Portuguese Pancreatic Club Perspectives on Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Staging, Associated Genetic Syndromes and Particularities of Their Clinical Approach.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (panNENs) have been historically regarded as rare, but their incidence has raised more than 6-fold over the last 3 decades, mostly owing to improvement in the detection of small asymptomatic tumours with imaging. Early detection and proper classification and staging are essential for the prognosis and management of panNENs. Histological evaluation is mandatory in all patients for the diagnosis of panNEN. Regarding localization and staging, multiphasic contrast-enhanced computer tomography is considered the imaging study of choice. Nevertheless, several other diagnostic modalities might present complementary information that can help in diagnosis and staging optimization: magnetic resonance imaging, somatostatin receptor imaging using positron emission tomography in combination with computed tomography (PET/CT), PET/CT with fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG), and endoscopic ultrasound. Approximately 10% of panNENs are due to an inherited syndrome, which includes multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, von Hippel-Lindau disease, neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1), tuberous sclerosis complex, and Mahvash disease. In this review, the Portuguese Pancreatic Club summarizes the classification, diagnosis, and staging of panNENs, with a focus on imaging studies. It also summarizes the characteristics and particularities of panNENs associated with inherited syndromes.

As neoplasias neuroendócrinas pancreáticas (panNENs) são historicamente consideradas raras, embora a sua incidência tenha aumentado mais de 6 vezes nas últimas três décadas, principalmente devido à otimização do diagnóstico de tumores pequenos e assintomáticos em exames de imagem. A deteção precoce, a classificação e o estadiamento adequados são essenciais para o prognóstico e abordagem dos panNENs. A avaliação histológica é obrigatória em todos os doentes para o diagnóstico de panNENs. Para a localização e estadiamento, ​​a TC multifásica com contraste é considerada o estudo de imagem de eleição. Contudo, várias outras modalidades diagnósticas podem apresentar informações complementares que podem auxiliar no diagnóstico e na otimização do estadiamento: ressonância magnética, PET/CT dos receptores da somatostatina, PET/CT [18F]FDG e ecoendoscopia. Aproximadamente 10% dos panNENs estão relacionados com síndromes hereditários, que incluem neoplasia endócrina múltipla tipo 1 (MEN1), doença de von Hippel-Lindau (VHL), neurofibromatose tipo 1 (NF1), complexo de esclerose tuberosa (TSC) e doença de Mahvash. Neste artigo, o Clube Português de Pâncreas aborda a classificação, diagnóstico e estadiamento de panNENs, ​​com foco nos estudos de imagem, bem como resume as características e particularidades dos panNENs associados aos síndromes hereditários.

Higher frequency of gastric neoplasia in advanced chronic liver disease patients: Impact of screening endoscopy in an intermediate-high risk country.

BACKGROUND: The Baveno VII guidelines were proposed to identify which patients could safely avoid screening esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) for gastroesophageal varices. We aimed to evaluate the frequency of gastric neoplasia in compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) patients who underwent EGD for screening of gastroesophageal varices (GOEV) compared to a healthy population. METHODS: Retrospective study that enrolled all cACLD patients who underwent EGD for GOEV screening (January 2008-June 2018) in a tertiary reference center. cACLD patients were compared with asymptomatic healthy individuals who underwent EGD in a private hospital setting (April 2017-March 2018). RESULTS: We evaluated 1845 patients (481 cACLD patients, 1364 healthy individuals). A significantly higher frequency of gastric neoplasia was observed in patients with cACLD compared to healthy individuals (4.0% vs. 1.0 %; p < 0.001). Rare histopathological subtypes (WHO Classification) accounted for 28.7 % of gastric carcinoma cases in the cACLD cohort. Seven cases of gastric neoplasia (36.8 % of gastric neoplasia cases in the cACLD patients) were diagnosed in patients who, according to the Baveno VII criteria, would have not been submitted to EGD. CONCLUSION: We found an increased frequency of gastric neoplasia in patients with cACLD in comparison with healthy individuals. In countries with intermediate-high risk for GC, continuing to perform EGD could be beneficial.

