Immunohistochemical analysis of the monoclonal antibody 4B5 in breast tissue expressing human epidermal growth factor receptor 4 (HER4).

AIMS: A recent study examining the specificity of human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) 2 pharmacodiagnostic antibodies demonstrated that CB11 and 4B5 stain both HER2-transfected and HER4-transfected cell lines. However, there has been no evidence showing that 4B5 has affinity for HER4 in clinically obtained tissues, and, if so, whether this has any impact on the assessment of HER2. We therefore sought to determine the expression of membrane-bound HER4 in clinical breast carcinomas, and evaluate its impact on the clinical utility of 4B5 in determining HER2 status. METHODS AND RESULTS: Breast carcinomas were assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for membrane-bound HER4 using anti-HER4 clone E200. HER2 expression in these cases was then assessed using anti-HER2 clone 4B5, and a reference clone, SP3. In all 117 membrane HER4-positive cases (out of 241), 4B5 scored equal to or less than the reference anti-HER2 clone SP3. Eighteen cases were positive for membrane-bound HER4 by E200 and negative by 4B5, including a membrane HER4 level 3+ case. CONCLUSIONS: No cross-reactivity of 4B5 with membrane-bound HER4 was identified in the clinical IHC analysis of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast carcinoma cases as evidenced by the HER4 antibody clone E200.

Adjunctive HPV in-situ hybridization (ISH) assay as an aid in the diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in cervical tissue specimens: an analytical and functional characterization.

The purpose of this study was to develop and analytically and functionally validate a new human papillomavirus (HPV) in-situ hybridization (ISH) assay and to determine whether the use of this assay combined with hemotoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining could potentially improve the diagnostic accuracy of interpreting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in human cervical tissue specimens. An automated HPV ISH assay was developed using probes that targeted the broad spectrum of HPV genotypes most commonly associated with CIN. In an exploratory study, tissue sections (n=118) were stained with H&E alone and H&E with HPV ISH and evaluated by 6 general surgical pathologists. Results were compared with diagnoses established by expert pathologists on H&E alone. The change in specificity (diagnosis of no-CIN) and sensitivity (diagnosis of CIN) using H&E plus HPV versus H&E alone was determined. The HPV ISH assay detected 21 HPV genotypes and demonstrated no cross-reactivity to Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex virus (HSV)-1, HSV-2, or human placental DNA. The assay detected HPV in a range of 1 to 600 copies on CaSki, HeLa, and SiHa xenografts. Use of this assay with H&E staining improved the average diagnostic specificity of the surgical pathologists from 68.5% to 89.9% (P<0.001), with fewer false-positive CIN 1 results (122 vs. 39). The diagnostic sensitivity was similar for assessments made with H&E alone and those made with HPV plus H&E (93.1% vs. 93.6%). In conclusion, a new automated broad-spectrum HPV ISH assay combined with H&E-stained slides contributed to better ascertainment of CIN than H&E staining alone.

Silver in situ hybridization (SISH) for determination of HER2 gene status in breast carcinoma: comparison with FISH and assessment of interobserver reproducibility.

The importance of HER2 status in breast cancer management has focused attention on the ability of clinical assays to correctly assign HER2 amplification status. There is no consensus as to the best method for assessing HER2 status. Disadvantages of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing include longer time required for staining and scoring slides, requirements for specialized training and fluorescence microscopy, and loss of the signal due to quenching of the fluorescent dye. Silver-enhanced in situ hybridization (SISH) is a rapid fully automated assay providing permanently stained slides that are interpreted by conventional bright field microscopy which enables pathologists to evaluate slides within the context of tissue morphology. This study evaluates the concordance between SISH and FISH assays in determining the status of HER2 gene amplification in a cohort of 298 primary invasive breast carcinomas. Furthermore, we assessed in detail the variables contributing to interobserver interpretive reproducibility of HER2 SISH among 10 pathologists. HER2 was quantified using the ratio of HER2 to CHR17 signals using the conventional historical interpretation scale and also by the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists reporting scheme. For SISH status determined by consensus among 10 pathologists, overall concordance between SISH and FISH was identified in 288 of 298 cases (96.6%) using the conventional Food and Drug Administration approved criteria. Overall agreement was observed in 282 of 285 cases (98.9%) using the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists result reporting scheme (with equivocal cases removed). In conclusion, SISH represents a novel approach for the determination of HER2 status in breast cancer. The overall concordance between SISH and FISH is excellent, and the interpretation of SISH results by pathologists is most reproducible using the HER2/CHR17 ratio.