Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Neuroimmunomodulation ; 29(3): 231-247, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34610606

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Inflammation is a mechanism of the immune system that is part of the reaction to pathogens or injury. The central nervous system closely regulates inflammation via neuroendocrine or direct neuroimmune mechanisms, but our current knowledge of the underlying circuitry is limited. Therefore, we aimed to identify hypothalamic centres involved in sensing or modulating inflammation and to study their association with known large-scale brain networks. METHODS: Using high-resolution functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we recorded brain activity in healthy male subjects undergoing experimental inflammation from intravenous endotoxin. Four fMRI runs covered key phases of the developing inflammation: pre-inflammatory baseline, onset of endotoxemia, onset of pro-inflammatory cytokinemia, and peak of pro-inflammatory cytokinemia. Using masked independent component analysis, we identified functionally homogeneous subregions of the hypothalamus, which were further tested for changes in functional connectivity during inflammation and for temporal correlation with tumour necrosis factor and adrenocorticotropic hormone serum levels. We then studied the connection of these inflammation-associated hypothalamic subregions with known large-scale brain networks. RESULTS: Our results show that there are at least 6 hypothalamic subregions associated with inflammation in humans including the paraventricular nucleus, supraoptic nucleus, dorsomedial hypothalamus, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, lateral hypothalamic area, and supramammillary nucleus. They are functionally embedded in at least 3 different large-scale brain networks, namely a medial frontoparietal network, an occipital-pericentral network, and a midcingulo-insular network. CONCLUSION: Measuring how the hypothalamus detects or modulates systemic inflammation is a first step to understand central nervous immunomodulation.


Assuntos
Endotoxemia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagem , Endotoxemia/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Hipotálamo/diagnóstico por imagem , Hipotálamo/fisiologia , Masculino , Núcleo Hipotalâmico Paraventricular
2.
J Pain Res ; 10: 1059-1069, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28533694

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: In orthopedic surgery, it is well known that the use of intrathecal morphine (ITM) leads to an improved quality of postoperative analgesia. Little is known how this improved analgesia affects the long-term course after surgery. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized, double-blind trial. SETTING: Academic medical center. SUBJECTS: Forty-nine patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement surgery in spinal anesthesia. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 0.1 mg (n=16) or 0.2 mg (n=16) morphine sulfate intrathecally or physiological saline (n=17) added to 3 mL 0.5% isobaric bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia. As a function of the quality of the short-term postoperative analgesia, the effect on recovery and quality of life was evaluated at various time points up to 26 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: In both ITM groups, the additionally required postoperative systemic morphine dose was significantly reduced compared with the placebo group (P=0.004). One week after operation, patients with ITM reported significantly less pain at rest (P=0.01) compared to the placebo group. At discharge, in comparison with the 0.1 mg ITM and placebo group, the 0.2 mg ITM group showed a higher degree of impairment regarding pain, stiffness, and physical function of the respective joint (P=0.02). Over the further follow-up period of 6 months after surgery, recovery and the quality of life did not differ significantly between the three study groups (P>0.2). CONCLUSION: Morphine (0.1 mg) as adjunct to 0.5% bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia is effective to produce a pronounced postoperative analgesia with a beneficial analgesic effect up to 1 week after surgery. With this study design, the different quality of postoperative analgesia had no effect on quality of life and recovery in patients over the 6-month follow-up period. In the medium term, ITM may induce hyperalgesic effects.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA