Stapedotomy Versus Hearing Aids in the Management of Conductive Hearing Loss Caused by Otosclerosis: A Prospective Comparative Study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of patients with unilateral otosclerosis treated consecutively by a hearing aid then stapedotomy. STUDY DESIGN: Monocentric, nonrandomized, prospective, longitudinal, cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary university hospital. PATIENTS: Adult patients with a unilateral conductive hearing loss of at least 30 dB caused by otosclerosis. INTERVENTIONS: Consecutive treatment by an external hearing aid followed by stapedotomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Differences between hearing aids and stapedotomy in quality of life, pure-tone audiometry, binaural hearing, tinnitus severity, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were included, of which 20 (91%) underwent stapedotomy. Stapedotomy demonstrated increased quality of life according to Glasgow Health Status Inventory scores versus hearing aids (+10.4 ± 9.4 [p = 0.0001]). Stapedotomy versus hearing aids showed improved pure-tone averages (-11.1 ± 11.0 dB [p = 0.002]) and air-bone gaps (-11.8 ± 10.7 dB [p = 0.0006]). Stapedotomy was superior to hearing aids for speech-in-noise recognition in the reverse dichotic condition (-8.4 ± 26.9 dB [p = 0.004]) and showed improved sound localization accuracy in root mean square error (-14.5 ± 24.5 degrees [p = 0.02]). Stapedotomy, but not hearing aids, showed improved patient self-evaluated tinnitus after baseline adjustment according to the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (-8.0 ± 13.4 [p = 0.02]) and visual analog scale for tinnitus intensity (-28.7 ± 34.1 [p = 0.006]). Overall, patients were more satisfied with surgery versus hearing aids. CONCLUSIONS: Stapedotomy remains more effective compared with hearing aids with greater improvements in quality of life, patient satisfaction, hearing outcomes, and self-evaluated tinnitus.

Treatment choice in single-sided deafness and asymmetric hearing loss. A prospective, multicentre cohort study on 155 patients.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the treatment choice in a cohort of subjects with single-sided deafness (SSD) and asymmetric hearing loss (AHL). To assess the reliability of the treatment trials. DESIGN: In this national, multicentre, prospective study, the choice of subjects was made after two consecutive trials of Contralateral Routing Of the Signal (CROS) hearing aids and a Bone Conduction Device (BCD) on a headband. Subjects could proceed with one of these two options, opt for cochlear implantation or decline all treatments. SETTING: Seven tertiary university hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifty-five subjects with SSD or AHL fulfilling the candidacy criteria for cochlear implantation, with or without associated tinnitus. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: After the two trials, the number of subjects choosing each option was described. Repeated assessments of both generic and auditory-specific quality of life were conducted, as well as hearing assessments (speech recognition in noise and horizontal localization). RESULTS: CROS was chosen by 75 subjects, followed by cochlear implantation (n = 51), BCD (n = 18) and abstention (n = 11). Patients who opted for cochlear implantation had a poorer quality of life (P = .03). The improvement of quality of life indices after each trial was significantly associated with the final treatment choice (P = .008 for generic indices, P = .002 for auditory-specific indices). The follow-up showed that this improvement had been overestimated in the CROS group, with a long-term retention rate of 52.5%. CONCLUSIONS: More than one third of SSD/AHL subjects are unsatisfied after CROS and BCD trials. Repeated quality of life assessments help counselling the patient for his/her treatment choice.

Management of parotid duct injury secondary to cow horn in a developing country.

Stensen duct injury has been reported in the medical literature following penetrating injuries of the cheek or by exeresis of tumors of the cheek or of the oral mucosa. This type of physical trauma often arises from injuries as a result being assaulted (e.g. with knife) or from road accidents. The complexity of the damage to the anatomical structures and the causative agent sometimes makes the diagnosis difficult. We report on a clinical case of managemenent Stensen duct injury secondary of goring by a cow horn.

Speech-in-noise perception in unilateral hearing loss: Relation to pure-tone thresholds and brainstem plasticity.

We investigated speech recognition in noise in subjects with mild to profound levels of unilateral hearing loss. Thirty-five adults were evaluated using an adaptive signal-to-noise ratio (SNR50) sentence recognition threshold test in three spatial configurations. The results revealed a significant correlation between pure-tone average audiometric thresholds in the poorer ear and SNR thresholds in the two conditions where speech and noise were spatially separated: dichotic - with speech presented to the poorer ear and reverse dichotic - with speech presented to the better ear. This first result suggested that standard pure-tone air-conduction thresholds can be a reliable predictor of speech recognition in noise for binaural conditions. However, a subgroup of 14 subjects was found to have poorer-than-expected speech recognition scores, especially in the reverse dichotic listening condition. In this subgroup 9 subjects had been diagnosed with vestibular schwannoma at stage III or IV likely affecting the lower brainstem function. These subjects showed SNR thresholds in the reverse dichotic condition on average 4dB poorer (higher) than for the other 21 normally-performing subjects. For the 7 of 9 subjects whose vestibular schwannoma was removed, the deficit was no longer apparent on average 5 months following the surgical procedure. These results suggest that following unilateral hearing loss the capacity to use monaural spectral information is supported by the lower brainstem.

Arterial embolization with Onyx of head and neck paragangliomas.

OBJECT: To report the morbidity and long term results in the treatment of paragangliomas by transarterial embolization with ethylene vinyl alcohol (Onyx), either as preoperative or palliative treatment. METHODS: Between September 2005 and 2012, 18 jugulotympanic, 7 vagal, and 4 carotid body paragangliomas (CBPs) underwent Onyx embolization, accordingly to our head and neck multidisciplinary team's decision. CBPs were embolized preoperatively. Jugulotympanic and vagal paragangliomas underwent surgery when feasible, otherwise palliative embolization was carried out alone, or in combination with radiotherapy or tympanic surgery in the case of skull base or tympanic extension. Treatment results, and clinical and MRI follow-up data were recorded. RESULTS: In all cases, devascularization of at least 60% of the initial tumor blush was obtained; 6 patients underwent two embolizations. Post-embolization, 8 patients presented with cranial nerve palsy, with partial or complete regression at follow-up (mean 31 months, range 3-86 months), except for 2 vagal and 1 hypoglossal palsy. 10 patients were embolized preoperatively; 70% were cured after surgery and 30% showed residual tumor. 19 patients received palliative embolization, of whom 5 underwent radiotherapy and 3 received tympanic surgery post-embolization. Long term follow-up of palliative embolization resulted in tumor volume stability (75%) or extension in intracranial or tympanic compartments. Onyx embolization of CBPs resulted in more difficult surgical dissection in 2 of 4 cases. CONCLUSIONS: Onyx embolization is a valuable alternative to surgery in the treatment of jugulotympanic and vagal paragangliomas; tympanic surgery or radiosurgery of the skull base should be considered in selected cases. Preoperative Onyx embolization of CBPs is not recommended.

Effect of corticosteroids on facial function after cerebellopontine angle tumor removal: a double-blind study versus placebo.

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of corticosteroids administered intra- and postoperatively on the occurrence of facial palsy after a cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumor resection, and to investigate pre- and intraoperative prognostic factors. A multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind and versus-placebo study was conducted between 2006 and 2010. Three hundred and ten patients operated on for a CPA tumor (96% vestibular schwannomas, 4% miscellaneous) were included by five participating centers. The population was stratified into patients with small (≤15 mm CPA on axial MRI views) and large tumors. In each group, patients were randomized to receive corticosteroid (1 mg/kg/day i.v. methylprednisolone intraoperatively and at postoperative days 1-5) or placebo. Steroids did not affect the facial function at postoperative days 1, 8 and 30 in patients with small or large tumors as evaluated by House and Brackmann grading.

Improvement of cognitive function after cochlear implantation in elderly patients.

