Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 19 de 19
Filtrar
2.
JAMA Surg ; 159(2): 161-169, 2024 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38019510

RESUMO

Importance: Surgical infections are a major cause of perioperative morbidity and mortality, particularly in low-resource settings. Clean Cut, a 6-month quality improvement program developed by the global nonprofit organization Lifebox, has demonstrated improvements in postoperative infectious complications. However, the pilot program required intense external programmatic and resource support. Objective: To examine the improvement in adherence to infection prevention and control standards and rates of postoperative infections in hospitals in the Clean Cut program after implementation strategies were updated and program execution was refined. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study evaluated and refined the Clean Cut implementation strategy to enhance scalability based on a qualitative study of its pilot phase, including formalizing programmatic and educational materials, building an automated data entry and analysis platform, and reorganizing hospital-based team composition. Clean Cut was introduced from January 1, 2019, to February 28, 2022, in 7 Ethiopian hospitals that had not previously participated in the program. Prospective data initiated on arrival in the operating room were collected, and patients were followed up through hospital discharge and with 30-day follow-up telephone calls. Exposure: Implementation of the refined Clean Cut program. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was surgical site infection (SSI); secondary outcomes were adherence to 6 infection prevention standards, mortality, hospital length of stay, and other infectious complications. Results: A total of 3364 patients (mean [SD] age, 26.5 [38.0] years; 2196 [65.3%] female) from 7 Ethiopian hospitals were studied (1575 at baseline and 1789 after intervention). After controlling for confounders, the relative risk of SSIs was reduced by 34.0% after program implementation (relative risk, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.54-0.81; P < .001). Appropriate Surgical Safety Checklist use increased from 16.3% to 43.0% (P < .001), surgeon hand and patient skin antisepsis improved from 46.0% to 66.0% (P < .001), and timely antibiotic administration improved from 17.8% to 39.0% (P < .001). Surgical instrument (38.7% vs 10.2%), linen sterility (35.5% vs 12.8%), and gauze counting (89.2% vs 82.5%; P < .001 for all comparisons) also improved significantly. Conclusions and Relevance: A modified implementation strategy for the Clean Cut program focusing on reduced external resource and programmatic input from Lifebox, structured education and training materials, and wider hospital engagement resulted in outcomes that matched our pilot study, with improved adherence to recognized infection prevention standards resulting in a reduction in SSIs. The demonstration of scalability reinforces the value of this SSI prevention program.


Assuntos
Hospitais , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica , Humanos , Feminino , Adulto , Masculino , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Prospectivos , Projetos Piloto , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle
5.
Surg Infect (Larchmt) ; 21(6): 533-539, 2020 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32301651

RESUMO

Background: Surgical site infections (SSIs) represent a major cause of morbidity and mortality in Ethiopia. Lack of post-discharge follow-up, including identification of SSIs, is a barrier to continued patient care, often because of financial and travel constraints. As part of a surgical quality improvement initiative, we aimed to assess patient outcomes at 30 days post-operative with a telephone call. Patients and Methods: We conducted mobile telephone follow-up as part of Lifebox's ongoing Clean Cut program, which aims to improve compliance with intra-operative infection prevention standards. One urban tertiary referral hospital and one rural district general hospital in Ethiopia were included in this phase of the study; hospital nursing staff called patients at 30 days post-operative inquiring about signs of SSIs, health-care-seeking behavior, and treatments provided if patients had any healthcare encounters since discharge. Results: A total of 701 patients were included; overall 77% of patients were reached by telephone call after discharge. The rural study site reached 362 patients (87%) by telephone; the urban site reached 176 patients (62%) (p < 0.001). Of the 39 SSIs identified, 19 (49%) were captured as outpatient during the telephone follow-up (p < 0.001); 22 (34%) of all complications were captured following discharge (p < 0.001). Telephone follow-up improved from 65%-78% in the first half of project implementation to 77%-89% in the second half of project implementation. Conclusion: Telephone follow-up after surgery in Ethiopia is feasible and valuable, and identified nearly half of all SSIs and one-third of total complications in our cohort. Follow-up improved over the course of the program, likely indicating a learning curve that, once overcome, is a more accurate marker of its practicability. Given the increasing use of mobile telephones in Ethiopia and ease of implementation, this model could be practical in other low-resource surgical settings.


