A Phase II Trial of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Androgen Deprivation for Oligometastases in Prostate Cancer (SBRT-SG 05).

PURPOSE: SBRT-Spanish Group-05 (ClinicalTrials.gov.Identifier: NCT02192788) is a collaborative (SBRT-SG, Grupo de Investigación Clínica en Oncología Radioterápica, and Sociedad Española de Oncología Radioterápica) prospective multicenter phase II trial testing stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in patients with oligorecurrent prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two cohorts of patients with prostate cancer in an oligorecurrent stage (hormone-sensitive in the principal cohort and castration-resistant in the exploratory cohort) were assigned to receive ADT and SBRT for at least 24 months from the time of the enrollment. Concomitant treatment with chemotherapy, abiraterone, or enzalutamide was not allowed. Oncologic outcomes were assessed in both cohorts. Toxicity was prospectively analyzed. RESULTS: From 2014 to 2019, 81 patients with a total of 126 lesions from 14 centers met the inclusion criteria, 14 of whom were castration-resistant. With a median follow-up of 40 months (12-58 months), 3-year local recurrence-free survival was 92.5% (95% CI, 79.9%-96.3%) and 85.7% (95% CI, 48.2%-95.6%) in the principal and exploratory cohorts, respectively. In the principal cohort, biochemical relapse-free survival and metastasis progression-free survival at 1, 2, and 3 years were 91% (95% CI, 81%-95.8%), 73.7% (95% CI, 61.1%-82.8%), 50.6% (95% CI, 36.2%-63.3%), and 92% (95% CI, 83%-97%), 81% (95% CI, 70%-89%), and 67% (95% CI, 53%-77%), respectively. In the exploratory cohort, metastasis progression-free survival at 1, 2, and 3 years was 64% (95% CI, 34%-83%), 43% (95% CI, 18%-66%), and 26% (95% CI, 7%-51%), respectively. None of the patients developed grade III or higher toxicity or symptoms related to local progression, and only 2 (2.4%) patients developed grade II toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of SBRT and ADT is safe and shows favorable clinical outcomes in patients with hormone-sensitive and castration-resistant prostate cancer. Validation studies are needed in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Psychometric validation of the Spanish version of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite-26.

PURPOSE: To assess the validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Spanish version of the Expanded Prostate cancer Index Composite (EPIC) with 26 items. METHODS: Multicentric longitudinal study of patients diagnosed with localized or locally advanced prostate cancer (any T, any N, M0) treated with active surveillance, surgery, external radiotherapy, or brachytherapy. The EPIC-50 was administered initially to the cohort (n = 324 patients), until it was replaced in November 2019 by the EPIC-26 (n = 543), in both groups before treatment and 12 months after. We assessed confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), reliability with Cronbach's alpha coefficient, criterion validity with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and responsiveness by testing a priori hypotheses on deterioration effect size (ES). RESULTS: The CFA confirmed the five-domain structure of the EPIC-26 proposed by the original instrument (comparative fit index = 0.95). The agreement between EPIC-50 (gold standard) and EPIC-26 domains was excellent (ICC > 0.90). Cronbach's alpha was > 0.7 in almost all domains, and the floor effect was near zero, although ceiling effect was higher than 50% in urinary incontinence and bowel domains. Hypothesized changes between before and 12 months after treatment were confirmed: ES > 0.8 in both urinary incontinence and sexual domains among patients who underwent surgery; and ES ranging 0.44-0.48 for bowel and sexual domains in patients treated with external radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: The Spanish version of the EPIC-26 has demonstrated adequate metric properties, similar to those of the original version, with acceptable goodness-of-fit indices, good criterion validity, reliability, and responsiveness to detect changes after radical prostatectomy or external radiotherapy.

Management of high-risk and post-operative non-metastatic prostate cancer in Catalonia: an expert Delphi consensus.

