Efficacy and safety evaluation of Monoblue Dual View and Monoblue ILM View vital stains during vitrectomy surgery.

PURPOSE: To compare the staining properties of Monoblue inner limiting membrane (ILM) View and Monoblue DUAL View (study products) vital stains during vitrectomy surgery to those of ILM Blue or Membrane Blue Dual (control products). METHODS: In this study, 105 patients were included in the Ophthalmic Clinic of the University Hospitals Leuven from September 2021 to April 2022. For prospective data collection in this study, patients were randomized between a control group (ILM Blue or Membrane Blue Dual, manufactured and commercialized by DORC®) and a study group (Monoblue ILM View or Monoblue DUAL View, manufactured and commercialized by Arcadophta®-BVI®). For retrospective data collection, patients were divided into similar surgery groups. Efficacy was analyzed using a binary subjective evaluation of the visualization of stained membranes during vitrectomy. The rate and severity of potential adverse events related to the study products were tracked, allowing both treatment groups to be compared with the corresponding control groups (ILM Blue and Membrane Blue Dual). RESULTS: Based on the results and findings, none of the comparisons (primary outcomes) were statistically significant, showing similar efficacy of the dyes used. The study products were found to be safe in this study since no serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The present findings indicate that the Monoblue ILM View and Monoblue DUAL View dyes can safely be used during vitrectomy to stain the ILM and/or epiretinal membrane (ERM) when removal is needed.

Efficacy and safety of the implantation of a single-piece angulated foldable IOL in the sulcus.

PURPOSE: To study the visual results and tolerance of a Zeiss CT Lucia 601P intraocular lens (IOL) implanted in the sulcus after complicated cataract surgery or during IOL exchange for clouded IOL. METHODS: In total, 64 patients who underwent sulcus implantation were recalled to the hospital to undergo subjective and objective refraction, best corrected visual acuity measurement, tonometry, optical coherence tomography, laser flare photometry, biometry, and wavefront aberrometry. RESULTS: In spite of a large variation in preoperative refraction, the target refraction was obtained within 1.5 diopters in approximately 97% of patients and within 0.5 diopter in 53% of patients. Average BCVA was high (Snellen 0.86) and related to concomitant (mostly retinal) pathologies in eyes with poorer visual performance. Wavefront aberrometry showed no evidence of IOL tilting or decentration after long-term implantation in the sulcus. Tonometry was not different from the fellow eye of the patient (p > 0.5). In 53 patients with bilateral pseudophakia, the laser flare photometry was not significantly different from the fellow eye (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that this single-piece angulated foldable acrylic IOL can be considered for implantation in the sulcus. The visual results are favorable, and the IOL can be well-positioned and tolerated in the sulcus. Moreover, there were no safety issues found since there was no evidence of elevated IOP or chronic uveitis.

Effect of opioid-free versus opioid-based strategies during multimodal anaesthesia on postoperative morphine consumption after bariatric surgery: a randomised double-blind clinical trial.

Background: The efficacy and safety of opioid-free anaesthesia during bariatric surgery remain debated, particularly when administering multimodal analgesia. As multimodal analgesia has become the standard of care in many centres, we aimed to determine if such a strategy coupled with either dexmedetomidine (opioid-free anaesthesia) or remifentanil with a morphine transition (opioid-based anaesthesia), would reduce postoperative morphine requirements and opioid-related adverse events. Methods: In this prospective double-blind study, 172 class III obese patients having laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery were randomly allocated to receive either sevoflurane-dexmedetomidine anaesthesia with a continuous infusion of lidocaine and ketamine (opioid-free group) or sevoflurane-remifentanil anaesthesia with a morphine transition (opioid-based group). Both groups received at anaesthesia induction a bolus of magnesium, lidocaine, ketamine, paracetamol, diclofenac, and dexamethasone. The primary outcome was 24-h postoperative morphine consumption. Secondary outcomes included postoperative quality of recovery (QoR40), incidence of hypoxaemia, bradycardia, and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Results: Eighty-six patients were recruited in each group (predominantly women, 70% had obstructive sleep apnoea). There was no significant difference in postoperative morphine consumption (median [inter-quartile range]: 16 [13-26] vs 15 [10-24] mg, P=0.183). The QoR40 up to postoperative day 30 did not differ between groups, but PONV was less frequent in the opioid-free group (37% vs 59%, P=0.005). Hypoxaemia and bradycardia were not different between groups. Conclusions: During bariatric surgery, a multimodal opioid-free anaesthesia technique did not decrease postoperative morphine consumption when compared with a multimodal opioid-based strategy. Quality of recovery did not differ between groups although the incidence of PONV was less in the opioid-free group. Clinical trial registration: NCT05004519.

