Surgical approach to forearm pronation deformity in patients with cerebral palsy: a systematic review.

Background: Pronation deformity in patients with cerebral palsy can have a major impact on upper limb functionality. There is lack of consensus in the literature about the preferred surgical technique to address this deformity. Study aim: To evaluate and synthesize the outcome of different surgical techniques for pronation deformity in patients with cerebral palsy. Methodology: The databases MEDLINE and Embase were searched for publications up to December 2021. Articles were considered eligible for inclusion when the included patients had a pronation deformity caused by cerebral palsy and results of surgical intervention for pronation deformity were examined. Evaluation of the quality of the retrieved study was conducted using the MINORS tool. Meta-analysis was not possible due to the heterogeneity of interventions and reported outcomes. Results: Nineteen studies, involving 475 patients and eight different techniques were included. All studies reported gain of active supination in most patients. The effect of surgery on functional gain was less clear and there was a large heterogeneity of reported functional outcome measures. There were 46 reported complications. Overall quality of study design was poor, illustrated by the average MINOR score of 6.9/16. Overall, there is a high risk of bias due to poor internal and external validity of the studies. Conclusion: Despite positive reports on gain in supination and functionality after most procedures addressing pronation deformity in CP patients, no conclusions can be drawn concerning the preferred technique due to the low quality of the evidence.

An improved method for assessing the technical accuracy of optical tracking systems for orthopaedic surgical navigation.

BACKGROUND: Optical tracking systems (OTSs) are essential components of many modern computer assisted orthopaedic surgery (CAOS) systems but patient movement is often neglected in the evaluation of the accuracy. The aim of this study was to develop a representative test to assess the accuracy of OTSs including patient movement and demonstrate the effect of pointer design and OTS choice. METHOD: A mobile phantom with dynamic reference base (DRB) attached was designed and constructed. The point registration trueness and precision were evaluated for measurements with both a static and moving phantom. RESULTS: The trueness of the total target registration error (TTRE) was 1.4 to 2.7 times worse with a moving phantom compared to a static phantom. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of OTSs for CAOS applications should be evaluated by measurements with a moving phantom as the evaluation of the TTRE with a static frame significantly underestimates the measurement error.

A study on the efficacy of AFO stiffness prescriptions.

PURPOSE: Ankle foot orthosis (AFO) stiffness is a key characteristic that determines how much support or restraint an AFO can provide. Thus, the goal of the current study is twofold: (1) to quantify AFO prescriptions for a group of patients; (2) to evaluate what impact these AFO have on the push-off phase. METHOD: Six patients were included in the study. Three patients were prescribed an AFO for ankle support and three patients were prescribed an AFO for ankle and knee support. Two types of AFO - a traditional polypropylene AFO (AFOPP) and a novel carbon-selective laser sintered polyamide AFO (AFOPA), were produced for each patient. AFO ankle stiffness was measured in a dedicated test rig. Gait analysis was performed under shod and orthotic conditions. RESULTS: Patient mass normalized AFOPP stiffness for ankle support ranged from 0.042 to 0.069 N·m·deg-1·kg-1, while for ankle and knee support it ranged from 0.081 to 0.127 N·m·deg-1·kg-1. On the group level, the ankle range of motion and mean ankle velocity in the push-off phase significantly decreased in both orthotic conditions, while peak ankle push-off power decreased non-significantly. Accordingly, on the group level, no significant improvements in walking speed were observed. However, after patient differentiation into good and bad responders it was found that in good responders peak ankle push-off power tended to be preserved and walking speed tended to increase. CONCLUSIONS: Quantification of AFO stiffness may help to understand why certain orthotic interventions are successful (unsuccessful) and ultimately lead to better AFO prescriptions. Implications for rehabilitation AFO ankle stiffness is key characteristic that determines how much support or restraint an AFO can provide. In a typical clinical setting, AFO ankle stiffness is not quantified. AFO has to meet individual patient's biomechanical needs. More objective AFO prescription and more controlled AFO production methods are needed to increase AFO success rate.

Three-dimensional correction of fibular hemimelia using a computer-assisted planning : technical report and literature review.

The purpose of this survey in Belgium and the Netherlands was to assess treatment variation in glenohumeral osteoarthritis between experienced and less experienced orthopedic surgeons, and to investigate perioperative treatment after shoulder arthroplasty in a large group of orthopedic surgeons. Orthopedic surgeons specialized in shoulder surgery were invited to complete a survey between November 2013 and February 2015. Seventy-one percent of the approached surgeons com-pleted the survey. Less experienced surgeons (< 6 years) and surgeons from the Netherlands find patient characteristics (e.g. smoking p=0.01) more relevant than more experienced surgeons (≥ 6 years) and surgeons from Belgium. Less experienced surgeons will less likely (p=0.001) perform resurfacing arthroplasty compare to experienced surgeons. The less and the experienced surgeons use similar indications for a reverse shoulder arthroplasty regarding age limit and cuff arthropathy without osteoarthritis. Less experienced surgeon will more likely (p=0.003) prescribe a low molecular weight heparin during the hospital stay after a shoulder arthroplasty. In this survey, we found a decrease in the use of resurfacing arthroplasty and a strong increase in the use of reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Besides, there is little consensus concerning pre-operative planning, patient characteristics, surgical technique, and patient reported outcome measures. Level of evidence: IV.