Best Practices in Esophageal, Gastroduodenal, and Colonic Stenting.

Endoscopic stenting is an area of endoscopy that has witnessed noteworthy advancements over the last decade, resulting in evolving clinical practices among gastroenterologists around the world. Indications for endoscopic stenting have progressively expanded, becoming a frequent part of the management algorithm for various benign and malignant conditions of the gastrointestinal tract, from esophagus to rectum. In addition to expanded indications, continuous technological enhancements and development of novel endoscopic stents have resulted in an increased success of these approaches and, in some cases, allowed new applications. This review aimed to summarize best practices in esophageal, gastroduodenal, and colonic stenting.

A colocação de próteses endoscópicas é uma técnica que tem testemunhado avanços notáveis na última década, resultando na evolução da prática clínica diária dos gastroenterologistas em todo o mundo. As indicações para a colocação de próteses endoscópicas têm expandido progressivamente, tornando-se uma opção cada vez mais frequente no algoritmo de abordagem das mais variadas condições benignas e malignas do trato gastrointestinal (desde o esófago ao reto). Além da expansão nas indicações, o aprimoramento tecnológico contínuo e o desenvolvimento de novas próteses endoscópicos resultaram num maior sucesso dessas abordagens e, em alguns casos, permitiram novas aplicações. Esta revisão tem como objetivo resumir as melhores práticas em colocação de próteses endoscópicas esofágicas, gastroduodenais e colorretais.

Development of a Model to Predict Liver Decompensation prior to Transarterial Chemoembolization Refractoriness in Patients with Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Introduction: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the first-line treatment for patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). For patients without an adequate response, current finding suggests that treatment with molecular target agents, approved for advanced stage, might present benefits. However, this requires a preserved liver function. This study aims to evaluate possible predictors of early deterioration of hepatic reserve, prior to TACE refractoriness, in a cohort of patients treated with TACE. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 99 patients with Child-Pugh class A and intermediate-stage HCC who underwent TACE as the first-line treatment. All patients were submitted to a biochemical and medical evaluation prior to initial TACE and every month afterward. Response to initial TACE was evaluated at 1 month. The time to Child-Pugh class deterioration before TACE refractoriness was assessed. Results: Ninety-nine patients were included. Objective response rate (ORR) to initial TACE was assessed as present in 59 (63.4%) and as absent in 34 (36.6%) patients. Liver decompensated before TACE refractoriness in 51 (51.5%) patients, and the median time to liver decompensation was 14 (IQR 8-20) months after first TACE. In multivariate analysis, beyond up-to-7 criteria (HR 2.4, p = 0.031), albumin <35 mg/dL (HR 3.5, p < 0.001) and absence of ORR (HR 2.4, p = 0.020) were associated with decreased overall survival free of liver decompensation. Moreover, beyond up-to-7 criteria, albumin <35 mg/dL and absence of ORR associated negatively with 6-month survival free of liver decompensation. Our model created using those variables was able to predict liver decompensation at 6 months with an AUROC of 0.701 (p = 0.02). Conclusions: The absence of ORR after initial TACE, beyond up-to-7 criteria and albumin <35 mg/dL, was a predictive factor for early liver decompensation before TACE refractoriness in our population. Such patients might benefit from treatment escalation to systemic therapy, in monotherapy or in combination with TACE.

Introdução: A quimioembolização transarterial (TACE) é o tratamento de primeira linha para doentes com carcinoma hepatocelular (HCC) em estadio intermédio. Em doentes sem resposta adequada, a evidência atual sugere que o tratamento com agentes de alvo molecular, aprovado para estágio avançado, pode apresentar benefícios. Porém, isso requer função hepática preservada. O objetivo deste estudo é avaliar possíveis preditores de deterioração precoce da reserva hepática, antes da refratariedade ao TACE, em uma coorte de doentes tratados com TACE. Métodos: Análise retrospectiva de noventa e nove doentes com Child-Pugh classe A e HCC em estadio intermédio que foram submetidos a TACE como tratamento de primeira linha. Todos os doentes foram submetidos a uma avaliação bioquímica e médica antes do TACE inicial e a cada mês após. A resposta ao TACE inicial foi avaliada em 1 mês. O tempo para a deterioração da classe Child-Pugh antes da refratariedade a TACE foi avaliado. Resultados: Noventa e nove doentes foram incluídos. A resposta radiológica objetiva (ORR) ao TACE inicial foi avaliada como presente em 59 (63.4%) e ausente em 34 (36.6%) doentes. Descompensação hepática ocorreu, antes da refratariedade a TACE, em 51 (51.5%) doentes e o tempo médio para a descompensação hepática foi de 14 (IQR 8­20) meses, após o primeiro TACE. Na análise multivariada, além dos critérios up-to-7 (HR 2,4, p = 0.031), albumina <35 mg/dL (HR 3,5, p < 0.001) e ausência de ORR (HR 2,4, p = 0.020) foram associados a diminuição da sobrevida livre de descompensação hepática. Além disso, a sobrevida de 6 meses livre de descompensação hepática apresentou associação, além dos critérios up-to-7 , albumina <35 mg/dL e ausência de ORR. Foi criado um modelo com essas variáveis, capaz de prever a descompensação hepática com AUROC de 0,701 (p = 0.02). Conclusões: A ausência de ORR após TACE inicial, além dos critérios up-to-7 e albumina <35 mg/dL foram fatores preditivos para descompensação hepática antes da refratariedade a TACE na nossa população. Esses doentes podem beneficiar do escalonamento do tratamento para a terapia sistêmica, em monoterapia ou em combinação com TACE.

Best Practices in Pancreatico-biliary Stenting and EUS-guided Drainage.

Indications for endoscopic placement of endoluminal and transluminal stents have greatly expanded over time. Endoscopic stent placement is now a well-established approach for the treatment of benign and malignant biliary and pancreatic diseases (ie, obstructive jaundice, intra-abdominal fluid collections, chronic pancreatitis etc.). Ongoing refinement of technical approaches and development of novel stents is increasing the applicability and success of pancreatico-biliary stenting. In this review, we discuss the important developments in the field of pancreatico-biliary stenting, with a specific focus on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound-associated developments.

Futuristic Developments and Applications in Endoluminal Stenting.

Endoscopic stenting is a well-established option for the treatment of malignant obstruction, temporary management of benign strictures, and sealing transmural defects, as well as drainage of pancreatic fluid collections and biliary obstruction. In recent years, in addition to expansion in indications for endoscopic stenting, considerable strides have been made in stent technology, and several types of devices with advanced designs and materials are continuously being developed. In this review, we discuss the important developments in stent designs and novel indications for endoluminal and transluminal stenting. Our discussion specifically focuses on (i) biodegradable as well as (ii) irradiating and drug-eluting stents for esophageal, gastroduodenal, biliary, and colonic indications, (iii) endoscopic stenting in inflammatory bowel disease, and (iv) lumen-apposing metal stent.

Upper gastrointestinal stenting during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak: impact of mitigation measures and risk of contamination for patients and staff.

Background and study aims The impact of COVID-19 mitigation measures on stent placement procedures has not yet been reported. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of COVID-19 mitigation measures on upper stenting during SARS-CoV-2 outbreak, as well as the use of personal protection equipment (PPE) and risk of contamination for patients and staff. Patients and methods This was a multicenter, retrospective study of consecutive patients who underwent stent placement for upper gastrointestinal obstruction during the second half of SARS-CoV-2 outbreak period in comparison to same period one year before. Results A total of 29 stents were placed for upper gastrointestinal obstruction during the study period, corresponding to an increase of 241 % comparing to the same period in 2019 (n = 12). No significant major differences were found between the two time periods regarding patients' baseline characteristics, post-stenting management and number of staff involved in stent placement. Fellows' involvement was significantly lower in 2020 compared to 2019 (21 % vs 67 %; P  = 0.01). The majority of procedures were performed using FFP2 /FFP3 mask (76 %), protective eyewear (86 %), two pairs of gloves (65 %), hairnet (76 %) and full disposable gowns (90 %). One patient tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 after the procedure. None of the medical staff involved in stenting procedures developed COVID-19 14 days after procedure. Conclusion Upper gastrointestinal stenting increased during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak period, which could be related to yearly variation on the number of procedures or reflect a change of oncologic treatment practice during COVID times.

Implications of COVID-19 for the busy gastroenterologist.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infection caused by a novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) originated in China in December 2020 and declared pandemic by WHO. This coronavirus mainly spreads through the respiratory tract and enters cells through angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). The clinical symptoms of COVID-19 patients include fever, cough, and fatigue. Gastrointestinal symptoms (diarrhea, anorexia, and vomiting) may be present in 50% of patients and may be associated with worst prognosis. Other risk factors are older age, male gender, and underlying chronic diseases. Mitigation measures are essential to reduce the number of people infected. Hospitals are a place of increased SARS-CoV-2 exposure. This has implications in the organization of healthcare services and specifically endoscopy departments. Patients and healthcare workers safety must be optimized in this new reality. Comprehension of COVID-19 gastrointestinal manifestations and implications of SARS-CoV-2 in the management of patients with gastrointestinal diseases, under or not immunosuppressant therapies, is essential. In this review, we summarized the latest research progress and major societies recommendations regarding the implications of COVID-19 in gastroenterology, namely the adaptations that gastroenterology/endoscopy departments and professionals must do in order to optimize the provided assistance, as well as the implications that this infection will have, in particularly vulnerable patients such as those with chronic liver disease and inflammatory bowel disease under or not immunosuppressant therapies.

Self-expandable metal stents in esophageal cancer before preoperative neoadjuvant therapy: efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) placement for malignant dysphagia before preoperative neoadjuvant therapy (NT) is controversial. AIM: Evaluate SEMS placement impact on clinical and oncologic outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer who underwent surgery after NT. METHODS: Retrospective study of esophageal cancer patients referred for esophagectomy after NT. A propensity score was built consisting of the conditional probability of having had a SEMS given a set of baseline variables. In the SEMS group, patients underwent SEMS placement followed by NT and esophagectomy, whereas in the non-SEMS group, patients underwent only NT and esophagectomy. RESULTS: One hundred patients were included, 29 in the SEMS group and 71 in the non-SEMS group. Median follow-up was 18 months. SEMS-related adverse events occurred in 20.7% of the patients. After propensity score analysis, SEMS use decreased delta dysphagia score (regression coefficient [RC]: - 2.69, 95% CI - 3.18 to - 2.21), dysphagia grade before surgery (RC: - 0.74, 95% CI - 1.22 to - 0.27), hospital readmissions at 1 month (OR 0.18; p = 0.019), but increased overall morbidity after surgery (OR 3.02; p = 0.045). No significant differences were found regarding delta albumin levels and albumin levels before surgery, delta weight and weight before surgery, death related to surgery, number of lymph nodes harvested, R0 resection rate, tumor recurrence, recurrence-free survival, overall survival, and 30-day, 6-month, and 3-year mortality. CONCLUSION: SEMS placement improved dysphagia and allowed patients to maintain an equal nutritional status compared to patients without dysphagia during NT. Although postsurgical morbidity was higher in patients with SEMS placement, postsurgical mortality and oncological outcome were not different.

(Technically) Difficult colonoscope insertion - Tips and tricks.

Cecal intubation is a critical aspect of effective, complete colonoscopy. Difficult colonoscopy is most often considered as one in which it is challenging or impossible to reach the cecum. It may be a common occurrence due to patient and/or endoscopist factors. Incomplete colonoscopies should be avoided, since patients in this context present an important prevalence of lesions that escape examination. The approach to successful cecal intubation should depend on characterization of the problem as redundant colon or difficult sigmoid colon. Most patients with a prior incomplete colonoscopy can be colonoscoped successfully, if careful attention is paid to technique, using a variety of scopes, colonoscopy methods and additional equipment. Sufficient time should be allotted to make the attempt.