Assuntos
Alta do Paciente , Melhoria de Qualidade/organização & administração , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Telefone , Adulto , Telefone Celular , Países em Desenvolvimento , Etiópia , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Hospitais Gerais , Humanos , Masculino , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Centros de Atenção Terciária
6.
Surg Infect (Larchmt) ; 20(2): 139-145, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30628859

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Abdominal infections following surgery have many severe consequences. Several effective, well-evaluated infection prevention and control processes exist to avoid these infections. METHODS: This manuscript reviews and provides supporting evidence for common management strategies useful to avoid postoperative abdominal infection. RESULTS: Prevention of abdominal infection begins with preparation of the environment using standard infection control practices. Peri-operative use of systemic antibiotics, an antibiotic bowel preparation in colorectal surgery, and effective antiseptic preparation of the surgical site all reduce infection rates. Peri-operative supplemental oxygenation, maintenance of core body temperature, and physiologic euglycemia will reduce both incisional and organ-space infections in the abdominal surgery patient. Strategic use of irrigation and drain placement may be useful in some circumstances. CONCLUSION: Specific methods of prevention are documented to reduce intra-abdominal infections. Prevention requires a multi-disciplinary team including the surgeon, anesthesiologist, and all operating room personnel.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Geral/métodos , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Infecções Intra-Abdominais/prevenção & controle , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Humanos
7.
Surg Technol Int ; 34: 30-34, 2019 May 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30472721

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The growth of laparoscopic surgery has increased the use of laparoscopic electrosurgical devices based on radiofrequency current. Despite an improvement in most post-operative outcomes, the use of these devices can be associated with inadvertent thermal or mechanical injuries, also called accidental punctures and lacerations (APLs). APLs can occur through either operator error or system error, including insulation failure or capacitive coupling resulting in stray energy burns. Our aim was to estimate the incidence and-as a result-the impact of laparoscopic APLs. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) State Inpatient Database (SID) was performed for 2009 in California (CA) and Florida (FL). ICD-9 codes and current procedural terminology were used to query for five common general surgery procedures: appendectomy, cholecystectomy, fundoplication, gastric bypass, and gastroplasty with these procedures cross-referenced for any secondary procedure at the time of the initial surgery indicative of APLs. The c2 test was used for comparisons where appropriate. RESULTS: Overall, 192,794 primary laparoscopic procedures were identified in the HCUP database in CA and FL in 2009, with a similar procedure frequency distribution between CA and FL. Six hundred ninety-four procedures were complicated by APL. Gastric bypass and fundoplication were more commonly associated with APLs. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective analysis of procedures performed in CA and FL, the estimated incidence of APL was 3.6 per 1000 cases. Patient morbidity and mortality were likely related to both pilot-error injuries and stray energy burns during laparoscopy. Possible solutions to reduce surgical complications from APL include educational programs to reduce pilot error and the incorporation of fail-safe technologies to eliminate stray energy burns, such as active electrode monitoring and use of non-radiofrequency current (true cautery).


Assuntos
Queimaduras/epidemiologia , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Ablação por Radiofrequência/efeitos adversos , Acidentes/estatística & dados numéricos , Queimaduras/etiologia , California/epidemiologia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Florida/epidemiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Segurança do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Ablação por Radiofrequência/instrumentação , Estudos Retrospectivos
9.
Surg Infect (Larchmt) ; 19(6): 593-602, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30156997

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Surgical infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Inadequately reprocessed surgical instruments can be a vector for pathogens. Little has been published on the current state of surgical instrument reprocessing in LMICs. METHODS: We performed a scoping review of English-language articles in PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases describing current methods, policies, and barriers to surgical instrument reprocessing in LMICs. We conducted qualitative analysis of all studies to categorize existing practices and barriers to successful surgical instrument reprocessing. Barriers were non-exclusively categorized by theme: training/education, resource availability, environment, and policies/procedures. Studies associating surgical infections with existing practices were separately evaluated to assess this relationship. RESULTS: Nine hundred seventy-two abstracts were identified. Forty studies met criteria for qualitative analysis and three studies associated patient outcomes with surgical instrument reprocessing. Most studies (n = 28, 70%) discussed institution-specific policies/procedures; half discussed shortcomings in staff training. Sterilization (n = 38, 95%), verification of sterilization (n = 19, 48%), and instrument cleaning and decontamination (n = 16, 40%) were the most common instrument reprocessing practices examined. Poor resource availability and the lack of effective education/training and appropriate policies/procedures were cited as the common barriers. Of the case series investigating surgical instrument reprocessing with patient outcomes, improperly cleaned and sterilized neurosurgical instruments and contaminated rinse water were linked to Pseudomonas aeruginosa ventriculitis and Mycobacterium port site infections, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Large gaps exist between instrument reprocessing practices in LMICs and recommended policies/procedures. Identified areas for improvement include instrument cleaning and decontamination, sterilization aspects of instrument reprocessing, and verification of sterilization. Education and training of staff responsible for reprocessing instruments and realistic, defined policies and procedures are critical, and lend themselves to improvement interventions.


Assuntos
Países em Desenvolvimento , Desinfecção/métodos , Política Organizacional , Instrumentos Cirúrgicos/efeitos adversos , Contaminação de Equipamentos/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Instrumentos Cirúrgicos/normas , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle
10.
J Am Coll Surg ; 226(6): 1103-1116.e3, 2018 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29574175

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Surgical infections cause substantial morbidity and mortality in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). To improve adherence to critical perioperative infection prevention standards, we developed Clean Cut, a checklist-based quality improvement program to improve compliance with best practices. We hypothesized that process mapping infection prevention activities can help clinicians identify strategies for improving surgical safety. STUDY DESIGN: We introduced Clean Cut at a tertiary hospital in Ethiopia. Infection prevention standards included skin antisepsis, ensuring a sterile field, instrument decontamination/sterilization, prophylactic antibiotic administration, routine swab/gauze counting, and use of a surgical safety checklist. Processes were mapped by a visiting surgical fellow and local operating theater staff to facilitate the development of contextually relevant solutions; processes were reassessed for improvements. RESULTS: Process mapping helped identify barriers to using alcohol-based hand solution due to skin irritation, inconsistent administration of prophylactic antibiotics due to variable delivery outside of the operating theater, inefficiencies in assuring sterility of surgical instruments through lack of confirmatory measures, and occurrences of retained surgical items through inappropriate guidelines, staffing, and training in proper routine gauze counting. Compliance with most processes improved significantly following organizational changes to align tasks with specific process goals. CONCLUSIONS: Enumerating the steps involved in surgical infection prevention using a process mapping technique helped identify opportunities for improving adherence and plotting contextually relevant solutions, resulting in superior compliance with antiseptic standards. Simplifying these process maps into an adaptable tool could be a powerful strategy for improving safe surgery delivery in LMICs.


Assuntos
Recursos em Saúde , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde , Melhoria de Qualidade , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/uso terapêutico , Antibioticoprofilaxia , Lista de Checagem , Etiópia , Hospitais de Ensino , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Roupa de Proteção , Esterilização/normas
11.
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open ; 3(1): e000250, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30623028

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Injuries due to encounters with animals can be serious, but are often discussed anecdotally or only for isolated types of encounters. We sought to characterize animal-related injuries presenting to US emergency departments (ED) to determine the impact of these types of injuries. METHODS: All ED encounters with diagnosis codes corresponding to animal-related injury were identified using ICD-9-CM codes from the 2010 2014 National Emergency Department Sample (NEDS). Outcomes assessed included inpatient admission, mortality, and healthcare cost. Survey methodology was applied to univariate and multivariate analyses. Weighted numbers are presented. RESULTS: There were 6 457 534 ED visits resulting from animal-related injuries identified. Bites from non-venomous arthropods (n=2 648 880; 41%), dog bites (n=1 658 295; 26%) and envenomation from hornets, wasps or bees (n=812 357; 13%) constitute the majority of encounters. There were 210 516 patients (3%) admitted as inpatients. Inpatient admission was most common for those suffering from venomous snakes or lizard bites (24%, n=10 332). Death was infrequent occurring in 1162 patients (0.02% of all ED presentations). The greatest number of deaths was due to bites from non-venomous arthropods (24% of deaths, n=278) whereas rat bites proved the most lethal (6.5 deaths per 10 000 bites). Among persons aged 85 years or greater, odds of hospital admission for any animal-related injury was 6.42 (95% CI 5.57 to 7.40) and the OR for death was 27.71 (95% CI 10.38 to 73.99). Female sex was associated with improved survival (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.73) and lower rates of hospital admission (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.79). The total healthcare cost for these animal encounters during the observed time period was $5.96 billion (95% CI $5.43 to $6.50 billion). CONCLUSION: The morbidity, mortality, and healthcare cost due to animal encounters in the USA is considerable. Often overlooked, this particular mechanism of injury warrants further public health prevention efforts. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

13.
World J Surg ; 41(12): 3055-3065, 2017 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29051968

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Safe surgery requires high-quality, reliable lighting of the surgical field. Little is reported on the quality or potential safety impact of surgical lighting in low-resource settings, where power failures are common and equipment and resources are limited. METHODS: Members of the Lifebox Foundation created a novel, non-mandatory, 18-item survey tool using an iterative process. This was distributed to surgical providers practicing in low-resource settings through surgical societies and mailing lists. RESULTS: We received 100 complete responses, representing a range of surgical centres from 39 countries. Poor-quality surgical field lighting was reported by 40% of respondents, with 32% reporting delayed or cancelled operations due to poor lighting and 48% reporting electrical power failures at least once per week. Eighty per cent reported the quality of their surgical lighting presents a patient safety risk with 18% having direct experience of poor-quality lighting leading to negative patient outcomes. When power outages occur, 58% of surgeons rely on a backup generator and 29% operate by mobile phone light. Only 9% of respondents regularly use a surgical headlight, with the most common barriers reported as unaffordability and poor in-country suppliers. CONCLUSIONS: In our survey of surgeons working in low-resource settings, a majority report poor surgical lighting as a major risk to patient safety and nearly one-third report delayed or cancelled operations due to poor lighting. Developing and distributing robust, affordable, high-quality surgical headlights could provide an ideal solution to this significant surgical safety issue.


Assuntos
Iluminação , Salas Cirúrgicas , Segurança do Paciente , Estudos Transversais , Países em Desenvolvimento , Recursos em Saúde , Humanos , Cirurgiões , Inquéritos e Questionários
14.
World J Surg ; 41(12): 3012-3024, 2017 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29038828

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The WHO surgical safety checklist (SSC) is known to prevent postoperative complications; however, strategies for effective implementation are unclear. In addition to cultural and organizational barriers faced by high-income countries, resource-constrained settings face scarcity of durable and consumable goods. We used the SSC to better understand barriers to improvement at a trauma hospital in Battambang, Cambodia. METHODS: We introduced the SSC and trained data collectors to observe surgical staff performing the checklist. Members of the research team observed cases and data collection. After 3 months, we modified the data collection tool to focus on infection prevention and elicit more accurate responses. RESULTS: Over 16 months we recorded data on 695 operations (304 cases using the first tool and 391 cases with the modified tool). The first tool identified five items as being in high compliance, which were then excluded from further assessment. Two items-instrument sterility confirmation and sponge counting-were identified as being misinterpreted by the data collectors' tool. These items were reworded to capture objective assessment of task completion. Confirmation of instrument sterility was initially never performed but rectified to >95% compliance; sponge counting and prophylactic antibiotic administration were consistently underperformed. CONCLUSIONS: Staff complied with communication elements of the SSC and quickly adopted process improvements. The wording of our data collection tool affected interpretation of compliance with standards. Material resources are not the primary barrier to checklist implementation in this setting, and future work should focus on clarification of protocols and objective confirmation of tasks.


