Perspectives on Human Papilloma Virus Vaccination Barriers, Knowledge and Beliefs, and Practices: Providers Serving Arab-American Populations.

Little is known of HPV vaccination (HPVV) recommendation practices among healthcare providers who treat the Arab American community. Evidence indicates that HPVV patient uptake is low in this population. A survey was administered to healthcare providers (N = 46, 63% response rate) who treated ≥ 5% Arab American patients aged 9-26 years in areas of New York City and New Jersey with large Arab American populations. They were asked about barriers to HPVV recommendation and uptake among their Arab American patients. Providers (Doctors of Medicine and Osteopathy, Nurse Practitioners, and Physician Assistants) mostly worked in pediatrics (41%), primary care/internal medicine (26%), obstetrics/gynecology (20%), and family medicine (15%). Most (91%) were confident in their ability to effectively counsel their patients on HPVV. The most frequent provider-reported barriers to administering the HPVV to Arab American patients were patient cultural/religious practices (reported by 67%) and patient and provider difficulties with insurance reimbursement (44%). Most providers (84%) agreed that organizations/programs to increase HPVV uptake among Arab American patients were needed. Providers felt that HPVV uptake could be increased with educational materials in the patients' native languages ("very useful," 81%) and provider cultural competency training ("very useful," 65%). In responses to open-ended questions, cultural and religious HPVV barriers were a salient topic, as were linguistic barriers and provider burdens related to HPVV costs and regulations. HPVV uptake could potentially be improved with Arabic language education materials, provider education that is culturally and linguistically tailored to the Arab American community, and policies to address HPVV financial and regulatory burdens.

The Association of Untreated Mental Health Problems with Alcohol and Tobacco use Among New York City Taxi Drivers.

OBJECTIVES: Mental disorders and substance use disorders are highly comorbid. The "self-medication hypothesis" posits that individuals may use substances such as tobacco and alcohol to cope with symptoms associated with untreated mental health problems. The present study examined the association between having a currently untreated mental health condition and tobacco and alcohol use among male taxi drivers in NYC, a population at risk for poor mental and physical health outcomes. METHODS: The sample included 1105 male, ethnoracially diverse, primarily foreign-born NYC taxi drivers participating in a health fair program. This secondary cross-sectional analysis utilized logistic regression modeling to examine whether endorsement of a currently untreated mental health problem (i.e., depression, anxiety, or posttraumatic stress disorder) was associated with alcohol and/or tobacco use, controlling for potential confounders. RESULTS: 8.5% of drivers reported having mental health problems; among these, only 0.5% reported receiving treatment. Untreated mental health problems were associated with an increased risk of current tobacco/alcohol use after controlling for age, educational attainment, nativity, and pain history: drivers with untreated mental health problems had 1.9x the odds of reporting current tobacco use [95% CI: 1.10-3.19] and 1.6x the odds of reporting current alcohol use [95% CI: 1.01-2.46] than those without untreated mental health problems. CONCLUSIONS: Few drivers with mental health problems receive treatment. In line with the self-medication hypothesis, drivers with untreated mental health problems demonstrated significantly increased risk of tobacco and alcohol use. Efforts to encourage timely screening and treatment of mental health problems among taxi drivers are warranted.

