Predictive factors for fracture-related infection in open tibial fractures in a Sub-Saharan African setting.

INTRODUCTION: The management of open tibial fractures (OTF) is challenging in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) where appropriate human resources and infrastructure (including equipment, implants and surgical supplies) are not readily available and medical care is not readily accessible. OTF are not rarely associated with a subsequent fracture-related infection (FRI), which is one of the most devastating and difficult to cure complications in orthopaedic trauma care. The aim of this study was to determine the rate and the predictive factors of FRI in OTF in a limited-resource setting of sub-Saharan Africa. METHODS: Patients with OTF who underwent surgery from July 2015 to December 2020 and followed-up for at least 12 months in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Yaoundé (Cameroon) were retrospectively investigated. Diagnosis of FRI was based on the confirmatory criteria of the International FRI Consensus definition. All patients with bone infections, occurring at any time point during follow-up, were included. Logistic regression was used to determine the predictive factors for FRI. RESULTS: One hundred and five patients with OTF were studied. With a mean follow-up period of 29.5 ± 16.6 months, 33 patients (31.4%) presented with FRI. Gustilo-Anderson type of OTF, compliance with antibiotics, blood transfusion, time to first washing of the wounds and method of bone fixation were factors associated with the occurrence of FRI. In multivariable logistic regression, 6-hours delay to first washing of the wounds (OR=8.07, 95% CI: 1.43-45.31, p = 0.01), and compliance with antibiotics (OR=11.33, 95%CI: 1.11-115.6, p = 0.04) were the only independent predictors of FRI. CONCLUSION: The overall rate of FRI in open tibial fracture is still high in the sub-Saharan African context. For similar low-resources settings, this study supports the recommendations (1) to perform a very early washing-dressing-splinting of OTF on admission of the patient, (2) to administer antibiotics early, and (3) to perform surgery as soon as reasonably possible, once appropriate personnel, equipment, implants and surgical supplies are available.

Early posttraumatic ankle osteoarthritis following ankle fracture-dislocations in a sub-Saharan African setting.

INTRODUCTION: Ankle fracture-dislocation (AFD) represents a major threat to the joint and a potential source of complication and functional disability. This study was performed to assess the outcome of AFD in a resource-limited setting and factors associated with the posttraumatic ankle osteoarthritis (PTAOA). We hypothesized that conservative treatment after AFD was associated with higher risk of PTAOA compared to surgical treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 52 consecutive patients (mean age 37.2±11.1years, with 57.7% n=30, males) who were treated and followed in a teaching hospital for AFD during a period of six years were collected. Forty-four of these patients were obtained at the time of the study for a retrospective evaluation. Functional outcome was assessed using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS), ankle-hindfoot scale, and the patient's global satisfaction index. Radiographs were performed and analyzed for PTAOA. Logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with the presence of PTAOA. RESULTS: PTAOA was found in 19 (43.2%) patients after an average follow-up period of 27.2±18.3months. Anatomic fracture reduction was achieved in 22 (50%) patients, while the talus was centered in the mortise in 30 (68.2%) patients. Despite these poor anatomical results, the clinical outcome was good to excellent in 33 (75%) patients, and 88.6% was satisfied or very satisfied. Factors associated with the presence of PTAOA were the non-anatomical reduction (OR=11.07; p=0.007, 95% CI: 2.096-58.77) and the time elapsed since trauma (OR=1.073; p=0.007, 95% CI: 1.109-1.129). CONCLUSION: This study indicates that AFDs are associated with high rate of early and severe PTAOA. Non-anatomical realignment and a delay since trauma were positive predictors of PTAOA. There was no difference regarding the occurrence of PTAOA after AFD whatever the type of treatment, surgical or conservative. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; retrospective cohort study.

Biomechanical study of a low-cost external fixator for diaphyseal fractures of long bones.

BACKGROUND: External fixation improves open fracture management in emerging countries. However, sophisticated models are often expensive and unavailable. We assessed the biomechanical properties of a low-cost external fixation system in comparison with the Hoffmann® 3 system, as a reference. METHODS: Transversal, oblique, and comminuted fractures were created in the diaphysis of tibia sawbones. Six external fixators were tested in three modes of loading-axial compression, medio-lateral (ML) bending, and torsion-in order to determine construction stiffness. The fixator construct implies two uniplanar (UUEF1, UUEF2) depending the pin-rods fixation system and two biplanar (UBEF1, UBEF2) designs based on different bar to bar connections. The designed low-cost fixators were compared to a Hoffmann® 3 fixator single rod (H3-SR) and double rod (H3-DR). Twenty-seven constructs were stabilized with UUEF1, UUEF2, and H3-SR (nine constructs each). Nine constructs were stabilized with UBEF1, UBEF2, and H3-DR (three constructs each). RESULTS: UUEF2 was significantly stiffer than H3-SR (p < 0.001) in axial compression for oblique fractures and UUEF1 was significantly stiffer than H3-SR (p = 0.009) in ML bending for transversal fractures. Both UUEFs were significantly stiffer than H3-SR in axial compression and torsion (p < 0.05), and inferior to H3-SR in ML bending, for comminuted fractures. In the same fracture pattern, UBEFs were significantly stiffer than H3-DR (p = 0.001) in axial compression and torsion, while only UBEF1 was significantly stiffer than H3-DR in ML bending (p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrated that the stiffness of the UUEF and UBEF device compares to the reference fixator and may be helpful in maintaining fracture reduction. Fatigue testing and clinical assessment must be conducted to ensure that the objective of bone healing is achievable with such low-cost devices.