Tuberculosis and Immune Reconstitution Inflammatory Syndrome in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Anti-TNFα Treatment: Insights From a French Multicenter Study and Systematic Literature Review With Emphasis on Paradoxical Anti-TNFα Resumption.

Background: The advent of anti-tumor necrosis factor α (anti-TNFα) has revolutionized the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, susceptibility to active tuberculosis (TB) is associated with this therapy and requires its discontinuation. The risk of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) in this population is poorly understood, as is the safety of resuming anti-TNFα. Methods: This French retrospective study (2010-2022) included all TB cases in patients with IBD who were treated with anti-TNFα in 6 participating centers. A systematic literature review was performed on TB-IRIS and anti-TNFα exposure. Results: Thirty-six patients were included (median age, 35 years; IQR, 27-48). TB was disseminated in 86% and miliary in 53%. IRIS occurred in 47% after a median 45 days (IQR, 18-80). Most patients with TB-IRIS (93%) had disseminated TB. Miliary TB was associated with IRIS risk in univariate analysis (odds ratio, 7.33; 95% CI, 1.60-42.82; P = .015). Anti-TB treatment was longer in this population (median [IQR], 9 [9-12] vs 6 [6-9] months; P = .049). Anti-TNFα was resumed in 66% after a median 4 months (IQR, 3-10) for IBD activity (76%) or IRIS treatment (24%), with only 1 case of TB relapse. Fifty-two cases of TB-IRIS in patients treated with anti-TNFα were reported in the literature, complicating disseminating TB (85%) after a median 42 days (IQR, 21-90), with 70% requiring anti-inflammatory treatment. Forty cases of TB-IRIS or paradoxical reaction treated with anti-TNFα were also reported. IRIS was neurologic in 64%. Outcome was mostly favorable (93% recovery). Conclusions: TB with anti-TNFα treatment is often complicated by IRIS of varying severity. Restarting anti-TNFα is a safe and effective strategy.

FX06 to rescue SARS-CoV-2-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Vascular leakage is a major feature of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of FX06, a drug under development that stabilizes interendothelial cell junctions, at reducing vascular leakage during SARS-CoV-2-induced ARDS. METHODS: This multicenter, double-blinded, randomized trial included adults with COVID-19-associated ARDS who had received invasive mechanical ventilation for < 5 days and were randomized to receive either intravenous FX06 (400 mg/d, for 5 days) or its vehicle as placebo. The primary endpoint was the lowering-from day 1 to day 7-of the transpulmonary thermodilution-derived extravascular lung-water index (EVLWi). RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were randomized to receive FX06 and 24 the placebo. Although EVLWi was elevated at baseline (median [IQR] 15.6 mL/kg [13.5; 18.5]), its declines from day 1 to day 7 were comparable for FX06 recipients and controls (respectively, - 1.9 [- 3.3; - 0.5] vs. - 0.8 [- 5.5; - 1.1] mL/kg; estimated effect - 0.8 [- 3.1; + 2.4], p = 0.51). Cardiac indexes, pulmonary vascular permeability indexes, and fluid balances were also comparable, as were PaO2/FiO2 ratios and durations of mechanical ventilation. Adverse event rates were similar for the 2 groups, although more FX06 recipients developed ventilator-associated pneumonia (16/25 (64%) vs. 6/24 (24%), p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: In this unique-dosing-regimen study, FX06 did not lower SARS-CoV-2-induced pulmonary vascular leakage. Future investigations will need to evaluate its efficacy at earlier times during the disease or using other regimens. Trial registration NCT04618042. Registered 5 November 2020.

Acute circulatory failure in critically ill patients with hemophagocytic syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Hemophagocytic syndrome (HS) is a rare life-threatening condition that can lead to multi organ failure and shock. Acute circulatory failure in these patients has been poorly studied. Objectives of this study were to describe characteristics of HS patients with shock, prognostic factors and impact of etoposide infusion on hemodynamic parameters. This is a monocenter, retrospective, observational cohort study in a French tertiary intensive care unit (ICU). All adult critically ill patients with HS managed in the ICU between 2007 and 2017, requiring vasopressors (norepinephrine) and etoposide infusion. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were included. Two-third (n = 25) were of male gender and median age was 48 years [IQR 34-62]. Shock (n = 14, 41%) and acute respiratory failure (n = 8, 23.5%) were the main initial reasons for ICU admission. The most common HS trigger was underlying hematological malignancy (n = 26; 76%), followed by infectious diseases in 3 patients (9%) and auto immune diseases in 2 (6%) patients. Median SOFA score at ICU admission was 14 [10-17]. A majority of patients required mechanical ventilation (n = 29, 85%) and initial median lactate level was 3.7 mmol/L [2.9-6.9]. Hospital mortality rate was 53% (n = 18) and was associated with SOFA score and renal replacement therapy in univariate analysis. All patients received broad spectrum antibiotics under suspicion of septic shock. In 17 patients, 21 nosocomial infections were documented, mainly from bacterial origin. Etoposide infusion was followed by decreased norepinephrine doses despite an increase in lactate level, while no degradation in mean arterial pressure, heart rate or renal function were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital mortality remains high in critically ill HS patients with shock, but a significant improvement of hemodynamic parameters is observed following etoposide infusion, suggesting that an aggressive initial supportive care is crucial in these patients.