BACKGROUND: To reach a consensus on recommendations for the management of high-risk and post-operative non-metastatic prostate cancer by a group of Radiation Oncologists in Catalonia dedicated to prostate cancer. METHODS: A modified Delphi approach was employed to reach consensus on controversial topics in Radiation Oncology on high-risk non-metastatic (eight questions) and post-operative (eight questions) prostate cancer. An agreement of at least 75% was considered as consensus. The survey was electronically sent 6 weeks before an expert meeting where topics were reviewed and discussed. A second-round survey for the controversial questions only was sent and answered by participants after the meeting. RESULTS: After the first round of the survey, 19 experienced Radiation Oncologists attended the meeting and 74% fulfilled the second-round online questionnaire. An agreement of 9 of the 16 questions was accounted for the first round. After the meeting, an additional agreement was reached in 3 questions leading to a final consensus on 12 of the 16 questions. There are still controversial topics like the use of PET for staging of high-risk and post-operative non-metastatic prostate cancer and the optimal dose to the prostate bed in the salvage setting. CONCLUSION: This consensus contributes to establish recommendations and a framework to help in prostate cancer radiation therapy and pharmacological management in daily clinical practice of high-risk and post-operative non-metastatic prostate cancer.

Five-year quality of life in patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer treated with external beam radiotherapy alone versus external beam radiotherapy with high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost: a prospective multicenter study.

PURPOSE: Brachytherapy (BT) and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) are effective treatments for high-risk prostate cancer (PCa). However, the impact of these treatments on health-related quality of life (HRQL) remains unclear. In this study, we compared EBRT alone with EBRT plus a boost with high-dose rate (HDR)-BT to determine the impact on HRQL in patients with high-risk PCa. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective, multicenter study comparing patients with high-risk PCa treated with EBRT alone or EBRT + HDR-BT from 2004 to 2006. HRQL was assessed at baseline (pre-treatment) and periodically over the 5-year follow-up, using the SF-36 (v.2), EPIC, and FACT-G and FACT-P questionnaires. RESULTS: A total of 129 patients were included in the study, of these, 41 received EBRT alone and 88 EBRT + HDR-BT. All patients received hormonotherapy. Baseline clinical characteristics were similar, except for a slightly higher mean number of comorbidities in the EBRT group. During follow-up, the only significant between-group difference was a greater worsening on EPIC hormonal domain in the EBRT alone group (p = 0.028). There were no significant differences in time and interaction of treatment in SF-36, and FACT-G and FACT-P questionnaires or EPIC urinary incontinence, urinary irritative-obstructive, and bowel and sexual domains over the 5-year follow-up. Oncological outcomes were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: After five years of follow-up, EBRT alone or combined with HDR-BT boost had a similar impact on HRQL in patients with high-risk localized PCa. However, patients in the EBRT alone group experienced greater worsening of hormonal domain according to EPIC questionnaire.

[Targeted biopsies using magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonograpgy fusion compared with sistematic biopsies prostate cancer detection. Initial experience.] / Comparación entre la biopsia prostática con fusión de imagen ecografía/resonáncia magnética y la biopsia sistemática para la detección de cáncer de próstata. Experiencia inicial.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the initial experiencein our center on targeted prostate biopsies (TB) using Magnetic Resonance imaging/ultrasonography (MRI/US) fusion and to compare PCa detection with systematic biopsies (SB). PATIENTS AND ME THODS: A retrospective, descriptive and comparative study was conducted on the first 94 men who underwent TB using MRU/US fusion in our center since February 2017 to March 2018. All patients underwent a protocol of 6-12 cores of systematic biopsies (SB) (except 9) and 2-6 targeted coreson the MRI index lesion. The Hitachi/HiVision Preirus equipment was used with RVS software (Real-time virtual sonography) and a biplane transducer for the fusion imaging procedure. Clinically significant PCa (csPCa) was defined as: at least one core with a Gleason score of 3+4. RESULTS: The proportion of patients diagnosed with PCa was higher in TB compared with SB (p=0.035) and the mean of core performed for diagnosis was lower in TB compared with SB (p<0.001). A trend towards an improved detection of csPCa in TB compared to SB was observed (p=0.063). CONCLUSIONS: The MRI/US fusion targeted biopsies (TB) showed a higher detection rate of PCa, with less cores taken for diagnosis and a tendency to better identification of csCaP compared to SB.