IMPORTANCE: The association between hearing impairment and cognitive decline has been established; however, the effect of cochlear implantation on cognition in profoundly deaf elderly patients is not known. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the relationship between cognitive function and hearing restoration with a cochlear implant in elderly patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective longitudinal study performed in 10 tertiary referral centers between September 1, 2006, and June 30, 2009. The participants included 94 patients aged 65 to 85 years with profound, postlingual hearing loss who were evaluated before, 6 months after, and 12 months after cochlear implantation. INTERVENTIONS: Cochlear implantation and aural rehabilitation program. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Speech perception was measured using disyllabic word recognition tests in quiet and in noise settings. Cognitive function was assessed using a battery of 6 tests evaluating attention, memory, orientation, executive function, mental flexibility, and fluency (Mini-Mental State Examination, 5-word test, clock-drawing test, verbal fluency test, d2 test of attention, and Trail Making test parts A and B). Quality of life and depression were evaluated using the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire and the Geriatric Depression Scale-4. RESULTS: Cochlear implantation led to improvements in speech perception in quiet and in noise (at 6 months: in quiet, 42% score increase [95% CI, 35%-49%; P < .001]; in noise, at signal to noise ratio [SNR] +15 dB, 44% [95% CI, 36%-52%, P < .001], at SNR +10 dB, 37% [95% CI 30%-44%; P < .001], and at SNR +5 dB, 27% [95% CI, 20%-33%; P < .001]), quality of life, and Geriatric Depression Scale-4 scores (76% of patients gave responses indicating no depression at 12 months after implantation vs 59% before implantation; P = .02). Before cochlear implantation, 44% of the patients (40 of 91) had abnormal scores on 2 or 3 of 6 cognition tests. One year after implant, 81% of the subgroup (30 of 37) showed improved global cognitive function (no or 1 abnormal test score). Improved mean scores in all cognitive domains were observed as early as 6 months after cochlear implantation. Cognitive performance remained stable in the remaining 19% of the participants (7 of 37). Among patients with the best cognitive performance before implantation (ie, no or 1 abnormal cognitive test score), 24% (12 of 50) displayed a slight decline in cognitive performance. Multivariate analysis to examine the association between cognitive abilities before implantation and the variability in cochlear implant outcomes demonstrated a significant effect only between long-term memory and speech perception in noise at 12 months (SNR +15 dB, P = .01; SNR +10 dB, P < .001; and SNR +5 dB, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Rehabilitation of hearing communication through cochlear implantation in elderly patients results in improvements in speech perception and cognitive abilities and positively influences their social activity and quality of life. Further research is needed to assess the long-term effect of cochlear implantation on cognitive decline.

Decisive criteria between stapedotomy and cochlear implantation in patients with far advanced otosclerosis.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the hearing outcomes in patients with far-advanced otosclerosis and to identify the best initial approach based on preoperative word recognition scores (WRS), pure tone averages (PTA), and radiological classification. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case review. SETTING: Academic neurotology tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: All patients (n = 58) with preoperative air conduction PTA less than 85 dB (HL), disyllabic WRS less than or equal to 50% at 60 dB (HL) with well-fitted hearing aids, and evidence of otosclerosis on CT scan, treated in our department over the past 20 years. INTERVENTIONS: Stapedotomy, cochlear implantation, or both. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative WRS after a minimum of 12 months' follow-up, percentage of patients with WRS greater than 50%. Reliability of air and bone conduction PTAs and WRS in predicting failure of stapedotomy. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were divided into three groups: group I, primary stapedotomy (n = 32); group II, primary cochlear implantation (n = 9); and group III, secondary cochlear implantation (with a previous history of stapedotomy) (n = 25). The mean postoperative WRS were 50.6% (± 34), 75% (± 17), and 72% (± 20), respectively. Sixty percent of patients in the stapedotomy group had a postoperative WRS greater than 50% requiring no further treatment, compared to 85% for cochlear implant recipients. No specific predictive factors for stapedotomy outcome could be identified. Surgical difficulties during cochlear implantation were significantly higher in patients with advanced radiological stage. CONCLUSION: Although cochlear implantation gives better overall results, stapedotomy with hearing aids can still be very effective in the management of patients with far-advanced otosclerosis. It should therefore be proposed as a first-line treatment.

Reliability of cone beam computed tomography in scalar localization of the electrode array: a radio histological study.

Postoperative imaging plays a growing role in clinical studies concerning prognostic factors in cochlear implantation. Indeed, intracochlear position of the cochlear implant has recently been identified as a contributor in functional outcomes and radiological tools must be accurate enough to determine the final placement of the electrode array. The aim of our study was to validate cone beam computed tomography as a reliable technique for scalar localization of the electrode array. We performed therefore a temporal bone study on ten specimens that were implanted with a perimodiolar implant prototype. Cone beam reconstructions were performed and images were analyzed by two physicians both experienced in cochlear implant imaging, who determined the scalar localization of the implant. Temporal bones then underwent histological control to document this scalar localization and hypothetical intracochlear lesions. In four cases, a dislocation from scala tympani to scala vestibuli was suspected on cone beam reconstructions of the ascending part of the basal turn. In three of these four specimens, dislocation in pars ascendens was confirmed histologically. In the remaining temporal bone, histological analysis revealed an elevation with rupture of the basilar membrane. Histological assessment revealed spiral ligament tearing in another bone. We conclude that cone beam is a reliable tool to assess scalar localization of the selectrode array and may be used in future clinical studies.

