Genetics in reproductive endocrinology and infertility.

Tremendous advances in genetics have transformed the field of reproductive endocrinology and infertility over the last few decades. One of the most prominent advances is preimplantation genetic testing (PGT), which allows for the screening of embryos obtained during in vitro fertilization before transfer. Moreover, PGT can be performed for aneuploidy screening, detection of monogenic disorders, or exclusion of structural rearrangements. Refinement of biopsy techniques, such as obtaining samples at the blastocyst rather than the cleavage stage, has helped optimize results from PGT, and technological advances, including next-generation sequencing, have made PGT more efficient and accurate. The continued evolution of the approach to PGT has the potential to further enhance the accuracy of results, expand the application to other conditions, and increase access by reducing cost and improving efficiency.

Transfer of the fittest: using preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy to select embryo(s) most likely to lead to live birth.

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) was developed to identify euploid embryos from a cohort of embryos with unknown ploidy produced during an in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle. In recent years, the ability of PGT-A to improve IVF outcomes has come into question. The goal of this review was to summarize the major randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nonselection studies evaluating the benefit of PGT-A to improve the live birth rates (LBRs). We argue that the LBR per transfer is more relevant to the individual patient than the cumulative LBR as a means to minimize the burden of IVF by reducing futile transfers, pregnancy losses, and ongoing aneuploidy. The early RCTs demonstrate improved implantation rates and LBRs with PGT-A for embryo selection vs. traditional morphology. However, these studies are limited by the small sample size and a bias toward good-prognosis patients. Further studies using next-generation sequencing found more variable results but did confirm an improvement in the LBRs per transfer in an older population with a higher baseline risk of aneuploidy. The largest RCT to date showed similar cumulative LBRs in the PGT-A and control groups after biopsy and sequential transfer of up to 3 blastocysts with a significant reduction in the cumulative clinical pregnancy loss rate in the PGT-A group. Nonselection studies evaluating pregnancy outcomes after transfer of euploid vs. aneuploid embryos demonstrate near-perfect negative predictive value for an aneuploid result to predict live birth. Putative mosaic embryos had similar LBRs compared with euploid embryos. The available RCTs and nonselection studies support the practice of using PGT-A to identify euploid embryos for transfer, especially in an older population, while simultaneously selecting against aneuploid embryos, without negative impact on the total reproductive potential of the cycle.

A review of the pathophysiology of recurrent implantation failure.

Implantation is a critical step in human reproduction. The success of this step is dependent on a competent blastocyst, receptive endometrium, and successful cross talk between the embryonic and maternal interfaces. Recurrent implantation failure is the lack of implantation after the transfer of several embryo transfers. As the success of in vitro fertilization has increased and failures have become more unacceptable for patients and providers, the literature on recurrent implantation failure has increased. While this clinical phenomenon is often encountered, there is not a universally agreed-on definition-something addressed in an earlier portion of this Views and Reviews. Implantation failure can result from several different factors. In this review, we discuss factors including the maternal immune system, genetics of the embryo and parents, anatomic factors, hematologic factors, reproductive tract microbiome, and endocrine milieu, which factors into embryo and endometrial synchrony. These potential causes are at various stages of research and not all have clear implications or immediately apparent treatment.

Minimizing mosaicism: assessing the impact of fertilization method on rate of mosaicism after next-generation sequencing (NGS) preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A).

