Safety Profile of Thread Lifts on the Face and Neck: An Evidence-Based Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: "Thread lifting" has quickly gained popularity as a minimally invasive treatment for facial rejuvenation. However, the effectiveness is questionable, and the safety and adverse effects are often not discussed. OBJECTIVE: To identify and discuss the adverse effects associated with various types of threads. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Studies describing the use of thread lifts were identified using a PubMed search. Inclusion criteria included studies in which barbed and nonbarbed threads were used for the face and neck. RESULTS: Fifty-nine articles consisting of 14,222 patients (14,134 barbed, 81 nonbarbed, and 7 combined cases) were included. The most common side effects overall were facial asymmetry (n = 6,143), edema/tumefaction (n = 453), and ecchymosis (n = 407). Serious adverse effects were rare and consisted of paresthesias, alopecia, and injuries to vessels/glands. Most adverse effects were transient and self-resolving, with the exception of contour irregularities, injuries to vessels/glands, infections, and inflammatory reactions. CONCLUSION: Most side effects associated with threads were self-resolving, whereas more serious cases subsided with treatment. Future studies are critical to further determine whether thread lifting provides long-lasting, safe, and satisfying results.

Safety Profile for Microneedling: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Microneedling is a minimally invasive procedure that stimulates collagen and elastin proliferation. It is used in the treatment of various skin pathologies, that is, scarring, photodamage, and hair loss; however, its safety profile has yet to be comprehensively reviewed. OBJECTIVE: This review will discuss the reported side effects of microneedling in the current literature and delineate factors that increase the risk of complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search in August 2019 was conducted using the PubMed database to identify studies reporting adverse events (AEs) after microneedling therapy. RESULTS: Eighty-five articles were included in this systematic review. The most common reported AEs are transient procedural events that are expected postprocedure lasting up to 7 days, such as transient erythema/edema and pain, postinflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH), dry skin/exfoliation, lymphadenopathy, and irritant contact dermatitis. Persistent serious adverse effects included PIH, tram-track scarring, and granulomatous reactions. Factors that increase the risk of events are active infections, darker skin, and metal allergies. CONCLUSION: Microneedling is a relatively safe therapy. Most reported AEs are minimal, resolving quickly and spontaneously. Caution should be taken in patients with active infection, darker skin types, metal allergies, and when used in conjunction with products not approved for intradermal use.

Mohs surgery for the treatment of lentigo maligna and lentigo maligna melanoma - a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The role of Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) in the treatment of lentigo maligna (LM), and lentigo maligna melanoma (LMM) has been controversial. The use of frozen sections is commonly cited as a suboptimal way to distinguish atypical melanocytes, resulting in traditional wide-local excision techniques as the mainstay of therapy. OBJECTIVE: To compare the success of MMS as a treatment option for LM and LMM with that of traditional surgical and nonsurgical therapies by analyzing the published recurrence rates of these lesions after MMS procedures. METHODS AND MATERIALS: PubMed database was used to find relevant articles with search terms related to MMS, LM, and LMM. RESULTS: The search strategy resulted in 27 articles that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All studies considered; MMS provided a 1.35% recurrence rate with follow-up times ranging from 1 month to 5 years. Specifically, studies employing classical MMS and MMS with rush sections provided recurrence rates of 1.17% and 2.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION: MMS is one of the most successful treatment options for LM and LMM, with published evidence of improved recurrence rates when compared to other forms of therapy. Additional clinical trials are needed to further delineate the role of MMS in the treatment algorithm for these conditions.

Treatment Modalities for Cherry Angiomas: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Cherry angiomas are benign vascular proliferations of endothelial cells associated with aging. Currently, no mainstay of treatment for these vascular anomalies exists. OBJECTIVE: To review existing evidence-based therapies for the treatment of cherry angiomas. METHODS: A literature search in May 2019 was performed with PubMed Database and Cochrane Library using the following terms: "cherry angioma," "senile hemangioma," "senile angioma," "cherry hemangioma," and "Campbell de Morgan spots." RESULTS: Ten studies included in this systematic review reported laser therapy and nonlaser therapy as efficacious treatments for cherry angiomas. Among the laser therapies, pulsed dye laser (PDL) was preferred over potassium-titanyl-phosphate (KTP) and electrodessication (ED), based on decreased procedure-related pain. The neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser 1064 nm produced less pigmentary complications, whereas KTP and PDL risked pigmentary changes in darker-skinned individuals. Nonlaser therapies included cryotherapy, sclerotherapy, electrosurgery (i.e., ED, electrocoagulation), and radiofrequency ablation. No therapy proved to be superior. CONCLUSION: A variety of therapeutic modalities exist for the treatment of cherry angiomas. However, a limited number of high-quality studies explored the efficacy of treatments and compared treatment modalities. Light-based methods such as argon, KTP, Nd:YAG, intense pulsed light, and PDL, along with non-light-based interventions such as cryotherapy, electrosurgery, and sclerotherapy effectively treated cherry angiomas.