Cardiovascular and thromboembolic risk factors in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: a case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: The pathogenesis of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSHL) remains unknown, but vascular involvement is one of the main hypotheses. The main objective of this study was to investigate the association between ISSHL and cardiovascular and thromboembolic risk factors. STUDY DESIGN: Multicentric case-control study. METHODS: Ninety-six Caucasian patients with ISSHL and 179 sex- and age-matched controls were included. Patients were evaluated on the day of the inclusion and 1 week, 3 weeks and 3 months later. Clinical information concerning personal and familial cardiovascular and thromboembolic risk factors and concerning the ISSHL was collected. Blood samples were collected for genetic analysis of factor V Leiden and G20210A polymorphism in the factor II gene. The severity of the hearing loss was classified as mild (21-40 dB), moderate (41-70 dB), severe (71-90 dB) and profound or total (>90 dB). Hearing improvement was calculated as a relative improvement of hearing thresholds using the contralateral ear as baseline. RESULTS: Systolic blood pressure was higher in patients (130 ± 1.7 mm Hg) than in controls (124 ± 1.1 mm Hg, p = 0.003). The personal/familial history of cardiovascular events was also more prevalent in patients (p = 0.023 and p = 0.014, respectively), whereas no difference was found in the prevalence of personal cardiovascular risk factors (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, smoking habits). There was no correlation between the audiogram type, the hearing outcome and the presence of cardiovascular risk factors. No significant difference was observed in the personal/familial history or in the presence of thromboembolic risk factors. The prothrombin and factor V mutations were uncommon in both patients and controls. The final hearing threshold was only correlated with the severity of the initial hearing loss (p < 0.001), but not influenced by the presence of vertigo, audiogram type, time elapsed from onset of ISSHL to hospitalization or failure of a previous oral therapy. Hearing stabilization was obtained at 21 days in 92% of patients. CONCLUSION: These results support the theory of vascular involvement as the etiology of some cases of ISSHL. The sole predictive factor of poor final hearing is the severity of the initial hearing loss.

Revision stapes surgery: the "lateralized piston syndrome".

OBJECTIVE: The need for revision stapes surgery has many causes, and among these, we describe a particular displacement of the piston: the "lateralized piston syndrome". The goal of this study is to define criteria and surgical management of this syndrome. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study over 13 years. SETTING: Tertiary reference center. PATIENTS: A review of 1,289 consecutive stapes operations revealed 119 revisions (9%) from which 22 cases (18.5%) could be classified under the lateralized piston syndrome. INTERVENTION: Revision stapedotomy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Medical files, preoperative and postoperative audiograms, computed tomographic scans, and operative reports. RESULTS: The 22 cases presented as a delayed conductive hearing loss in 95.5% of cases. Preoperative computed tomographic scans showed a lateralized piston out of the stapedotomy in 81% of cases and touching the tympanic membrane in 54.5% of cases. Revisions revealed a lateral displacement of the piston out of the entire oval window in 86% of cases, with closure of the stapedotomy in all cases and incus necrosis in 77% of cases. Conventional pistons were fitted in 12 cases. In case of a significantly eroded incus, total prostheses (TORPs) in 6 cases and offset pistons in 4 cases were placed. Air-bone gap (ABG) was closed to within 20 dB in 82% of cases. Air-conduction puretone audiometry improvement was 17.2 dB (standard deviation [SD], 19.2), with a mean postoperative ABG of 16.2 dB (SD, 12.7). Only 1 ear, operated with TORP, had a sensorineural deterioration of 20 dB. With offset pistons, ABG was closed to within 20 dB in 100% of cases with a mean postoperative ABG of 8.8 dB (SD, 7.2). CONCLUSION: The lateralized piston syndrome was found in 18.5% of stapes surgery revisions. Surgical management was effective in correcting the conductive hearing loss. In the event of significant eroded incus, we observed better results with offset pistons than with TORPs.

Reliability of high-resolution CT scan in diagnosis of otosclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability of high-resolution computed tomographic scan (HRCT scan) for the diagnosis of otosclerosis and to determine its usefulness to predict hearing deterioration and surgical difficulties. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Tertiary reference center. PATIENTS: Two hundred nine ears (200 patients) presenting progressive conductive hearing loss with normal tympanic membrane, abnormal stapedial reflex, and scheduled for stapes surgery. The mean age was 47.3 years. INTERVENTION: All patients underwent HRCT scan before surgery (slice thickness of 0.6 to 1 mm). Stapedotomy was performed in 99% of cases. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: High-resolution computed tomographic scan results were categorized as positive, doubtful, or negative. We classified a CT scan as positive for otosclerosis when a hypodense focus was seen around the otic capsule. Preoperative and postoperative air- and bone-conduction thresholds were collected. RESULTS: Of 209 HRCT scans, 84.2% were classified positive, 8.6% doubtful, and 7.2% negative. In all patients with positive CT scan, otosclerosis was confirmed in surgery. Among 15 negative cases, we found 4 minor malformations and 1 fracture of the stapes. Footplate incidents (mobilized, floating, or fractured footplate; 5.3%) occurred significantly more frequently when an HRCT scan was negative or doubtful (p = 0.05). Mean preoperative air-bone gap was 27.7 dB (standard deviation, 10). Mean postoperative air-bone gap was within 10 dB in 65% and within 20 dB in 92% of cases. Greater than 10 dB deterioration of bone-conduction thresholds occurred in 2% of cases. Mean preoperative and postoperative bone-conduction thresholds were significantly lower in cases of round window obliteration, pericochlear, or internal auditory canal hypodensities (p < 0.005 and p < 0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSION: In our series, the sensitivity of HRCT scan to otosclerosis was 95.1%. Hypodense otosclerotic foci were mostly localized at the anterior part of footplate. Negative or doubtful cases were associated with the highest incidence of stapes footplate complications. Foci involving otic capsule, internal auditory canal, or round window led to a significantly higher risk of sensorineural hearing loss.

Cochlear reimplantations: technical and surgical failures.

CONCLUSION: Cochlear implant surgeons should have a good knowledge of how to diagnose device failures and how to deal with medical complications related to cochlear implantation. Electrode array misplacement may be due to unidentified inner ear malformation. Use of peroperative telemetry and radiographic examination should help to avoid such complications. OBJECTIVES: To review our experience of cochlear implant revision surgery and to compare our series to the literature. To report two cases of electrode array misplacement into the vestibular system and to discuss how to prevent this complication. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective review of cochlear implant revision surgery in a tertiary reference center. RESULTS: Of 487 cochlear implantations, 3.8% of adults and 4.5% of children underwent a revision surgery. The mean time to device failure was 7.6 years in children and 1.5 year in adults. Causes of revision were seven hard failures, four soft failures, and nine medical reasons. Among the medical reasons, four patients had skin flap infection associated with an extended endaural approach. Audiologic performances were stable or improved following reimplantation in 90% of cases. We had two cases of electrode array misplaced into the vestibular system.

Benefit of the Vibrant Soundbridge device in patients implanted for 5 to 8 years.

OBJECTIVES: To assess audiological performance, satisfaction rate, and side effects of 100 patients who have been using the middle ear implant Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB) for 5 to 8 yr when compared with data collected from 3 to 18 mo postsurgery. DESIGN: Audiological testing and subjective evaluation using self-assessment scales were performed in 77 out of the 100 patients using the VSB for 5 to 8 years. The results were compared to data collected 3 months (audiological testing) and 18 months (self-assessment scales) after surgery. Twenty-three patients have not been evaluated for different reported reasons. RESULTS: Pure-tone hearing thresholds decreased similarly in both implanted and contralateral ears. The satisfaction ratings and the functional gain provided by the VSB remained stable. Speech comprehension in quiet conditions without the VSB decreased from 56 to 37% in 5 to 8 yr, but an 81% score was achieved with the VSB. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the performance of the VSB does not deteriorate for more than 5 yr, without adverse effect. These results confirm the safety and the effectiveness of the VSB with a long-term follow-up.

Very far-advanced otosclerosis: stapedotomy or cochlear implantation.

CONCLUSION: Every patient with severe or profound hearing loss must have a temporal bone high-resolution computed tomography (CT) scan. Stapedotomy is a simple, safe and low-cost procedure compared with cochlear implantation and can provide very good results. This can justify our decision to propose stapedotomy at the initial treatment in patients with very far-advanced otosclerosis. In cases of hearing failure after stapes surgery, cochlear implantation is an option. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to find the best first intention treatment of very far-advanced otosclerosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study and included 14 patients with non-measurable preoperative bone and air conduction thresholds and otosclerosis on temporal bone high-resolution CT scan. Stapes surgery followed by a well fitted hearing aid was the initial treatment in 11 patients and cochlear implantation in 7 patients, including 4 patients who had poor results after stapedotomy. Objective and subjective audiometric results were studied and compared between stapedotomy and cochlear implantation groups. RESULTS: Objective and subjective results were statistically better in the cochlear implant group than in the stapedotomy group. However, four patients in the stapedotomy group had comparable results to the patients with cochlear implants.

Combined electroacoustic stimulation in conventional candidates for cochlear implantation.

OBJECTIVE: To report on combined ipsilateral electrical and acoustic stimulation in a subset of conventional candidates for cochlear implantation where preoperative pure tone thresholds were 85-110 dB HL, 250-500 Hz). In the remaining 7 cases, residual hearing was maintained up to at least 6 months after operation with minor changes. Insertion depth angles in these cases ranged from 285 to 420 degrees . For these subjects, the mean preoperative score for words presented at 65 dB SPL was 22%. Mean postoperative scores were 56% for CI alone, and 68% for CI plus ipsilateral hearing aid (p < 0.05, paired t). For sentences presented in multitalker babble noise at 5 dB SNR, mean scores were 61% CI alone, and 75% CI+IpsiHA (p < 0.01, paired t). CONCLUSIONS: Hearing was conserved during surgery and over time in 70% of conventional candidates implanted with the Nucleus 24 Contour Advance CI who had significant levels of preoperative low-frequency residual hearing (

Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the conservation of residual hearing in recipients of the Nucleus 24 Contour Advance cochlear implant (CI) and the benefits of combined electrical and acoustic stimulation. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective multicenter study. SETTING: CI clinics in Western Europe. PATIENTS: Adult candidates for conventional cochlear implantation with a minimum preoperative word recognition score of 10% in the ear to be implanted. INTERVENTION: "Soft-surgery" protocol, including a 1- to 1.2-mm anterior and inferior cochleostomy hole with the electrode array, inserted 17 mm using the "advance-off-stylet" technique. Patients with postoperative pure-tone hearing threshold levels (HTLs) of 80 dB hearing loss or less at 125 and 250 Hz and 90 dB hearing loss or less at 500 Hz were refitted with an in-the-ear hearing aid for combined ipsilateral electrical and acoustic (El-Ac) stimulation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A questionnaire to collect information regarding surgery. Pure-tone HTLs measured at intervals. Word recognition tested in quiet and sentence recognition tested in noise at 10 and 5 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). HEARING CONSERVATION RESULTS: HTL data were available for 27 patients. HTLs were conserved within 20 dB of preoperative levels for 33, 26, and 19% of patients for 125, 250, and 500 Hz, respectively. However, the recommended soft-surgery protocol was strictly followed in only 12 of 27 patients. For these 12 patients, hearing thresholds were conserved within 20 dB for 50, 50, and 33% of patients. Median threshold increases were 40 dB (range, 250-500 Hz) for the whole group and 23 dB for the strict surgery group. Ten patients retained sufficient HTLs to enter the El-Ac user group. SPEECH RECOGNITION RESULTS: Group mean recognition scores for nine El-Ac users for words presented at 65 dB sound pressure level were 45% for CI alone and 55% for CI + ipsilateral hearing aid (p < 0.05, paired t). For sentences presented in noise at 5 dB SNR, mean word scores were 46% CI alone and 56% CI + ipsilateral hearing aid (p < 0.01, paired t). CONCLUSION: Hearing was conserved for conventional candidates for cochlear implantation where the recommended soft-surgery protocol was strictly adhered. Combined ipsilateral electrical and acoustic stimulation provided considerable benefits for speech recognition in noise, equivalent to between 3 and 5 dB SNR, compared with CI alone.

Comparison between intraoperative observations and electromyographic monitoring data for facial nerve outcome after vestibular schwannoma surgery.

