Citrate high volume on-line hemodiafiltration modulates serum Interleukin-6 and Klotho levels: the multicenter randomized controlled study "Hephaestus".

BACKGROUND: Studies addressing the anti-inflammatory properties of citrate dialysate enrolled patients in both hemodialysis (HD) and hemodiafiltration (HDF), the latter not adjusted for adequate convective exchange. This is a potential source of confounding in that HDF itself has anti-inflammatory effects regardless of the buffer, and optimal clinical outcomes are related to the amount of convection. METHODS: To distinguish the merits of the buffer from those of convection, we performed a 6-month, prospective, randomized, crossover AB-BA study. Comparisons were made during the 3-month study period of on-line HDF with standard dialysate containing three mmol of acetic acid (OL-HDFst) and the 3-month of OL-HDF with dialysate containing one mmol of citric acid (OL-HDFcit). Primary outcome measure of the study was interleukin-6 (IL-6). Klotho, high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), fetuin and routine biochemical parameters were also analyzed. RESULTS: We analyzed 47 patients (mean age 64 years, range 27-84 years) enrolled in 10 participating Nephrology Units. Convective volumes were around 25 L/session with 90 percent of sessions > 20 L and ß2-microglobulin reduction rate 76% in both HDFs. Baseline median IL-6 values in OL-HDFst were 5.6 pg/ml (25:75 interquartile range IQR 2.9:10.6) and in OL-HDFcit 6.6 pg/ml (IQR 3.4:11.4 pg/ml). The difference was not statistically significant (p 0.88). IL-6 values were lower during OL-HDFcit than during OL-HDFst, both when analyzed as the median difference of overall IL-6 values (p 0.02) and as the median of pairwise differences between the baseline and the 3-month time points (p 0.03). The overall hsCRP values too, were lower during OL-HDFcit than during OL-HDFst (p 0.01). Klotho levels showed a time effect (p 0.02) and the increase was significant only during OL-HDFcit (p 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Citrate buffer modulated IL-6, hsCRP and Klotho levels during high volume OL-HDF. These results are not attributable to differences in the dialysis technology that was applied and may suggest a potential biological effect of citrate on CKD-associated inflammatory state. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02863016.

Effectiveness of Switch to Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent (ESA) Biosimilars versus Maintenance of ESA Originators in the Real-Life Setting: Matched-Control Study in Hemodialysis Patients.

BACKGROUND: In hemodialysis (HD), switching from erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) originators to biosimilars is associated with the need for doses approximately 10% higher, according to industry-driven studies. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy on anemia control of switching from ESA originators to biosimilars in daily clinical practice. METHODS: We retrospectively selected consecutive HD patients receiving stable intravenous ESA doses, and who had not been transfused in the previous 6 months, from 12 non-profit Italian centers. Patients switched from originators to biosimilars (n = 163) were matched with those maintained on ESA originators (n = 163) using a propensity score approach. The study duration was 24 weeks, and the primary endpoint was the mean dose difference (MDD), defined as the difference between the switch and control groups of ESA dose changes during the study (time-weighted average ESA dose minus baseline ESA dose). RESULTS: Age (70 ± 13 years), male sex (63%), diabetes (29%), history of cardiovascular disease (40%), body weight (68 ± 14 kg), vascular access (86% arteriovenous fistula), hemoglobin [Hb] (11.2 ± 0.9 g/dL) and ESA dose (8504 ± 6370 IU/week) were similar in the two groups. Hb remained unchanged during the study in both groups. Conversely, ESA dose remained unchanged in the control group and progressively increased in the switch group from week 8 to 24. The time-weighted average of the ESA dose was higher in the switch group than in the control group (10,503 ± 7389 vs. 7981 ± 5858 IU/week; p = 0.001), leading to a significant MDD of 2423 IU/week (95% confidence interval [CI] 1615-3321), corresponding to a 39.6% (95% CI 24.7-54.6) higher dose of biosimilars compared with originators. The time-weighted average of Hb was 0.2 g/dL lower in the switch group, with a more frequent ESA hyporesponsiveness (14.7 vs. 2.5%). Iron parameters and other resistance factors remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: In stable dialysis patients, switching from ESA originators to biosimilars requires 40% higher doses to maintain anemia control.

Internal hemodiafiltration versus low-flux bicarbonate dialysis: Results from a long-term prospective study.

INTRODUCTION: About ten years ago it was discovered that changes in filter design which increase passive filtration improved dialysis efficiency. Later, these modified membranes showed similar intra-dialytic efficiency when used in on-line hemodiafiltration or in bicarbonate dialysis, called internal hemodiafiltration. AIM AND METHODS: On the basis of these previous results, we studied the long-term effects of internal hemodiafiltration, in comparison with low-flux bicarbonate dialysis. The pre-dialysis beta2-microglobulin level was chosen as the primary outcome variable. A prospective multicenter study with a cross-over scheme, 2 treatments and 3 periods, was designed. Twenty-four patients, followed in two dialysis centers, were enrolled. Many other parameters were measured every month at the first dialysis session of the week. The intra-dialytic removal of urea, beta2-microglobulin and homocysteine was also calculated. RESULTS: The removal of uremic toxins was significantly higher in internal hemodiafiltration than in low-flux bicarbonate dialysis. The pre-dialysis value of urea, phosphorus, beta2-microglobulin and homocysteine was lower during internal hemodiafiltration as compared with low-flux bicarbonate dialysis. The mean pre-dialysis value of hemoglobin was significantly higher during internal hemodiafiltration than low-flux bicarbonate dialysis, with a trend towards a significantly lower consumption of erythropoiesis stimulating agents during internal hemodiafiltration as compared with low-flux bicarbonate dialysis. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term treatment with internal hemodiafiltration improves the removal of small molecules and stops the continuous increase of middle molecules as seen in low-flux bicarbonate dialysis. Internal hemodiafiltration may substitute low-flux bicarbonate dialysis, but we need new prospective studies about long-term hard end-points.