.74-0.92). Chronotype breakdown showed 39% morning, 56% intermediate, and only 6% evening types. Moderate-severe SD and SRI were reported in 13% and 17% at baseline, and with significant improvement in SD at 4 weeks (P = .014). Fitbit-recorded measures showed a correlation at week 4 between WASO and SD (r = 0.35, P = .009) but not with SRI (r = 0.24, P = .08). Conclusions: Collecting sleep data with Fitbits is feasible, PROs are consistent/reliable, > 10% of participants had SD and SRI that improved with smart wearable use, and SD was associated with WASO. The skewed chronotype distribution, risk and impact of sleep fragmentation mechanisms warrant further investigation. Trial Registration: NCT04 669 574.

Long-term survivors of glioblastoma: Tumor molecular, clinical, and imaging findings.

Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive primary brain malignancy with <45% living a year beyond diagnosis. Previously published investigations of long-term survivors (LTS) provided clinical data but rarely incorporated a comprehensive clinical and molecular analysis. Herein, we identify clinical, imaging, molecular, and outcome features for 23 GBM-LTS patients and compare them with a matched cohort of short-term survivors (STS). Methods: Molecularly confirmed Isocitrate Dehydrogenase (IDH) wildtype GBM patients living ≥3 years post-diagnosis (NLTS = 23) or <3 years (NSTS = 75) were identified from our Natural History study. Clinical and demographic characteristics were compared. Tumor tissue was analyzed with targeted next generation sequencing (NGS) (NLTS = 23; NSTS = 74) and methylation analysis (NLTS = 18; NSTS = 28). Pre-surgical MRI scans for a subset of LTS (N = 14) and STS control (N = 28) matched on sex, age, and extent of resection were analyzed. Results: LTS tended to be younger. Diagnostic MRIs showed more LTS with T1 tumor hypointensity. LTS tumors were enriched for MGMTp methylation and tumor protein 53 (TP53) mutation. Three patients with classic GBM histology were reclassified based on NGS and methylation testing. Additionally, there were LTS with typical poor prognostic molecular markers. Conclusions: Our findings emphasize that generalized predictions of prognosis are inaccurate for individual patients and underscore the need for complete clinical evaluation including molecular work-up to confirm the diagnosis. Continued accrual of patients to LTS registries that containcomprehensive clinical, imaging, tumor molecular data, and outcomes measures may pro\vide important insights about individual patient prognosis.

Empirically selected instruments for measuring quality-of-life dimensions in culturally diverse populations.

We describe a process for developing and testing the cultural equivalence of quality-of-life (QOL) instruments that may be used across culturally diverse populations. QOL instruments dealing with satisfaction with various life domains, psychological distress, and physical health and functioning were reviewed by African-American and Hispanic community advisory boards, translated into Spanish and back-translated to ensure translation adequacy, administered to samples of 100 patients from each of the ethnic minority populations by indigenous nurse interviewers, and examined for psychometric adequacy. Ten QOL measures showed adequate reliability and validity for further use in the assessment of QOL with African-American and Hispanic patients. Three other measures failed to meet the defined standards. A dimension shown to be particularly difficult to address across culturally diverse groups is family functioning. Procedures for achieving cultural equivalence of QOL measures have been shown to be practical and productive. Measures are identified that may be used with some confidence to assess varied dimensions of QOL with culturally diverse groups.