Rethinking the Role of Biodosimetry to Assess Risks for Acute Radiation Syndrome in Very Large Radiation Events: Reconsidering Legacy Concepts.

The development of effective uses of biodosimetry in large-scale events has been hampered by residual, i.e., "legacy" thinking based on strategies that scale up from biodosimetry in small accidents. Consequently, there remain vestiges of unrealistic assumptions about the likely magnitude of victims in "large" radiation events and incomplete analyses of the logistics for making biodosimetry measurements/assessments in the field for primary triage. Elements remain from an unrealistic focus on developing methods to use biodosimetry in the initial stage of triage for a million or more victims. Based on recent events and concomitant increased awareness of the potential for large-scale events as well as increased sophistication in planning and experience in the development of biodosimetry, a more realistic assessment of the most effective roles of biodosimetry in large-scale events is urgently needed. We argue this leads to a conclusion that the most effective utilization of biodosimetry in very large events would occur in a second stage of triage, after initially winnowing the population by identifying those most in need of acute medical attention, based on calculations of geographic sites where significant exposures could have occurred. Understanding the potential roles and limitations of biodosimetry in large-scale events involving significant radiation exposure should lead to development of the most effective and useful biodosimetric techniques for each stage of triage for acute radiation syndrome injuries, i.e., based on more realistic assumptions about the underlying event and the logistics for carrying out biodosimetry for large populations.

In Vivo Verification of Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Biodosimetry Using Patients Undergoing Radiation Therapy Treatment.

PURPOSE: Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) biodosimetry, used to triage large numbers of individuals incidentally exposed to unknown doses of ionizing radiation, is based on detecting a stable physical response in the body that is subject to quantifiable variation after exposure. In vivo measurement is essential to fully characterize the radiation response relevant to a living tooth measured in situ. The purpose of this study was to verify EPR spectroscopy in vivo by estimating the radiation dose received in participants' teeth. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A continuous wave L-band spectrometer was used for EPR measurements. Participants included healthy volunteers and patients undergoing head and neck and total body irradiation treatments. Healthy volunteers completed 1 measurement each, and patients underwent measurement before starting treatment and between subsequent fractions. Optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters and diodes were used to determine the dose delivered to the teeth to validate EPR measurements. RESULTS: Seventy measurements were acquired from 4 total body irradiation and 6 head and neck patients over 15 months. Patient data showed a linear increase of EPR signal with delivered dose across the dose range tested. A linear least-squares weighted fit of the data gave a statistically significant correlation between EPR signal and absorbed dose (P < .0001). The standard error of inverse prediction (SEIP), used to assess the usefulness of fits, was 1.92 Gy for the dose range most relevant for immediate triage (≤7 Gy). Correcting for natural background radiation based on patient age reduced the SEIP to 1.51 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the feasibility of using spectroscopic measurements from radiation therapy patients to validate in vivo EPR biodosimetry. The data illustrated a statistically significant correlation between the magnitude of EPR signals and absorbed dose. The SEIP of 1.51 Gy, obtained under clinical conditions, indicates the potential value of this technique in response to large radiation events.

A Critical Analysis of Possible Mechanisms for the Oxygen Effect in Radiation Therapy with FLASH.

The aim of this review is to stimulate readers to undertake appropriate investigations of the mechanism for a possible oxygen effect in FLASH. FLASH is a method of delivery of radiation that empirically, in animal models, appears to decrease the impact of radiation on normal tissues while retaining full effect on tumors. This has the potential for achieving a significantly increased effectiveness of radiation therapy. The mechanism is not known but, especially in view of the prominent role that oxygen has in the effects of radiation, investigations of mechanisms of FLASH have often focused on impacts of FLASH on oxygen levels. We and others have previously shown that simple differential depletion of oxygen directly changing the response to radiation is not a likely mechanism. In this review we consider how time-varying changes in oxygen levels could account for the FLASH effect by changing oxygen-dependent signaling in cells. While the methods of delivering FLASH are still evolving, current approaches for FLASH can differ from conventional irradiation in several ways that can impact the pattern of oxygen consumption: the rate of delivery of the radiation (40 Gy/s vs. 0.1 Gy/s), the time over which each fraction is delivered (e.g., <0.5 s. vs. 300 s), the delivery in pulses, the number of fractions, the size of the fractions, and the total duration of treatment. Taking these differences into account and recognizing that cell signaling is an intrinsic component of the need for cells to maintain steady-state conditions and, therefore, is activated by small changes in the environment, we delineate the potential time dependent changes in oxygen consumption and overview the cell signaling pathways whose differential activation by FLASH could account for the observed biological effects of FLASH. We speculate that the most likely pathways are those involved in repair of damaged DNA.

Implications of "flash" radiotherapy for biodosimetry.

Extremely high dose rate radiation delivery (FLASH) for cancer treatment has been shown to produce less damage to normal tissues while having the same radiotoxic effect on tumor tissue (referred to as the FLASH effect). Research on the FLASH effect has two very pertinent implications for the field of biodosimetry: (1) FLASH is a good model to simulate delivery of prompt radiation from the initial moments after detonating a nuclear weapon and (2) the FLASH effect elucidates how dose rate impacts the biological mechanisms that underlie most types of biological biodosimetry. The impact of dose rate will likely differ for different types of biodosimetry, depending on the specific underlying mechanisms. The greatest impact of FLASH effects is likely to occur for assays based on biological responses to radiation damage, but the consequences of differential effects of dose rates on the accuracy of dose estimates has not been taken into account.

Benefits and challenges of in vivo EPR nail biodosimetry in a second tier of medical triage in response to a large radiation event.

Following large-scale radiation events, an overwhelming number of people will potentially need mitigators or treatment for radiation-induced injuries. This necessitates having methods to triage people based on their dose and its likely distribution, so life-saving treatment is directed only to people who can benefit from such care. Using estimates of victims following an improvised nuclear device striking a major city, we illustrate a two-tier approach to triage. At the second tier, after first removing most who would not benefit from care, biodosimetry should provide accurate dose estimates and determine whether the dose was heterogeneous. We illustrate the value of using in vivo electron paramagnetic resonance nail biodosimetry to rapidly assess dose and determine its heterogeneity using independent measurements of nails from the hands and feet. Having previously established its feasibility, we review the benefits and challenges of potential improvements of this method that would make it particularly suitable for tier 2 triage. Improvements, guided by a user-centered approach to design and development, include expanding its capability to make simultaneous, independent measurements and improving its precision and universality.

A Radiation Biological Analysis of the Oxygen Effect as a Possible Mechanism in FLASH.

The delivery of radiation at an ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) is an important new approach to radiotherapy (RT) that appears to be able to improve the therapeutic ratio by diminishing damage to normal tissues. While the mechanisms by which FLASH improves outcomes have not been established, a role involving molecular oxygen (O2) is frequently mentioned. In order to effectively determine if the protective effect of FLASH RT occurs via a differential direct depletion of O2 (compared to conventional radiation), it is essential to consider the known role of O2 in modifying the response of cells and tissues to ionising radiation (known as 'the oxygen effect'). Considerations include: (1) The pertinent reaction involves an unstable intermediate of radiation-damaged DNA, which either undergoes chemical repair to restore the DNA or reacts with O2, resulting in an unrepairable lesion in the DNA, (2) These reactions occur in the nuclear DNA, which can be used to estimate the distance needed for O2 to diffuse through the cell to reach the intermediates, (3) The longest lifetime that the reactive site of the DNA is available to react with O2 is 1-10 µsec, (4) Using these lifetime estimates and known diffusion rates in different cell media, the maximal distance that O2 could travel in the cytosol to reach the site of the DNA (i.e., the nucleus) in time to react are 60-185 nm. This calculation defines the volume of oxygen that is pertinent for the direct oxygen effect, (5) Therefore, direct measurements of oxygen to determine if FLASH RT operates through differential radiochemical depletion of oxygen will require the ability to measure oxygen selectively in a sphere of <200 nm, with a time resolution of the duration of the delivery of FLASH, (6) It also is possible that alterations of oxygen levels by FLASH could occur more indirectly by affecting oxygen-dependent cell signalling and/or cellular repair.

First-In-Human Study in Cancer Patients Establishing the Feasibility of Oxygen Measurements in Tumors Using Electron Paramagnetic Resonance With the OxyChip.

OBJECTIVE: The overall objective of this clinical study was to validate an implantable oxygen sensor, called the 'OxyChip', as a clinically feasible technology that would allow individualized tumor-oxygen assessments in cancer patients prior to and during hypoxia-modification interventions such as hyperoxygen breathing. METHODS: Patients with any solid tumor at ≤3-cm depth from the skin-surface scheduled to undergo surgical resection (with or without neoadjuvant therapy) were considered eligible for the study. The OxyChip was implanted in the tumor and subsequently removed during standard-of-care surgery. Partial pressure of oxygen (pO2) at the implant location was assessed using electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) oximetry. RESULTS: Twenty-three cancer patients underwent OxyChip implantation in their tumors. Six patients received neoadjuvant therapy while the OxyChip was implanted. Median implant duration was 30 days (range 4-128 days). Forty-five successful oxygen measurements were made in 15 patients. Baseline pO2 values were variable with overall median 15.7 mmHg (range 0.6-73.1 mmHg); 33% of the values were below 10 mmHg. After hyperoxygenation, the overall median pO2 was 31.8 mmHg (range 1.5-144.6 mmHg). In 83% of the measurements, there was a statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05) response to hyperoxygenation. CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of baseline pO2 and response to hyperoxygenation using EPR oximetry with the OxyChip is clinically feasible in a variety of tumor types. Tumor oxygen at baseline differed significantly among patients. Although most tumors responded to a hyperoxygenation intervention, some were non-responders. These data demonstrated the need for individualized assessment of tumor oxygenation in the context of planned hyperoxygenation interventions to optimize clinical outcomes.

What Is the Meaning of an Oxygen Measurement? : Analysis of Methods Purporting to Measure Oxygen in Targeted Tissues.

Clinical measurements of O2 in tissues will inevitably provide data that are at best aggregated and will not reflect the inherent heterogeneity of O2 in tissues over space and time. Additionally, the nature of all existing techniques to measure O2 results in complex sampling of the volume that is sensed by the technique. By recognizing these potential limitations of the measures, one can focus on the very important and useful information that can be obtained from these techniques, especially data about factors that can change levels of O2 and then exploit these changes diagnostically and therapeutically. The clinical utility of such data ultimately needs to be verified by careful studies of outcomes related to the measured changes in levels of O2.

The impact of particulate electron paramagnetic resonance oxygen sensors on fluorodeoxyglucose imaging characteristics detected via positron emission tomography.

During a first-in-humans clinical trial investigating electron paramagnetic resonance tumor oximetry, a patient injected with the particulate oxygen sensor Printex ink was found to have unexpected fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in a dermal nodule via positron emission tomography (PET). This nodule co-localized with the Printex ink injection; biopsy of the area, due to concern for malignancy, revealed findings consistent with ink and an associated inflammatory reaction. Investigations were subsequently performed to assess the impact of oxygen sensors on FDG-PET/CT imaging. A retrospective analysis of three clinical tumor oximetry trials involving two oxygen sensors (charcoal particulates and LiNc-BuO microcrystals) in 22 patients was performed to evaluate FDG imaging characteristics. The impact of clinically used oxygen sensors (carbon black, charcoal particulates, LiNc-BuO microcrystals) on FDG-PET/CT imaging after implantation in rat muscle (n = 12) was investigated. The retrospective review revealed no other patients with FDG avidity associated with particulate sensors. The preclinical investigation found no injected oxygen sensor whose mean standard uptake values differed significantly from sham injections. The risk of a false-positive FDG-PET/CT scan due to oxygen sensors appears low. However, in the right clinical context the potential exists that an associated inflammatory reaction may confound interpretation.

OxyChip Implantation and Subsequent Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Oximetry in Human Tumors Is Safe and Feasible: First Experience in 24 Patients.