OBJETIVO: El objetivo de este estudio es describir la experiencia inicial en nuestro centro de las primeras 94 Biopsias de Próstata dirigidas (BD) con fusión de imagen ecografía/Resonancia magnética (US/RMmp) y comparar la tasa de detección de CaP con las biopsias sistemáticas.MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo, descriptivo y comparativo de los primeros 94 pacientes sometidos a BD por fusión de imagen US/RMmp en nuestro centro desde febrero de 2017 hasta marzo de 2018. Todos los pacientes fueron sometidos a un protocolo de 6-12 cilindros de biopsias sistemáticas (BS) (menos 9) y de 2-6 cilindros dirigidos a las lesiones diana visualizadas en la RMmp. Se utilizó el equipo Hitachi/HiVision Preirus con software RVS (Real-time virtual sonography) y un transductor biplanar para la fusión de imagen. Se definió como CaP clínicamente significativo un GS ≥ 3+4 en, al menos, 1 de los cilindros realizados. RESULTADOS: La proporción de detección de CaP fue mayor en las BD que en las BS (p=0,035) y el número de cilindros realizados para su diagnóstico fue menor en las BD comparado con las BS (p<0,001). Se observó  una clara tendencia a una mayor identificación de CaP clínicamente significativo (CaPcs) en las BD comparado con las BS (p=0,063). CONCLUSIONES: Comparado con las BS, las BD por fusión de imagen US/RMmp presentaron una mayor tasa de detección de CaP y una tendencia a una mayor identificación de CaPcS con una necesidad menor de cilindros realizados.

Association between EBRT dose volume histograms and quality of life in prostate cancer patients.

AIM: To evaluate the association between dose-volume histogram (DVH) values in organs at risk (OAR) and patient-reported HRQoL outcomes. BACKGROUND: Data on the association between DVHs and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients are limited. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Five-year follow-up study of 154 patients with organ-confined (stage T1/T2) PCa treated with EBRT between January 2003 and November 2005. HRQoL was evaluated with the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index (EPIC). DVH for OARs (penile bulb, rectum and bladder) were created for all patients for whom data were available (119/154; 77%). The functional data analysis (FDA) statistical method was used. HRQoL data was collected prospectively and data analysis was performed retrospectively. RESULTS: Worsening of urinary incontinence and obstructive symptoms correlated with higher DVH dose distributions at 24 months. Increased rectal bleeding at months 24 and 60 correlated with higher DVH dose distributions in the 40-70 Gy range. Patients with deterioration in rectal incontinence presented a higher DVH distribution range than patients without rectal incontinence. Penile bulb DVH values and erectile dysfunction were not significantly associated. CONCLUSIONS: DVH parameters and post-radiotherapy HRQoL appear to be closely correlated, underscoring the importance of assessing DVH values prior to initiating EBRT to determine the risk of developing HRQoL related adverse effects. Advanced treatment modalities may be appropriate in high risk cases to minimize treatment-related toxicity and to improve treatment outcomes and HRQoL. Future studies are needed to better elucidate the association between pre-treatment DVH parameters in organs at risk and subsequent HRQoL.

Patient-reported outcomes after treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this systematic review is to assess the impact of primary treatments with curative intention in patients with localized prostate cancer, measured with Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs), and to examine differences among modalities within treatments. METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search for January 2005-March 2017 following PRISMA guidelines, including longitudinal studies measuring disease-specific PROs in localized prostate cancer patients with a follow-up from pre- to post-treatment (≥1 year). Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. The study is registered in PROSPERO: CRD42015019747. RESULTS: Of 148 identified studies, 60 were included in the meta-analyses. At the 1st year, radical prostatectomy patients showed small urinary irritative-obstructive improvement (0.37SD 95%CI 0.30, 0.45), but large deterioration for sexual function and incontinence with high heterogeneity (I2 = 77% and 93%). Moderate worsening in external radiotherapy patients for sexual function (-0.46SD 95%CI -0.55, -0.36), small urinary incontinence (-0.16SD 95%CI -0.23, -0.09) and bowel impairment (-0.31SD 95%CI -0.39, -0.23). Brachytherapy patients presented small deterioration in urinary incontinence (-0.29SD 95%CI -0.39, -0.19), irritative obstructive symptoms (-0.35SD 95%CI -0.47, -0.23), sexual function (-0.12SD 95%CI -0.24, -0.002), and bowel bother (-0.27SD 95%CI -0.42, -0.11). These patterns persisted up to the 5th year. High-intensity focused ultrasound and active surveillance only have results at 1st year, showing no statistically significant worsening. CONCLUSIONS: No remarkable differences in PRO appeared between modalities within each treatment. Nowadays, available evidence supports brachytherapy as possible alternative to radical prostatectomy for patients seeking an attempted curative treatment limiting the risk for urinary incontinence and sexual dysfunction.

Exosomal and Non-Exosomal Urinary miRNAs in Prostate Cancer Detection and Prognosis.

BACKGROUND: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are non-coding small RNAs, involved in post-transcriptional regulation of many target genes. METHODS: Five miRNAs that have been consistently found deregulated in PCa (miR-21, miR-141, miR-214, miR-375, and let-7c) were analyzed in urinary pellets from 60 prostate cancer (PCa) patients and 10 healthy subjects by qRT-PCR. Besides, urinary exosomes were isolated by differential centrifugation and analyzed for those miRNAs. RESULTS: Significant upregulation of miR-21, miR-141, and miR-375 was found comparing PCa patients with healthy subjects in urinary pellets, while miR-214 was found significantly downregulated. Regarding urinary exosomes, miR-21 and miR-375 were also significantly upregulated in PCa but no differences were found for miR-141. Significant differences were found for let-7c in PCa in urinary exosomes while no differences were observed in urinary pellets. A panel combining miR-21 and miR-375 is suggested as the best combination to distinguish PCa patients and healthy subjects, with an AUC of 0.872. Furthermore, the association of miRNAs with clinicopathological characteristics was investigated. MiR-141 resulted significantly correlated with Gleason score in urinary pellets and let-7c with clinical stage in urinary exosomes. Additionally, miR-21, miR-141, and miR-214 were found significantly deregulated in intermediate/high-risk PCa versus low-risk/healthy subjects in urinary pellets. Significant differences between both groups were found in urinary exosomes for miR-21, miR-375, and let-7c. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the analysis of miRNAs-especially miRNA-21 and miR-375- in urine could be useful as biomarkers in PCa. Prostate 77: 573-583, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Localized prostate cancer treated with external beam radiation therapy: Long-term outcomes at a European comprehensive cancer centre.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: To present survival and toxicity outcomes in patients with clinically localized, non-metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study of 849 PCa patients (pts) treated from 1996 to 2005. Until August 2000, all patients (281) were treated with conventional dose EBRT (<76 Gy); subsequent pts received ≥76 Gy (565 pts). Median age was 70 years (range, 39-82). Most pts were intermediate (353; 42.8%) or high-risk (344; 41.7%). Mean PSA was 10.1 ng/ml. Median dose to the prostate was 75 Gy. Complete ADT was administered to 525 pts (61.8%). RESULTS: Median follow-up was 109.6 months (range, 68.3-193.4). Overall survival (OS) was 92.5% and 81.1% at 5 and 10 years; by risk group (low, intermediate, high), 5- and 10-year OS rates were 94.3% and 85.9%, 92.3% and 79.2%, and 91.9% and 80.2% (p = 0.728). Five- and 10-year BRFS was 94.1% and 80.6% (low risk), 86.4% and 70.9% (intermediate), and 85.2% and 71.4% (high) (p = 0.0666). Toxicity included rectitis: grade 1 (G1) (277 pts; 32.6%), G2 (108; 12.7%), and G3 (20; 2.6%) and urethritis: G1 (294; 34.6%); G2 (223; 26.2%), and G3 (11; 1.3%). By dose rate (<76 Gy vs. ≥76 Gy), 5 and 10-year BRFS rates were 83.1% and 68.3% vs. 88.4% and 74.8% (p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Our results are comparable to other published series in terms of disease control and toxicity. These findings confirm the need for dose escalation to achieve better biochemical control and the benefits of ADT in high-risk PCa patients.

Permanent seed brachytherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: long-term outcomes in a 700 patient cohort.

PURPOSE: Few large European studies have evaluated long-term outcomes for permanent prostate brachytherapy (PPB) as monotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. The objective of the present study was to evaluate long-term survival in this patient profile. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Retrospective study of 700 patients who underwent transperineal ultrasound-guided iodine-125 PPB (145 Gy) between January 2000 and July 2012. Median age was 64.8 years (range, 35-79). Most patients (638 of 700; 91%) had low-risk disease (D'Amico criteria). Eighty-five patients (12%) received hormonal treatment. Overall survival, cause-specific survival, and biochemical relapse-free survival were calculated and estimated using actuarial and Kaplan-Meier methods. Differences between groups were assessed using the log-rank test. RESULTS: Median followup was 63 months (range, 6-164). At 5- and 10-year followup, respectively, overall survival was 94% (95% confidence interval [CI], 92-96) and 84% (95% CI, 78-90); cause-specific survival was 100% and 97% (95% CI, 95-99); and biochemical relapse-free survival was 95% (95% CI, 93-97) and 85% (95% CI, 79-91). CONCLUSIONS: The long-term results presented in this report confirm previous studies and provide additional support for the use of PPB in patients with favorable-risk prostate cancer. Seed brachytherapy provides excellent long-term results in this patient profile.

External beam radiotherapy plus single-fraction high dose rate brachytherapy in the treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) plus high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRB) as a boost in patients (pts) with intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 2002 to July 2012, 377 pts with a diagnosis of intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer were treated with EBRT plus HDRB. Median patient age was 66 years (range, 41-86). Most patients (347 pts; 92%) were classified as high-risk (stage T2c-T3, or PSA>20 ng/mL, or GS ⩾ 8), with 30 patients (8%) considered intermediate risk. All patients underwent EBRT at a prescribed dose of 60.0 Gy (range, 45-70 Gy) to the prostate and seminal vesicles. A total of 120 pts (31%) received a dose of 46 Gy (45-50 Gy) to the true pelvis. All pts received a single-fraction 9 Gy (9-15 Gy) HDR boost. Most patients (353; 94%) were prescribed complete androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Overall survival (OS), cause-specific survival (CSS), and biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS) rates were calculated. In the case of BRFS, patients with <26 months of follow-up (n=106) were excluded to minimize the impact of ADT. RESULTS: The median follow-up for the entire sample was 50 months (range, 12-126), with 5-year actuarial OS and CSS, respectively, of 88% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 84-92) and 98% (95% CI: 97-99). The 5-year BRFS was 91% (95% CI: 87-95) in the 271 pts with ⩾ 26 months (median, 60 months) of follow-up. Late toxicity included grade 2 and 3 gastrointestinal toxicity in 17 (4.6%) and 6 pts (1.6%), respectively, as well as grades 2 and 3 genitourinary toxicity in 46 (12.2%) and 3 pts (0.8%), respectively. CONCLUSION: These long-term outcomes confirm that EBRT plus a single-fraction HDRB boost provides good results in treatment-related toxicity and biochemical control. In addition to the excellent clinical results, this fractionation schedule reduces physician workload, treatment-related expenses, patient discomfort and risks associated with anaesthesia. We believe these findings support the use of single-fractionation boost techniques.

Adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the Patient-Oriented Prostate Utility Scale (PORPUS).

OBJECTIVE: The Patient-Oriented Prostate Utility Scale (PORPUS) is a combined profile and utility-based quality of life measure for prostate cancer patients. Our objectives were to adapt the PORPUS into Spanish and to assess its acceptability, reliability, and validity. METHODS: The PORPUS was adapted into Spanish using forward and back translations and cognitive debriefing. PORPUS was administered jointly with the SF-36 and the Expanded Prostate Index Composite (EPIC) to 480 Spanish prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy. The Spanish PORPUS scores' distribution and reliability were examined and compared with the original instrument. To evaluate construct validity, relationships were assessed between PORPUS and other instruments (testing hypotheses of the original PORPUS study), and among known groups defined by side effect severity. RESULTS: Reliability coefficient was 0.76 (similar to the original PORPUS' 0.81). Spanish PORPUS items presented correlations ranging 0.57-0.88 with the corresponding EPIC domains, as in the original PORPUS study (0.60-0.83). Both PORPUS-P and PORPUS-U showed significant differences and large effect sizes (0.94-1.90) when comparing severe versus no problem groups on urinary, bowel, sexual and hormonal side effects defined by EPIC. CONCLUSIONS: A conceptually equivalent Spanish version was obtained, with high reliability and good construct validity, similar to the original Canadian PORPUS version. It can therefore be used to measure health-related quality of life and utilities in Spanish prostate cancer patients.