Assuntos
Lista de Checagem , Melhoria de Qualidade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/normas , Camboja , Lista de Checagem/estatística & dados numéricos , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Hospitais , Humanos , Segurança do Paciente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Organização Mundial da Saúde
15.
Surgery ; 162(2): 366-376, 2017 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28400124

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Armed conflict increasingly involves civilian populations, and health care needs may be immense. We hypothesized that sex disparities may exist among persons receiving operative care in conflict zones and sought to describe predictors of disparity. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of operative interventions performed between 2008 and 2014 at Médecins Sans Frontières Operation Center Brussels conflict projects. A Médecins Sans Frontières Operation Center Brussels conflict project was defined as a program established in response to human conflict, war, or social unrest. Intervention- and country-level variables were evaluated. For multivariate analysis, multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression was used with random-effect modeling to account for clustering and population differences in conflict zones. RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2014, 49,715 interventions were performed in conflict zones by Médecins Sans Frontières Operation Center Brussels. Median patient age was 24 years (range: 1-105 years), and 34,436 (69%) were men. Patient-level variables associated with decreased interventions on women included: American Society of Anesthesiologists score (P = .003), degree of urgency (P = .02), mechanism (P < .0001), and a country's predominant religion (P = .006). Men were 1.7 times more likely to have an operative intervention in a predominantly Muslim country (P = .006). CONCLUSION: Conflict is an unfortunate consequence of humanity in a world with limited resources. For most operative interventions performed in conflict zones, men were more commonly represented. Predominant religion was the greatest predictor of increased disparity between sexes, irrespective of the number of patients presenting as a result of traumatic injury. It is critical to understand what factors may underlie this disparity to ensure equitable and appropriate care for all patients in an already tragic situation.


Assuntos
Conflitos Armados , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Seleção de Pacientes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Sexuais , Adulto Jovem
18.
JAMA Surg ; 151(3): 257-63, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26536154

RESUMO

IMPORTANCE: Surgical care is recognized as a growing component of global public health. OBJECTIVE: To assess self-reported barriers to access of surgical care in Sierra Leone, Rwanda, and Nepal using the validated Surgeons OverSeas Assessment of Surgical Need tool. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Data for this cross-sectional, cluster-based population survey were collected from households in Rwanda (October 2011), Sierra Leone (January 2012), and Nepal (May and June 2014) using the Surgeons OverSeas Assessment of Surgical Need tool. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Basic demographic information, cost and mode of transportation to health care facilities, and barriers to access to surgical care of persons dying within the past year were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 4822 households were surveyed in Nepal, Rwanda, and Sierra Leone. Primary health care facilities were commonly reached rapidly by foot (>70%), transportation to secondary facilities differed by country, and public transportation was ubiquitously required for access to a tertiary care facility (46%-82% of respondents). Reasons for not seeking surgical care when needed included no money for health care (Sierra Leone: n = 103; 55%), a person dying before health care could be arranged (all countries: 32%-43%), no health care facility available (Nepal: n = 11; 42%), and a lack of trust in health care (Rwanda: n = 6; 26%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Self-reported determinants of access to surgical care vary widely among Sierra Leone, Rwanda, and Nepal, although commonalities exist. Understanding the epidemiology of barriers to surgical care is essential to effectively provide surgical service as a public health commodity in developing countries.


Assuntos
Países em Desenvolvimento , Emergências/epidemiologia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Saúde Pública , Autorrelato , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Análise por Conglomerados , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nepal/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ruanda/epidemiologia , Serra Leoa/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
19.
WMJ ; 114(3): 110-5, 2015 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27073829

RESUMO

Restriction of resident duty hours has resulted in the implementation of night float systems in surgical and medical programs. Many papers have examined the benefits and structure of night float, but few have addressed patient safety issues, quality patient care, and the impact on the residency education system. The objective of this review is to provide practical tips to optimize the night float experience for resident training while continuing to emphasize patient care. The tips provided are based on the experiences and reflections of residents, supervising staff, group discussions, and the available literature in a hospital-based general surgery residency program. Utilizing these resources, we concluded that the night float system addresses resident work hour restrictions; however, it ultimately creates new issues. Adaptations will help achieve a balance between resident education and patient safety.


Assuntos
Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Cirurgia Geral/educação , Internato e Residência , Assistência Noturna , Melhoria de Qualidade , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Admissão e Escalonamento de Pessoal , Tolerância ao Trabalho Programado , Carga de Trabalho
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA