The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on people living with HIV: a cross-sectional study in Caracas, Venezuela.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has disrupted multiple health services, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing, care, and treatment services, jeopardizing the achievement of the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS 90-90-90 global target. While there are limited studies assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on people living with HIV (PLHIV) in Latin America, there are none, to our knowledge, in Venezuela. This study aims to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic among PLHIV seen at the outpatient clinic of a reference hospital in Venezuela. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study among PLHIV aged 18 years and over seen at the Infectious Diseases Department of the University Hospital of Caracas, Venezuela between March 2021 and February 2022. RESULTS: A total of 238 PLHIV were included in the study. The median age was 43 (IQR 31-55) years, and the majority were male (68.9%). Most patients (88.2%, n = 210) came for routine check-ups, while 28 (11.3%) were newly diagnosed. The majority of patients (96.1%) were on antiretroviral therapy (ART), but only 67.8% had a viral load test, with almost all (95.6%) being undetectable. Among those who attended regular appointments, 11.9% reported missing at least one medical consultation, and 3.3% reported an interruption in their ART refill. More than half of the patients (55.5%) had received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, while the rest expressed hesitancy to get vaccinated. Most patients with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy were male (65.1%), younger than 44 years (57.5%), employed (47.2%), and had been diagnosed with HIV for less than one year (33%). However, no statistically significant differences were found between vaccinated patients and those with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Older age was a risk factor for missing consultations, while not having an alcoholic habit was identified as a protective factor against missing consultations. CONCLUSION: This study found that the COVID-19 pandemic had a limited impact on adherence to medical consultations and interruptions in ART among PLHIV seen at the University Hospital of Caracas, Venezuela.

Nuevas perspectivas en el estudio y tratamiento de la sepsis

La sepsis es una disfunción orgánica potencialmente mortal debida a una respuesta desregulada del hospedero a la infección. No sólo contribuye con el 20 % de todas las causas de muerte de forma global, sino que los sobrevivientes de esta también pueden experimentar una significativa morbilidad a largo plazo. La sepsis y el shock séptico son emergencias médicas que requieren reconocimiento rápido, administración de antimicrobianos apropiados, soporte hemodinámico cuidadoso y control de la fuente infecciosa. El objetivo de esta revisión fue describir la definición y los criterios diagnósticos, la epidemiología, los factores de riesgo, la patogenia y la conducta inicial ante la sepsis.

Sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction due to a dysregulated host response to infection. It severely impacts global disease burden as it constates 20 % of all causes of death; its survivors may experience long-term morbidity. Sepsis and septic shock are medical emergencies that require rapid identification, administration of appropriate antimicrobials, careful hemodynamic support, and control of the infection source. This review aims to update the definition of sepsis and its diagnostic criteria, epidemiology, risk factors, pathogenesis, and baseline behavior.

Amoebic liver abscess in a COVID-19 patient: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Amoebiasis is a parasitic disease caused by Entamoeba histolytica, which affects people living in low- and middle-income countries and has intestinal and extraintestinal manifestations. To date, knowledge on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) coinfection with enteric parasites is limited, and E. histolytica coinfection has not been previously described. Here we present the case of a patient with COVID-19 who, during hospitalisation, presented a clinical picture consistent with an amoebic liver abscess (ALA). CASE PRESENTATION: A 54-year-old man, admitted as a suspected case of COVID-19, presented to our hospital with dyspnoea, malaise, fever and hypoxaemia. A nasopharyngeal swab was positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. After 7 days, he developed diarrhoea, choluria and dysentery. An abdominal ultrasound showed a lesion compatible with a liver abscess; stool examination revealed E. histolytica trophozoites, and additional serology for E. histolytica was positive. After 12 days of treatment with metronidazole, ceftazidime and nitazoxanide, the patient reported acute abdominal pain, and an ultrasound examination revealed free liquid in the abdominal cavity. An emergency exploratory laparotomy was performed, finding 3000 mL of a thick fluid described as "anchovy paste". Computed tomography scan revealed a second abscess. He ended up receiving 21 days of antibiotic treatment and was discharged with satisfactory improvement. CONCLUSION: Here we present, to the best of our knowledge, the first report of ALA and COVID-19 co-presenting. Based on their pathophysiological similarities, coinfection with SARS-CoV-2 and E. histolytica could change the patient's clinical course; however, larger studies are needed to fully understand the interaction between these pathogens.

COVID-19 en Latinoamérica: una revisión sistemática de la literatura y análisis bibliométrico / COVID-19 in Latin America: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis

RESUMEN Objetivo Describir y analizar la actividad científica sobre la COVID-19 en Latinoamérica. Materiales y Métodos Mediante una revisión sistemática de la literatura en PubMed, LILACS y los repositorios preimpresos BioRxiv y medRxiv, se recuperaron todos los documentos disponibles sobre la COVID-19 en Latinoamérica desde el primero de enero hasta el 24 de abril de 2020, para su análisis bibliométrico. Resultados Un total de 29 publicaciones fueron incluidas en el análisis. El país con más producción científica fue Brasil (10/29; 34,4%), seguido de Colombia (6/29; 20,6%) y México (6/29; 20,6%). La universidad con más artículos fue la Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira, Colombia (5/29; 17,24%). El 41,3% de las publicaciones fueron documentos preimpresos. La mayoría de los estudios excluidos fueron comentarios editoriales u opiniones de expertos. Tres de cada cuatro investigaciones tenían un enfoque epidemiológico (21/29; 72,4%); limitados estudios sobre el diagnóstico (5/29; 17,2%), la fisiopatogenia (2/29; 2,8%) y los aspectos terapéuticos (1/29; 3,4%) fueron encontrados. Conclusión Pese al crecimiento exponencial de publicaciones en el mundo, existe una limitada cantidad de información sobre el comportamiento de esta infección en Latinoamérica. Se requiere la publicación de estudios con alta calidad metodológica, que aporten conocimiento sobre el impacto de la pandemia en la región.(AU)

ABSTRACT Objective Describe and analyze scientific activity on COVID-19 in Latin America. Materials and Methods Through a systematic review of the literature in PubMed, LILACS, and the preprinted repositories BioRxiv and medRxiv, all available documents on COVID-19 in Latin America from January 1 to April 24, 2020, were retrieved for review and bibliometric analysis. Results A total of 29 publications were included in the analysis. The country with the most scientific production was Brazil (10/29; 34,4%) followed by Colombia (6/29; 20,6%) and Mexico (6/29; 20,6%). The university with the most articles was the Technological University of Pereira, Colombia (5/29; 17,2%). 41,3% of the publications were preprinted documents. Most of the excluded studies were editorial comments or expert opinions. Three out of four investigations had an epidemiological focus (21/29; 72,4%); Limited studies on diagnosis (5/29; 17,24%), pathophysiology (2/29, 2,8%) and therapeutic Conclusion Despite the exponential growth of publications in the world, there is a limited amount of information on the behavior of this infection in Latin America. The publication of studies with high methodological quality is required, which provide knowledge of the impact of the pandemic in the region.(AU)

Malaria y coinfecciones en una región endémica de Venezuela

Introducción: La malaria continúa siendo un importante problema de salud pública en todo el mundo. Las coinfecciones son un factor de riesgo que incrementa la mortalidad de esta enfermedad. En Venezuela no existen estudios que describan la presencia de coinfecciones en pacientes con malaria. Nosotros determinamos las características clínicas y epidemiológicas de los pacientes con malaria y la presencia de coinfecciones en Ciudad Bolívar, Estado Bolívar, Venezuela. Metodología: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo, correlacional y transversal, que incluyó pacientes diagnosticados con malaria por prueba rápida y/o gota gruesa y extendido de sangre periférica que consultaron en tres centros médicos de Ciudad Bolívar, estado Bolívar, entre junio y noviembre de 2018. Se realizó una evaluación clínica y de laboratorio de cada paciente, las coinfecciones con Dengue (VD), Hepatitis viral (HV) (A, B y C), Leptospirosis (LP), y Chikungunya (VCHIK) fueron evaluadas mediante la técnica de ELISA. Resultados: Un total de 161 pacientes fueron estudiados, 106 (65,8 %) presentaron infección por P. vivax, 43 (26,7 %) por P. falciparum y 12 (7,4 %) tenían malaria mixta (Pf/Pv). La media de edad fue 33,8 (±13,43) años; 103 (63,9 %) fueron hombres, la raza más frecuente fue mestiza (94,4 %); la mayoría de los pacientes (37,3 %) practicaban la minería ilegal. Los síntomas más frecuentes fueron fiebre, escalofríos y cefalea. Anemia leve, trombocitopenia moderada, y compromiso de la función hepática fueron los hallazgos de laboratorio más relevantes en todas las especies parasitarias. Se encontró coinfección en 55/161 (34,2 %) pacientes, siendo más frecuente entre los pacientes con P. falciparum (48,8 %). La coinfección más frecuente fue con VD (14,9 %), seguida de VHA (11,8 %)VHB (6,2 %), VCHIK (5,5 %) y LP (3,7 %). En el grupo de coinfectados fue más frecuente la malaria complicada (56,36 %) que la no complicada (43,63 %) con una diferencia estadísticamente significativa (P=0,018). Conclusión: Se encontró una alta prevalencia de coinfecciones en los pacientes con malaria, y su asociación con la severidad de la Malaria, estos datos epidemiológicos influyen de manera directa en el curso clínico, así como en la mortalidad de la enfermedad. Estos hallazgos deben darse a conocer al personal de salud para la identificación oportuna de coinfecciones en estos pacientes.

Introduction: Malaria continues to be a major public health problem worldwide. Co-infections are a risk factor that increases the mortality of this disease. In Venezuela there are no studies describing the presence of coinfections in patients with malaria. We determine the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of patients with malaria and the presence of coinfections in Ciudad Bolívar, Bolívar state, Venezuela. Methodology: A descriptive, correlational and cross-sectional study was carried out, which included patients diagnosed with malaria by rapid test and / or thick and extended peripheral blood drop that they consulted in three medical centers in Ciudad Bolívar, Bolívar state, between June and November 2018 A clinical and laboratory evaluation of each patient was performed, coinfections with Dengue (DV), viral hepatitis (HV) (A, B and C), Leptospirosis (LP), and Chikungunya (VCHIK) were evaluated using the technique of ELISA Results: A total of 161 patients were studied, 106 (65.8 %) had P. vivax infection, 43 (26.7 %) due to P. falciparum and 12 (7.4 %) had mixed malaria (Pf / Pv ). The mean age was 33.8 (± 13.43) years; 103 (63.9 %) were men, the most frequent race was mestizo (94.4 %); the majority of patients (37.3 %) practiced illegal mining. The most frequent symptoms were fever, chills and headache. Mild anemia, moderate thrombocytopenia, and hepatic function impairment were the most relevant laboratory findings in all parasitic species. Coinfection was found in 55/161 (34.2 %) patients, being more frequent among patients with P. falciparum (48.8 %). The most frequent coinfection was with RV (14.9 %), followed by HAV (11.8 %) HBV (6.2 %), HCV (5.5 %) and LP (3.7 %). Complicated malaria (56.36 %) was more frequent than uncomplicated (43.63 %) with a statistically significant difference (P = 0.018). Conclusion: A high prevalence of coinfections was found in patients with malaria, and its association with the severity of Malaria, these epidemiological data directly influence the clinical course, as well as the mortality of the disease. These findings should be made known to health personnel for the timely identification of coinfections in these patients.