Twenty-year experience in the management of squamous cell anal canal carcinoma with interstitial brachytherapy.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate clinical characteristics, local control, acute and late toxicity, and prognostic factors of patients with anal canal carcinoma treated with brachytherapy. METHODS: From 1989 to 2009, 38 patients were treated with iridium 192 low-dose-rate (N = 26) or pulsed-dose-rate (N = 12) interstitial brachytherapy at a single institution. The median age was 62 years (range, 38-86 years). The TNM classification was as follows: 10 T1, 22 T2, 5 T3 and 1 T4; 32 N0, 3 N1 and 3 N2. Most patients (32/38) received either a first course of radiochemotherapy (N = 22) or radiotherapy alone (N=10) consisting of a total delivered dose of 45 Gy to the pelvis (range, 32-50) followed by a boost a median of 18 days later of 15-35 Gy (median 20 Gy) to the anal canal. The remaining 6 cases were treated with brachytherapy alone (dose range, 60-65 Gy). RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 30 months (range, 4-200), 2- and 5-year local control rates were 91% and 87%, respectively. Preservation of the anal sphincter was achieved in 32 patients (84%). Three patients experienced incontinence after brachytherapy. Only 2 patients showed chronic mucositis grade 3/4. Age proved to be a statistically significant prognostic factor for overall survival in the univariate (p = 0.033) and multivariate analyses (p = 0.018). Concurrent chemotherapy with external beam radiotherapy was a statistically significant prognostic factor for disease-free survival in the univariate and multivariate analyses (p = 0.007 and p = 0.044, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Interstitial brachytherapy appears to be an effective and well tolerated treatment for anal carcinoma offering both high local tumour control and anal sphincter preservation.

Long-term results of a phase II trial of induction paclitaxel-carboplatin followed by concurrent radiation therapy and weekly paclitaxel and consolidation paclitaxel-carboplatin in stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Long-term results of a phase II study on the use of induction chemotherapy (CHT) using paclitaxel (P)-carboplatin (C) followed by a concurrent radiation therapy (RT) and weekly P and consolidation PC were reviewed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer started treatment with induction CHT (two cycles of P 175 mg/m, day 1 and C, area under the curve 6, day 1, given at 3-week interval), after which accelerated RT with a concomitant boost ("field-in-a-field") (1.8 Gy large fields and the boost dose 0.88 Gy) was administered in 23 fractions with 61.64 Gy and concurrent weekly P (45 mg/m). Consolidation with two cycles of PC was administered. RESULTS: The median follow-up for all 32 patients was 17.2 months (range, 3.8-107 months). The median survival time was 16.9 months, and the 5-year survival and 10-year survival were 25% and 17.5%, respectively. The median time for disease progression was 9.5 months, and disease-free survival was 21% at 5 and 10 years. The median time to local progression was 14.6 months, and the 5- to 10-year local progression-free survival was 35.7%. The median time to distant metastasis was 17.5 months. Toxicity was acceptable, with only one (3.1%) patient experiencing grade 5 (lung) toxicity and another patient presenting grade 4 toxicity (leucopenia). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this single-institutional phase II study of induction CHT followed by concurrent RT-CHT and consolidation CHT in very unfavorable patient population showed acceptable results with acceptable toxicity.

Evidence-based consensus recommendations to improve the quality of life in prostate cancer treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Prostate cancer (PC) is one of the tumours with the highest incidence in recent years. PC therapies have several adverse effects. A panel consensus recommendation has been made to prevent or ameliorate complications in PC treatment to improve quality of life. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifteen specialists have met to analyse the different toxicities associated with PC treatment. Each medical specialist performed a National Library of Medicine PubMed search citations searching about these secondary effects and his specialty from 1999 to 2009 to propose measures for their prevention/amelioration. RESULTS: Surgery is associated with incontinence and impotence. Radiotherapy can produce acute, late urological and gastrointestinal toxicity. Brachytherapy can produce acute urinary retention. Chemotherapy is associated with haematotoxicity, peripheral neuropathy and diarrhoea, and hormone therapy can produce osteoporosis, metabolic syndrome, cognitive and muscular alterations, cardiotoxicity, etc. CONCLUSIONS: Improvement in surgical techniques and technology (IMRT/IGRT) can prevent surgical and radiotherapeutic toxicity, respectively. Brachytherapy toxicity can be prevented with precise techniques to preserve the urethra. Chemotherapy toxicity can be prevented with personalized schedules of treatment and close follow-up of iatrogenia and hormone therapy toxicity can be prevented with close follow-up of possible secondary effects.

External beam radiotherapy plus high-dose-rate brachytherapy for treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer: the initial experience of the Catalan Institute of Oncology.

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to report initial outcomes in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (CaP) who underwent external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) treatment combined with high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) as a boost. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From 2002 to 2007, 114 CaP patients underwent EBRT followed by (192)I HDR-BT. The patients were classified into intermediate- (Group 1) or high- (Group 2) risk groups. The mean total EBRT dose was 60.0Gy (95% confidence interval [CI]: 59.9-60.1) at 2Gy per fraction. After a mean of 20.6 days (95% CI: 18.4-22.8), all the patients received a single-fraction 9-Gy dose of HDR-BT boost. Of the 114 patients in the study, 103 (90.4%) underwent up to 3 years of complete androgen deprivation therapy after diagnosis. RESULTS: The mean followup for the entire group was 32.1 months (95% CI: 29.9-34.4). The 4-year biochemical failure-free survival rate was 97.4% and treatment was well-tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary biochemical control rates after EBRT plus one fraction of 9-Gy HDR-BT are encouraging. This atypical fractionation schedule is cost-effective and reduces patient discomfort and treatment-related risks. More followup is required to confirm these findings.

Phase II study of vinorelbine and estramustine in combination with conformational radiotherapy for patients with high-risk prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of vinorelbine and estramustine in combination with three-dimensional conformational radiotherapy (3D-CRT) in patients with localized high-risk prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifty patients received estramustine, 600 mg/m(2) daily, and vinorelbine, 25 mg/m(2), on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle for three cycles in combination with 8 weeks of 3D-CRT (total dose of 70.2 gray [Gy] at 1.8-Gy fractions or 70 Gy at 2.0-Gy fractions). Additionally, patients received luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogs for 3 years. RESULTS: All patients were evaluated for response and toxicity. Progression-free survival at 5 years was 72% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 52-86). All patients who relapsed had only biochemical relapse. The most frequent severe toxicities were cystitis (16% of patients), leucopenia (10% of patients), diarrhea (10% of patients), neutropenia (8% of patients), and proctitis (8% of patients). Six patients (12%) did not complete study treatment due to the patient's decision (n = 1) and to adverse events such as hepatotoxicity, proctitis, paralytic ileus, and acute myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS: Vinorelbine and estramustine in combination with 3D-CRT is a safe and effective regimen for patients with localized high-risk prostate cancer. A randomized trial is needed to determine whether the results of this regimen are an improvement over the results obtained with radiotherapy and androgen ablation.

Conservative treatment in noninvasive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The elective treatment for noninvasive breast carcinoma has not yet been established. As a result of mammographic screening programs, the incidence of noninvasive tumors has increased and has lead to the same controversy already present had with invasive carcinomas: mastectomy or conserving therapy. METHODS: Since 1990, 101 patients with noninvasive breast cancer were treated with irradiation following breast-conserving surgery. All the patients had irradiation of the whole breast (mean dose, 47.6 +/- 1.2 Gy). The radiation dose boost to the tumor bed was delivered in 28.7% of the cases (mean dose, 21.03 +/- 3.06 Gy), and in 71.3%, the boost was not administered. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 34 months, survival is 100%. The disease-free survival at 5 years by the Kaplan-Meier method is 93.6 +/- 8.65. CONCLUSIONS: The conserving treatment is a valid option for treatment of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ.

Improvement in performance status after erythropoietin treatment in lung cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

PURPOSE: A prospective Phase II trial was carried out to evaluate the effectiveness of erythropoietin in improving or maintaining performance status as determined by the Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score and hemoglobin (Hb) levels in lung cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation (CH-RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 51 patients with lung cancer (11 with small-cell, limited stage and 40 with non-small-cell disease, 17 with Stage IIIA and 23 with Stage IIIB), who underwent three different concurrent CH-RT protocols were enrolled. Baseline Hb and KPS values were recorded, as were the nadir Hb and KPS values before concurrent CH-RT. The final Hb and KPS values were recorded the last week of concurrent CH-RT. An Hb level of