The choice of perioperative inotropic support impacts the outcome of small infants undergoing complex cardiac surgery: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Vaso-inotropic agents are frequently used to prevent and/or treat low cardiac output syndrome in infants undergoing surgery for congenital heart disease. Due to the lack of comparative studies, their use is largely dependent on physician- and center preferences. The aim was to assess the impact of two different inotropic regimens, milrinone-epinephrine versus dobutamine on postoperative morbi-mortality in young children undergoing complex cardiac surgery. METHODS: All consecutive children younger than one year of age admitted for complex cardiac surgery (Risk Adjustment in Congenital Heart Surgery-1 [RACHS-1] score ≥3) with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) from January 2008 to December 2018 were included. Children received either milrinone in association with low dose epinephrine (milrinone-epinephrine group) or dobutamine (dobutamine group) groups were matched and compared using a propensity score. Our primary outcome was a composite measure including either hospital death and/or the presence of at least two of the following events: respiratory failure, prolonged inotropic support, or renal failure. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty patients were included in the analysis. Children in the milrinone-epinephrine group (N.=184) suffered more frequently from a cyanotic heart disease and had longer surgery, CPB, and aortic cross clamp times than those in the dobutamine group (N.=66). After matching, children in the milrinone-epinephrine group had a higher incidence of severe postoperative morbidity or mortality compared to those in the dobutamine group (27.4 versus 13.9%; P=0.016). Respiratory failure (28% vs. 12%), prolonged inotropic support (71% vs. 35%) and in-hospital death (3 vs. 0%) were more frequent in the milrinone-epinephrine group. CONCLUSIONS: In young infants undergoing complex cardiac surgery, milrinone combined with epinephrine is associated with a higher incidence of postoperative morbidity or mortality compared to dobutamine for perioperative inotropic support. Further prospective randomized studies are required to confirm this finding.

Influence of height on ED95 of intrathecal 2-chloroprocaine for knee arthroscopy: A prospective dose-response clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Plain 2-chloroprocaine , a rapid acting amino-ester-type local anaesthetic, is used in short ambulatory procedures under spinal anaesthesia. The ED 95 of 2-chloroprocaine for lower limb surgery has not yet been defined. Moreover, patients' body height could influence the effects of the administered dose. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the ED 95 of plain 2-chloroprocaine based on the height of patients undergoing ambulatory knee arthroscopy under spinal anaesthesia using the continual reassessment statistical method (CRM). DESIGN: Prospective, dose-response, double blind, controlled, bi-center, clinical trial. SETTING: One university teaching hospital in Brussels and one general teaching hospital, Braine l'Alleud, Belgium. Université libre de Bruxelles. PATIENTS: ASA I-III (120 patients) scheduled for day-case knee arthroscopy under spinal anaesthesia. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were divided into three groups of 40, each comprising 10 cohorts of 4 patients, according to their respective heights (Group 1: 150-165 cm, Group 2: 166-180 cm, Group 3: 181-195 cm). Each patient enrolled into one of the 3 groups received an intrathecal dose of plain 2-chloroprocaine determined by the CRM. The starting doses for the first cohorts of four were 40 mg in group 1, 45 mg in group 2 and 50 mg in group 3. The doses for subsequent cohorts were determined by CRM of outcomes in all patients in the previous competed cohorts. Anaesthesia was considered successful when there was a lack of pinprick or cold sensation up to T12, the visual analogue scale score for tourniquet pain was < 2 and no pain during surgery. MAIN OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was the success or failure of the block. Side effects were also recorded. RESULTS: ED 95 of 2-chloroprocaine is 40 mg in group 1, 35 mg in group 2, 45 mg in group 3. Groups were different in terms of height and gender ( P  < 0.05) and similar in terms of body mass index and age ( P  > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The ED95 of intrathecal 2-chloroprocaine for patients undergoing ambulatory knee arthroscopy is between 35 and 45 mg. Height could be a factor involved in the calculation, and patient sex could partly explain the nonlinear relation between height and dose. TRIAL REGISTRY NUMBER: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03882489.