An interactive mobile application versus an educational booklet to promote job retention in women undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Job loss after a cancer diagnosis can lead to long-term financial toxicity and its attendant adverse clinical consequences, including decreased treatment adherence. Among women undergoing (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer, access to work accommodations (e.g., sick leave) is associated with higher job retention after treatment completion. However, low-income and/or minority women are less likely to have access to work accommodations and, therefore, are at higher risk of job loss. Given the time and transportation barriers that low-income working patients commonly face, it is crucial to develop an intervention that is convenient and easy to use. METHODS: We designed an intervention to promote job retention during and after (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer by improving access to relevant accommodations. Talking to Employers And Medical staff about Work (TEAMWork) is an English/Spanish mobile application (app) that provides (1) suggestions for work accommodations tailored to specific job demands, (2) coaching/strategies for negotiating with an employer, (3) advice for symptom self-management, and (4) tools to improve communication with the medical oncology team. This study is a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the app as a job-retention tool compared to a control condition that provides the app content in an informational paper booklet. The primary outcome of the study is work status after treatment completion. Secondary outcomes include work status 1 and 2 years later, participant self-efficacy to ask an employer for accommodations, receipt of workplace accommodations during and following adjuvant therapy, patient self-efficacy to communicate with the oncology provider, self-reported symptom burden during and following adjuvant therapy, and cancer treatment adherence. DISCUSSION: This study will assess the use of mobile technology to improve vulnerable breast cancer patients' ability to communicate with their employers and oncology providers, work during treatment and retain their jobs in the long term, thereby diminishing the potential consequences of job loss, including decreased treatment adherence, debt, and bankruptcy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClincalTrials.gov NCT03572374 . Registered on 08 June 2018.

Exploring the Impact of Language Concordance on Cancer Communication.

PURPOSE: Patients with cancer who have limited English proficiency are more likely to experience inequities in cancer knowledge, timely care, and access to clinical trials. Matching patients with language-concordant clinicians and working with professional interpreters can effectively reduce language-related disparities, but little data are available regarding the impact of language-concordant interactions in oncology care. This study aimed to assess the use of the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS) in language-concordant and -discordant interactions for patients with non-English language preference presenting for an initial oncology visit at four New York City hospitals. METHODS: We used the RIAS, a validated tool for qualitative coding and quantitative analysis, to evaluate interactions between 34 patients and 16 clinicians. The pairings were stratified into dyads: English language-concordant (n = 12); professionally interpreted (n = 11); partially language-concordant (n = 4, partially bilingual clinicians who communicated in Spanish and/or used ad hoc interpreters); and Spanish language-concordant (n = 7). A trained Spanish-speaking coder analyzed the recordings using established RIAS codes. RESULTS: Spanish language-concordant clinicians had almost two-fold greater number of statements about biomedical information than English language-concordant clinicians. Spanish language-concordant patients had a higher tendency to engage in positive talk such as expressing agreement. The number of partnership/facilitation-related statements was equivalent for English and Spanish language-concordant groups but lower in professionally interpreted and partially language-concordant dyads. CONCLUSION: Language concordance may facilitate more effective biomedical counseling and therapeutic relationships between oncology clinicians and patients. Future research should further explore the impact of language concordance on cancer-specific health outcomes.

Social determinants and health-related quality of life in a sample of diverse, low socioeconomic status cancer patients.

OBJECTIVES: In the United States, medically underserved populations, such as ethnoracially underrepresented groups, the limited English proficient (LEP), and the unemployed, may be vulnerable to poor functioning in cancer survivorship. The present study examined whether race/ethnicity, LEP status, and unemployment status were associated with poor health-related quality of life (HRQL) in four domains (physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being (FWB)) in a diverse, low socioeconomic status (SES) sample of cancer patients. METHODS: The sample included 1592 ethnoracially diverse, low SES, primarily foreign-born adult oncology patients participating in an enhanced patient navigation program in 11 New York City hospital-based cancer clinics. This secondary cross-sectional analysis of program intake data examined bivariate associations between sociodemographic and clinical factors and poor HRQL (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General scores ≤70). Factors found to be related to poor HRQL (at p < 0.05) were entered into logistic regressions with overall HRQL and the four HRQL subscales as outcomes. The Benjamini-Hochberg Procedure controlled for potentially inflated type-I error rate due to multiple comparisons. RESULTS: All three predictor variables (race/ethnicity, LEP status, and unemployment status) were significantly associated with increased odds of reporting poor FWB. Specifically, non-Hispanic White and Hispanic cancer patients had 2.7 and 1.5 times the odds of reporting poor FWB than non-Hispanic Black patients. The unemployed had 1.4 times the odds of reporting poor FWB than their employed or retired counterparts. Limited EP patients had 1.4 times the odds of reporting poor FWB than EP participants. Non-Hispanic Black patients evidenced significantly lower odds of reporting poor HRQL across all subscale domains compared with other ethnoracial groups. CONCLUSIONS: LEP and unemployed individuals were more likely to report poor FWB, which may indicate that the most marginalized cancer patients face significant barriers to adequate functioning. Interventions that promote functional abilities (i.e., activities of daily living, self-care, and work retention) and policies and programs that reduce systemic inequality and address social determinants of health may aid in improving HRQL for these underserved groups in survivorship. Non-Hispanic Black cancer patients were less likely than other groups to report poor physical, social, emotional, and FWB. Identifying protective factors in this group may aid in efforts to improve HRQL for all patients.

