A prospective survey on therapeutic inertia in psoriatic arthritis (OPTI'PsA).

OBJECTIVES: Clinical inertia, or therapeutic inertia (TI), is the medical behaviour of not initiating or intensifying treatment when recommended by clinical recommendations. To our knowledge, our survey is the first to assess TI around psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: Eight hundred and twenty-five French rheumatologists were contacted via email between January and March 2021 and invited to complete an online questionnaire consisting of seven clinical vignettes: five cases ('oligoarthritis', 'enthesitis', 'polyarthritis', 'neoplastic history', 'cardiovascular risk') requiring treatment OPTImization, and two 'control' cases (distal interphalangeal arthritis, atypical axial involvement) not requiring any change of treatment-according to the most recent PsA recommendations. Rheumatologists were also questioned about their routine practice, continuing medical education and perception of PsA. RESULTS: One hundred and one rheumatologists completed this OPTI'PsA survey. Almost half the respondents (47%) demonstrated TI on at least one of the five vignettes that warranted treatment optimization. The complex profiles inducing the most TI were 'oligoarthritis' and 'enthesitis' with 20% and 19% of respondents not modifying treatment, respectively. Conversely, clinical profiles for which there was the least uncertainty ('polyarthritis in relapse', 'neoplastic history' and 'cardiovascular risk') generated less TI with 11%, 8% and 6% of respondents, respectively, choosing not to change the current treatment. CONCLUSION: The rate of TI we observed for PsA is similar to published data for other chronic diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, gout or multiple sclerosis. Our study is the first to show marked clinical inertia in PsA, and further research is warranted to ascertain the reasons behind this inertia.

Impairment of central retinal artery hemodynamics in affected and fellow eyes in giant cell arteritis patients with unilateral vision loss.

OBJECTIVES: Permanent visual impairment is a major complication of giant cell arteritis (GCA). We investigated the added value of color Doppler imaging (CDI) of the central retinal artery (CRA) in patients with suspected GCA for early risk evaluation before temporal artery biopsy (TAB) results become available. METHODS: We conducted a non-interventional observational study of 30 consecutive patients hospitalized for suspected GCA, including a comprehensive analysis of clinical, laboratory, imaging, CDI and pathology data. GCA was diagnosed or excluded (GCA+, GCA-, respectively) according to American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria and TAB findings. Three patients not meeting ACR criteria were excluded secondarily. The GCA- group contained ten patients, and the GCA+ group contained 17 patients, including eight with unilateral, transient or permanent clinical visual impairment (CVI). RESULTS: Mean blood flow velocity (mBFV) in the CRA was impaired in the affected eyes of GCA + CVI+ patients (1.9 ± 0.9 cm.s-1, p < 0.001) relative to controls (4.1 ± 1.0 cm.s-1), GCA- patients (3.6 ± 0.7 cm.s-1) and GCA + CVI- patients (3.8 ± 0.8 cm.s-1). The mBFVs of the CRA was similar for affected and fellow eyes (right or left). CRA mBFV measurements effectively differentiated between patients with and without CVI (ROC-curve analysis, AUC = 0.925 [95%CI: 0.700 to 0.996], p < 0.0001, 88% sensitivity, 89% specificity, and cutoff of ≤2.7 cm.s-1 for affected eyes; 75% sensitivity, 100% specificity and cutoff of ≤2.2 cm.s-1 for fellow eyes). CONCLUSION: CDI facilities the early detection of visual ischemia risk in GCA+ patients, justifying urgent high-dose corticosteroid administration to save at least the fellow eye before pathology results become available.

MUC5B Promoter Variant and Rheumatoid Arthritis with Interstitial Lung Disease.

BACKGROUND: Given the phenotypic similarities between rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD) (hereafter, RA-ILD) and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, we hypothesized that the strongest risk factor for the development of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, the gain-of-function MUC5B promoter variant rs35705950, would also contribute to the risk of ILD among patients with RA. METHODS: Using a discovery population and multiple validation populations, we tested the association of the MUC5B promoter variant rs35705950 in 620 patients with RA-ILD, 614 patients with RA without ILD, and 5448 unaffected controls. RESULTS: Analysis of the discovery population revealed an association of the minor allele of the MUC5B promoter variant with RA-ILD when patients with RA-ILD were compared with unaffected controls (adjusted odds ratio, 3.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8 to 5.2; P=9.7×10-17). The MUC5B promoter variant was also significantly overrepresented among patients with RA-ILD, as compared with unaffected controls, in an analysis of the multiethnic case series (adjusted odds ratio, 5.5; 95% CI, 4.2 to 7.3; P=4.7×10-35) and in a combined analysis of the discovery population and the multiethnic case series (adjusted odds ratio, 4.7; 95% CI, 3.9 to 5.8; P=1.3×10-49). In addition, the MUC5B promoter variant was associated with an increased risk of ILD among patients with RA (adjusted odds ratio in combined analysis, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.8 to 5.4; P=7.4×10-5), particularly among those with evidence of usual interstitial pneumonia on high-resolution computed tomography (adjusted odds ratio in combined analysis, 6.1; 95% CI, 2.9 to 13.1; P=2.5×10-6). However, no significant association with the MUC5B promoter variant was observed for the diagnosis of RA alone. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the MUC5B promoter variant was associated with RA-ILD and more specifically associated with evidence of usual interstitial pneumonia on imaging. (Funded by Société Française de Rhumatologie and others.).