Tocilizumab-Induced Unexpected Increase of Several Inflammatory Cytokines in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients: The Anti-Inflammatory Side of IL-6.

Early evidence during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic indicated high levels of interleukin (IL)-6 in patients with severe COVID-19. This led to the off-label use of tocilizumab (TCZ) during the first wave of the pandemic. While the monoclonal antibody blocks IL-6 pathway, its effect on other inflammatory cytokines remains poorly described. To better understand the effect of TCZ on the biological inflammatory profile, we monitored a large panel of inflammatory cytokines in critically ill COVID-19 patients receiving off-label TCZ. Twenty-three patients with polymerase chain reaction-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection were included in the study, among which 15 patients received TCZ and 8 patients did not. Serum samples were collected for 8 days, before and following TCZ administration or hospital admission for the control group. Serum profile of 12 cytokines (IL-1ß, -2, -4, -6, -8, -10, -12, -13, -17, -18, tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), and sIL-6R were assessed in these two groups. Although the increased IL-6 concentrations after TCZ infusion were expected, we observed an unexpected increase in IL-1ß, -2, -4, -10, -12p70, -18, and sIL-6R levels in the treated patients with maximal values reaching 2 to 4 days after TCZ. In contrast, no change in cytokine levels was observed in the control group. Our results suggested that some inflammatory pathways escape IL-6R blockade and even appeared amplified. This finding highlights an old observation of the anti-inflammatory effects of IL-6 as already suggested over 20 years ago. Clinical Trial Registration number: NCT04346017.

Comparison of equipotent doses of intrathecal hyperbaric prilocaine 2% and hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% for elective caesarean section: A prospective, randomised, controlled, two-centre clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Elective caesarean section is performed mainly under spinal anaesthesia using hyperbaric bupivacaine combined with opioids. Despite rapid onset, good quality anaesthesia, bupivacaine provides a long duration of motor block and is related to maternal hypotension. Current policies appeal for implementation of enhanced recovery procedures after caesarean section. Hyperbaric prilocaine is an intermediate-acting local anaesthetic known for its efficacy in ambulatory surgery. Evidence on the clinical relevance of intrathecal prilocaine use for caesarean section is currently lacking. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate whether hyperbaric prilocaine would offer a shorter motor block and recovery than bupivacaine, when comparing equipotent doses. We also assessed the characteristics of sensory block, maternal haemodynamics and side effects for both mother and newborn. DESIGN: Prospective, randomised, double-blind, controlled, two-centre, clinical trial. SETTING: One university teaching hospital and one general teaching hospital in Brussels, Belgium. PATIENTS: American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status 2 parturients (n = 40) undergoing caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive spinal anaesthesia using hyperbaric prilocaine 50 mg or hyperbaric bupivacaine 10 mg, both given with sufentanil 2.5 µg and morphine 100 µg. An epidural catheter was introduced as a backup in case of failure. MAIN OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was the motor block regression (modified Bromage scale 1 to 6). Secondary outcomes included sensory block characteristics, first unassisted ambulation, maternal side effects, newborns' parameters and overall satisfaction. RESULTS: Median [IQR] motor block was significantly shorter in the hyperbaric prilocaine group (110 [104 to 150] min versus 175 [135 to 189] min, P = 0.001). First unassisted ambulation was achieved earlier after prilocaine (204.5 [177 to 246.5] min versus 314 [209.25 to 400] min, P = 0.007), and the incidence of maternal hypotension was significantly higher with bupivacaine (P = 0.033). No supplementary epidural analgesia was needed. CONCLUSION: Prilocaine provides shorter motor block, faster recovery and better haemodynamic stability than bupivacaine while offering equivalent surgical anaesthesia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02973048, EudraCT: 2016-003010-26.

The place of S-ketamine in fibromyalgia treatment (ESKEFIB): study protocol for a prospective, single-center, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, dose-escalation controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Fibromyalgia is a chronic multidimensional pain disease with no curative treatment currently available. Its management relies on a multimodal approach involving pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic elements. Because a suggested factor in its etiology is a central sensitization phenomenon involving the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR), NMDAR antagonists have been proposed as a treatment target. Ketamine and its levogyre form, S-ketamine, have been used to treat chronic pain for many years without consensus about their therapeutic efficiency. We aim to assess the efficacy of S-ketamine as a co-treatment for fibromyalgia. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, single-center, double-blind, parallel-group, dose-escalation trial will compare a co-treatment with S-ketamine (intervention) to a control treatment without S-ketamine (control). It will consist of two successive cohorts with 2:1 randomization ratio (S-ketamine at two different doses: control) with 105 participants in each cohort. The protocol follow-up time will be 12 weeks, including 3 visits for the treatment (week 0, week 2, and week 4) and 3 visits for follow-up (week 6, week 9, and week 12). Our primary outcome, pain relief and/or better patient function, will be assessed with the Brief Pain Inventory questionnaire. The statistical analysis will be performed on an intention-to-treat basis. If the primary outcome is reached at the end of follow-up in the first cohort with low-dose S-ketamine (0.2 mg/kg), the trial will end. If not, the trial will continue with the second cohort and high-dose S-ketamine (0.4 mg/kg). DISCUSSION: The challenge of our trial is the inclusion of a large number of participants in comparison to other trials involving ketamine or S-ketamine infusions for chronic pain management. The originality of our protocol is to include functionality in addition to pain relief as a primary outcome because these two endpoints are not linked in a linear way. For some patients, functional status is more important than pain relief. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT reference: 2020-000473-25, ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT04436250, first posted June 18, 2020; last updated July 21, 2020. Protocol version 2.2 issued on September 30, 2020, after a revision by the ethics committee. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04436250.

Does propofol mode of administration influence psychomotor recovery time after sedation for colonoscopy: A prospective randomized assessor-blinded trial.

BACKGROUND: Propofol sedation has become increasingly popular for colonoscopy. Different modes of propofol administration have been described, but their influence on psychomotor recovery time remains largely unknown. This prospective randomized assessor-blinded study tested the hypothesis that target-controlled infusion system (TCI) combined with sedation depth monitoring should be associated with a more stable sedation than intermittent bolus application with clinical monitoring of sedation depth, resulting in a faster psychomotor skills recovery. METHODS: One hundred sixty-four patients undergoing colonoscopy were randomized to receive propofol with the former (TCI group) or the latter (bolus group) mode of administration. Psychomotor skill recovery was assessed using the Choice Reaction Time (CRT) performed before and every ten minutes after waking up from propofol sedation. Clinical recovery was also assessed using the modified Post-anesthetic Discharge Scoring System (PADS). RESULTS: Induction and wake up times were longer in the TCI group, where patients received more propofol than those in the bolus group. Evolution of CRT was similar in both groups. Twenty minutes after arrival in the post-anesthesia care unit, 35 (49%) of patients in the TCI group and 43 (54%) in the bolus group achieved CRT values equal or shorter than their baseline values. Interestingly, according to the PADS score, most of the patients were considered fit for discharge at that moment. Incidence of adverse event was not different between groups. CONCLUSION: In the conditions of our study characterized by short procedure duration, target-controlled infusion of propofol does not offer any benefit in terms of psychomotor skills recovery over intermittent bolus application.

Does a balanced colloid decrease perioperative blood loss in paediatric cardiac surgery: A double-blinded randomized controlled trial?

BACKGROUND: Unbalanced fluid solutions cause metabolic acidosis and could be associated with impaired coagulation and increased blood loss. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the use of a balanced colloid compared with a saline colloid for peri-operative fluid therapy in children undergoing cardiac surgery is associated with decreased blood loss and exposure to blood products. DESIGN: Double-blinded randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Tertiary children's hospital from 2013 to 2016. PATIENTS: Children older than 29 days and younger than 3 years admitted for cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Exclusion criteria were emergency cardiac surgery, moribund (American Society of Anesthesiologists 5), Jehovah's witnesses, coagulopathy, renal failure, liver injury, intracranial haemorrhage and electrolyte disturbances. From the 128 patients eligible, 88 were included in the study. INTERVENTION: Random assignment of patients to either a saline colloid (6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 in 0.9% NaCl) or a balanced-electrolyte colloid (6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 in an isotonic solution) for CPB priming and intra- and postoperative fluid therapy during the first postoperative 48 h. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The primary outcome measure was calculated blood loss until the third postoperative day (POD3). RESULTS: A total of 44 patients were included in each study arm. Calculated blood loss at POD3 was not significantly different between the groups (saline colloid 19.9 [IQR 13.8 to 26.1] ml kg-1 versus balanced colloid 15.9 [IQR 9.0 to 25.3 ml kg-1], P = 0.409). Secondary outcomes related to bleeding, exposure to blood products and coagulation were not different between groups. There was also no difference in length of mechanical ventilation, intensive care and hospital length of stay between groups. CONCLUSION: The use of a balanced colloid for peri-operative fluid therapy compared with a saline one is not associated with decreased blood loss or exposure to blood products. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT identifier: 2012-006034-17 and ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT02584868.

Covid-19 and blood groups: ABO antibody levels may also matter.

BACKGROUND: Susceptibility to Covid-19 has been found to be associated with the ABO blood group, with O type individuals being at a lower risk. However, the underlying mechanism has not been elucidated. Here, we aimed to test the hypothesis that Covid-19 patients might have lower levels of ABO antibodies than non-infected individuals as they could offer some degree of protection. METHODS: After showing that the viral spike protein harbors the ABO glycan epitopes when produced by cells expressing the relevant glycosyltransferases, like upper respiratory tract epithelial cells, we enrolled 290 patients with Covid-19 and 276 asymptomatic controls to compare their levels of natural ABO blood group antibodies. RESULTS: We found significantly lower IgM anti-A + anti-B agglutination scores in blood group O patients (76.93 vs 88.29, P-value = 0.034) and lower levels of anti-B (24.93 vs 30.40, P-value = 0.028) and anti-A antibodies (28.56 vs 36.50, P-value = 0.048) in blood group A and blood group B patients, respectively, compared to controls. CONCLUSION: In this study, we showed that ABO antibody levels are significantly lower in Covid-19 patients compared to controls. These findings could indicate that patients with low levels of ABO antibodies are at higher risk of being infected.

Sufentanil sublingual tablet system versus oral oxycodone for management of postoperative pain in enhanced recovery after surgery pathway for total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled study.

PURPOSE: Effectiveness of sufentanil sublingual tablet system (SSTS) compared to oral oxycodone in the management of postoperative pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) within an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. METHODS: This pragmatic, parallel, open label, randomized controlled, trial enrolled 72 adult patients scheduled for TKA under spinal anesthesia following ERAS pathway. In addition to multimodal analgesia, patients received SSTS 15 mcg (SSTS group) or oral oxycodone extended release 10 mg twice daily and oral oxycodone immediate-release 5 mg up to four times daily on demand (Oxy group) to control pain during 48 h postoperatively. The primary endpoint was pain measured using a numeric rating scale at 24 h postoperatively. Time to first mobilization, side effects and patient satisfaction were also recorded. RESULTS: Median pain score at 24 h at rest was 3 [2-4] for Oxy group vs 2 [1.75-3] for SSTS group (p = 0.272) whereas median pain score on movement was 4 [3-6] vs 3 [2-5] respectively (p = 0.059). No difference in time to first mobilization was found between the two groups. The method of pain control was judged good/excellent for 83.9% of patients in the SSTS group compared with 52.9% in the Oxy group (p = 0.007). The incidence of nausea was 33% in SSTS group and 9% in Oxy group (p = 0.181). CONCLUSIONS: In complement to ERAS multimodal analgesia, sublingual sufentanil 15 mcg tablet system did not show clinically significant pain improvement compared to oral oxycodone after total knee arthroplasty. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials: NCT04448457 ; retrospectively registered on June 24, 2020. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04448457?cond=sublingual+sufentanil&cntry=BE&draw=2&rank=3.