PURPOSE: Advances in preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) have led to practice changes in assisted reproductive technologies (ART), enabling fertility centers to transfer single embryos while maintaining excellent ongoing pregnancy rates, reducing miscarriage rates, and dramatically reducing ART-associated multiple pregnancies. The introduction of next-generation sequencing (NGS) allows PGT laboratories to assess for embryo mosaicism-although the true incidence and reproductive potential of predicted mosaic embryos are controversial. Due to concern for genetic contamination from other spermatozoa, most reference laboratories require use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for single gene preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGT-M). However, in PGT for aneuploidy (PGT-A), conventional insemination (IVF) is typically permissible. The purpose of this study was to evaluate rates of euploid, aneuploid, and mosaic in trophectoderm biopsy samples from embryos in IVF versus ICSI PGT-A cycles. Secondary aims were to assess sex ratio, and subtypes of aneuploidy and mosaicism in IVF versus ICSI PGT-A cycles. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of women undergoing PGT-A at a single academic fertility center from July 1, 2015, to September 1, 2017. In all cycles, PGT-A was performed via trophectoderm biopsy on day 5 or 6 and analyzed using NGS at a single reference lab. We collected and compared patient demographics, fertility testing, cycle characteristics, and PGT-A outcomes between IVF and ICSI cycles. RESULTS: Three hundred two PGT-A cycles were included for analysis: 75 IVF and 227 ICSI cycles, resulting in 251 IVF and 724 ICSI biopsied blastocysts. Mean oocyte age of included cycles was 38.6 years (IVF) and 38.5 years (ICSI), p = 0.85. Baseline characteristics of IVF and ICSI PGT-A cycles were similar with the exception of semen parameters: IVF cycles had higher sperm concentration and total motility compared to ICSI cycles. PGT-A outcomes did not differ between IVF and ICSI cycles: euploid 27.9% (IVF) versus 30% (ICSI); aneuploid 45.4% (IVF) versus 43.1% (ICSI); no result 4.4% (IVF) versus 6.2% (ICSI). Though not significant, we identified a trend toward higher rate of mosaicism in IVF (25.9%) versus ICSI (20.9%). Among mosaic embryos, a lower percentage of simple mosaic embryos resulted from IVF (53.8%) versus ICSI (70.2%). Among aneuploid embryos, a non-significant higher percentage of complex aneuploidy resulted from IVF (16.3%) versus ICSI (9%). IVF resulted in a non-significant higher proportion of cycles with no transferrable embryos (42.7%) versus ICSI (36.6%). Numerical and sex chromosome involvement in mosaicism and aneuploidy were similar between IVF and ICSI cycles. CONCLUSION: IVF and ICSI NGS PGT-A have similar rates of euploid, aneuploid, and no result embryos, though IVF may result in higher rates of mosaicism and demonstrates differences in proportions of mosaic and aneuploid subtypes compared to ICSI. ICSI may be preferable to conventional insemination to minimize the rate of mosaic results in NGS PGT-A cycles.

High relative deoxyribonucleic acid content of trophectoderm biopsy adversely affects pregnancy outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between relative DNA content of the trophectoderm biopsy and pregnancy outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Academic-affiliated private practice. PATIENT(S): This study included patients undergoing their first single embryo transfer after trophectoderm biopsy and comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS) at a single center between January 2010 and February 2014. INTERVENTION(S): In phase 1 of the study, a standard curve was developed to estimate the relative DNA content of trophectoderm biopsies. Phase 2 of the study examined reproductive outcomes in patients undergoing single embryo transfer after trophectoderm biopsy and CCS. Samples were divided into quartiles according to their relative DNA content, and clinical outcomes were compared. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Chemical pregnancy rate, clinical implantation rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, live birth rate. RESULT(S): The quartile of highest relative DNA content had a significantly lower live birth rate when compared with the other three quartiles (relative risk 0.84, 95% confidence interval 0.75-0.95). There was no difference between the quartiles regarding age, body mass index, ovarian response, or endometrial thickness. Among those patients who had a live birth, there was no difference in hCG levels, gestational age at delivery, or birth weight with respect to biopsy DNA content. CONCLUSION(S): Trophectoderm biopsies with the highest relative DNA content are associated with lower live birth rates after single embryo transfer. Possible explanations for this phenomenon include diminished accuracy of the euploid diagnosis vs. a mechanical impact of the biopsy. Regardless of the cause, the outcomes emphasize the importance of obtaining appropriately sized trophectoderm biopsies for CCS.

SNP array-based analyses of unbalanced embryos as a reference to distinguish between balanced translocation carrier and normal blastocysts.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to validate a method that provides the opportunity to distinguish a balanced translocation carrier embryo from a truly normal embryo in parallel with comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS). METHODS: A series of translocation carrier couples that underwent IVF with single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array-based CCS on 148 embryos were included. Predictions of balanced or normal status of each embryo were made based upon embryonic SNP genotypes. In one case, microdeletion status was used to designate whether embryos were balanced or normal. In 10 additional cases, conventional karyotyping was performed on newborns in order to establish the true genetic status (balanced or normal) of the original transferred embryo. Finally, implantation potential of balanced or normal embryos was compared. RESULTS: Phasing SNPs using unbalanced embryos allowed accurate prediction of whether transferred embryos were balanced translocation carriers or truly normal in all cases completed to date (100 % concordance with conventional karyotyping of newborns). No difference in implantation potential of balanced or normal embryos was observed. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the validity of a CCS method capable of distinguishing normal from balanced translocation carrier embryos. The only prerequisite is the availability of parental DNA and an unbalanced IVF embryo, making the method applicable to the majority of carrier couples. In addition, the SNP array platform allows simultaneous CCS for aneuploidy with the same platform and from the same biopsy. Future work will involve prospective predictions to select normal embryos with subsequent karyotyping of the resulting newborns.

Expanded carrier screening in an infertile population: how often is clinical decision making affected?

PURPOSE: Options for preconception genetic screening have grown dramatically. Expanded carrier screening (ECS) now allows for determining carrier status for hundreds of genetic mutations by using a single sample, and some recommend ECS prior to in vitro fertilization. This study seeks to evaluate how often ECS alters clinical management when patients present for infertility care. METHODS: All patients tested with ECS at a single infertility care center from 2011 to 2014 were evaluated. The overall rate of positive ECS results and the number of couples who were carriers of the same genetic disorder were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 6,643 individuals were tested, representing 3,738 couples; 1,666 (25.1%) of the individuals had a positive test result for at least one disorder. In 8 of the 3,738 couples, both members of the couple were positive for the same genetic disorder or had a test result that placed them at risk of having an affected child. Three of eight cases were cystic fibrosis. In this cohort, ECS affected clinical care eight times after 6,643 tests (0.12%, confidence interval: 0.05-0.24%) in 3,738 couples (0.21%, confidence interval: 0.09-0.42%). CONCLUSIONS: ECS is becoming more widespread. In a large case series, ECS affected clinical decision making for patients presenting for infertility care in 0.21% of cases. This information must be weighed when utilizing these tests and may be a helpful part of patient counseling.Genet Med 18 11, 1097-1101.

Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) supplementation results in supraphysiologic DHEA-S serum levels and progesterone assay interference that may impact clinical management in IVF.

PURPOSE: Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) is often prescribed for poor responders in IVF in an effort to improve response to ovarian stimulation. The effect of DHEA supplementation and resultant supraphysiologic DHEA-S serum levels on sex steroid assays has not been evaluated in this population. This study seeks to determine the relationship between DHEA supplementation and progesterone measurements to characterize the degree of interference with particular immunoassays. METHODS: Characterization was accomplished in two phases. First, DHEA-S standard control reagents with no progesterone present were assayed for both DHEA-S and progesterone levels. Second, serum pools from 60 unique IVF patients' serum were used to create six pooled serum samples: three from patients on DHEA supplementation and three from patients not on DHEA supplementation. The three pools were composed of patients whose serum fell into low, medium, and high progesterone ranges. Baseline DHEA-S and progesterone were measured, and the mean level of DHEA-S in the mid-range progesterone pool was used as the mid-point for addition of DHEA-S standard to the serum pools from patients without DHEA supplementation. Progesterone from these pools was then measured on three commercially available immunoassay systems. RESULTS: The first experiment revealed a linear increase in progesterone when analyzing the DHEA-S standard ranging from 0.5 µg/dL [corrected] in the blank control (no DHEA-S) to up to 2.0 µg/dL [corrected] in the high control (DHEA-S >700 µg/dL), [corrected] indicating that the DHEA-S cross-reacts with the progesterone assays. In the second experiment, patients' serum DHEA-S and progesterone were measured from pooled serum samples of those taking DHEA and those not taking DHEA. Adding DHEA-S to the pooled serum of those not taking DHEA resulted in a linear increase in progesterone levels on two of three commercially available immunoassays (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: DHEA-S can interfere with standard progesterone immunoassays used in clinical ART programs, and thus serum progesterone levels in IVF patients on DHEA supplementation may not reflect truly bioactive progesterone.

Endometrial disruption does not improve implantation in patients who have failed the transfer of euploid blastocysts.