Introduction: Tumor hypoxia confers both a poor prognosis and increased resistance to oncologic therapies, and therefore, hypoxia modification with reliable oxygen profiling during anticancer treatment is desirable. The OxyChip is an implantable oxygen sensor that can detect tumor oxygen levels using electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) oximetry. We report initial safety and feasibility outcomes after OxyChip implantation in a first-in-humans clinical trial (NCT02706197, www.clinicaltrials.gov). Materials and Methods: Twenty-four patients were enrolled. Eligible patients had a tumor ≤ 3 cm from the skin surface with planned surgical resection as part of standard-of-care therapy. Most patients had a squamous cell carcinoma of the skin (33%) or a breast malignancy (33%). After an initial cohort of six patients who received surgery alone, eligibility was expanded to patients receiving either chemotherapy or radiotherapy prior to surgical resection. The OxyChip was implanted into the tumor using an 18-G needle; a subset of patients had ultrasound-guided implantation. Electron paramagnetic resonance oximetry was carried out using a custom-built clinical EPR scanner. Patients were evaluated for associated toxicity using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE); evaluations started immediately after OxyChip placement, occurred during every EPR oximetry measurement, and continued periodically after removal. The OxyChip was removed during standard-of-care surgery, and pathologic analysis of the tissue surrounding the OxyChip was performed. Results: Eighteen patients received surgery alone, while five underwent chemotherapy and one underwent radiotherapy prior to surgery. No unanticipated serious adverse device events occurred. The maximum severity of any adverse event as graded by the CTCAE was 1 (least severe), and all were related to events typically associated with implantation. After surgical resection, 45% of the patients had no histopathologic findings specifically associated with the OxyChip. All tissue pathology was "anticipated" excepting a patient with greater than expected inflammatory findings, which was assessed to be related to the tumor as opposed to the OxyChip. Conclusion: This report of the first-in-humans trial of OxyChip implantation and EPR oximetry demonstrated no significant clinical pathology or unanticipated serious adverse device events. Use of the OxyChip in the clinic was thus safe and feasible.

How best to interpret measures of levels of oxygen in tissues to make them effective clinical tools for care of patients with cancer and other oxygen-dependent pathologies.

It is well understood that the level of molecular oxygen (O2 ) in tissue is a very important factor impacting both physiology and pathological processes as well as responsiveness to some treatments. Data on O2 in tissue could be effectively utilized to enhance precision medicine. However, the nature of the data that can be obtained using existing clinically applicable techniques is often misunderstood, and this can confound the effective use of the information. Attempts to make clinical measurements of O2 in tissues will inevitably provide data that are aggregated over time and space and therefore will not fully represent the inherent heterogeneity of O2 in tissues. Additionally, the nature of existing techniques to measure O2 may result in uneven sampling of the volume of interest and therefore may not provide accurate information on the "average" O2 in the measured volume. By recognizing the potential limitations of the O2 measurements, one can focus on the important and useful information that can be obtained from these techniques. The most valuable clinical characterizations of oxygen are likely to be derived from a series of measurements that provide data about factors that can change levels of O2 , which then can be exploited both diagnostically and therapeutically. The clinical utility of such data ultimately needs to be verified by careful studies of outcomes related to the measured changes in levels of O2 .

Scientific and Logistical Considerations When Screening for Radiation Risks by Using Biodosimetry Based on Biological Effects of Radiation Rather than Dose: The Need for Prior Measurements of Homogeneity and Distribution of Dose.

An effective medical response to a large-scale radiation event requires prompt and effective initial triage so that appropriate care can be provided to individuals with significant risk for severe acute radiation injury. Arguably, it would be advantageous to use injury rather than radiation dose for the initial assessment; i.e., use bioassays of biological damage. Such assays would be based on changes in intrinsic biological response elements; e.g., up- or down-regulation of genes, proteins, metabolites, blood cell counts, chromosomal aberrations, micronuclei, micro-RNA, cytokines, or transcriptomes. Using a framework to evaluate the feasibility of biodosimetry for triaging up to a million people in less than a week following a major radiation event, Part 1 analyzes the logistical feasibility and clinical needs for ensuring that biomarkers of organ-specific injury could be effectively used in this context. We conclude that the decision to use biomarkers of organ-specific injury would greatly benefit by first having independent knowledge of whether the person's exposure was heterogeneous and, if so, what was the dose distribution (to determine which organs were exposed to high doses). In Part 2, we describe how these two essential needs for prior information (heterogeneity and dose distribution) could be obtained by using in vivo nail dosimetry. This novel physical biodosimetry method can also meet the needs for initial triage, providing non-invasive, point-of-care measurements made by non-experts with immediate dose estimates for four separate anatomical sites. Additionally, it uniquely provides immediate information as to whether the exposure was homogeneous and, if not, it can estimate the dose distribution. We conclude that combining the capability of methods such as in vivo EPR nail dosimetry with bioassays to predict organ-specific damage would allow effective use of medical resources to save lives.

Developments in Biodosimetry Methods for Triage With a Focus on X-band Electron Paramagnetic Resonance In Vivo Fingernail Dosimetry.

Instrumentation and application methodologies for rapidly and accurately estimating individual ionizing radiation dose are needed for on-site triage in a radiological/nuclear event. One such methodology is an in vivo X-band, electron paramagnetic resonance, physically based dosimetry method to directly measure the radiation-induced signal in fingernails. The primary components under development are key instrument features, such as resonators with unique geometries that allow for large sampling volumes but limit radiation-induced signal measurements to the nail plate, and methodological approaches for addressing interfering signals in the nail and for calibrating dose from radiation-induced signal measurements. One resonator development highlighted here is a surface resonator array designed to reduce signal detection losses due to the soft tissues underlying the nail plate. Several surface resonator array geometries, along with ergonomic features to stabilize fingernail placement, have been tested in tissue-equivalent nail models and in vivo nail measurements of healthy volunteers using simulated radiation-induced signals in their fingernails. These studies demonstrated radiation-induced signal detection sensitivities and quantitation limits approaching the clinically relevant range of ≤ 10 Gy. Studies of the capabilities of the current instrument suggest that a reduction in the variability in radiation-induced signal measurements can be obtained with refinements to the surface resonator array and ergonomic features of the human interface to the instrument. Additional studies are required before the quantitative limits of the assay can be determined for triage decisions in a field application of dosimetry. These include expanded in vivo nail studies and associated ex vivo nail studies to provide informed approaches to accommodate for a potential interfering native signal in the nails when calculating the radiation-induced signal from the nail plate spectral measurements and to provide a method for calibrating dose estimates from the radiation-induced signal measurements based on quantifying experiments in patients undergoing total-body irradiation or total-skin electron therapy.

Using India Ink as a Sensor for Oximetry: Evidence of its Safety as a Medical Device.

Clinical EPR spectroscopy is emerging as an important modality, with the potential to be used in standard clinical practice to determine the extent of hypoxia in tissues and whether hypoxic tissues respond to breathing enriched oxygen during therapy. Oximetry can provide important information useful for prognosis and to improve patient outcomes. EPR oximetry has many potential advantages over other ways to measure oxygen in tissues, including directly measuring oxygen in tissues and being particularly sensitive to low oxygen, repeatable, and non-invasive after an initial injection of the EPR-sensing material is placed in the tumor. The most immediately available oxygen sensor is India ink, where two classes of carbon (carbon black and charcoal) have been identified as having acceptable paramagnetic properties for oximetry. While India ink has a long history of safe use in tattoos, a systematic research search regarding its safety for marking tissues for medical uses and an examination of the evidence that differentiates between ink based on charcoal or carbon black has not been conducted. METHODS: Using systematic literature search techniques, we searched the PubMed and Food and Drug Administration databases, finding ~1000 publications reporting on adverse events associated with India/carbon based inks. The detailed review of outcomes was based on studies involving >16 patients, where the ink was identifiable as carbon black or charcoal. RESULTS: Fifty-six studies met these criteria. There were few reports of complications other than transient and usually mild discomfort and bleeding at injection, and there was no difference in charcoal vs. carbon black India ink. CONCLUSIONS: India ink was generally well tolerated by patients and physicians reported that it was easy to use in practice and used few resources. The risk is low enough to justify its use as an oxygen sensor in clinical practice.

Development of the Implantable Resonator System for Clinical EPR Oximetry.

Hypoxic tumors are more resistant to radiotherapy and chemotherapy, which decreases the efficacy of these common forms of treatment. We have been developing implantable paramagnetic particulates to measure oxygen in vivo using electron paramagnetic resonance. Once implanted, oxygen can be measured repeatedly and non-invasively in superficial tissues (<3 cm deep), using an electron paramagnetic resonance spectrometer and an external surface-loop resonator. To significantly extend the clinical applications of electron paramagnetic resonance oximetry, we developed an implantable resonator system to obtain measurements at deeper sites. This system has been used to successfully obtain oxygen measurements in animal studies for several years. We report here on recent developments needed to meet the regulatory requirements to make this technology available for clinical use. radio frequency heating is discussed and magnetic resonance compatibility testing of the device has been carried out by a Good Laboratory Practice-certified laboratory. The geometry of the implantable resonator has been modified to meet our focused goal of verifying safety and efficacy for the proposed use of intracranial measurements and also for future use in tissue sites other than the brain. We have encapsulated the device within a smooth cylindrical-shaped silicone elastomer to prevent tissues from adhering to the device and to limit perturbation of tissue during implantation and removal. We have modified the configuration for simultaneously measuring oxygen at multiple sites by developing a linear array of oxygen sensing probes, which each provide independent measurements. If positive results are obtained in additional studies which evaluate biocompatibility and chemical characterization, we believe the implantable resonator will be at a suitable stage for initial testing in human subjects.

Comparing the Effectiveness of Methods to Measure Oxygen in Tissues for Prognosis and Treatment of Cancer.

Given the clinical evidence that hypoxic tumors are more resistant to standard therapy and that adjusting therapies can improve the outcomes for the subpopulation with hypoxic tumors, in vivo methods to measure oxygen in tissue have important clinical potential. This paper provides the rationale for and methodological strategies to use comparative effectiveness research to evaluate oximetry for cancer care. Nine oximetry methods that have been used in vivo to measure oxygen in human tumors are evaluated on several clinically relevant criteria to illustrate the value of applying comparative effectiveness to oximetry.

Advances in in vivo EPR Tooth BIOdosimetry: Meeting the targets for initial triage following a large-scale radiation event.

Several important recent advances in the development and evolution of in vivo Tooth Biodosimetry using Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) allow its performance to meet or exceed the U.S. targeted requirements for accuracy and ease of operation and throughput in a large-scale radiation event. Ergonomically based changes to the magnet, coupled with the development of rotation of the magnet and advanced software to automate collection of data, have made it easier and faster to make a measurement. From start to finish, measurements require a total elapsed time of 5 min, with data acquisition taking place in less than 3 min. At the same time, the accuracy of the data for triage of large populations has improved, as indicated using the metrics of sensitivity, specificity and area under the ROC curve. Applying these standards to the intended population, EPR in vivo Tooth Biodosimetry has approximately the same diagnostic accuracy as the purported 'gold standard' (dicentric chromosome assay). Other improvements include miniaturisation of the spectrometer, leading to the creation of a significantly lighter and more compact prototype that is suitable for transporting for Point of Care (POC) operation and that can be operated off a single standard power outlet. Additional advancements in the resonator, including use of a disposable sensing loop attached to the incisor tooth, have resulted in a biodosimetry method where measurements can be made quickly with a simple 5-step workflow and by people needing only a few minutes of training (which can be built into the instrument as a training video). In sum, recent advancements allow this prototype to meet or exceed the US Federal Government's recommended targets for POC biodosimetry in large-scale events.

ROC Analysis for Evaluation of Radiation Biodosimetry Technologies.

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis is a fundamental tool used for the evaluation and comparison of diagnostic systems that provides estimates of the combinations of sensitivity and specificity that can be achieved with a given technique. Along with critical considerations of practical limitations, such as throughput and time to availability of results, ROC analyses can be applied to provide meaningful assessments and comparisons of available biodosimetry methods. Accordingly, guidance from the Food and Drug Administration to evaluate biodosimetry devices recommends using ROC analysis. However, the existing literature for the numerous biodosimetry methods that have been developed to address the needs for triage either do not contain ROC analyses or present ROC analyses where the dose distributions of the study samples are not representative of the populations to be screened. The use of non-representative sample populations can result in a significant spectrum bias, where estimated performance metrics do not accurately characterize the true performance under real-world conditions. Particularly, in scenarios where a large group of people is screened because they were potentially exposed in a large-scale radiation event, directly measured population data do not exist. However, a number of complex simulations have been performed and reported in the literature that provide estimates of the required dose distributions. Based on these simulations and reported data about the output and uncertainties of biodosimetry assays, we illustrate how ROC curves can be generated that incorporate a realistic representative sample. A technique to generate ROC curves for biodosimetry data is presented along with representative ROC curves, summary statistics and discussion based on published data for triage-ready electron paramagnetic resonance in vivo tooth dosimetry, the dicentric chromosome assay and quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay. We argue that this methodology should be adopted generally to evaluate the performance of radiation biodosimetry screening assays so that they can be compared in the context of their intended use.

Evaluating the Special Needs of The Military for Radiation Biodosimetry for Tactical Warfare Against Deployed Troops: Comparing Military to Civilian Needs for Biodosimetry Methods.

The aim of this paper is to delineate characteristics of biodosimetry most suitable for assessing individuals who have potentially been exposed to significant radiation from a nuclear device explosion when the primary population targeted by the explosion and needing rapid assessment for triage is civilians vs. deployed military personnel. The authors first carry out a systematic analysis of the requirements for biodosimetry to meet the military's needs to assess deployed troops in a warfare situation, which include accomplishing the military mission. Then the military's special capabilities to respond and carry out biodosimetry for deployed troops in warfare are compared and contrasted systematically, in contrast to those available to respond and conduct biodosimetry for civilians who have been targeted by terrorists, for example. Then the effectiveness of different biodosimetry methods to address military vs. civilian needs and capabilities in these scenarios was compared and, using five representative types of biodosimetry with sufficient published data to be useful for the simulations, the number of individuals are estimated who could be assessed by military vs. civilian responders within the timeframe needed for triage decisions. Analyses based on these scenarios indicate that, in comparison to responses for a civilian population, a wartime military response for deployed troops has both more complex requirements for and greater capabilities to use different types of biodosimetry to evaluate radiation exposure in a very short timeframe after the exposure occurs. Greater complexity for the deployed military is based on factors such as a greater likelihood of partial or whole body exposure, conditions that include exposure to neutrons, and a greater likelihood of combined injury. These simulations showed, for both the military and civilian response, that a very fast rate of initiating the processing (24,000 d) is needed to have at least some methods capable of completing the assessment of 50,000 people within a 2- or 6-d timeframe following exposure. This in turn suggests a very high capacity (i.e., laboratories, devices, supplies and expertise) would be necessary to achieve these rates. These simulations also demonstrated the practical importance of the military's superior capacity to minimize time to transport samples to offsite facilities and use the results to carry out triage quickly. Assuming sufficient resources and the fastest daily rate to initiate processing victims, the military scenario revealed that two biodosimetry methods could achieve the necessary throughput to triage 50,000 victims in 2 d (i.e., the timeframe needed for injured victims), and all five achieved the targeted throughput within 6 d. In contrast, simulations based on the civilian scenario revealed that no method could process 50,000 people in 2 d and only two could succeed within 6 d.

Comparison of the needs for biodosimetry for large-scale radiation events for military versus civilian populations.

The aim of this paper is to compare and contrast the needs for biodosimetry for initial triage for military forces and civilian populations when there are radiation exposures that involve potentially a large number of persons. Several differences in the likely scenarios for exposure of military forces include a greater likelihood of having higher rates of significant exposures, inhomogeneous exposures, significant doses from neutrons, and combined injury. Measurements will be able to begin sooner than for exposures in civilian settings because medical facilities usually are an integral part of the way military forces are deployed. It also will be very feasible to have personnel that will be trained and equipped specifically for rapid deployment to assess dose. As a consequence, the most appropriate biodosimetry techniques will include features that are not present or are less important for civilian settings; i.e., the need for changes that become measureable very soon after the radiation is received, the ability to complete measurements in very close proximity to the subjects (so samples do not need to be transported out and results returned), increased capability of resolving homogeneity of the exposure, ability to be carried out in an injured person, capability of determining whether neutrons have made a significant contribution to dose, and the ability to rely on more sophisticated equipment and trained personnel to carry out the measurements at the point of care.