Arab American Mothers' HPV Vaccination Knowledge and Beliefs.

Little is known of Arab Americans' human papilloma virus vaccination (HPVV) behaviors. We explored associations between US Arab immigrant mothers' beliefs regarding HPVV for their children with socioeconomic, medical, and religious/cultural factors. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in New York City (August 2019-April 2021) with 162 Arab American immigrant women who had at least one child aged 9 through 26 years. Among those reporting that their child/children had not received the HPVV (63.5%), reasons included not having heard of it (67.3%) and lack of provider recommendation (59.4%). HPVV awareness and uptake, respectively, were more likely among those with education ≥ 10 years (p < .001 and p < .001, respectively), with more years in the US (p < .001 and p < .001), and with higher household income (p < .001 and p = .002). Participants with limited English proficiency were less likely to have HPVV awareness and uptake (p < .001 and p < .001). Christian religious affiliation was positively associated with HPVV awareness and uptake (p = .014 and p = .048). A greater number of years in the US was significantly associated with willingness to vaccinate if recommended by the doctor (p = .031). In open-ended responses, mothers indicated that they did not receive strong provider HPVV recommendations, potentially because of their providers' perceptions of their cultural backgrounds. Mothers indicated a desire for HPVV educational materials in Arabic to help them with decision making. Potential opportunities to augment HPVV uptake among Arab immigrants' children include increasing population knowledge, increasing provider recommendation, and providing culturally/religiously responsive HPVV education in English and Arabic.

Food to Overcome Outcomes Disparities: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Food Insecurity Interventions to Improve Cancer Outcomes.

PURPOSE: Food insecurity is prevalent among low-income immigrant and minority patients with cancer. To our knowledge, this randomized controlled trial is the first to prospectively examine the impact on cancer outcomes of food insecurity interventions, with the goal of informing evidence-based interventions to address food insecurity in patients with cancer. METHODS: A three-arm randomized controlled trial was conducted among food-insecure (18-item US Department of Agriculture Household Food Security Survey Module score ≥ 3) patients with cancer (N = 117) at four New York City safety net cancer clinics. Arms included a hospital cancer clinic-based food pantry (arm 1), food voucher plus pantry (arm 2), and home grocery delivery plus pantry (arm 3). Treatment completion (primary outcome) and full appointment attendance were assessed at 6 months. Food security status, depression symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), and quality-of-life scores (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General) were assessed at baseline and at 6 months. RESULTS: Voucher plus pantry had the highest treatment completion rate (94.6%), followed by grocery delivery plus pantry (82.5%) and pantry (77.5%; P = .046). Food security scores improved significantly in all arms, and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General scores improved significantly in the pantry and delivery plus pantry arms. CONCLUSION: Our findings in this preliminary study suggest that voucher plus pantry was the most effective intervention at improving treatment completion, and it met our a priori criterion for a promising intervention (≥ 90%). All interventions demonstrated the potential to improve food security among medically underserved, food-insecure patients with cancer at risk of impaired nutrition status, reduced quality of life, and poorer survival. All patients with cancer should be screened for food insecurity, with evidence-based food insecurity interventions made available.

Work Status Reduction and Cost-Related Nonadherence during Cancer Treatment.

Many cancer patients experience a reduction in work status during cancer treatment. Authors analyzed cross-sectional survey data from U.S. cancer patients and survivors to examine the relationship between reduced work status and cost-related nonadherence, defined as skipping or forgoing medical treatments or medications due to cost. Of 381 respondents who were working at the time of diagnosis, 143 reported a reduction in work status during treatment. Age, racial identity, level of education, and treatment type were associated with reductions in work status. Respondents who reduced work status had higher odds of engaging in cost-related nonadherence than those with stable employment. Authors conclude that reduced work status is associated with nonadherence that can undermine treatment benefit and lead to disease progression. This association is troubling given that African American respondents were more likely to report reduced work status during treatment, potentially exacerbating existing cancer health disparities. To reduce treatment nonadherence, social workers should assess for potential employment problems and be prepared to intervene through counseling, community resource referrals, and direct financial assistance. Social workers should be aware of how structural racism is reproduced through inequitable labor policies and practices that have direct implications for health and access to care.

The financial coping strategies of US cancer patients and survivors.

PURPOSE: Coping behaviors may play a mediating role in producing the negative health outcomes observed in financially burdened cancer patients and survivors. METHODS: Exploratory factor and latent class analysis of survey data. RESULTS: A total of 510 people completed the survey, ages ranged from 25 to over 75 [over half greater than 55 years old (57.8%)]. Most respondents identified as female (64.7%), white (70.8%), or African American (18.6%). A four-factor model of financial coping was revealed: care-altering, lifestyle-altering, self-advocacy, and financial help-seeking. Respondents grouped into three financial coping classes: low burden/low coping (n = 212), high self-advocacy (n = 143), and high burden/high coping (n = 155). African American respondents were at far greater odds than white respondents of being in the high burden/high coping class (OR = 5.82, 95% CI 3.01-6.64) or the self-advocacy class (OR = 1.99, 95% CI 1.19-2.80) than the low burden/low coping class. Compared to respondents aged 65 years and older, those 35-44 were more likely in the high burden/high coping class (OR = 12.27, 95% CI 7.03-19.87) and the high self-advocacy class (OR = 7.08, 95% CI 5.89-8.28) than the low burden/low coping class. CONCLUSION: One-third of respondents were in the high burden/high coping class. Age and race/ethnicity were significantly associated with class membership. Some coping strategies may compromise health and well-being. Program and policy interventions that reduce the odds that patients will use strategies that undermine treatment outcomes and increase patient use of protective strategies are needed.

Racial Disparities in Total Knee Replacement Failure As Related to Poverty.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether racial disparities in total knee replacement (TKR) failure are explained by poverty. METHODS: Black and white New York state residents, enrolled in a prospective single-institution TKR registry January 1, 2008 to February 6, 2012, who underwent primary unilateral TKR (n = 4,062) were linked to the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database (January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2014) to capture revisions performed at outside institutions. Patients were linked by geocoded addresses to residential census tracts. Multivariable Cox regression was used to assess predictors of TKR revision. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze predictors of TKR failure, defined as TKR revision in New York state ≤2 years after surgery, or as Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) TKR quality of life score "not improved" or "worsened" 2 years after surgery. RESULTS: The mean ± SD age was 68.4 ± 10 years, 64% of patients were female, 8% lived in census tracts with >20% of the population under the poverty line, and 9% were black. Median follow-up time was 5.3 years. A total of 3% of patients (122 of 4,062) required revision a median 454 days (interquartile range 215-829) after surgery. TKR revision risk was higher in blacks than whites, with a hazard ratio of 1.69 (95% confidence interval 1.01-2.81), but in multivariable analysis, only younger age, male sex, and constrained prosthesis were predictors of TKR revision. TKR failure occurred in 200 of 2,832 cases (7%) with 2-year surveys. Risk factors for TKR failure were non-osteoarthritis TKR indication, low surgeon volume, and low HSS Expectations Survey score, but not black race. Community poverty was not associated with TKR revision or failure. CONCLUSION: There was a trend toward higher TKR revision risk in blacks, but poverty did not modify the relationship between race and TKR revision or failure.