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of single pass outpatient endometrial biopsy in patients at the highest risk for an endometrial cause for failed implantation; those that have failed to conceive despite the transfer of morphologically normal euploid embryos. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study consisting of all patients less than 42 years old who failed their first euploid blastocyst transfer and subsequently completed a second transfer cycle of euploid blastocysts. Cycles were analyzed to determine if a single pass endometrial biopsy, termed 'endometrial disruption', was performed in a cycle preceding their second embryo transfer. Transfer outcomes were analyzed and implantation rates calculated. Data analysis was performed to compare outcomes between patients who had endometrial disruption performed versus those that did not. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety patients failed their first euploid embryo transfer and subsequently completed a second euploid embryo transfer and were included. Thirty-nine patients underwent endometrial disruption and 251 did not. There were no statistical differences in clinical implantation rate or sustained implantation rate between the group with endometrial disruption and subjects without any intervention (Clinical IR, 43.6 % vs. 55.0 %, p = 0.13; 38.5 % vs. 42.6 %, p = 0.60). When controlling for transfer order there was no statistical difference noted in implantation rates. CONCLUSIONS: Single pass endometrial biopsy has no impact on endometrial receptivity in the highest risk subgroup- patient's that have failed to sustain the transfer of morphologically normal euploid embryos- as evidenced by equivalent implantation rates. It is possible that variations in technique may alter outcomes and randomized trials are needed to answer this question.

Vitamin D levels do not affect IVF outcomes following the transfer of euploid blastocysts.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize the relationship between serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D (25-OH D) levels and implantation and clinical pregnancy rates in women who undergo a euploid blastocyst embryo transfer. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study, conducted in an academic setting, included 529 cycles in which comprehensive chromosome screening was performed as part of routine infertility care with an autologous transfer of 1 or 2 euploid blastocysts. After excluding repeat cycles there were 517 unique cycles representing 517 women for evaluation. Vitamin D levels from serum samples obtained on the day of ovulation trigger in the fresh in vitro fertilization cycle were analyzed. The primary outcome was ongoing pregnancy rate as defined by sonographic presence of fetal heart rate at >8 weeks' gestation. RESULTS: For the population as a whole, serum vitamin D ranges and pregnancy outcomes did not correlate. Furthermore, pregnancy rates did not differ when comparing women in different strata of vitamin D levels (<20, 20-29.9, and ≥30 ng/mL). No meaningful breakpoint for vitamin D levels and ongoing pregnancy rate was identified using receiver operating characteristic analysis with the resultant line possessing an area under the curve of 0.502. Multivariate logistic regression controlling for age, transfer order, race, season, and body mass index did not yield a different result. The study was powered to detect an 18% difference in ongoing pregnancy rates between patients grouped by the 3 vitamin D ranges. CONCLUSION: In women undergoing euploid embryo transfer, vitamin D status was unrelated to pregnancy outcomes. Measuring serum 25-OH vitamin D levels does not predict the likelihood that euploid blastocysts will implant. These results may not apply to women who do not undergo extended embryo culture, blastocyst biopsy for comprehensive chromosome screening, and euploid embryo transfer.

Aneuploidy across individual chromosomes at the embryonic level in trophectoderm biopsies: changes with patient age and chromosome structure.

PURPOSE: To characterize each chromosome's risk for being involved in embryonic aneuploidy. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study conducted at a single, academic center. The cohort consisted of 15,169 consecutive trophectoderm biopsies which then underwent comprehensive chromosome screening utilizing validated real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) or single nucleotide polymosphism (SNP) array platforms. Analysis was done to determine probability of aneuploidy by chromosome, changes in that risk with increasing maternal age, and in relationship of aneuploidy to chromosomal structure as classified by prior cytogenetic literature. RESULTS: The highest prevalence of imbalances leading to aneuploidy was seen for chromosomes 13, 15, 16, 18, 19, 21, and 22. While elevated in all age groups, there was a disproportionate rise in aneuploidy rates for these chromosomes with increasing maternal age. When classic cytogenetic karyotype groups were compared, the overall smaller groups D, E, and G were associated with the highest rates. Similarly, when grouped based upon structure, acrocentric chromosomes exhibited the highest rates of aneuploidy, followed by the metacentric chromosomes, with the lowest prevalence of error in those with submetacentric structures. CONCLUSIONS: The highest rates of chromosomal aneuploidy were found in chromosomes known to be involved in clinically detectable, abnormal pregnancies, not just simply implantation failure. The rate of aneuploidy in these chromosomes rises disproportionately with age when compared to the other chromosomes which may provide information about chromosomal susceptibility to aging. The biological structure groupings did show varied aneuploidy rates which may provide insight into the biology of aneuploidy.

