Birth prevalence of achondroplasia: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Achondroplasia is a genetic disorder that results in disproportionate short stature. The true prevalence of achondroplasia is unknown as estimates vary widely. This systematic literature review and meta-analysis was conducted to better estimate worldwide achondroplasia birth prevalence. PubMed, Embase, Scielo, and Google Scholar were searched, complemented by manual searching, for peer-reviewed articles published between 1950 and 2019. Eligible articles were identified by two independent researchers using predefined selection criteria. Birth prevalence estimates were extracted for analysis, and the quality of evidence was assessed. A meta-analysis using a quality effects approach based on the inverse variance fixed effect model was conducted. The search identified 955 unique articles, of which 52 were eligible and included. Based on the meta-analysis, the worldwide birth prevalence of achondroplasia was estimated to be 4.6 per 100,000. Substantial regional variation was observed with a considerably higher birth prevalence reported in North Africa and the Middle East compared to other regions, particularly Europe and the Americas. Higher birth prevalence was also reported in specialized care settings. Significant heterogeneity (Higgins I2 of 84.3) was present and some indication of publication bias was detected, based on visual asymmetry of the Doi plot with a Furuya-Kanamori index of 2.73. Analysis of pooled data from the current literature yields a worldwide achondroplasia birth prevalence of approximately 4.6 per 100,000, with considerable regional variation. Careful interpretation of these findings is advised as included studies are of broadly varying methodological quality.

Use of Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) and Sorafenib in Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: US Regional Analysis of the GIDEON Registry.

BACKGROUND: Global Investigation of Therapeutic Decisions in Hepatocellular Carcinoma and of Treatment with Sorafenib (GIDEON) is a worldwide, prospective, non-interventional study to evaluate the safety of sorafenib in a variety of patient subsets. METHODS: Eligible patients had unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma for whom the decision had been made to treat with sorafenib. Treatment strategies were instituted at the physician's discretion. Patient and disease characteristics, treatment practices, incidences of adverse events (AEs), and overall survival were collected. RESULTS: In the United States, 563 patients were evaluable for safety. Subgroup analysis was performed for patients who underwent transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) prior to the initiation of sorafenib (group A, n=158), after the initiation of sorafenib only (group B, n=29), both (group C, n=38), or did not undergo TACE (n=318). Patient demographics were similar across the groups. In group A, 29% had Child-Pugh score B or C at diagnosis, and 19% had Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer tumor stage C or D. In group B, 48% had Child-Pugh score B or C at study entry, and 31% had BCLC stage C or D. The majority of patients in all groups initially received full-dose sorafenib. Incidences of grade ≥3 drug-related AEs were 30%, 17%, and 16% in groups A, B, and C, respectively, and 22% in patients who did not undergo TACE. No new safety signals emerged. CONCLUSIONS: The results from GIDEON reaffirm that sorafenib can be safely used in the context of TACE.

A systematic review of the efficacy and safety experience reported for sorafenib in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in the post-approval setting.

BACKGROUND: Sorafenib was FDA approved in 2005 for treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) based on the results of the pivotal phase 3 clinical trial, TARGET (Treatment Approaches in Renal Cancer Global Evaluation Trial). Since that time, numerous clinical studies have been undertaken that substantially broaden our knowledge of the use of sorafenib for this indication. METHODS: We systematically reviewed PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and www.clinicaltrials.gov for prospective clinical studies using single agent sorafenib in RCC and published since 2005. Primary endpoints of interest were progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews #CRD42014010765. RESULTS: We identified 30 studies in which 2182 patients were treated with sorafenib, including 1575 patients who participated in randomized controlled phase 3 trials. In these trials, sorafenib was administered as first-, second- or third-line treatment. Heterogeneity among trial designs and reporting of data precluded statistical comparisons among trials or with TARGET. The PFS appeared shorter in second- vs. first-line treatment, consistent with the more advanced tumor status in the second-line setting. In some trials, incidences of grade 3/4 hypertension or hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) were more than double that seen in TARGET (4% and 6%, respectively). These variances may be attributable to increased recognition of HFSR, or potentially differences in dose adjustments, that could be consequences of increased familiarity with sorafenib usage. Several small studies enrolled exclusively Asian patients. These studies reported notably longer PFS than was observed in TARGET. However, no obvious corresponding differences in disease control rate and overall survival were seen. CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, more recent experiences using sorafenib in RCC are consistent with results reported for TARGET with no marked changes of response endpoints or new safety signals observed.

ErbB3 inhibitory surrobodies inhibit tumor cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo.

ErbB3 is an important regulator of tumorigenesis and is implicated in development of resistance to several currently used oncology drugs. We have identified ErbB3 inhibitors based on a novel biologic scaffold termed a surrobody. Two of these inhibitors appear to work by a previously unrecognized mechanism of action. As a consequence, they not only inhibited cell proliferation and intracellular signaling driven by stimulation with the ErbB3 ligand neuregulin (NRG), but also inhibited signaling and proliferation that was driven by overexpression of ErbB2 in the absence of ligand stimulation. In addition, the surrobodies inhibited tumor growth in vivo in both ErbB2-overexpressing and nonoverexpressing cells. In ErbB2-overexpressing cells, both of the anti-ErbB3 surrobodies significantly augmented the activities of trastuzumab, lapatinib, and GDC-0941, agents that inhibit cell proliferation by different mechanisms. Moreover, although NRG diminished the efficacy of these agents, when they were combined with anti-ErbB3 surrobodies the affect of NRG was abrogated. In this capacity, the anti-ErbB3 surrobodies were more effective than the ErbB2/ErbB3 dimerization inhibitory antibody pertuzumab. Despite the fact that these surrobodies appear to engage ErbB3 differently than previously described anti-ErbB3 antibodies, they retain all of the beneficial characteristics of this class of agents, including the ability to augment drugs that inhibit EGF receptor. These anti-ErbB3 agents, therefore, show substantial promise for development as single agents or in combination with other ErbB-directed antibodies or small molecules and may provide for a broader range of therapeutic indications than previously described anti-ErbB3 antibodies.