A four-channel device may enhance the sensitivity of electromyography (EMG). Determination of stimulation thresholds (STs) below 0.05 mA improves facial prognostic information after vestibular schwannoma (VS) surgery. To compare intraoperative observations with electromyographic data for predicting the immediate facial function outcome after VS surgery.A total of 111 VS patients operated on and intraoperatively monitored using four-channel facial EMG between October 2002 and September 2003 were included in this multicentre, prospective study. Mascular activity detection was performed in the frontal, orbicularis oculi, orbicularis oris and platysma muscles. Intraoperative observations were made concerning adhesion and nerve stretch, and facial function was graded (House-Brackmann classification) at postoperative Days 1 and 8.Facial function at postoperative Days 1 and 8 was related to the intraoperative nerve STs at the brainstem and in the adhesion zone (range 0.01-3 mA for a response > 100 microV). At postoperative Day 8, good facial function (Grades 1 or 2) was observed in 93% of cases for STs in the adhesion zone of 0.01-0.04 mA, 85% for STs of 0.05-0.3 mA and 79% for STs > 0.3 mA. These STs were related to the degree of tumor adhesion and not to the nerve stretch. The maximal EMG response was detected in the frontal or platysma muscles in 26% of cases, and in the orbicularis oris and orbicularis oculi muscles in 74%.

Preservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation: how and why.

CONCLUSIONS: Hearing may be conserved in adults after implantation with the Nucleus Contour Advance perimodiolar electrode array. The degree of hearing preservation and the maximum insertion depth of the electrode array can vary considerably despite a defined surgical protocol. Residual hearing combined with electrical stimulation in the same ear can provide additional benefits even for conventional candidates for cochlear implantation. OBJECTIVES: We present preliminary results from a prospective multicentre study investigating the conservation of residual hearing after implantation with a standard-length Nucleus Contour Advance perimodiolar electrode array and the benefits of combined electrical and acoustic stimulation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The subjects were 12 adult candidates for cochlear implantation recruited according to national selection criteria. A "soft" surgery protocol was defined, as follows: 1-1.2-mm cochleostomy hole anterior and inferior to the round window; Nucleus Contour Advance electrode array inserted using the "Advance-off-stylet" technique; and insertion depth controlled by means of three square marker ribs left outside the cochleostomy hole. These procedures had been shown to reduce insertion forces in temporal bone preparations. Variations in surgical techniques were monitored using a questionnaire. Pure-tone thresholds were measured pre- and postoperatively. Patients who still retained thresholds <90 dB HL for frequencies up to 500 Hz were re-fitted with an in-the-ear (ITE) hearing aid. Word recognition was tested in quiet and sentence perception in noise for the cochlear implant alone and in combination with an ipsilateral hearing aid. RESULTS: Hearing threshold level data were available for 12 patients recruited from 6 of the centres. Median increases in hearing threshold levels were 23, 27 and 33 dB for the frequencies 125, 250 and 500 Hz, respectively. These median increases include the data for two patients who had total loss of residual hearing due to difficulties encountered during surgery. "Cochlear view" X-ray images indicated that the depth of insertion varied between 300 and 430 degrees, despite modest variations in the length of the electrode inserted (17-19 mm). The insertion angle had some influence on the preservation of residual hearing at frequencies of 250-500 Hz. Six of the 12 patients retained sufficient hearing for effective use of an ipsilateral ITE hearing aid (< or = 80 dB HL at 125 and 250 Hz; < or = 90 dB HL at 500 Hz). Word recognition scores in quiet were improved from 10% to 30% with the cochlear implant plus ipsilateral hearing aid in 3 patients who had at least 3 months postoperative experience. Signal:noise ratio thresholds for sentence recognition were improved by up to 3 dB. Patients reported that they experienced greatly improved sound quality and preferred to use the two devices together.

Neurotological complications after radiosurgery versus conservative management in acoustic neuromas: a systematic review-based study.

OBJECTIVE: Treatment modalities for acoustic neuroma (AN) include surgery, observation and gamma-knife surgery. The aim of this study was to compare neurotological complications resulting from two treatment alternatives to microsurgery: radiosurgery and observation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the literature dealing with radiosurgery for AN and compared the rate of neurotological complications in this population with that in a cohort of patients managed conservatively. RESULTS: We found that neurotological complications, namely facial hypoesthesia (p = 0.002), hearing loss (p < 0.05) and hydrocephalus (p = 0.02), were more frequently encountered after radiosurgery than with conservative management. In contrast, we found that the risk of growth of AN is significantly higher with conservative management and that the rate of stability of the tumor did not differ significantly between the two treatments. CONCLUSION: We prefer a conservative management regimen for patients who cannot be operated on for their AN. However, there are some difficulties inherent in this conservative management policy, namely non-compliance and difficulties in establishing the evolution of the tumor.