Effect of pneumoperitoneum on dynamic variables of fluid responsiveness (Delta PP and PVI) during Trendelenburg position.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pulse pressure variation (ΔPP) is considered as one of the best predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients under mechanical ventilation. Pleth Variability Index (PVI) has been proposed as a noninvasive alternative. However, pneumoperitoneum has been recently suggested as a limitation to their interpretation. The aim of this study was to compare changes in ΔPP and PVI related to autotransfusion associated with a Trendelenburg maneuver before and during pneumoperitoneum. METHODS: 50 patients undergoing elective abdominal laparoscopic surgery were enrolled in this prospective observational study. All patients were equipped with an invasive radial artery catheter and a PVI probe. After obtaining a stable signal with both ΔPP and PVI, baseline values were recorded, before and after head-down tilts of 10°, with or without abdominal insufflation (10-12 mmHg). All measurements were made before any fluid challenge under standardized anaesthesia, while patients were paralyzed and mechanically ventilated with 8 mL/kg tidal volume. RESULTS: Changes in ΔPP and PVI associated with the Trendelenburg maneuver before and after insufflation of the pneumoperitoneum were significantly different (P < 0.001). In baseline conditions, the Trendelenburg maneuver was associated with a significant decrease in heart rate while mean arterial pressure remained unchanged. Both ΔPP and PVI decreased. After insufflation of the pneumoperitoneum, the Trendelenburg maneuver was associated with a significant decrease in heart rate and ΔPP and an increase in mean arterial pressure while PVI remained unchanged. CONCLUSION: Pneumoperitoneum did not alter the response of ΔPP to autotransfusion associated with the Trendelenburg maneuver, which was not the case for the PVI. This latter decreased during Trendelenburg maneuver performed alone and remained unchanged during Trendelenburg maneuver performed after insufflation of the pneumoperitoneum.

EVALUATION OF TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR INHIBITOR THERAPY IN SUSAC SYNDROME.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor therapy on ocular relapses in patients with Susac syndrome. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with Susac syndrome according to classical clinical criteria. We evaluated the disease activity before and after introduction of anti-TNF therapy and its value as a steroid-sparing agent. RESULTS: Five patients were included. All were initially treated with a combination of corticosteroids and classical immunosuppressive drugs. Infliximab was started in three patients, and adalimumab was started in two patients. Patients had on average 5 ocular relapses during a mean follow-up time of 2.59 years before introducing a TNF inhibitor, corresponding with on average 1.93 relapses per year. After the introduction of an anti-TNF agent, this number was reduced by factor 5.51 to an average of 0.35 relapses per year for a mean follow-up of 2.86 years (P = 0.10). Before anti-TNF introduction ocular relapses occurred at a mean daily dose of 34 mg of prednisone, whereas with anti-TNF treatment, corticosteroid administration could be completely stopped in four patients with one patient still needing 5 mg daily (P = 0.10). Infliximab and adalimumab generally were well tolerated, and no serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Although not statistically significant, our results suggest that anti-TNF therapy can be a valuable option for the treatment of ocular Susac syndrome and may especially be considered in those patients unresponsive to more conventional immunosuppressive treatment.

Aprotinin versus tranexamic acid in children undergoing cardiac surgery: an observational study.

