Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Fam Syst Health ; 42(1): 34-49, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38647492

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Up to 20% of youth have impairing mental health problems as early as age 3. Early identification and intervention of mental health risks in pediatric primary care could mitigate this crisis via prevention prior to disease onset. The purpose of this study was to establish the feasibility and acceptability of implementing a brief transdiagnostic screening instrument in pediatric primary care for irritability and corollary impairment. METHOD: Five pediatric clinicians in a Midwest clinic implemented the Multidimensional Assessment Profiles-Early Assessment Screener of Irritability (MAPS-EASI) for toddlers (24-30 months) and their families. MAPS-EASI (psychometrically derived from the well-validated MAPS-Scales) includes six items (scored 0-5) about symptoms (e.g., tantrums, grumpy mood), context, and frequency and two items (scored 0-3) assessed impairment. Positive screens (MAPS-EASI ≥ 5 plus impairment ≥ 2) were referred to an evidence-based parenting intervention. We assessed reach and outcomes of MAPS-EASI screening. Follow-up interviews with clinicians assessed perspectives on irritability screening and MAPS-EASI implementation. RESULTS: Of 201 eligible families, 100 (49.8%) completed the screener for a 24- or 30-month well-child visit. Mean MAPS-EASI scores were 5.8 (SD = 3.2), mean impairment scores were 0.9 (SD = 0.9), and 24 (24.0%) screened positive. Clinicians indicated that irritability screening for toddlers was aligned with their prevention-oriented, developmentally based practice. MAPS-EASI had face validity and increased clinician decision-making confidence. Finally, clinicians identified barriers and facilitators to large-scale implementation. CONCLUSIONS: MAPS-EASI proved to be feasible and acceptable in pediatric primary care. Further tailoring will be needed as the MAPS-EASI processes are scaled out to new contexts and populations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).


Assuntos
Humor Irritável , Programas de Rastreamento , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Humanos , Feminino , Pré-Escolar , Masculino , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Programas de Rastreamento/instrumentação , Programas de Rastreamento/normas , Psicometria/instrumentação , Psicometria/métodos , Pediatras/estatística & dados numéricos , Pediatras/psicologia , Pediatras/normas , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
Pediatr Ann ; 49(10): e421-e425, 2020 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33034656

RESUMO

Systematic mental health screening is a recommended but controversial process in the pediatricians' behavioral health tool kit. Although the American Academy of Pediatrics and other organizations promote routine behavioral health screening, implementing an effective and sustainable screening program can be challenging. We discuss the rationale for and barriers to screening in pediatric settings, identify accessible validated tools that can be easily incorporated into practice, and suggest a practical strategy for implementing a more accurate screening system for common mental health concerns in pediatric primary care. [Pediatr Ann. 2020;49(10):e421-e425.].


Assuntos
Transtornos Mentais/diagnóstico , Saúde Mental , Pediatria , Criança , Humanos , Programas de Rastreamento , Pediatras , Padrões de Prática Médica , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA