IVIg-induced plasmablasts in patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome.

Objective: The Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute, immune-mediated disease of peripheral nerves. Plasmablasts and plasma cells play a central role in GBS by producing neurotoxic antibodies. The standard treatment for GBS is high-dose intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg), however the working mechanism is unknown and the response to treatment is highly variable. We aimed to determine whether IVIg changes the frequency of B-cell subsets in patients with GBS. Methods: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from 67 patients with GBS before and/or 1, 2, 4, and 12 weeks after treatment with high-dose IVIg. B-cell subset frequencies were determined by flow cytometry and related to serum immunoglobulin levels. Immunoglobulin transcripts before and after IVIg treatment were examined by next-generation sequencing. Antiglycolipid antibodies were determined by ELISA. Results: Patients treated with IVIg demonstrated a strong increase in plasmablasts, which peaked 1 week after treatment. Flow cytometry identified a relative increase in IgG2 plasmablasts posttreatment. Within IGG sequences, dominant clones were identified which were also IGG2 and had different immunoglobulin sequences compared to pretreatment samples. High plasmablast frequencies after treatment correlated with an increase in serum IgG and IgM, suggesting endogenous production. Patients with a high number of plasmablasts started to improve earlier (P = 0.015) and were treated with a higher dose of IVIg. Interpretation: High-dose IVIg treatment alters the distribution of B-cell subsets in the peripheral blood of GBS patients, suggesting de novo (oligo-)clonal B-cell activation. Very high numbers of plasmablasts after IVIg therapy may be a potential biomarker for fast clinical recovery.

Clinical relevance of serum antibodies to GD1b in immune-mediated neuropathies.

Antibodies to the ganglioside GD1b have been reported in various forms of immune-mediated neuropathy, but their clinical relevance for diagnosis and prognosis is unknown. We investigated the prevalence of anti-GD1b antibodies in acute and chronic immune-mediated neuropathies, and the clinical presentation and outcome in Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and Miller Fisher-GBS overlap syndrome (MF-GBS). Anti-GD1b, anti-GM1 and anti-GQ1b antibodies were tested in serum of patients with GBS (N = 165), Miller Fisher syndrome (N = 10), MF-GBS (N = 28), monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance neuropathy (MGUS; N = 101), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (N = 29), paraneoplastic syndrome with anti-Hu-associated neuropathy (PNS; N = 11), other auto-immune diseases (AID; N = 60), and healthy controls (HC; N = 60). All samples were tested by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay according to the Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment protocol. IgM anti-GD1b antibodies were found in GBS (N = 4; 2.4%), MGUS (N = 3; 3.0%), and PNS patients (N = 1; 9.1%). IgG anti-GD1b antibodies were found in GBS (N = 20; 12.1%) and MF-GBS (N = 4; 14.3%) patients, but not in the AID and HC group. In the combined group of MF-GBS and GBS patients ((MF-)GBS), 14/36 (38.9%) patients with IgG anti-GD1b antibodies also had IgG anti-GM1 antibodies, and IgG anti-GD1b and IgG anti-GQ1b antibodies were found in 3/29 (10.3%) patients. Patients with (MF-)GBS and anti-GD1b without anti-GM1 antibodies did not differ regarding sensory disturbances or disease severity but recovered faster regarding the ability to walk independently compared with patients without anti-GD1b antibodies (P = 0.031) and with patients with both anti-GD1b and anti-GM1 antibodies (P = 0.034). In conclusion, testing for anti-GD1b antibodies may identify a specific group of immune-mediated neuropathies and (MF-)GBS patients with only anti-GD1b antibodies tend to recover faster.