OBJECTIVES: The upcoming release of aprotinin in paediatric cardiac surgery prompted a re-evaluation of its use in comparison to tranexamic acid (TXA) focusing on their effect on exposure to blood transfusions as well as severe postoperative morbidity or mortality. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary children hospital from 2002 to 2015. Patients receiving aprotinin (Aprotinin group: 2002-2007) were compared with those receiving TXA group (2008-2015) using propensity score analysis. Primary outcome measures were 'exposure to blood products' and 'severe postoperative morbidity or mortality'. High-risk subgroups that included neonates, complex (Risk Adjusted Classification for Congenital Heart Surgery-1 ≥ 3) and redo surgery were also analysed. RESULTS: The study included 2157 patients, 1136 in the Aprotinin group and 1021 in the TXA group. Exposure to blood products was significantly higher in the Aprotinin group (78% vs 60%; P < 0.001) as well as in the complex and redo surgery subgroups. Incidence of mortality and/or severe morbidity was higher in the Aprotinin group (33% vs 28%; P = 0.007), as well as in the neonate group. However, cardiopulmonary bypass priming volume and intraoperative fluid balance were significantly decreased, and the use of modified ultrafiltration significantly increased in the TXA group. CONCLUSIONS: In our population, children receiving aprotinin were more frequently transfused and were at a higher risk of developing severe postoperative morbidity or mortality than those receiving TXA. Subgroups at high risk of bleeding or inflammation did not seem to benefit from aprotinin. These differences might be explained by a safer profile of TXA, but also attributed to major changes in our patient blood management strategies over years.

Pleth variability index versus pulse pressure variation for intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy in patients undergoing low-to-moderate risk abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) based on dynamic indicators of fluid responsiveness has been shown to decrease postoperative complications and hospital length of stay (LOS) in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. The usefulness of this approach still needs to be clarified in low-to-moderate risk abdominal surgery. Both pulse-pressure variation (PPV) and pleth variability index (PVI) can be used to guide GDFT strategies. The objective of this prospective randomized controlled trial was to determine if the use of PVI guided GDFT, when compared to PPV guided GDFT, would lead to similar hospital LOS in patients undergoing low-to-moderate risk surgery. Secondary outcomes included amount of fluid administered and incidence of postoperative complications. METHODS: Patients were randomized into either PVI or PPV guided GDFT groups. Both received a baseline 2 ml kg- 1 h- 1 Lactated Ringer infusion. Additional fluid boluses consisted of 250 mL of colloid that was infused over a 10 min period if PVI was > 15% or PPV was > 13% for at least five minutes. The primary outcome was to determine if hospital LOS, which was defined as the number of days from surgery up to the day the surgeon authorized hospital discharge, was equivalent between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 76 patients were included and they were randomized into two groups of 38 patients. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. Both PVI and PPV guided GDFT strategies were equivalent for the primary outcome of LOS (median [interquartile range]) (days) 2.5 [2.0-3.3] vs. 3.0 [2.0-5.0], p = 0.230, respectively. Fluids infused, postoperative complications, and all other outcomes were not different between groups. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing low-to-moderate risk abdominal surgery, PVI seems to guide GDFT similarly to PPV in regards to hospital LOS, amount of fluid, and incidence of postoperative complications. However, in low-risk patients undergoing these surgical procedures optimizing stroke volume may have limited impact on outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02908256 , September 2016, retrospectively registered.

Ivory arthroplasty for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: 10-year follow-up.

This prospective study investigates long-term functional outcome after total trapeziometacarpal joint replacement with the Ivory arthroplasty for trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis. Clinical outcome, overall function, pain, and radiologic outcome after a minimum of 10 years were evaluated for 26 Ivory arthroplasty in 24 patients. Two patients had bilateral arthroplasties. The female to male ratio was 22:2, and the mean age was 71 years (range 57-83). The mean follow-up period was 130 months (range 120-142). Overall functioning as defined by the QuickDASH score and visual analogue pain score improved by 50% and 81%, respectively, when compared with the preoperative status. However, these outcomes deteriorated beyond 5 years after surgery. Long-term results suggest the Ivory arthroplasty to be a reliable treatment for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis since it improves overall function and reduces pain up to 10 years postoperatively. However, revision within 10 years after surgery was needed in four of 26 cases. Level of evidence: II.

The role of the vitreous body in effective IOL positioning.

PURPOSE: To compare the effective lens position (ELP) after phaco surgery alone and after combined phacovitrectomy surgery. METHODS: Twenty patients who were scheduled for elective surgery in both eyes were included. In one eye, phacovitrectomy surgery was performed (without any tamponade), and in the fellow eye, only phaco surgery was performed using the same IOL type. Pre- and postoperative biometric measurements were performed using laser interference biometry. The postoperative anterior chamber depth (ACD) was measured to determine the ELP. The primary outcome measure was the difference in the postoperative ACD between both eyes. RESULTS: The postoperative ACD following phacovitrectomy showed a statistically significant increase compared with that following phaco surgery alone, indicating a more posterior position of the IOL. CONCLUSIONS: An adjusted ELP parameter to optimize IOL calculation may be useful in eyes undergoing combined phacovitrectomy sugergy.

Pulmonary valve replacement after right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction with homograft vs Contegra®: a case control comparison of mortality and morbidity.

BACKGROUND: Repair of congenital heart defects involving the right ventricular outflow tract may require the implantation of a right ventricle to pulmonary artery conduit. This conduit is likely to be replaced during childhood. This study compares the operative outcomes of the replacement procedure of Contegra® and homografts in pulmonary position. METHODS: From 1999 to 2016, 82 children underwent 87 right ventricle to pulmonary artery conduit replacements (60 Contegra® and 27 homografts). Demographics, operative and clinical data were obtained through a retrospective review of the medical records. The two groups were matched for comparison using propensity score matching. All the procedures were performed by the same team of surgeons. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups when considering the operative data for anesthesia, surgery, cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic clamping durations. A peroperative complication rate of 13.47% and 15.36% in Contegra® and homograft replacement groups respectively (p value = 0.758) was observed. There was no difference regarding the blood loss and fluid input. No statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups for the post-operative morbidity. We considered the Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM) score, the day of extubation, the day of withdrawal of inotropic drugs, the length of the intensive care unit stay and the length of hospital stay. The overall mortality is 2.3% but there is no statistically significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Right ventricle to pulmonary artery conduit replacement procedure can be achieved with a low surgical morbidity or mortality, not influenced by the type of conduit that is replaced. Therefore, the choice between homograft or Contegra® for right ventricle to pulmonary artery reconstruction should not be influenced by the future surgical risk during the replacement procedure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03048071 . Registered 9 February 2017 (retrospectively registered).

Impact of On-Bypass Red Blood Cell Transfusion on Severe Postoperative Morbidity or Mortality in Children.

BACKGROUND: Children undergoing cardiac surgery are frequently exposed to red blood cell (RBC) transfusions mainly in the case of hemorrhage or low oxygen transport. However, in this population, RBCs are sometimes added to the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) priming solution to maintain a predefined hematocrit on bypass. In this study, we investigated the impact of RBCs added to the CPB on severe postoperative morbidity or mortality. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted between 2006 and 2012 in a tertiary care level, children's hospital. Children receiving red cells only to prime the CPB (CPB transfusion) were compared with those receiving no RBCs during their entire hospital stay. The primary outcome was severe postoperative morbidity or mortality. Studied secondary outcomes were neurologic deficit, infection, length of mechanical ventilation, pediatric intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, and mortality. Both groups were compared with propensity score analysis where patients were matched via a genetic matching algorithm. In all analyses, applying a Bonferroni correction, a P value <.05/8 = .00625, was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Among the 854 patients retained for this study, 439 (51.4%) received no RBC transfusion during their entire hospital stay and 415 (49.6%) received a CPB transfusion. Thirty-five (8.0%) patients in the no-transfusion group and 110 (26.5%) patients in the CPB transfusion group developed severe postoperative morbidity or died. This difference was statistically significant using univariate analysis (P < .001). Propensity score analysis showed that 79 (19.55%) patients developed severe postoperative morbidity or died in the no-transfusion group compared with 103 (25.50%) patients in the CPB transfusion group (P = .043). The relative risk and its Bonferroni-corrected confidence interval was 0.77 (0.53-1.10). All secondary outcomes were not significantly different between both groups, except the number of patients who developed infections (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In the condition of our study, adding RBCs to the CPB priming to maintain a predefined hematocrit does not seem to impact markedly severe postoperative morbidity or mortality in children undergoing cardiac surgery. Only the risk of infection was increased in the CPB transfusion group. Further studies are warranted to better understand the complex interaction among severity of illness, anemia, RBCs transfusion, and outcome in children undergoing cardiac surgery.