Endometrial infusion of human chorionic gonadotropin at the time of blastocyst embryo transfer does not impact clinical outcomes: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether endometrial hCG infusion at the time of human blastocyst transfer impacts implantation rates. DESIGN: Randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Academic. PATIENT(S): Infertile couples with the female partner less than 43 years old (n = 300) undergoing fresh or frozen ET of one or two blastocysts. INTERVENTION(S): Patients undergoing ET were randomized into either a treatment or a control group. The treatment group received an infusion of 500 IU of hCG diluted in ET media. The control group received a sham infusion of ET media. Infusions were done using a separate catheter less than 3 minutes before actual ET. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Sustained implantation rate: ongoing viable gestation (primary outcome) and ongoing pregnancy rate (secondary outcome). RESULT(S): A total of 473 blastocysts were transferred into 300 patients. There were no differences between the two groups in sustained implantation rate (48.1% in the hCG group, 44.2% in the control group) or ongoing pregnancy rate (58.8% in the hCG group, 52.0% in the control group). CONCLUSION(S): Endometrial infusion of hCG at the time of blastocyst ET does not improve sustained implantation rates. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01643993.

Defining the "sweet spot" for administered luteinizing hormone-to-follicle-stimulating hormone gonadotropin ratios during ovarian stimulation to protect against a clinically significant late follicular increase in progesterone: an analysis of 10,280 first in vitro fertilization cycles.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether different ratios of administered LH-to-FSH influence the risk of clinically relevant late follicular P elevations and whether there is an optimal range of LH-to-FSH to mitigate this risk. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Private academic center. PATIENT(S): A total of 10,280 patients undergoing their first IVF cycle. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The ratio of exogenous LH-to-FSH throughout stimulation and association with absolute serum P level≥1.5 ng/mL on the day of hCG administration. RESULT(S): Stimulations using no administered LH (N=718) had the highest risk of P elevation≥1.5 ng/mL (relative risk [RR]=2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-2.2). The lowest risk of P increase occurred with an LH-to-FSH ratio of 0.30:0.60 (20%; N=4,732). In contrast, ratios<0.30, reflecting proportionally less administered LH (N=4,847) were at increased risk for premature P elevation (32%, RR=1.6; 95% CI 1.5-1.7) as were ratios>0.60 (23%, RR 1.1; 95% CI 1.0-1.3). This pattern of lowest risk in the 0.30-0.60 range held true for cycles characterized by low, normal, and high response. When performing a logistic regression to control for multiple confounding variables this relationship persisted. CONCLUSION(S): Absent or inadequate LH dosing is associated with a risk for a late follicular elevation in P sufficient to induce suboptimal outcomes. A total LH-to-FSH ratio of 0.30:0.60 was associated with the lowest risk of P elevation. Optimization of this parameter should be considered when making gonadotropin dosing decisions.

Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes from the BEST Trial: single embryo transfer with aneuploidy screening improves outcomes after in vitro fertilization without compromising delivery rates.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether performing elective single embryo transfer (eSET) after trophectoderm biopsy and rapid aneuploidy screening results in improved obstetrical and neonatal outcomes compared with transferring 2 untested embryos. STUDY DESIGN: The Blastocyst Euploid Selective Transfer (BEST) Trial enrolled infertile couples with a female partner up to age 42 years who were undergoing in vitro fertilization. They were randomized to receive transfer of a single euploid embryo (eSET) or to the standard of care with transfer of 2 embryos that were not biopsied for aneuploidy screening (untested 2-embryo transfer). Gestational age at delivery, birthweight, and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) lengths of stay were compared with Mann-Whitney U. The risk of preterm delivery, low birthweight, and NICU admission were compared with χ(2). RESULTS: Among the 175 randomized patients, the delivery rates were similar (69% after euploid eSET vs 72% after untested 2-embryo transfer; P = .6) through the fresh cycle and up to 1 frozen transfer, with a dramatic difference in multiple births (1.6% vs 47%; P < .0001). The risk of preterm delivery (P = .03), low birthweight (P = .002), and NICU admission (P = .04) were significantly higher after untested 2-embryo transfer. Babies born after untested 2-embryo transfer spent >5 times as many days in the NICU (479 vs 93 days; P = .03). CONCLUSION: By enhancing embryo selection with a validated method of aneuploidy screening, a single euploid embryo with high reproductive potential can be selected for transfer. Using this approach, eSET can be performed without compromising delivery rates and improving the chance of having a healthy, term singleton delivery after in vitro fertilization.

The nature of aneuploidy with increasing age of the female partner: a review of 15,169 consecutive trophectoderm biopsies evaluated with comprehensive chromosomal screening.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between the age of the female partner and the prevalence and nature of human embryonic aneuploidy. DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: Academic. PATIENT(S): Trophectoderm biopsies. INTERVENTION(S): Comprehensive chromosomal screening performed on patients with blastocysts available for biopsy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Evaluation of the impact of maternal age on the prevalence of aneuploidy, the probability of having no euploid embryos within a cohort, the complexity of aneuploidy as gauged by the number of aneuploid chromosomes, and the trisomy/monosomy ratio. RESULT(S): Aneuploidy increased predictably after 26 years of age. A slightly increased prevalence was noted at younger ages, with >40% aneuploidy in women 23 years and under. The no euploid embryo rate was lowest (2% to 6%) in women aged 26 to 37, was 33% at age 42, and was 53% at age 44. Among the biopsies with aneuploidy, 64% involved a single chromosome, 20% two chromosomes, and 16% three chromosomes, with the proportion of more complex aneuploidy increasing with age. Finally, the trisomy/monosomy ratio approximated 1 and increased minimally with age. CONCLUSION(S): The lowest risk for embryonic aneuploidy was between ages 26 and 30. Both younger and older age groups had higher rates of aneuploidy and an increased risk for more complex aneuploidies. The overall risk did not measurably change after age 43. Trisomies and monosomies are equally prevalent.

Comprehensive chromosome screening alters traditional morphology-based embryo selection: a prospective study of 100 consecutive cycles of planned fresh euploid blastocyst transfer.

OBJECTIVE: To determine how often trophectoderm biopsy and rapid, real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS) alters clinical management by resulting in the transfer of a different embryo than would have been chosen by traditional day 5 morphology-based criteria. DESIGN: Prospective. SETTING: Academic center for reproductive medicine. PATIENT(S): Infertile couples (n = 100; mean age 35 ± 4 years) with at least two blastocysts suitable for biopsy on day 5. INTERVENTION(S): Prior to trophectoderm biopsy for CCS the embryologist identified which embryo would have been selected for traditional day 5 elective single ET. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The risk of aneuploidy in the embryos that would have been selected on day 5 was calculated and compared with the aneuploidy rate of the cohort of all embryos that underwent CCS testing. The aneuploidy risk was compared between age groups. RESULT(S): After quantitative PCR-based CCS, 22% (95% confidence interval 15%-31%) of the embryos selected by day 5 morphology were aneuploid, which was lower than the 32% aneuploidy rate of the cohort. Patients ≥35 years had a higher risk of an aneuploid blastocyst being selected by morphology than those <35 years old (31% vs. 14%). Among patients who had selection altered by CCS, 74% (14/19) delivered, including 77% (10/13) after elective single ET. Most patients (77%) had an additional euploid blastocyst vitrified for future use. CONCLUSION(S): The CCS results alter embryo selection due to the presence of aneuploidy in embryos with optimal day 5 morphology. Excellent outcomes were obtained when CCS-based selection was different than morphology-based selection.

Blastocyst biopsy with comprehensive chromosome screening and fresh embryo transfer significantly increases in vitro fertilization implantation and delivery rates: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether blastocyst biopsy and rapid quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)-based comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS) improves in vitro fertilization (IVF) implantation and delivery rates. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Academic reproductive medicine center. PATIENT(S): Infertile couples in whom the female partner (or oocyte donor) is between the ages of 21 and 42 years who are attempting conception through IVF. INTERVENTION(S): Embryonic aneuploidy screening. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Sustained implantation and delivery rates. RESULT(S): We transferred 134 blastocysts to 72 patients in the study (CCS) group and 163 blastocysts to 83 patients in the routine care (control) group. Sustained implantation rates (probability that an embryo will implant and progress to delivery) were statistically significantly higher in the CCS group (89 of 134; 66.4%) compared with those from the control group (78 of 163; 47.9%). Delivery rates per cycle were also statistically significantly higher in the CCS group. Sixty one of 72 treatment cycles using CCS led to delivery (84.7%), and 56 of 83 (67.5%) control cycles ultimately delivered. Outcomes were excellent in both groups, but use of CCS clearly improved patient outcomes. CONCLUSION(S): Blastocyst biopsy with rapid qPCR-based comprehensive chromosomal screening results in statistically significantly improved IVF outcomes, as evidenced by meaningful increases in sustained implantation and delivery rates. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01219283.